Switch to:

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.04
ATW's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
87% of the 79 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.26 vs. ATW: 0.04 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
ATW' s 10-Year Cash to Debt Range
Min: 0.04  Med: 0.29 Max: 5.58
Current: 0.04
0.04
5.58
Equity to Asset 0.60
ATW's Equity to Asset is ranked higher than
66% of the 68 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.54 vs. ATW: 0.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
ATW' s 10-Year Equity to Asset Range
Min: 0.5  Med: 0.67 Max: 0.86
Current: 0.6
0.5
0.86
Interest Coverage 10.50
ATW's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
52% of the 48 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 11.32 vs. ATW: 10.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
ATW' s 10-Year Interest Coverage Range
Min: 1.29  Med: 17.18 Max: 173.48
Current: 10.5
1.29
173.48
F-Score: 6
Z-Score: 1.85
M-Score: -2.61
WACC vs ROIC
6.38%
10.48%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 36.13
ATW's Operating margin (%) is ranked higher than
90% of the 73 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 3.45 vs. ATW: 36.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
ATW' s 10-Year Operating margin (%) Range
Min: 4.48  Med: 33.38 Max: 50.95
Current: 36.13
4.48
50.95
Net-margin (%) 29.06
ATW's Net-margin (%) is ranked higher than
92% of the 72 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -0.19 vs. ATW: 29.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
ATW' s 10-Year Net-margin (%) Range
Min: -8.84  Med: 22.46 Max: 42.75
Current: 29.06
-8.84
42.75
ROE (%) 14.99
ATW's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
87% of the 77 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -0.32 vs. ATW: 14.99 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
ATW' s 10-Year ROE (%) Range
Min: -4.74  Med: 15.15 Max: 29.52
Current: 14.99
-4.74
29.52
ROA (%) 8.79
ATW's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
89% of the 80 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -1.03 vs. ATW: 8.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
ATW' s 10-Year ROA (%) Range
Min: -2.65  Med: 9.63 Max: 23.7
Current: 8.79
-2.65
23.7
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 11.69
ATW's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
82% of the 79 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -1.69 vs. ATW: 11.69 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
ATW' s 10-Year ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: 1.54  Med: 19.79 Max: 34.34
Current: 11.69
1.54
34.34
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 22.30
ATW's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
86% of the 51 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 9.20 vs. ATW: 22.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
ATW' s 10-Year Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: -1.1  Med: 16.50 Max: 42.5
Current: 22.3
-1.1
42.5
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) 16.50
ATW's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
80% of the 51 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -4.20 vs. ATW: 16.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
ATW' s 10-Year EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: -20.4  Med: 16.50 Max: 64.3
Current: 16.5
-20.4
64.3
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) 8.10
ATW's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
70% of the 46 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -12.80 vs. ATW: 8.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
ATW' s 10-Year EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: -34.1  Med: 10.40 Max: 149.7
Current: 8.1
-34.1
149.7
» ATW's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q3 2014

ATW Guru Trades in Q3 2014

Steven Cohen 153,200 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 11,000 sh (+182.05%)
Arnold Van Den Berg 560,680 sh (+92.75%)
Chuck Royce 1,506,241 sh (+74.15%)
First Pacific Advisors 2,786,900 sh (+16.10%)
FPA Capital Fund 1,242,600 sh (+15.08%)
David Dreman 206,006 sh (+1.38%)
George Soros Sold Out
Columbia Wanger Sold Out
Scott Black 155,786 sh (-0.20%)
» More
Q4 2014

ATW Guru Trades in Q4 2014

Jim Simons 580,800 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 21,154 sh (+92.31%)
Arnold Van Den Berg 796,115 sh (+41.99%)
Chuck Royce 2,119,952 sh (+40.74%)
First Pacific Advisors 3,700,600 sh (+32.79%)
FPA Capital Fund 1,646,400 sh (+32.50%)
David Dreman 217,184 sh (+5.43%)
Steven Cohen Sold Out
Scott Black Sold Out
» More
Q1 2015

ATW Guru Trades in Q1 2015

Prem Watsa 8,000 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 182,100 sh (New)
David Dreman 255,569 sh (+17.67%)
Chuck Royce 2,247,719 sh (+6.03%)
Paul Tudor Jones 20,600 sh (-2.62%)
Arnold Van Den Berg 715,313 sh (-10.15%)
First Pacific Advisors 2,671,500 sh (-27.81%)
FPA Capital Fund 1,065,100 sh (-35.31%)
Jim Simons 156,900 sh (-72.99%)
» More
Q2 2015

