Switch to:
Also traded in: Brazil, Germany, Mexico, Switzerland, UK

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.13
COP's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
71% of the 468 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.65 vs. COP: 0.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
COP' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.01  Med: 0.06 Max: N/A
Current: 0.13
Equity-to-Asset 0.40
COP's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
64% of the 425 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.52 vs. COP: 0.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
COP' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.13  Med: 0.39 Max: 0.5
Current: 0.4
0.13
0.5
Piotroski F-Score: 6
Altman Z-Score: 1.40
Beneish M-Score: -3.00
WACC vs ROIC
7.74%
-3.87%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % -8.28
COP's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
59% of the 436 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -23.06 vs. COP: -8.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
COP' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -20.67  Med: 11.25 Max: 26.66
Current: -8.28
-20.67
26.66
Net Margin % -5.75
COP's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
63% of the 434 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -29.08 vs. COP: -5.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
COP' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -14.84  Med: 5.92 Max: 18.82
Current: -5.75
-14.84
18.82
ROE % -4.26
COP's ROE % is ranked higher than
59% of the 425 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -8.78 vs. COP: -4.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
COP' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -23.58  Med: 13.54 Max: 18.59
Current: -4.26
-23.58
18.59
ROA % -1.67
COP's ROA % is ranked higher than
65% of the 511 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -7.02 vs. COP: -1.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
COP' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -10.6  Med: 6.05 Max: 8.04
Current: -1.67
-10.6
8.04
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % -3.70
COP's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
60% of the 483 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -8.12 vs. COP: -3.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
COP' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -8.91  Med: 16.58 Max: 27.7
Current: -3.7
-8.91
27.7
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -25.30
COP's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
56% of the 374 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -21.40 vs. COP: -25.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
COP' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -33.4  Med: 3.5 Max: 30
Current: -25.3
-33.4
30
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate -40.30
COP's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
73% of the 308 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -21.00 vs. COP: -40.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
COP' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -50.1  Med: 0.3 Max: 58.8
Current: -40.3
-50.1
58.8
GuruFocus has detected 2 Warning Signs with ConocoPhillips $COP.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» COP's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-08-02 Est.)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - E&P » Oil & Gas E&P    NAICS: 324110    SIC: 2911
Compare:NYSE:EOG, OTCPK:CEOHF, NYSE:OXY, NYSE:CNQ, OTCPK:NOVKY, NYSE:PXD, NYSE:APC, OTCPK:MITSF, OTCPK:WOPEY, NYSE:APA, NYSE:CXO, NYSE:DVN, OTCPK:OAOFY, OTCPK:IPXHY, NYSE:HES, NYSE:NBL, NYSE:CLR, NYSE:COG, OTCPK:PTXLF, NYSE:MRO » details
Traded in other countries:COPH34.Brazil, YCP.Germany, COP.Mexico, COP.Switzerland, 0QZA.UK,
Headquarter Location:USA
ConocoPhillips is an independent exploration and production (E&P) company. The Company is engaged in exploration, development and production of crude oil and natural gas.

ConocoPhillips is a U.S.-based independent exploration and production firm. In 2016, it produced 929,000 barrels per day of oil and natural gas liquids and 3.9 billion cubic feet per day of natural gas, primarily from the United States, Canada, Norway, and the United Kingdom. Proven reserves at year-end 2016 stood at 6.4 billion barrels of oil equivalent.

Guru Investment Theses on ConocoPhillips

Yacktman Funds Comments on ConocoPhillips - May 04, 2016

ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) was weak along with other commodity stocks in the first quarter. Recently the shares have rallied significantly off their lows. Our total exposure to energy stocks is modest in the Fund.




From Donald Yacktman (Trades, Portfolio)'s Yacktman Focused Fund (Trades, Portfolio) first quarter 2016 commentary.

