Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.08
NYSE:DAR's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
85% of the 177 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 0.45 vs. NYSE:DAR: 0.08 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
NYSE:DAR' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.01  Med: 0.08 Max: 2.68
Current: 0.08
0.01
2.68
Equity-to-Asset 0.42
NYSE:DAR's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
59% of the 167 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 0.48 vs. NYSE:DAR: 0.42 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
NYSE:DAR' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.06  Med: 0.37 Max: 0.7
Current: 0.42
-0.06
0.7
Interest Coverage 1.70
NYSE:DAR's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
89% of the 123 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 11.27 vs. NYSE:DAR: 1.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
NYSE:DAR' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.21  Med: 8.96 Max: 30.71
Current: 1.7
1.21
30.71
Piotroski F-Score: 6
Altman Z-Score: 1.85
Beneish M-Score: -2.82
WACC vs ROIC
8.83%
3.62%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 4.48
NYSE:DAR's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
52% of the 170 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 3.91 vs. NYSE:DAR: 4.48 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
NYSE:DAR' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.16  Med: 11.43 Max: 17.5
Current: 4.48
4.16
17.5
Net Margin % 3.06
NYSE:DAR's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
54% of the 170 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 2.43 vs. NYSE:DAR: 3.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
NYSE:DAR' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.62  Med: 6.54 Max: 9.43
Current: 3.06
1.62
9.43
ROE % 5.44
NYSE:DAR's ROE % is ranked higher than
55% of the 168 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 3.58 vs. NYSE:DAR: 5.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
NYSE:DAR' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.23  Med: 12.5 Max: 25.85
Current: 5.44
3.23
25.85
ROA % 2.23
NYSE:DAR's ROA % is ranked higher than
55% of the 183 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.04 vs. NYSE:DAR: 2.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
NYSE:DAR' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.53  Med: 6.85 Max: 14.63
Current: 2.23
1.53
14.63
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 11.47
NYSE:DAR's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
60% of the 182 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 6.56 vs. NYSE:DAR: 11.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
NYSE:DAR' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.28  Med: 37.11 Max: 71.82
Current: 11.47
10.28
71.82
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate 12.70
NYSE:DAR's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
71% of the 131 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 0.80 vs. NYSE:DAR: 12.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
NYSE:DAR' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -31.8  Med: 4.05 Max: 27.1
Current: 12.7
-31.8
27.1
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate 7.00
NYSE:DAR's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked higher than
57% of the 112 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 5.30 vs. NYSE:DAR: 7.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
NYSE:DAR' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -59.9  Med: 1.1 Max: 96.3
Current: 7
-59.9
96.3
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate -12.00
NYSE:DAR's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked lower than
68% of the 97 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 2.40 vs. NYSE:DAR: -12.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
NYSE:DAR' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -37.7  Med: -6.9 Max: 93.9
Current: -12
-37.7
93.9
GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with Darling Ingredients Inc $NYSE:DAR.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» NYSE:DAR's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-08-11 Est.)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2016

DAR Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Jim Simons 919,800 sh (+82.86%)
Steven Cohen 1,040,900 sh (+6.04%)
Joel Greenblatt 10,666 sh (unchged)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 328,696 sh (-0.24%)
Ken Fisher 2,095,569 sh (-0.58%)
Mario Cibelli 1,040,000 sh (-5.45%)
Paul Tudor Jones 21,259 sh (-63.12%)
» More
Q3 2016

DAR Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Paul Tudor Jones 39,865 sh (+87.52%)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 336,769 sh (+2.46%)
Ken Fisher 2,107,937 sh (+0.59%)
Joel Greenblatt 10,666 sh (unchged)
Mario Cibelli 1,040,000 sh (unchged)
Steven Cohen Sold Out
Jim Simons 914,700 sh (-0.55%)
» More
Q4 2016

DAR Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Joel Greenblatt 13,692 sh (+28.37%)
Mario Cibelli 1,075,000 sh (+3.37%)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 339,417 sh (+0.79%)
Ken Fisher 2,075,252 sh (-1.55%)
Paul Tudor Jones 33,040 sh (-17.12%)
Jim Simons 306,315 sh (-66.51%)
» More
Q1 2017

DAR Guru Trades in Q1 2017

John Hussman 6,000 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 1,020,600 sh (New)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 350,717 sh (+3.33%)
Mario Cibelli 1,075,000 sh (unchged)
Joel Greenblatt Sold Out
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Ken Fisher 2,056,451 sh (-0.91%)
Jim Simons 116,891 sh (-61.84%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with DAR