ATW Guru Trades in Q2 2015

Joel Greenblatt 121,698 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 1,025,800 sh (+463.32%)
David Dreman 274,778 sh (+7.52%)
FPA Capital Fund 1,065,100 sh (unchged)
Prem Watsa 8,000 sh (unchged)
Arnold Van Den Berg 901,591 sh (unchged)
Jim Simons Sold Out
Chuck Royce 2,231,819 sh (-0.71%)
First Pacific Advisors 2,610,200 sh (-2.29%)
Arnold Van Den Berg 674,166 sh (-5.75%)
Paul Tudor Jones 18,600 sh (-9.71%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with ATW

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Guru Investment Theses on Atwood Oceanics Inc

FPA Capital Fund Comments on Atwood Oceanics Inc - Feb 19, 2015

Atwood Oceanics (ATW) is an offshore drilling contractor. They have been an industry leader in utilization rates, profit margins, and returns on capital for years, and they have been profitable 19 of the last 20 years. Our thesis for purchasing the stock was that the company had almost completely renewed its fleet over the last few years and signed those rigs to contracts that gave it one of the biggest backlogs in the industry. We are currently modeling in our Base Case that 98/77/36% of the total revenue we expect them to generate in FY2015/16/17 is already under contract. We believed the culture and business practices behind the company’s peer-leading efficiencies would allow them to convert that backlog into substantial profits and initiate a meaningful dividend, which they recently implemented ($1/share per year).

The stock’s negative performance in the fourth quarter is due to a combination of macro and company-specific factors. Macro: Spot prices for Brent Oil fell by nearly 40% during the quarter, as discussed above, and the Philadelphia Oil Service Sector index had a total return of (20.38%). Company-specific: Atwood delayed the delivery of their two uncontracted newbuild drillships by 6 months because they lost out on a customer tender that would have put them to work at decent rates of ~$400k/day. However, even if drillship dayrates fall further to $350k/day the company should still earn $3/share by FY2017 when most of their backlog will have burned off. At the Dec-31 price of $28.37 the stock is trading at less than 10x that figure (and yielding 3.52%), but in the intervening two years the company should earn ~$12 per share, or greater than 40% of the current market cap. The company-specific elements of our thesis are still intact.

From FPA Capital Fund (Trades, Portfolio) Q4 2014 Letter.

Check out FPA Capital Fund latest stock trades

FPA Capital Fund Comments on Atwood Oceanics - Jul 23, 2014

We added to a number of existing positions in the quarter and started one new position, which is too small of a position to talk about at this point. Among the stocks that we added to in the quarter were Atwood Oceanics (ATW) and Titan International (TWI).

Although ATW appreciated roughly 4% in the June quarter, in early April the stock was down 10% from its closing first quarter price. As we mentioned last quarter, when we also added to the position, investors are concerned about the prices the company can charge to rent out its equipment to its customers. Atwood owns off-shore drilling rigs, some of which cost upwards of $600 million apiece to construct today.

These $600 million rigs, typically very sophisticated drill ships, allow ATW’s oil & gas exploration customers to drill in the ultra-deep waters (UDW) of the Gulf of Mexico, off the coast of western Africa, or in the deep waters of Brazil. These deep water basins, and other basins, hold the potential to extract over a hundred billion barrels of oil over the next few decades. However, these are very expensive and long- term projects, which not every oil company has access to or the capital to risk. Hence, ATW’s drill ships can potentially be rented out to a narrower group of customers than rigs for shallow water drilling (typically four-hundred feet of water depth), where the company’s jack-up drilling rigs operate.

While there are a number of potentially large oil & gas reserves in the ultra-deep waters, generally 7,500 feet of water or deeper, the timing of when these projects get started can be lumpy. Additionally, ATW is not the only drilling rig operator that sees this very large opportunity, so the company’s competitors have also ordered new UDW drill ships. Thus, the market is concerned about a temporary supply and demand imbalance for UDW drill ships.

In our conservative analysis, we think UDW drill ship rental rates may fall from roughly $600,000 a day, which is where day rates were in late 2013, to roughly $500,000 a day. In this downside scenario, we estimate that ATW could earn close to $5.00 a share this year and over $7.00 a share in 2015 and 2016. This also assumes one of the company’s semi-submersible rigs is idled later this year. With ATW trading below $50, we believe the risk-to-reward ratio warranted additional capital being deployed in the stock. Subsequent to our additional purchases in the second quarter, two of ATW’s competitors announced new UDW drill ship contracts at much higher rates than many investors and Wall Street analysts expected. We think these recent higher day rate contracts, which were also higher than our conservative case expectations, bode well for Atwood’s two remaining un-contracted UDW drill ships.

