Switch to:
Computer Sciences Corp (NYSE:CSC)
Piotroski F-Score
3 (As of Today)

Warning Sign:

Piotroski F-Score of 3 is low, which usually implies poor business operation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 8 or 9
Bad or low score = 0 or 1

Computer Sciences Corp has an F-score of indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

CSC' s 10-Year Piotroski F-Score Range
Min: 4   Max: 8
Current: 3

4
8

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Computer Sciences Corp was 8. The lowest was 4. And the median was 6.


Definition

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* All numbers are in millions except for per share data and ratio. All numbers are in their own currency.

This Year () TTM:Last Year () TTM:
Net Income was 174 + 141 + 203 + 156 = $674 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 548 + 529 + 270 + 213 = $1,560 Mil.
Revenue was + + + = $ Mil.
Gross Profit was + + + = $ Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year () was $ Mil.
Total Assets was $ Mil.
Long-Term Debt was $ Mil.
Total Current Assets was $ Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $ Mil.
Net Income was 0 + 510 + 130 + 40 = $680 Mil.

Revenue was + + + = $ Mil.
Gross Profit was + + + = $ Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year () was $ Mil.
Total Assets was $ Mil.
Long-Term Debt was $ Mil.
Total Current Assets was $ Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $ Mil.

Profitability

Q1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Computer Sciences Corp's current net income was 674. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Q2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by total assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Computer Sciences Corp's current cash flow from operations was 1,560. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Q3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year’s return on assets (1) to last year’s return on assets.

Score 1 if it’s higher, 0 if it’s lower.

Computer Sciences Corp's return on assets of this year was . Computer Sciences Corp's return on assets of last year was . ==> Last year is higher ==> Score .

Q4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA =< ROA.

Computer Sciences Corp's current net income was 674. Computer Sciences Corp's current cash flow from operations was 1,560. ==> 1,560 =< 674 ==> CFROA =< ROA ==> Score .

Funding

Q5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year’s gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year’s gearing.

Score 1 if gearing is lower, 0 if it’s higher.

Gearing (This Year)=Long-Term Debt/Total Assets
=/
=

Gearing (Last Year)=Long-Term Debt/Total Assets
=/
=

Computer Sciences Corp's gearing of this year was . Computer Sciences Corp's gearing of last year was . ==> Last year is lower ==> Score .

Q6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year’s current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year’s current ratio.

Score 1 if this year’s current ratio is higher, 0 if it’s lower

Current Ratio (This Year)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=/
=

Current Ratio (Last Year)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=/
=

Computer Sciences Corp's current ratio of this year was . Computer Sciences Corp's current ratio of last year was . ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score .

Q7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 1 if there is fewer number of shares in issue this year. Score 0 otherwise.

Computer Sciences Corp's number of shares in issue this year was . Computer Sciences Corp's number of shares in issue last year was . ==> There is more number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score .

Efficiency

Q8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year’s gross margin (gross profit divided by sales) to last year’s.

Score 1 if this year’s gross margin is higher, 0 if it’s lower.

Gross Margin (This Year)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=/
=

Gross Margin (Last Year)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=/
=

Computer Sciences Corp's gross margin of this year was . Computer Sciences Corp's gross margin of last year was . ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score .

Q9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year’s asset turnover (total sales divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year’s asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year’s asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it’s lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the beginning of this year ()
=/
=

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the beginning of last year ()
=/
=

Computer Sciences Corp's asset turnover of this year was . Computer Sciences Corp's asset turnover of last year was . ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score .

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score=Q1+Q2+Q3+Q4+Q5+Q6+Q7+Q8+Q9
=1+1+++++++
=

Good or high score = 8 or 9

Bad or low score = 0 or 1

Computer Sciences Corp has an F-score of indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.


Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Related Terms

Net Income, Cash Flow from Operations, Revenue, Gross Profit, Total Assets, Long-Term Debt, Total Current Assets, Total Current Liabilities


Historical Data

* All numbers are in millions except for per share data and ratio. All numbers are in their own currency.

Computer Sciences Corp Annual Data

Mar05Mar06Mar07Mar08Mar09Mar10Mar11Mar12Mar13Mar14
Q1 1111111011
Q2 1111111111
Q3 1001100010
Q4 1111111111
Q5 1010011101
Q6 0100110010
Q7 1011100101
Q8 1110100011
Q9 0001000110
F-score 7566754576

Computer Sciences Corp Quarterly Data

Dec11Mar12Jun12Sep12Dec12Mar13Jun13Sep13Dec13Mar14
Q1 00001111
Q2 11111111
Q3 00011110
Q4 11111111
Q5 01101001
Q6 00001110
Q7 11100111
Q8 00001111
Q9 11011100
F-score 4544888766
Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
Free 7-day Trial
FEEDBACK
Email Hide