Check out Donald Yacktman latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about ConocoPhillips

Covered call options reports for ConocoPhillips, Fiat Chrysler Auto, General Electric, Regions Financial Corporation, and Exxon Mobil, include trade ideas that offer returns of 20% or more!
ConocoPhillips Sells Canadian Oil Sands Assets to Cenovus Energy $13.3 billion deal is part of company’s plan to increase value
Following Royal Dutch Shell’s (NYSE:RDS.A) lead in exiting its Canadian oil sands businesses earlier this month, ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) announced Wednesday it is selling its 50% interest in Foster Creek Christina Lake oil sands partnership and a majority of its Canadian Deep Basin gas assets to Cenovus Energy Inc. (NYSE:CVE)(TSX:CVE) for $13.3 billion. Read more...
Donald Yacktman Invests in Bank of America, Berkshire Twenty-First Century Fox is guru's largest buy of 3rd quarter
Donald Yacktman (Trades, Portfolio) is the president and co-chief investment officer of Yacktman Asset Management Co. He is also a co-manager for the Yacktman Fund (Trades, Portfolio). During the third quarter the guru’s largest buys were the following: Read more...
Oil Gains With Saudi Arabia and Russia Cooperation Agreement aims to help improve oil prices
Oil prices gained Monday as Saudi Arabia and Russia entered into an agreement to seek stabilization in the oil market. The two countries will work to seek output freezes, but speculators are skeptical of the market’s price gains. Read more...
2 More Reasons Why Buffett Continues to Buy Phillips 66 Further exploration of Buffett's involvement with the company
I have written about Warren Buffet’s accumulation of PSX shares on Gurufocus before. At that time, my reverse engineering of the Oracle’s actions led me to believe it was driven not by an interest in the oil and gas sector, but valuation driven. As Buffett continues to buy shares of Phillips 66 (NYSE:PSX) and I have gained additional insights over time, it is time for an update. Read more...
Warren Buffett Adds to Phillips 66 Guru expands his influence in the energy company
Warren Buffett (Trades, Portfolio) of Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A) (NYSE:BRK.B) added to his holdings in Phillips 66 (NYSE:PSX) on Aug. 24. Read more...
U.S Stock Ends Mostly Lower The U.S. stock market showed mixed economic data Thursday
The U.S. stock market is dynamic and every day you will see tons of new things. Today, Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) shares shined and investors are very happy about it. But investors are following Apple's shares closely, as they think the tech giant`s big moment might come to an end soon. Read more...
S&P 500 Companies' Piotroski F-Scores Weaken, Energy Stocks Get Hit the Worst Current scores are still strong, but not as strong as it once was
Throughout the past two years, the distribution of Piotroski F-scores for the Standard & Poor’s 500 index has generally shifted near all-time lows. While many of these companies had strong F-scores in the past, most companies, especially in the energy sector, have experienced declining F-scores. Tumbling oil prices present one likely reason for the weakening F-scores among energy companies. Read more...
Daniel Loeb Beats Market But Stocks Down Loeb's plays best struggling peers
Third Point investor Daniel Loeb (Trades, Portfolio) posted a higher return than the S&P 500 index in June, saved from negative performance by gains in his bond portfolio. Read more...
Coro Announces Election of Directors and Results from Annual General and Special Meeting

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA--(Marketwired - Jun 29, 2016) - Coro Mining Corp. (TSX:COP) ("Coro", the "Company") is pleased to report that all of the nominees listed in its information circular dated May 30, 2016 were re-elected as directors of Coro at the Company's annual general and special meeting of shareholders held in Vancouver, Wednesday, June 29, 2016 (the "Meeting"). The detailed results of the votes received by proxy and voted at the meeting are listed below.