From FPA Capital Fund (Trades, Portfolio)’s Second Quarter 2014 Commentary.

Check out FPA Capital Fund latest stock trades

FPA Capital Comments on Atwood Oceanics - May 02, 2014

ATW (NYSE:ATW) decreased almost 6% in the quarter as the market became increasingly concerned about the prices the company can charge to rent out its equipment to its customers. Atwood owns off-shore drilling rigs, some of which cost upwards of $600 million apiece to construct today. These $600 million rigs, typically very sophisticated drill ships, allow ATW's oil & gas exploration customers to drill in the ultra-deep waters (UDW) of the Gulf of Mexico, off the coast of western Africa, or in the deep waters of Brazil. These deep water basins, and other basins, hold the potential to extract over a hundred billion barrels of oil over the next few decades. However, these are very expensive and long-term projects, which not every oil company has access to or the capital to risk. Hence, ATW's drillships can potentially be rented out to a narrower group of customers than rigs for shallow water drilling (typically four-hundred feet of water depth), where the company's jack-up drilling rigs operate.



While there are a number of potentially large oil & gas reserves in the UDW, generally 7,500 feet of water or deeper, the timing of when these projects get started can be lumpy. Additionally, ATW is not the only drilling rig operator that sees this very large opportunity, so the company's competitors have also ordered new UDW drill ships. Thus, the market is concerned about a temporary supply and demand imbalance for UDW drill ships.



In our conservative analysis, we think UDW drill ship rental rates may fall from roughly $600,000/day, which is where day rates were in late 2013, to roughly $500,000 a day. In this downside scenario, ATW would earn close to $5.00 a share this year and over $7.00 a share in 2015 and 2016. This also assumes one of the company's semi-submersible rigs is idled later this year. With ATW trading in the mid $40s, we believe the risk-to-reward ratio warrants additional capital being deployed in the stock.



From FPA Capital's first quarter 2014 commentary.



Check out FPA Capital latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about Atwood Oceanics Inc

5-Year Lows: Atwood Oceanics Inc, HMS Holdings Corp, Advanced Micro Devices Inc, and Government Properties Income Trust
According to GuruFocus list of 5-year lows, these Guru stocks have reached their 5-year lows: Atwood Oceanics Inc, HMS Holdings Corp, Advanced Micro Devices Inc, and Government Properties Income Trust Read more...
FPA Capital Fund Comments on Atwood Oceanics Inc
Atwood Oceanics (ATW) is an offshore drilling contractor. They have been an industry leader in utilization rates, profit margins, and returns on capital for years, and they have been profitable 19 of the last 20 years. Our thesis for purchasing the stock was that the company had almost completely renewed its fleet over the last few years and signed those rigs to contracts that gave it one of the biggest backlogs in the industry. We are currently modeling in our Base Case that 98/77/36% of the total revenue we expect them to generate in FY2015/16/17 is already under contract. We believed the culture and business practices behind the company’s peer-leading efficiencies would allow them to convert that backlog into substantial profits and initiate a meaningful dividend, which they recently implemented ($1/share per year). Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 3.10
ATW's P/E(ttm) is ranked higher than
82% of the 34 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 10.30 vs. ATW: 3.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/E(ttm) only.
ATW' s 10-Year P/E(ttm) Range
Min: 2.78  Med: 10.78 Max: 98.14
Current: 3.1
2.78
98.14
Forward P/E 3.83
ATW's Forward P/E is ranked higher than
87% of the 31 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 12.92 vs. ATW: 3.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
PE(NRI) 3.10
ATW's PE(NRI) is ranked higher than
82% of the 34 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 8.90 vs. ATW: 3.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE(NRI) only.
ATW' s 10-Year PE(NRI) Range
Min: 2.78  Med: 10.78 Max: 92.54
Current: 3.1
2.78
92.54
P/B 0.43
ATW's P/B is ranked higher than
72% of the 74 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.64 vs. ATW: 0.43 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
ATW' s 10-Year P/B Range
Min: 0.39  Med: 1.75 Max: 5.06
Current: 0.43
0.39
5.06
P/S 0.91
ATW's P/S is ranked lower than
58% of the 66 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.68 vs. ATW: 0.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
ATW' s 10-Year P/S Range
Min: 0.81  Med: 4.03 Max: 8.5
Current: 0.91
0.81
8.5
POCF 2.10
ATW's POCF is ranked higher than
58% of the 53 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 2.27 vs. ATW: 2.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
ATW' s 10-Year POCF Range
Min: 1.87  Med: 9.39 Max: 44.61
Current: 2.1
1.87
44.61
EV-to-EBIT 5.85
ATW's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
71% of the 41 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 8.77 vs. ATW: 5.85 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
ATW' s 10-Year EV-to-EBIT Range
Min: 3  Med: 11.00 Max: 43.2
Current: 5.85
3
43.2
PEG 0.26
ATW's PEG is ranked higher than
62% of the 16 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.44 vs. ATW: 0.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG only.
ATW' s 10-Year PEG Range
Min: 0.06  Med: 0.48 Max: 12.91
Current: 0.26
0.06
12.91
Shiller P/E 3.91
ATW's Shiller P/E is ranked higher than
85% of the 27 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 8.93 vs. ATW: 3.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
ATW' s 10-Year Shiller P/E Range
Min: 3.47  Med: 14.51 Max: 80
Current: 3.91
3.47
80
Current Ratio 3.27
ATW's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
78% of the 77 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 1.63 vs. ATW: 3.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
ATW' s 10-Year Current Ratio Range
Min: 0.61  Med: 2.85 Max: 5.67
Current: 3.27
0.61
5.67
Quick Ratio 2.37
ATW's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
73% of the 77 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 1.45 vs. ATW: 2.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
ATW' s 10-Year Quick Ratio Range
Min: 0.49  Med: 2.25 Max: 5.12
Current: 2.37
0.49
5.12
Days Inventory 84.67
ATW's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
88% of the 50 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 24.94 vs. ATW: 84.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
ATW' s 10-Year Days Inventory Range
Min: 37.29  Med: 48.63 Max: 90.62
Current: 84.67
37.29
90.62
Days Sales Outstanding 69.26
ATW's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
69% of the 64 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 56.36 vs. ATW: 69.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
ATW' s 10-Year Days Sales Outstanding Range
Min: 44.53  Med: 71.47 Max: 105.85
Current: 69.26
44.53
105.85

