Andrew Barrett book review: “Influence – The Psychology of Persuasion” by Robert B Cialdini, Amazon subtitle: ‘Excellent content somewhat marred by impractical conclusions’ 4/5
3rd edition/publication (2007), Collins Business Essentials, 320 pages (of which 280 pages for actual book)
Influence is another of the twenty books Charlie Munger recommends in the second edition of Poor Charlie’s Almanack. Its content is excellent (and sometimes even hair-raisingly remarkable – as when he shows that media reporting of suicides actually causes more of them via the social proof bias) but I think Cialdini could have done a much better job of turning the research evidence into useful/practical advice. (The same problem manifests itself in Gilbert’s book ‘Stumbling on Happiness’ – though Cialdini’s is the better book.)
I was discussing this book with a friend who had also read it and I thought he put it very well: Cialdini is one of those clever people who is not very wise. That is also why Poor Charlie’s Almanack is so good and unusual: Munger is both clever and has deliberately attempted to distil a lifetime’s worth of reading over a broad subject matter area into practical advice on how to live a successful/useful life.
In particular, Cialdini shows us clearly that a significant number of our psychological biases work completely unconsciously. (By that I mean it can be demonstrated that a certain bias has affected a group of individual’s actions/conclusions whilst they strenuously deny they have paid any attention to or are even totally unaware of the biasing factor.) For example, Cialdini quotes one study where “men who saw a new-car ad that included a seductive young woman model rated the car as faster, more appealing, more expensive-looking, and better designed than did men who saw the same ad without the model. Yet when asked later, the men refused to believe that the presence of the young woman had influenced their judgements.”
He then goes on to suggest various complicated ways to try to monitor ourselves to see if we are being affected by some of these biases – in order that we can attempt to limit the damage from faulty decisions (often in situations deliberately set up to cause our faulty decisions to be detrimental to us and advantageous to some other). For example, he highlights the “extreme caution” needed in auction situations where one encounters the “devilish construction of scarcity plus rivalry” – and suggests that we watch ourselves for signs of arousal so that we can stop short.
Well, I think Munger and his partner Warren Buffett have a much more practical and simpler way of dealing with that problem, based on the wisdom of the rustic that Munger likes to quote: “all I want to know is where I’m going to die so can avoid going there.” The whole thrust of Cialdini’s book is that these biases are often unconscious and are in any case often very strong (and usually much stronger that we believe/expect) – which is another way of saying you’re unlikely to have good results fighting against them.
Much better to simply bypass the problem where possible and do as Buffett does and refuse to get involved in auction situations. Using rules like this, to paraphrase Munger on a different subject (tax shelters): if you always avoid auction situations you might miss out on the odd good deal, but overall your life is likely to be better.
This is also why I consider Taleb (Fooled by Randomness and The Black Swan) to be much wiser than Cialdini: he understands that being aware of biases doesn’t make them go away. You need tricks and methods to live successfully with them.
I also think the advice in Cialdini’s epilogue is very poor. He suggests that we rise up to fight people/organisations who misuse our psychological biases for their own ends: “In short, we should be willing to use boycott, threat, confrontation, censure, tirade, nearly anything, to retaliate.”
This is crazy advice: the effort and time required to do it would leave little for anything else and would also guarantee a miserable life focussed on negativity. It also shows Cialdini’s lack of familiarity with good training principles (an excellent book on the subject is Karen Pryor’s ‘Don’t Shoot The Dog’). Plenty of research now shows that positive reinforcement (rewarding behaviour you like) is at least as effective as negative reinforcement and much more so than punishment. It also has the huge benefit of leading to a much more pleasant life.
However, even with those caveats (essentially that you have to do your own thinking about how to cope with the biases that Cialdini does an excellent job of laying out) it is still a very useful book.
3rd edition/publication (2007), Collins Business Essentials, 320 pages (of which 280 pages for actual book)
Influence is another of the twenty books Charlie Munger recommends in the second edition of Poor Charlie’s Almanack. Its content is excellent (and sometimes even hair-raisingly remarkable – as when he shows that media reporting of suicides actually causes more of them via the social proof bias) but I think Cialdini could have done a much better job of turning the research evidence into useful/practical advice. (The same problem manifests itself in Gilbert’s book ‘Stumbling on Happiness’ – though Cialdini’s is the better book.)
I was discussing this book with a friend who had also read it and I thought he put it very well: Cialdini is one of those clever people who is not very wise. That is also why Poor Charlie’s Almanack is so good and unusual: Munger is both clever and has deliberately attempted to distil a lifetime’s worth of reading over a broad subject matter area into practical advice on how to live a successful/useful life.
In particular, Cialdini shows us clearly that a significant number of our psychological biases work completely unconsciously. (By that I mean it can be demonstrated that a certain bias has affected a group of individual’s actions/conclusions whilst they strenuously deny they have paid any attention to or are even totally unaware of the biasing factor.) For example, Cialdini quotes one study where “men who saw a new-car ad that included a seductive young woman model rated the car as faster, more appealing, more expensive-looking, and better designed than did men who saw the same ad without the model. Yet when asked later, the men refused to believe that the presence of the young woman had influenced their judgements.”
He then goes on to suggest various complicated ways to try to monitor ourselves to see if we are being affected by some of these biases – in order that we can attempt to limit the damage from faulty decisions (often in situations deliberately set up to cause our faulty decisions to be detrimental to us and advantageous to some other). For example, he highlights the “extreme caution” needed in auction situations where one encounters the “devilish construction of scarcity plus rivalry” – and suggests that we watch ourselves for signs of arousal so that we can stop short.
Well, I think Munger and his partner Warren Buffett have a much more practical and simpler way of dealing with that problem, based on the wisdom of the rustic that Munger likes to quote: “all I want to know is where I’m going to die so can avoid going there.” The whole thrust of Cialdini’s book is that these biases are often unconscious and are in any case often very strong (and usually much stronger that we believe/expect) – which is another way of saying you’re unlikely to have good results fighting against them.
Much better to simply bypass the problem where possible and do as Buffett does and refuse to get involved in auction situations. Using rules like this, to paraphrase Munger on a different subject (tax shelters): if you always avoid auction situations you might miss out on the odd good deal, but overall your life is likely to be better.
This is also why I consider Taleb (Fooled by Randomness and The Black Swan) to be much wiser than Cialdini: he understands that being aware of biases doesn’t make them go away. You need tricks and methods to live successfully with them.
I also think the advice in Cialdini’s epilogue is very poor. He suggests that we rise up to fight people/organisations who misuse our psychological biases for their own ends: “In short, we should be willing to use boycott, threat, confrontation, censure, tirade, nearly anything, to retaliate.”
This is crazy advice: the effort and time required to do it would leave little for anything else and would also guarantee a miserable life focussed on negativity. It also shows Cialdini’s lack of familiarity with good training principles (an excellent book on the subject is Karen Pryor’s ‘Don’t Shoot The Dog’). Plenty of research now shows that positive reinforcement (rewarding behaviour you like) is at least as effective as negative reinforcement and much more so than punishment. It also has the huge benefit of leading to a much more pleasant life.
However, even with those caveats (essentially that you have to do your own thinking about how to cope with the biases that Cialdini does an excellent job of laying out) it is still a very useful book.
