1. How to use GuruFocus - Tutorials
  2. What Is in the GuruFocus Premium Membership?
  3. A DIY Guide on How to Invest Using Guru Strategies
Stepan Lavrouk
Stepan Lavrouk
Articles (370) 

Warren Buffett: What Makes a Good Moat and What Does Not

Good leadership is not enough

June 19, 2019 | About:

It’s no secret that Warren Buffett (Trades, Portfolio)’s Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A)(NYSE:BRK.B) looks for its acquisition targets to have deep and wide moats. But what exactly are the characteristics of such companies? In his 2007 letter to shareholders, Buffett explained what constitutes a good moat, and what does not.

Leadership alone does not a moat make

One of Buffett’s criteria for assessing moats is that the competitive advantage has to endure for a long time going forward. An interesting consequence of this rule is that it eliminates businesses that rely on the skills of a talented founder or CEO for success. In Buffett’s own words:

"If a business requires a superstar to produce great results, the business itself cannot be deemed great. A medical partnership led by your area’s premier brain surgeon may enjoy outsized and growing earnings, but that tells little about its future. The partnership’s moat will go when the surgeon goes. You can count, though, on the moat of the Mayo Clinic to endure, even though you can’t name its CEO.”

Of course, having a great leader is hugely beneficial for a company, and the businesses that Berkshire invests in typically do have excellent management. But a truly excellent business is one that will deliver even under mediocre management. As the Oracle of Omaha once said, quoting Peter Lynch:

“I try to invest in businesses that are so wonderful that an idiot can run them. Because sooner or later, one will.”

Competitive advantage in a stable industry

While investing in a high-growth sector like tech can reap sizeable rewards for the lucky, the nature of a disruptive industry is that it is difficult to forecast which companies will do well, and whose moats will endure. For this reason, Buffett and company prefer mature industries with clearly defined leaders:

“Long-term competitive advantage in a stable industry is what we seek in a business. If that comes with rapid organic growth, great. But even without organic growth, such a business is rewarding. We will simply take the lush earnings of the business and use them to buy similar businesses elsewhere. There’s no rule that you have to invest money where you’ve earned it. Indeed, it’s often a mistake to do so: Truly great businesses, earning huge returns on tangible assets, can’t for any extended period reinvest a large portion of their earnings internally at high rates of return.”

A great business in a mature sector should ideally not have a lot of room to reinvest earnings, as the market is likely saturated with its products. Buffett cited See’s Candy as a premier example of such a company: It is fundamentally unexciting as a business, and its share of the market is largely fixed and does not grow. Crucially though, almost all of its earnings are distributed back to Berkshire -- of the $1.35 billion that See’s earned between 1972 (the year Buffett acquired the company) and 2007, when the letter was written, only $32 million had to be reinvested into it. The rest went to Berkshire. Now that is a good investment.

Disclosure: The author owns no stocks mentioned.

Read more here:

Morgan Stanley’s Business Conditions Index Hits 2nd-Lowest Reading Ever

David Einhorn: How to Manage Investment Risk

The Myth of Private Equity

Not a Premium Member of GuruFocus? Sign up for a free 7-day trial here.

About the author:

Stepan Lavrouk
Stepan Lavrouk is a financial writer with a background in equity research and macro trading. Specific investing interests include energy, fundamental geoeconomic analysis and biotechnology. He holds a bachelor of science degree from Trinity College Dublin.

Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes)

Comments

batbeer2
Batbeer2 premium member - 7 months ago
Thanks for sharing your thoughts.

You say: >> “I try to invest in businesses that are so wonderful that an idiot can run them. Because sooner or later, one will.”

That is not Warren Buffett (Trades, Portfolio)'s line. That is Warren Buffett (Trades, Portfolio) quoting Peter Lynch.

To which I would add that it's good to own a great business with great management but not one that is great because it has great management. I learned that from a former contributor on this forum, Geoff Gannon.

.... just some thoughts.



Stepan Lavrouk
Stepan Lavrouk - 7 months ago    Report SPAM

Thank you for pointing that out! I have duly amended the article to reflect that it is a Lynch quote.

Please leave your comment:



Performances of the stocks mentioned by Stepan Lavrouk


User Generated Screeners


pjmason14Momentum
pascal.van.garsseHigh FCF-M2
kosalmmuse6
kosalmmuseBest one1
DBrizanall 2019Feb26
kosalmmuseBest one
DBrizanall 2019Feb25
kosalmmuseNice
kosalmmusehan
MsDale*52-Week Low
Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
/* */