FOR
WITHHELD


Gordon J. Fretwell
115,097,099
5,075,711


Alan J. Stephens
120,058,540
114,270


Michael D. Philpot
119,806,618
366,192


Michael Haworth
119,963,918
208,892


Roderick J. Webster
119,908,923
263,887


Colin Kinley
119,750,996
421,814



In addition, the Company announces that its shareholders approved the both the Private Placement and Management's potential participation in the Private Placement announced on May 24, 2016. Coro will provide an update on the Private Placement shortly. CORO MINING CORP. Alan Stephens, President and CEO Coro's strategy is to grow a mining business through the discovery, development and operation of "Coro type" deposits. These are defined as projects at whatever stage of development, that are well located with respect to infrastructure and water, which have low permitting risk, and which have the potential to achieve a short and cost effective timeline to production. Our preference is for open pit heap leach copper projects, where we will seek to minimise capital investment rather than maximise NPV, where we will prioritise profitability over production rate, and finally, where the likely capital cost is financeable relative to our market capitalization. The Company's assets include its 65% interest in SCM Berta including the Berta and Salvadora deposits; the Marimaca drill stage project; the Planta Prat project; the Llancahue prospect, optioned to Industrias Peñoles; and a royalty on the San Jorge copper-gold project located in Argentina. For further information please visit the Company's website at www.coromining.com. This news release includes certain "forward-looking statements" under applicable Canadian securities legislation. Such forward-looking statements or information, including but not limited to those with respect to Private Placement, the prices of copper, estimated future production, estimated costs of future production, permitting time lines, involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements or information. Such factors include, among others, the risk that all conditions precedent to completion of the Financing Transaction will not be satisfied, the actual prices of copper, the factual results of current exploration, development and mining activities, changes in project parameters as plans continue to be evaluated, as well as those factors disclosed in the Company's documents filed from time to time with the securities regulators in the Provinces of British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island and Newfoundland and Labrador.





Michael Philpot
Executive Vice-President
(778) 240 2555 or (604) 682 5546
[email protected]
Francois Perron
Renmark Financial Communications Inc.
(416) 644-2020 or (514) 939-3989
[email protected]
www.renmarkfinancial.com




Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
Forward PE Ratio 68.49
COP's Forward PE Ratio is ranked lower than
88% of the 119 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 19.34 vs. COP: 68.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PB Ratio 1.56
COP's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
63% of the 429 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.16 vs. COP: 1.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
COP' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.57  Med: 1.18 Max: 1.92
Current: 1.56
0.57
1.92
PS Ratio 2.05
COP's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
62% of the 401 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 2.87 vs. COP: 2.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
COP' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.18  Med: 0.71 Max: 2.66
Current: 2.05
0.18
2.66
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 31.38
COP's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
76% of the 131 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 13.41 vs. COP: 31.38 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
COP' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.65  Med: 13.12 Max: 144.13
Current: 31.38
4.65
144.13
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 9.54
COP's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
66% of the 272 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 6.30 vs. COP: 9.54 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
COP' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.94  Med: 4.65 Max: 14.7
Current: 9.54
1.94
14.7
EV-to-EBITDA 11.94
COP's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
57% of the 266 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 10.51 vs. COP: 11.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
COP' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -243.1  Med: 4.1 Max: 13609
Current: 11.94
-243.1
13609
Shiller PE Ratio 15.54
COP's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked higher than
52% of the 82 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 15.95 vs. COP: 15.54 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
COP' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.18  Med: 11.51 Max: 17.56
Current: 15.54
6.18
17.56
Current Ratio 1.43
COP's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
54% of the 497 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.27 vs. COP: 1.43 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
COP' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.66  Med: 1.01 Max: 1.43
Current: 1.43
0.66
1.43
Quick Ratio 1.28
COP's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
52% of the 496 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.17 vs. COP: 1.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
COP' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.38  Med: 0.79 Max: 1.32
Current: 1.28
0.38
1.32
Days Inventory 23.99
COP's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
55% of the 204 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 28.39 vs. COP: 23.99 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
COP' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.42  Med: 15.47 Max: 48.14
Current: 23.99
9.42
48.14
Days Sales Outstanding 41.80
COP's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
63% of the 386 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 51.71 vs. COP: 41.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
COP' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 17.78  Med: 46.29 Max: 91.3
Current: 41.8
17.78
91.3
Days Payable 76.96
COP's Days Payable is ranked lower than
54% of the 255 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 86.03 vs. COP: 76.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
COP' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 28.29  Med: 88.27 Max: 192.52
Current: 76.96
28.29
192.52

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 2.30
COP's Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
65% of the 293 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 3.15 vs. COP: 2.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
COP' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.93  Med: 4.36 Max: 8.94
Current: 2.3
1.93
8.94
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate -28.20
COP's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked higher than
55% of the 100 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -38.90 vs. COP: -28.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
COP' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -28.2  Med: 6.2 Max: 22.4
Current: -28.2
-28.2
22.4
Forward Dividend Yield % 2.36
COP's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
66% of the 267 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 3.58 vs. COP: 2.36 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 1.21
COP's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked lower than
78% of the 419 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 2.85 vs. COP: 1.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
COP' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.02  Med: 2.3 Max: 4.72
Current: 1.21
1.02
4.72
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -0.30
COP's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
88% of the 376 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -10.50 vs. COP: -0.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
COP' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -38.8  Med: -0.3 Max: 7.2
Current: -0.3
-38.8
7.2

