Switch to:

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.01
CLR's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
97% of the 508 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.60 vs. CLR: 0.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
CLR' s 10-Year Cash to Debt Range
Min: 0  Med: 0.05 Max: No Debt
Current: 0.01
Equity to Asset 0.31
CLR's Equity to Asset is ranked lower than
81% of the 477 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.54 vs. CLR: 0.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
CLR' s 10-Year Equity to Asset Range
Min: 0.24  Med: 0.37 Max: 0.57
Current: 0.31
0.24
0.57
Interest Coverage 6.58
CLR's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
69% of the 325 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 30.48 vs. CLR: 6.58 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
CLR' s 10-Year Interest Coverage Range
Min: 1.33  Med: 7.89 Max: 9999.99
Current: 6.58
1.33
9999.99
F-Score: 5
Z-Score: 1.77
M-Score: -3.42
WACC vs ROIC
5.62%
7.93%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 29.97
CLR's Operating margin (%) is ranked higher than
81% of the 493 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -7.19 vs. CLR: 29.97 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
CLR' s 10-Year Operating margin (%) Range
Min: -3.07  Med: 37.94 Max: 55.57
Current: 29.97
-3.07
55.57
Net-margin (%) 13.90
CLR's Net-margin (%) is ranked higher than
73% of the 494 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -13.66 vs. CLR: 13.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
CLR' s 10-Year Net-margin (%) Range
Min: -7.51  Med: 15.72 Max: 52.33
Current: 13.9
-7.51
52.33
ROE (%) 13.37
CLR's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
85% of the 536 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -8.18 vs. CLR: 13.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
CLR' s 10-Year ROE (%) Range
Min: -25.95  Med: 21.48 Max: 85.39
Current: 13.37
-25.95
85.39
ROA (%) 4.27
CLR's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
78% of the 571 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -5.19 vs. CLR: 4.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
CLR' s 10-Year ROA (%) Range
Min: -8.13  Med: 5.70 Max: 35.16
Current: 4.27
-8.13
35.16
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 10.20
CLR's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
80% of the 553 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -7.40 vs. CLR: 10.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
CLR' s 10-Year ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: -5.5  Med: 17.67 Max: 82.32
Current: 10.2
-5.5
82.32
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 40.90
CLR's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
86% of the 345 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 6.50 vs. CLR: 40.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CLR' s 10-Year Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: -83.6  Med: 8.60 Max: 190.4
Current: 40.9
-83.6
190.4
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) 38.80
CLR's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
82% of the 305 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -0.90 vs. CLR: 38.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CLR' s 10-Year EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: 0  Med: -39.30 Max: 112.9
Current: 38.8
0
112.9
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) 30.10
CLR's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
76% of the 272 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.40 vs. CLR: 30.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CLR' s 10-Year EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: -84.4  Med: 4.05 Max: 1103.7
Current: 30.1
-84.4
1103.7
» CLR's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2014

CLR Guru Trades in Q2 2014

Ken Heebner 30,000 sh (New)
John Keeley 42,820 sh (+94.37%)
Paul Singer 150,000 sh (unchged)
Ray Dalio 33,300 sh (unchged)
Jim Simons Sold Out
Mariko Gordon Sold Out
Mario Gabelli 18,880 sh (-0.19%)
Murray Stahl 498,376 sh (-5.44%)
Jeremy Grantham 1,300 sh (-91.77%)
» More
Q3 2014

CLR Guru Trades in Q3 2014

Mario Gabelli 44,330 sh (+17.40%)
Ray Dalio 68,900 sh (+3.45%)
Louis Moore Bacon 100,000 sh (unchged)
Jeremy Grantham Sold Out
Ken Heebner Sold Out
Murray Stahl 984,733 sh (-1.21%)
John Keeley 82,360 sh (-3.83%)
» More
Q4 2014

CLR Guru Trades in Q4 2014

George Soros 349,468 sh (New)
Paul Singer 212,000 sh (New)
Michael Price 200,000 sh (New)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 268,760 sh (New)
Jim Simons 863,100 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 198,200 sh (New)
Ray Dalio 91,616 sh (+32.97%)
Mario Gabelli 49,180 sh (+10.94%)
John Keeley 83,560 sh (+1.46%)
Paul Singer 500,000 sh (unchged)
Murray Stahl 972,076 sh (-1.29%)
» More
Q1 2015

CLR Guru Trades in Q1 2015

Kyle Bass 17,513 sh (New)
Kyle Bass 17,513 sh (New)
Ray Dalio 119,159 sh (+30.06%)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 308,880 sh (+14.93%)
Michael Price 200,000 sh (unchged)
Steven Cohen Sold Out
Paul Singer Sold Out
George Soros Sold Out
Mario Gabelli 49,130 sh (-0.10%)
Jim Simons 798,000 sh (-7.54%)
Murray Stahl 894,719 sh (-7.96%)
John Keeley 35,170 sh (-57.91%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with CLR