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 3.96
ATW's Dividend Yield is ranked lower than
81% of the 91 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 10.10 vs. ATW: 3.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
ATW' s 10-Year Dividend Yield Range
Min: 0.73  Med: 1.64 Max: 4.46
Current: 3.96
0.73
4.46
Dividend Payout 0.12
ATW's Dividend Payout is ranked higher than
86% of the 44 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.65 vs. ATW: 0.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout only.
ATW' s 10-Year Dividend Payout Range
Min: 0.13  Med: 0.15 Max: 0.35
Current: 0.12
0.13
0.35
Yield on cost (5-Year) 3.96
ATW's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked lower than
87% of the 90 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 13.24 vs. ATW: 3.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only.
ATW' s 10-Year Yield on cost (5-Year) Range
Min: 0.73  Med: 1.64 Max: 4.53
Current: 3.96
0.73
4.53
Share Buyback Rate 0.20
ATW's Share Buyback Rate is ranked higher than
84% of the 56 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -4.00 vs. ATW: 0.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Share Buyback Rate only.
ATW' s 10-Year Share Buyback Rate Range
Min: 0.2  Med: -0.70 Max: -4.3
Current: 0.2

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 0.43
ATW's Price/Tangible Book is ranked higher than
74% of the 73 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.70 vs. ATW: 0.43 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
ATW' s 10-Year Price/Tangible Book Range
Min: 0.61  Med: 2.02 Max: 6.23
Current: 0.43
0.61
6.23
Price/DCF (Earnings Based) 0.11
ATW's Price/DCF (Earnings Based) is ranked higher than
67% of the 3 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.11 vs. ATW: 0.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/DCF (Earnings Based) only.
N/A
Price/Median PS Value 0.22
ATW's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
78% of the 64 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.39 vs. ATW: 0.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
ATW' s 10-Year Price/Median PS Value Range
Min: 0.31  Med: 0.93 Max: 2.12
Current: 0.22
0.31
2.12
Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value 0.21
ATW's Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value is ranked higher than
56% of the 9 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.21 vs. ATW: 0.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value only.
ATW' s 10-Year Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value Range
Min: 0.15  Med: 0.80 Max: 3.26
Current: 0.21
0.15
3.26
Price/Graham Number 0.24
ATW's Price/Graham Number is ranked higher than
80% of the 30 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.56 vs. ATW: 0.24 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Graham Number only.
ATW' s 10-Year Price/Graham Number Range
Min: 0.34  Med: 1.19 Max: 3.68
Current: 0.24
0.34
3.68
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 17.10
ATW's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
85% of the 80 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.70 vs. ATW: 17.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
ATW' s 10-Year Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: 2.3  Med: 9.10 Max: 33.3
Current: 17.1
2.3
33.3
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) -8.81
ATW's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked lower than
70% of the 30 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 4.07 vs. ATW: -8.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
ATW' s 10-Year Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range
Min: -18.8  Med: 11.80 Max: 50.5
Current: -8.81
-18.8
50.5