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 1.55
COP's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
59% of the 402 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.21 vs. COP: 1.55 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
COP' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.87  Med: 1.82 Max: 2.45
Current: 1.55
0.87
2.45
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 1.40
COP's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked lower than
60% of the 117 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.10 vs. COP: 1.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
COP' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.44  Med: 1.03 Max: 7.6
Current: 1.4
0.44
7.6
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 2.89
COP's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked lower than
91% of the 370 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.86 vs. COP: 2.89 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
COP' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.29  Med: 0.68 Max: 3.64
Current: 2.89
0.29
3.64
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % -2.88
COP's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
54% of the 513 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -3.91 vs. COP: -2.88 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
COP' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -25.7  Med: 15.7 Max: 45.7
Current: -2.88
-25.7
45.7
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % -28.67
COP's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
66% of the 177 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -16.06 vs. COP: -28.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
COP' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -28.7  Med: 4.5 Max: 47.1
Current: -28.67
-28.7
47.1

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $27,116.00
EPS (TTM) $ -1.26
Beta1.31
Short Percentage of Float2.09%
52-Week Range $38.80 - 53.17
Shares Outstanding (Mil)1,237.10

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18 Dec19
Revenue (Mil $) 22,878 21,478 20,478
EPS ($) 0.75 1.84 2.38
EPS without NRI ($) 0.75 1.84 2.38
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
N/A
Dividends per Share ($) 1.06 1.15 1.21
» More Articles for COP

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
San Juan Basin's Dividend Yield May Not Be as Attractive as It Seems Jun 20 2017 
Covered call options reports for ConocoPhillips, Fiat Chrysler Auto, General Electric, Regions Finan Apr 03 2017 
Bullish on Cenovus Energy After Acquisition Announcement Apr 03 2017 
ConocoPhillips Sells Canadian Oil Sands Assets to Cenovus Energy Mar 30 2017 
ConocoPhillips Raises Dividend as Turnaround Takes Shape Feb 09 2017 
Dividend Growth Stock Battle: Phillips 66 vs. Valero Feb 01 2017 
Donald Yacktman Invests in Bank of America, Berkshire Dec 13 2016 
Value Down Stream: Valero, Phillips 66 Oct 03 2016 
Is Chevron's Dividend Still Safe? Sep 26 2016 
Is Southern Company's Dividend Still Safe? Sep 09 2016 

More From Other Websites
Are ConocoPhillips’s Debt Reduction Plans on Track? Jun 26 2017
ConocoPhillips Stock: This Week’s Price Range Forecast Jun 26 2017
How Upstream Companies Have Performed since Prices Bottomed Out Jun 26 2017
ConocoPhillips Stock Is Outperforming Crude Oil Prices Jun 26 2017
What Analysts Recommended for Energy Stocks Last Week Jun 26 2017
Tropical Storm Cindy Cripples Gulf Of Mexico Oil Production Jun 24 2017
DBRS downgrades Cenovus after ConocoPhillips deal Jun 23 2017
Better Buy: ConocoPhillips vs. BP Jun 22 2017
Canada's Cenovus facing tough market for critical asset sales Jun 22 2017
ConocoPhillips: Not a Buy Despite Major Positive, Goldman Sachs Says Jun 22 2017
Oil & Gas Stock Roundup: EQT-Rice Energy Tie-Up, Chevron's $9.5B Legal Reprieve & More Jun 21 2017
Cenovus Hit by CEO Retirement, ConocoPhillips Deal Plans Jun 21 2017
Why SUPERVALU, Cenovus Energy, and Frontier Communications Slumped Today Jun 20 2017
This Oil Sands Deal Soured in Less Than 3 Months Jun 20 2017
Cenovus Energy Inc Plunges After Announcing CEO Retirement and New 5-Year Plan Jun 20 2017
Cenovus CEO to step down; company to sell up to $5 bln in assets Jun 20 2017
Encana’s Stock Price Forecast Using Implied Volatility Jun 20 2017
Cenovus to face investors amid rift after share decline Jun 20 2017
What Wall Street Analysts Are Saying about ConocoPhillips Jun 19 2017
What’s ConocoPhillips’s Stock Price Range Forecast for the Week? Jun 19 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}