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Waste Management » Waste Management    NAICS: 311613    SIC: 7389
Compare:OTCPK:TCEPY, NYSE:ADSW, NYSE:CLH, NYSE:CVA, OTCPK:TMRAY, NAS:ECOL, OTCPK:BOTRF, NAS:CWST, OTCPK:LLPP, OTCPK:CTEQF, OTCPK:CXEE, NAS:AQMS, AMEX:AXU, OTCPK:NWLTF, NAS:RELY, NAS:SMED, NAS:EEI, NAS:QRHC, NAS:PESI, OTCPK:SENR » details
Traded in other countries:43D.Germany,
Headquarter Location:USA
Darling Ingredients Inc is a developer & producer of natural ingredients from edible & inedible bio-nutrients, creating customized specialty solutions for customers in the food, pet food, pharmaceutical, feed, fuel, bioenergy & fertilizer industries.

Darling Ingredients develops and manufactures sustainable ingredients for customers in pharmaceutical, food, pet food, fuel, and fertilizer industries. It collects and transforms all aspects of animal by-product streams into ingredients, including gelatin, fats, proteins, pet food ingredients, fertilizers, and other specialty products. In addition, the company recovers and converts used cooking oil and bakery remnants into feed and fuel ingredients. Darling has three primary business segments: feed ingredients (majority of revenue), food ingredients, and fuel ingredients. It provides grease trap services for food businesses, and sells various equipment for collecting and delivering cooking oil. The company derives the majority of its sales from customers in North America.

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 25.17
DAR's PE Ratio is ranked lower than
55% of the 99 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 20.17 vs. DAR: 25.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
DAR' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.56  Med: 20.88 Max: 217.5
Current: 25.17
3.56
217.5
Forward PE Ratio 24.21
DAR's Forward PE Ratio is ranked higher than
62% of the 42 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 20.92 vs. DAR: 24.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 25.17
DAR's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked lower than
54% of the 101 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 20.51 vs. DAR: 25.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
DAR' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.56  Med: 20.88 Max: 217.5
Current: 25.17
3.56
217.5
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 10.35
DAR's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked higher than
75% of the 57 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 18.06 vs. DAR: 10.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
DAR' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.74  Med: 12.92 Max: 82.08
Current: 10.35
3.74
82.08
PB Ratio 1.33
DAR's PB Ratio is ranked higher than
64% of the 161 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.82 vs. DAR: 1.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
DAR' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.72  Med: 2.03 Max: 5.91
Current: 1.33
0.72
5.91
PS Ratio 0.76
DAR's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
70% of the 165 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.32 vs. DAR: 0.76 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
DAR' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.34  Med: 1.05 Max: 1.87
Current: 0.76
0.34
1.87
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 14.18
DAR's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
51% of the 55 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 16.30 vs. DAR: 14.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
DAR' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.47  Med: 14.49 Max: 109.55
Current: 14.18
4.47
109.55
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 6.05
DAR's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
70% of the 77 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 9.20 vs. DAR: 6.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
DAR' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.19  Med: 8.73 Max: 22.82
Current: 6.05
3.19
22.82
EV-to-EBIT 19.94
DAR's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
53% of the 165 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 19.25 vs. DAR: 19.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
DAR' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.1  Med: 13.3 Max: 67
Current: 19.94
2.1
67
EV-to-EBITDA 8.60
DAR's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
74% of the 174 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 11.92 vs. DAR: 8.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
DAR' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.8  Med: 8.4 Max: 21
Current: 8.6
1.8
21
Shiller PE Ratio 21.05
DAR's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked higher than
72% of the 25 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 30.26 vs. DAR: 21.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
DAR' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 11.71  Med: 30.16 Max: 290.67
Current: 21.05
11.71
290.67
Current Ratio 2.05
DAR's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
70% of the 172 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.33 vs. DAR: 2.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
DAR' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.25  Med: 1.4 Max: 6.38
Current: 2.05
0.25
6.38
Quick Ratio 1.30
DAR's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
54% of the 172 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.17 vs. DAR: 1.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
DAR' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.19  Med: 1.11 Max: 6.01
Current: 1.3
0.19
6.01
Days Inventory 47.26
DAR's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
68% of the 136 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 29.89 vs. DAR: 47.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
DAR' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 13.26  Med: 18 Max: 51.31
Current: 47.26
13.26
51.31
Days Sales Outstanding 40.67
DAR's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
75% of the 123 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 65.06 vs. DAR: 40.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
DAR' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 18.27  Med: 30.71 Max: 44.03
Current: 40.67
18.27
44.03
Days Payable 24.24
DAR's Days Payable is ranked lower than
70% of the 107 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 44.42 vs. DAR: 24.24 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
DAR' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.64  Med: 18.09 Max: 48.14
Current: 24.24
9.64
48.14

