Switch to:

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.04
STON's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
96% of the 82 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 0.79 vs. STON: 0.04 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
STON' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.02  Med: 0.07 Max: N/A
Current: 0.04
Equity to Asset 0.12
STON's Equity to Asset is ranked lower than
88% of the 84 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 0.45 vs. STON: 0.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
STON' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.07  Med: 0.15 Max: 0.24
Current: 0.12
0.07
0.24
Interest Coverage 0.22
STON's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
98% of the 58 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 15.53 vs. STON: 0.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
STON' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.15  Med: 0.78 Max: 2.01
Current: 0.22
0.15
2.01
F-Score: 4
Z-Score: 0.61
M-Score: -2.45
WACC vs ROIC
7.24%
1.92%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 1.64
STON's Operating margin (%) is ranked lower than
73% of the 84 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 7.84 vs. STON: 1.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
STON' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.66  Med: 6.32 Max: 12.91
Current: 1.64
1.66
12.91
Net-margin (%) -8.30
STON's Net-margin (%) is ranked lower than
87% of the 84 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 4.68 vs. STON: -8.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
STON' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -7.72  Med: -0.99 Max: 4.67
Current: -8.3
-7.72
4.67
ROE (%) -12.45
STON's ROE (%) is ranked lower than
85% of the 80 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 6.89 vs. STON: -12.45 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
STON' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -15.4  Med: -1.53 Max: 4.18
Current: -12.45
-15.4
4.18
ROA (%) -1.47
STON's ROA (%) is ranked lower than
77% of the 84 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 2.91 vs. STON: -1.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
STON' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1.35  Med: -0.19 Max: 0.88
Current: -1.47
-1.35
0.88
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 0.57
STON's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
76% of the 84 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 16.11 vs. STON: 0.57 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
STON' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.06  Med: 3.95 Max: 6.3
Current: 0.57
-0.06
6.3
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) -3.50
STON's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
84% of the 63 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 4.00 vs. STON: -3.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
STON' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: -4.60 Max: 14.1
Current: -3.5
0
14.1
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) 8.50
STON's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
59% of the 58 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 4.90 vs. STON: 8.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
STON' s EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: -6.15 Max: 18.5
Current: 8.5
0
18.5
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) -7.40
STON's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
58% of the 48 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 2.00 vs. STON: -7.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
STON' s EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: -18.00 Max: 107.4
Current: -7.4
0
107.4
» STON's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q1 2015

STON Guru Trades in Q1 2015

Jim Simons 198,826 sh (+44.71%)
John Keeley 22,900 sh (unchged)
NWQ Managers 72,725 sh (-32.36%)
» More
Q2 2015

STON Guru Trades in Q2 2015

NWQ Managers 102,025 sh (+40.29%)
John Keeley 22,900 sh (unchged)
Jim Simons 109,369 sh (-44.99%)
» More
Q3 2015

STON Guru Trades in Q3 2015

NWQ Managers 126,825 sh (+24.31%)
John Keeley Sold Out
Jim Simons Sold Out
» More
Q4 2015

STON Guru Trades in Q4 2015

Jim Simons 41,802 sh (New)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with STON

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/B 4.01
STON's P/B is ranked lower than
76% of the 96 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 2.01 vs. STON: 4.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
STON' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.63  Med: 2.17 Max: 5.8
Current: 4.01
0.63
5.8
P/S 2.61
STON's P/S is ranked lower than
84% of the 94 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.07 vs. STON: 2.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
STON' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.58  Med: 1.95 Max: 3.06
Current: 2.61
0.58
3.06
PFCF 16.51
STON's PFCF is ranked higher than
67% of the 70 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 19.71 vs. STON: 16.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PFCF only.
STON' s PFCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.44  Med: 22.41 Max: 99999999.99
Current: 16.51
7.44
99999999.99
POCF 97.16
STON's POCF is ranked lower than
100% of the 83 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 11.04 vs. STON: 97.16 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
STON' s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.42  Med: 15.75 Max: 1451.5
Current: 97.16
4.42
1451.5
EV-to-EBIT 397.21
STON's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
99% of the 79 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 13.32 vs. STON: 397.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
STON' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -3181.1  Med: 44.30 Max: 685.2
Current: 397.21
-3181.1
685.2
EV-to-EBITDA 74.24
STON's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
100% of the 86 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 10.02 vs. STON: 74.24 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
STON' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 12.5  Med: 31.00 Max: 91.2
Current: 74.24
12.5
91.2
Current Ratio 2.60
STON's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
75% of the 81 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.62 vs. STON: 2.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
STON' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.54  Med: 2.72 Max: 9.45
Current: 2.6
0.54
9.45
Quick Ratio 2.60
STON's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
81% of the 81 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.25 vs. STON: 2.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
STON' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.54  Med: 2.72 Max: 9.45
Current: 2.6
0.54
9.45
Days Sales Outstanding 80.30
STON's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
90% of the 70 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 21.69 vs. STON: 80.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
STON' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 65.84  Med: 78.64 Max: 108.75
Current: 80.3
65.84
108.75