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Top Ranked Articles about Continental Resources Inc

Weekly CEO Buys Highlight: CLR, KMI, TEP, HLX, MRO
According to GuruFocus Insider Data, these are the largest CEO buys during the past week. The overall trend of CEOs is illustrated in the chart below: Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 25.26
CLR's P/E(ttm) is ranked lower than
73% of the 203 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 13.40 vs. CLR: 25.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/E(ttm) only.
CLR' s 10-Year P/E(ttm) Range
Min: 1.78  Med: 26.96 Max: 330.15
Current: 25.26
1.78
330.15
Forward P/E 43.48
CLR's Forward P/E is ranked lower than
68% of the 231 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 27.10 vs. CLR: 43.48 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
PE(NRI) 25.90
CLR's PE(NRI) is ranked lower than
74% of the 199 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 13.30 vs. CLR: 25.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE(NRI) only.
CLR' s 10-Year PE(NRI) Range
Min: 1.78  Med: 27.09 Max: 357.21
Current: 25.9
1.78
357.21
P/B 3.25
CLR's P/B is ranked lower than
90% of the 535 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.97 vs. CLR: 3.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
CLR' s 10-Year P/B Range
Min: 2.39  Med: 5.55 Max: 16.07
Current: 3.25
2.39
16.07
P/S 3.50
CLR's P/S is ranked lower than
69% of the 487 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 2.00 vs. CLR: 3.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
CLR' s 10-Year P/S Range
Min: 0.79  Med: 6.68 Max: 22.07
Current: 3.5
0.79
22.07
POCF 4.89
CLR's POCF is ranked lower than
59% of the 346 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 4.00 vs. CLR: 4.89 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
CLR' s 10-Year POCF Range
Min: 3.19  Med: 10.27 Max: 26.15
Current: 4.89
3.19
26.15
EV-to-EBIT 17.63
CLR's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
69% of the 242 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 10.79 vs. CLR: 17.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
CLR' s 10-Year EV-to-EBIT Range
Min: -747  Med: 17.15 Max: 136.2
Current: 17.63
-747
136.2
PEG 0.47
CLR's PEG is ranked higher than
70% of the 71 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.93 vs. CLR: 0.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG only.
CLR' s 10-Year PEG Range
Min: 0.23  Med: 0.58 Max: 1.59
Current: 0.47
0.23
1.59
Shiller P/E 29.58
CLR's Shiller P/E is ranked lower than
75% of the 145 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 17.06 vs. CLR: 29.58 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
CLR' s 10-Year Shiller P/E Range
Min: 2.2  Med: 11.62 Max: 64.52
Current: 29.58
2.2
64.52
Current Ratio 0.75
CLR's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
70% of the 549 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.25 vs. CLR: 0.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
CLR' s 10-Year Current Ratio Range
Min: 0.56  Med: 0.89 Max: 1.72
Current: 0.75
0.56
1.72
Quick Ratio 0.68
CLR's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
72% of the 549 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.21 vs. CLR: 0.68 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
CLR' s 10-Year Quick Ratio Range
Min: 0.52  Med: 0.81 Max: 1.49
Current: 0.68
0.52
1.49
Days Inventory 83.76
CLR's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
82% of the 220 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 23.36 vs. CLR: 83.76 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
CLR' s 10-Year Days Inventory Range
Min: 14.5  Med: 72.74 Max: 107.79
Current: 83.76
14.5
107.79
Days Sales Outstanding 37.35
CLR's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
55% of the 444 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 40.25 vs. CLR: 37.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
CLR' s 10-Year Days Sales Outstanding Range
Min: 8.36  Med: 67.23 Max: 102.24
Current: 37.35
8.36
102.24

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 3.27
CLR's Price/Tangible Book is ranked lower than
87% of the 498 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.04 vs. CLR: 3.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
CLR' s 10-Year Price/Tangible Book Range
Min: 2.87  Med: 5.38 Max: 13.92
Current: 3.27
2.87
13.92
Price/Median PS Value 0.53
CLR's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
52% of the 429 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. CLR: 0.53 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
CLR' s 10-Year Price/Median PS Value Range
Min: 0.13  Med: 1.04 Max: 3.28
Current: 0.53
0.13
3.28
Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value 1.02
CLR's Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value is ranked lower than
56% of the 48 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.99 vs. CLR: 1.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value only.
CLR' s 10-Year Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value Range
Min: 0.58  Med: 1.13 Max: 31.87
Current: 1.02
0.58
31.87
Price/Graham Number 1.93
CLR's Price/Graham Number is ranked lower than
79% of the 189 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.89 vs. CLR: 1.93 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Graham Number only.
CLR' s 10-Year Price/Graham Number Range
Min: 1.34  Med: 2.66 Max: 9.51
Current: 1.93
1.34
9.51
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 5.80
CLR's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
71% of the 569 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -3.70 vs. CLR: 5.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
CLR' s 10-Year Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: 0.7  Med: 5.80 Max: 19.9
Current: 5.8
0.7
19.9
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) 40.60
CLR's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked higher than
94% of the 190 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -4.89 vs. CLR: 40.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
CLR' s 10-Year Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range
Min: -1  Med: 12.40 Max: 56.1
Current: 40.6
-1
56.1