Analyst Estimate

Sep15 Sep16 Sep17 Sep18
Revenue(Mil) 1,380 1,200 936 937
EPS($) 7.84 4.95 0.54 0.56
EPS without NRI($) 7.84 4.95 0.54 0.56

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - Drilling » Oil & Gas Drilling
Compare:SDRL, ESV, PES, OMVJF, SBR » details
Traded in other countries:AWZ.Germany,
Atwood Oceanics Inc was organized in 1968 as a Texas corporation and commenced operations in 1970. It is headquartered in Houston, Texas with support offices in Australia, Malaysia, Singapore and the United Kingdom. The Company is an offshore drilling contractor, engaged in drilling and completion of exploratory and developmental oil and gas wells. It owns 13 mobile offshore drilling units located in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, the Mediterranean Sea, offshore West Africa, offshore Southeast Asia and offshore Australia, is constructing three ultra-deepwater drillships. Its various types of drilling rigs are Ultra-Deep-water Drill-ships, Semisubmersible Rigs, Semisubmersible Tender Assist Rigs and Jack-up Drilling Rigs. The Ultra-Deepwater Drillships are self-propelled vessels, shaped like conventional ships, and are mobile of the major rig types. Semisubmersible rigs have two hulls, the lower of which is capable of being flooded. Semisubmersible tender assist rigs operate similar to semisubmersible rigs except that their drilling equipment is temporarily installed on permanently constructed offshore support platforms. A jack-up drilling rig consists of a single hull supported by at least three legs positioned on the sea floor. It is typically towed to the well site and once on location, its legs are lowered to the sea floor and the unit is raised out of the water by jacking the hull up the legs. It competes with several international offshore drilling contractors. Its competitors include Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc., Ensco PLC, Noble Corporation, Rowan Companies PLC, Seadrill Limited, and Transocean Ltd. It complies with extensive government regulation in the form of international conventions, federal, state and local laws and regulations in jurisdictions where its vessels operate and are registered. The Company is subject to changing tax laws, treaties and regulations in and between countries in which it operates.
» More Articles for ATW

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
AtmanCo Announces the Results of Second Quarter for 2015 Aug 28 2015 
Atwood Oceanics Discounting 2016 Concerns Aug 05 2015 
holdings Jul 28 2015 
holdings Jul 27 2015 
holdings Jul 27 2015 
holdings Jul 27 2015 
Prem Watsa's Worst Performing Stocks Jul 21 2015 
More Pain For Oil And Offshore Drilling Companies Jul 21 2015 
5-Year Lows: Atwood Oceanics Inc, HMS Holdings Corp, Advanced Micro Devices Inc, and Government Prop Jul 19 2015 
AtmanCo Launches Solution on Salesforce AppExchange, the World's Leading Enterprise Apps Marketplace Jul 13 2015 

More From Other Websites
Getting Moody About Offshore Drillers Aug 25 2015
Atwood Oceanics downgraded by Global Hunter Securities Aug 21 2015
ATWOOD OCEANICS DECLARES QUARTERLY CASH DIVIDEND Aug 20 2015
ATWOOD OCEANICS DECLARES QUARTERLY CASH DIVIDEND Aug 20 2015
Offshore Drillers: Can it Get Any Worse? Aug 13 2015
Noble Corp. Plc Earnings Q2*, 2015 Aug 13 2015
Atwood Oceanics (ATW) Stock Lower on Analyst Downgrade Aug 13 2015
Barclays Sees Trouble For Offshore Drillers Aug 13 2015
Atwood Oceanics, Inc. Earnings Q2*, 2015 Aug 12 2015
10-Q for Atwood Oceanics, Inc. Aug 01 2015
Offshore Drillers: Don't Dive in Shallow Water Jul 31 2015
ATWOOD OCEANICS INC Files SEC form 10-Q, Quarterly Report Jul 30 2015
Edited Transcript of ATW earnings conference call or presentation 30-Jul-15 2:00pm GMT Jul 30 2015
Offshore Drillers: About That Short Squeeze… Jul 30 2015
ATWOOD OCEANICS ANNOUNCES FISCAL 2015 THIRD QUARTER EARNINGS Jul 29 2015
ATWOOD OCEANICS INC Files SEC form 8-K, Results of Operations and Financial Condition, Financial... Jul 29 2015
ATWOOD OCEANICS ANNOUNCES FISCAL 2015 THIRD QUARTER EARNINGS Jul 29 2015

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
FEEDBACK