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -0.10
DAR's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
82% of the 105 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: -7.30 vs. DAR: -0.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
DAR' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -60.1  Med: -8.3 Max: 0
Current: -0.1
-60.1
0

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 38.82
DAR's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
97% of the 143 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 2.05 vs. DAR: 38.82 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
DAR' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.42  Med: 7.21 Max: 60.33
Current: 38.82
1.42
60.33
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 0.90
DAR's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked higher than
77% of the 57 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.17 vs. DAR: 0.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
DAR' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.09  Med: 1.04 Max: 2.68
Current: 0.9
0.09
2.68
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.72
DAR's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
80% of the 125 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 0.99 vs. DAR: 0.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
DAR' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.02  Med: 0.63 Max: 1.69
Current: 0.72
0.02
1.69
Price-to-Graham-Number 6.60
DAR's Price-to-Graham-Number is ranked lower than
97% of the 78 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.38 vs. DAR: 6.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Graham-Number only.
DAR' s Price-to-Graham-Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.89  Med: 2.19 Max: 8.91
Current: 6.6
0.89
8.91
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 5.02
DAR's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
68% of the 241 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 3.06 vs. DAR: 5.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
DAR' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.5  Med: 7.5 Max: 47.6
Current: 5.02
1.5
47.6
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % 8.32
DAR's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked higher than
56% of the 66 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 5.18 vs. DAR: 8.32 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
DAR' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -22.8  Med: 26.3 Max: 33.9
Current: 8.32
-22.8
33.9

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $3,499
EPS (TTM) $ 0.64
Beta1.62
Short Percentage of Float2.49%
52-Week Range $11.51 - 16.61
Shares Outstanding (Mil)164.65

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18
Revenue (Mil $) 3,513 3,653
EPS ($) 0.67 0.82
EPS without NRI ($) 0.67 0.82
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
N/A
Dividends per Share ($)
» More Articles for DAR

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Darling Ingredients to Participate in June Investor Conferences in New York May 24 2017 
Intrexon and Darling to Build Commercial-scale Production of Insect-Based Advanced Feed Ingredients May 10 2017 
Darling Ingredients to Participate in May Investor Conferences in New York May 08 2017 
Darling Ingredients Inc. Announces First Quarter 2017 Earnings Conference Call And Webcast Apr 12 2017 
8 of the Worst Stocks in Gurus' Portfolios Feb 20 2017 
Private Capital Sells Stake in Cisco Systems Jun 30 2015 
Mario Cibelli Adds to Stakes in SeaWorld, Fidelity National Financial Jun 09 2015 
Weekly 3-Year Low Highlights: ABI, YOKU, DAR, BPT, EFC Mar 23 2015 
Mario Cibelli Adds to Largest Stakes in His Portfolio Mar 21 2015 
Canaccord Genuity Weighs in on 4 Bio-resource Stocks Mar 05 2015 

More From Other Websites
Darling Ingredients to Participate in June Investor Conferences in New York May 24 2017
Darling Ingredients Massive Cup and Handle Breakout Underway May 23 2017
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Levi & Korsinsky, LLP Reminds Shareholders of an Investigation Involving Possible... May 18 2017
Edited Transcript of DAR earnings conference call or presentation 12-May-17 12:30pm GMT May 18 2017
Intrexon's First-Quarter 2017 Revenue Lacks Diversification, but Help Is On the Way May 12 2017
Darling Ingredients Stirs Up a Strong Quarter May 12 2017
Darling misses 1Q profit forecasts May 11 2017
Darling Ingredients Inc. Reports First Quarter 2017 Financial Results: May 11 2017
Food Stocks' Q1 Earnings Releases on May 11: BRFS, DAR & AGRO May 10 2017
Intrexon and Darling to Build Commercial-scale Production of Insect-Based Advanced Feed Ingredients May 10 2017
Tyson Foods (TSN) Lags Q2 Earnings, Sales on Lower Volumes May 08 2017
Darling Ingredients to Participate in May Investor Conferences in New York May 08 2017
Darling Ingredients Inc. Announces First Quarter 2017 Earnings Conference Call And Webcast Apr 12 2017
ETFs with exposure to Darling Ingredients, Inc. : April 12, 2017 Apr 12 2017
Zacks.com featured highlights: ArcelorMittal, American Equity Investment Life Holding, Darling... Apr 04 2017
INVESTOR ALERT: Levi & Korsinsky, LLP Reminds Shareholders of an Investigation Involving Possible... Mar 29 2017
Kraft Heinz Introduces Oven Baked Macaroni & Cheese Item Mar 29 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)