Grahamites

The Big Picture Math

How simple math shows IBM will get back to growth in the near future

October 20, 2017 | About:

IBM (NYSE:IBM) reported a great third quarter, which took a lot of analysts and investors by surprise. The stock price shot up almost 10% following the earnings release. It’s IBM’s 22nd straight quarter of shrinking sales. But now suddenly everyone starts to believe that IBM will turn the corner soon.

I’ll skip the details of the quarter in terms of how great IBM did. You can read the press release and earnings call transcripts. In investing, sometimes simple math can tell a whole lot about the story and that’s the case with IBM – granted if you’ve done enough work to understand the business and to get comfortable with the assumptions behind the simple math.

Again, let’s not worry about the technicalities of the strategic imperatives and IBM’s legacy businesses for now. Let’s just look at how the math has worked so far. You can find all the relevant data and information from IBM’s public disclosures. You may have to read the transcripts and presentations to find some numbers, but it’s all out there.

Then the trouble started to emerge as the legacy business started to decline and continued to do so until today. From 2012 to 2014, IBM’s legacy revenue declined by 8%, 9% and 12% while the strategic imperative businesses had grown impressively by 20%, 19% and 19%. By the end of 2014, legacy business accounted for 73% of the business, and the strategic imperatives accounted for 27% of the business.

In 2015, 2016 and 2017, the trajectory has been very consistent – double-digit growth in the strategic imperative business and high single-digit to low double-digit legacy business decline. If we do the math in the beginning of 2015, we’ll see that somewhere between 2017 and 2018, IBM’s revenue will grow again depending on how fast the strategic imperative business grows and how fast the legacy business declines. But the math is very straightforward – by 2018 or early 2019, strategic imperatives will account for more than 50% of the revenue base.

But IBM doesn’t need the strategic imperatives to be over 50% of the revenue to grow the top line again. If IBM’s strategic imperative business revenue accounts for say 42% of the total and grows 12%, and the legacy business say declines 7%, IBM will show revenue growth in this scenario, which is not too far from where IBM is today.

As illustrated above, IBM essentially went through an engineered multiyear transformation – in the early phase, the growth in the new business wasn’t enough to offset the decline in the legacy business; in the later stage, the growth in the new business will more than offset the decline in the legacy business. For investors who know enough about the business and have patience, IBM was a great time arbitrage opportunity. Wall Street analysts, though, have demonstrated their ever-growing short-term focus – instead of asking questions such as how exactly does IBM’s blockchain service help Nestle (XSWX:NESN) with food safety or how Watson competes against competitive AI offerings from other tech companies, almost all the questions on the earnings call are about near-term growth, margins and guidance.

Conclusion

One of the most important mental models is big picture math. In a world where short-term noise is becoming more and more prevalent and pernicious, it’s important to stay focused on the most important things and figure out how the big picture math works.

Disclosure: Long IBM.

Grahamites
A global value investor constantly seeking to acquire worldly wisdom. My investment philosophy has been inspired by Warren Buffett, Charlie Munger, Howard Marks, Chuck Akre, Li Lu, Zhang Lei and Peter Lynch.

 Currently 5.00/512345 Rating: 5.0/5 (9 votes) Voters:

Praveen Chawla - 11 months ago

It takes time to turn a big ship around. Value investors a frequently too early, but this seems to be the right time to go long with a 3 to 5 year horizon.

Ed_l_grey - 11 months ago    Report SPAM

There is broad agreement among people with expertise in areas related to IBM's products that those products are inferior. When IBM produces a custom system for a customer, the work is not guaranteed to perform its required function. Many businesses, governments, etc. have learned to go elsewhere for services.

In the "old days" of IBM success, they mainly made their money on sales and leasing of expensive equipment, mostly computers. The system software was proprietary and also expensive. They were one of very few manufacturers of that equipment. Now that kind of equipment is a commodity, based on Intel processors, made by many companies. Now the system software is mostly open source, not under IBM control and pricing.

Grahamites - 11 months ago

Praveen -Agreed that It certainly takes patience in companies like IBM. Thanks for commenting.

Vgm - 11 months ago    Report SPAM

Thanks for the interesting piece Grahamites.

I might class Buffett as the king of big picture math ("I'd rather be roughly right than precisely wrong") and of course he sold a third of his large IBM holding earlier this year. There seemed to be two reasons for selling: first, he valued the company down from what he had at his initial investment; and second he cited increased competition.

Have you evaluated the competition and does it lead to a lowering of your future expectations?

Thanks again.

Grahamites - 11 months ago

Vgm - Thanks for the comments and for the great question. I invested in IBM most likely with a different time horizon and different reasons than Mr.Buffett. I don't intend to hold IBM for 10 years. This is a Peter Lynch slow grower type investment for me. My cost basis is about \$130 and I'm happy to exit with a 50-60% total return in 2 - 3 years. So my big picture math is probably very different from Mr.Buffett's big picture math. That being said, I had very low expectations in IBM when I bought it. Through contacts at Amazon, Google, Facebook and some other tech companies, I've learned that while IBM's pretty entrenched with certain clients (say big banks and railroads), their competitive position has worsened over the years against the competitors. But it's not a winner takes all markets so there's room for IBM to grow with the markets, which is enough for them to get back on revenue growth track in my opinion.

Ed_l_grey - 11 months ago    Report SPAM

Just as Berkshire Hathaway generally goes up over the long term, I think IBM is in a slow decline, so it's not a company you can buy and forget. While you may be right about the next few years and get your 50% gain, you're taking more of a chance than if you simply bought Berkshire Hathaway or some other solid company.

Grahamites - 11 months ago

Ed_I_grey - Thanks for the reminder. You maybe right. But as I laid out in the math, 45% of the business is growing double digits. The old business is declining for sure. But one day the trend will reverse. That’s my bet. If I see disconfirming evidences along the way or the math changes, i’m happy to exit IBM.