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 9.95
STON's Dividend Yield is ranked higher than
93% of the 76 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 2.29 vs. STON: 9.95 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
STON' s Dividend Yield Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.27  Med: 9.26 Max: 23.06
Current: 9.95
2.27
23.06
Dividend Payout 28.35
STON's Dividend Payout is ranked lower than
100% of the 52 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 0.35 vs. STON: 28.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout only.
STON' s Dividend Payout Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.93  Med: 4.16 Max: 30
Current: 28.35
0.93
30
Dividend Growth (3y) 1.40
STON's Dividend Growth (3y) is ranked lower than
64% of the 28 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 7.00 vs. STON: 1.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Growth (3y) only.
STON' s Dividend Growth (3y) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 1.60 Max: 4.9
Current: 1.4
0
4.9
Forward Dividend Yield 10.13
STON's Forward Dividend Yield is ranked higher than
91% of the 65 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 2.83 vs. STON: 10.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield only.
N/A
Yield on cost (5-Year) 10.93
STON's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked higher than
94% of the 77 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 2.60 vs. STON: 10.93 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only.
STON' s Yield on cost (5-Year) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.49  Med: 10.17 Max: 25.34
Current: 10.93
2.49
25.34
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -11.90
STON's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked lower than
78% of the 50 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: -0.90 vs. STON: -11.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
STON' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -17.3  Med: -10.95 Max: 0
Current: -11.9
-17.3
0

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 11.62
STON's Price/Tangible Book is ranked lower than
95% of the 74 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 2.24 vs. STON: 11.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
STON' s Price/Tangible Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.74  Med: 1.93 Max: 27.16
Current: 11.62
0.74
27.16
Price/Projected FCF 3.89
STON's Price/Projected FCF is ranked lower than
83% of the 63 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.96 vs. STON: 3.89 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Projected FCF only.
STON' s Price/Projected FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.3  Med: 2.46 Max: 4.97
Current: 3.89
0.3
4.97
Price/Median PS Value 1.34
STON's Price/Median PS Value is ranked lower than
77% of the 87 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.00 vs. STON: 1.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
STON' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.37  Med: 1.00 Max: 1.97
Current: 1.34
0.37
1.97
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 0.20
STON's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
75% of the 79 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 5.80 vs. STON: 0.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
STON' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.1  Med: 2.20 Max: 6.2
Current: 0.2
0.1
6.2
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) -10.24
STON's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked lower than
74% of the 46 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 5.27 vs. STON: -10.24 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
STON' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -17.9  Med: -10.30 Max: 30.8
Current: -10.24
-17.9
30.8

More Statistics

Revenue(Mil) $300
EPS $ -0.83
Beta0.64
Short Percentage of Float1.11%
52-Week Range $22.04 - 32.06
Shares Outstanding(Mil)31.78