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - E&P » Oil & Gas E&P
Compare:OJSCY, APC, APA, HRTPY, SGTZY » details
Traded in other countries:C5L.Germany, CTLR.USA,
Continental Resources Inc was formed in 1967 in the state of Oklahoma. It is an independent crude oil and natural gas exploration and production company with properties in the North, South and East regions of the United States. The North region consists of properties north of Kansas and west of the Mississippi River and includes North Dakota Bakken, Montana Bakken, and the Red River units. The South region includes Kansas and all properties south of Kansas and west of the Mississippi River including various plays in the South Central Oklahoma Oil Province ("SCOOP"), Northwest Cana and Arkoma areas of Oklahoma. The East region is comprised of undeveloped leasehold acreage east of the Mississippi River. Its exploration drilling in North Dakota focused on evaluating the productivity of the Lower Three Forks "benches" which include the Three Forks 2 ("TF2"), Three Forks 3 ("TF3"), and the Three Forks 4 ("TF4") reservoirs. The Company sells its products to midstream marketing companies or crude oil refining companies at the lease. The crude oil and natural gas industry in the United States is subject to various types of regulation at the federal, state and local levels. Laws, rules, regulations, policies, and interpretations affecting its industry have been pervasive and are continuously reviewed by legislators and regulators, including the imposition of new or increased requirements on them and other industry participants.
» More Articles for CLR

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
KEELEY Mid Cap Value Fund First Quarter 2015 Commentary Jun 17 2015 
Why Continental Resources Can Make a Comeback May 27 2015 
Cimarex Energy Had One of the Highest Growth Rates Among Petroleum Companies Apr 24 2015 
March Madness Round 3: Kinder Morgan vs Disney Mar 24 2015 
Continental Resources' New Discoveries Make It a Smart Long-Term Bet Mar 23 2015 
Why Continental Resources Is a Good Long-Term Buy Mar 17 2015 
Weekly CEO Buys Highlight: CLR, KMI, TEP, HLX, MRO Mar 16 2015 
Legendary Value Investor Michael Price's New 13-f Filing Feb 18 2015 
Weekly 3-Year Low Highlights: RDS.B, GSK, WPZ, CLR Dec 14 2014 
Can Continental Resources Improve in the Long Run? Dec 04 2014 

More From Other Websites
What Wall Street Thinks about the Top Upstream Energy Companies Jun 25 2015
EOG and Pioneer: The Best Upstream Stocks in the Past 3 Years Jun 19 2015
The Shale Industry Could Be Swallowed by Its Own Debt Jun 19 2015
Analyst Has 4 Oil Stocks to Buy as Rig Count Plunges Jun 18 2015
The New Money Masters: Oil Trader Pierre Andurand Jun 17 2015
One of the World's Best Oil Companies Now on Sale Jun 15 2015
EPA Study Of Fracking's Impact On Drinking Water: Two Charts On The Power Of The Fracking Boom Jun 04 2015
EPA Study Says Fracking Hasn't Hurt Drinking Water: The Industry By The Numbers Jun 04 2015
CONTINENTAL RESOURCES, INC Files SEC form 8-K, Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders May 21 2015
Why Did Continental Resources’ 1Q15 Production Surge? May 19 2015
This Innovation Will Help U.S. Companies Win The Oil Price War May 18 2015
Big Oil May Be Caught Off-Guard By Wave Of Retirement May 18 2015
Continental Resources upgraded by Goldman May 18 2015
Oil tycoon Harold Hamm reportedly tried to get scientists fired over their earthquake research May 15 2015
This Week In Energy: Iran Nuclear Deal Has White House Walking A Tightrope May 15 2015
Wall Street Recommendations after Continental Resources’ Earnings May 15 2015
Continental Resources’ 1Q15 Earnings Exceeded Estimates May 14 2015
Could This New Business Model Save Fracking? May 13 2015
CONTINENTAL RESOURCES, INC Financials May 13 2015
Continental Resources Posts Net Loss in 1Q15 May 12 2015

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
FEEDBACK