Latest Earnings Webcast

» More Conference Calls

Business Description

Industry: Personal Services » Personal Services
Compare:STAN, HRB, CSV, TUC, SCI » details
Stonemor Partners LP was formed as a Delaware limited partnership in April 2, 2004. The Company owns and operates the cemetery and funeral home business conducted by Cornerstone and its subsidiaries. On September 20, 2004, it completed its initial public offering. It operates 277 cemeteries in 27 states and Puerto Rico. It owns 259 of these cemeteries, and it operates the remaining 18 under management or operating agreements with the nonprofit cemetery corporations that own the cemeteries. The Company sells cemetery products and services both at the time of death, which it refers to as at-need and prior to the time of death, which it refers to as pre-need. Pre-need products and services are typically sold on an installment basis. The Company is organized into five distinct reportable segments which are classified as Cemetery Operations - Southeast, Cemetery Operations - Northeast, Cemetery Operations - West, Funeral Homes, and Corporate. The Cemetery Operations segments sells interment rights, caskets, burial vaults, cremation niches, markers and other cemetery related merchandise. Its Funeral Homes segment offers a range of funeral-related services such as family consultation, the removal of and preparation of remains and the use of funeral home facilities for visitation. Its Corporate segment includes various home office expenses, miscellaneous selling, cemetery and general administrative expenses that are not allocable to other operating segments, certain depreciation and amortization expenses and acquisition related costs. Its cemetery properties are located in Alabama, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, Washington and West Virginia. The cemetery operations include sales of cemetery interment rights, merchandise and services and the performance of cemetery maintenance and other services. The cemetery products and services that the Company sells are burial lots, lawn crypts, mausoleum crypts, cremation niches, perpetual care rights, burial vaults, caskets, grave markers and grave marker bases, memorials, installation of burial vaults, installation of caskets, installation of other cemetery merchandise, and other service items. One of the principal services it provides at its cemeteries is an opening and closing, which is the digging and refilling of burial spaces to install the vault and place the casket into the vault. The Company competes with two publicly held death care companies that have U.S. operations; Service Corporation International, and Carriage Services, Inc. The Company's operations is subject to regulation, supervision and licensing under federal, state and local laws which impacts the goods and services that it may sell and the manner in which it may furnish goods and services.
» More Articles for STON

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Is StoneMor Partners a Solid Value? The Company Insiders Seem to Think So Aug 22 2015 
7 Stocks to Fund a Happy Retirement Jul 09 2015 
7 Quirky Dividend Stocks Jun 03 2015 
Best Yielding Dividend Challengers | 30 High-Yield Dividend Growth Stocks Feb 22 2013 
The 10 Highest Yielding Dividend Contenders Feb 15 2012 
StoneMor Partners L.P. Common Unit Rep L Reports Operating Results (10-Q) Nov 09 2010 
StoneMor Partners L.P. Common Unit Rep L Reports Operating Results (10-Q/A) Sep 13 2010 
StoneMor Partners L.P. Common Unit Rep L Reports Operating Results (10-Q) Aug 09 2010 
StoneMor Partners L.P. Common Unit Rep L Reports Operating Results (10-Q) Aug 09 2010 
StoneMor Partners L.P. Common Unit Rep L Reports Operating Results (10-Q) May 10 2010 

More From Other Websites
StoneMor Partners LP breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : February 8, 2016 Feb 08 2016
StoneMor Partners LP – Value Analysis (NYSE:STON) : January 27, 2016 Jan 27 2016
StoneMor Partners LP breached its 50 day moving average in a Bullish Manner : January 27, 2016 Jan 27 2016
StoneMor Partners L.P. Announces Distribution, Date of Conference Call and Webcast to Discuss 2015... Jan 26 2016
StoneMor Partners L.P. Announces Distribution, Date of Conference Call and Webcast to Discuss 2015... Jan 26 2016
7 Dividend Stocks That Are Suddenly Bargains Jan 23 2016
StoneMor Partners LP Earnings Analysis: Q3, 2015 By the Numbers Dec 16 2015
STONEMOR PARTNERS LP Financials Dec 08 2015
Here is What Hedge Funds Think About PharMerica Corporation (PMC) Nov 26 2015
StoneMor Partners LP – Value Analysis (NYSE:STON) : November 24, 2015 Nov 24 2015
StoneMor Partners LP breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : November 24, 2015 Nov 24 2015
Is Zafgen Inc (ZFGN) A Good Stock To Buy? Nov 22 2015
STONEMOR PARTNERS LP Files SEC form 8-K, Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Financial... Nov 19 2015
StoneMor Partners L.P. to Present at the Southwest IDEAS Investor Conference on November 19 in... Nov 16 2015
StoneMor Partners L.P. to Present at the Southwest IDEAS Investor Conference on November 19 in... Nov 16 2015
Edited Transcript of STON earnings conference call or presentation 9-Nov-15 3:00pm GMT Nov 09 2015
StoneMor Partners LP Earnings Call scheduled for 10:00 am ET today Nov 09 2015
StoneMor Partners LP breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : November 9, 2015 Nov 09 2015
STONEMOR PARTNERS LP Files SEC form 8-K, Results of Operations and Financial Condition, Financial... Nov 09 2015
StoneMor Partners L.P. Reports Operating and Financial Results for the Third Quarter 2015 Nov 09 2015

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
FEEDBACK