Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany, Mexico

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.06
NYSE:DO's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
80% of the 69 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.38 vs. NYSE:DO: 0.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
NYSE:DO' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.03  Med: 0.74 Max: No Debt
Current: 0.06
Equity-to-Asset 0.60
NYSE:DO's Equity-to-Asset is ranked higher than
61% of the 61 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.58 vs. NYSE:DO: 0.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
NYSE:DO' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.26  Med: 0.6 Max: 0.8
Current: 0.6
0.26
0.8
Piotroski F-Score: 3
Altman Z-Score: 0.85
Beneish M-Score: -3.18
WACC vs ROIC
5.66%
-5.76%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % -27.77
NYSE:DO's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
70% of the 63 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -3.07 vs. NYSE:DO: -27.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
NYSE:DO' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -27.77  Med: 35.01 Max: 53.9
Current: -27.77
-27.77
53.9
Net Margin % -29.01
NYSE:DO's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
69% of the 64 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -14.82 vs. NYSE:DO: -29.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
NYSE:DO' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -29.01  Med: 26.44 Max: 37.9
Current: -29.01
-29.01
37.9
ROE % -11.50
NYSE:DO's ROE % is ranked lower than
65% of the 65 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -6.13 vs. NYSE:DO: -11.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
NYSE:DO' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -11.5  Med: 19.83 Max: 42.01
Current: -11.5
-11.5
42.01
ROA % -6.71
NYSE:DO's ROA % is ranked lower than
55% of the 71 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -3.81 vs. NYSE:DO: -6.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
NYSE:DO' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -6.71  Med: 12.11 Max: 28.2
Current: -6.71
-6.71
28.2
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % -7.28
NYSE:DO's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
58% of the 69 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -3.66 vs. NYSE:DO: -7.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
NYSE:DO' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -7.28  Med: 22.89 Max: 54.21
Current: -7.28
-7.28
54.21
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -17.80
NYSE:DO's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
62% of the 60 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -23.80 vs. NYSE:DO: -17.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
NYSE:DO' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -17.8  Med: -1.7 Max: 69.3
Current: -17.8
-17.8
69.3
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate -85.70
NYSE:DO's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
98% of the 54 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -15.40 vs. NYSE:DO: -85.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
NYSE:DO' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -85.7  Med: -8.3 Max: 146.7
Current: -85.7
-85.7
146.7
GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Signs with Diamond Offshore Drilling Inc $NYSE:DO.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» NYSE:DO's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-08-01 Est.)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - Drilling » Oil & Gas Drilling    NAICS: 213111    SIC: 1381
Compare:NYSE:RDC, NYSE:ESV, OTCPK:CESDF, NYSE:NE, NYSE:UNT, OTCPK:ESVIF, NYSE:ATW, NYSE:NBR, NYSE:SBR, OTCPK:TDGCF, OTCPK:GFKSY, NYSE:SDLP, NYSE:SDRL, OTCPK:SVGYF, OTCPK:ARHVF, NYSE:PES, NYSE:ICD, OTCPK:AWLCF, OTCPK:FOEAY, NYSE:NADL » details
Traded in other countries:DO1.Germany, DO.Mexico,
Headquarter Location:USA
Diamond Offshore Drilling Inc is an offshore oil and gas drilling contractor. Its fleet offers a range of services in various markets, including the deep water, harsh environment, conventional semi submersible and jack-up markets.

Diamond Offshore is an offshore contract driller with active oil and gas rigs drilling around the world. The company was a wholly owned subsidiary of Loews until 1995, when the parent company publicly offered a portion of the contract driller.

Top Ranked Articles about Diamond Offshore Drilling Inc

Loews Corporation Completes Acquisition of Consolidated Container Company
Offshore Drilling: Not Dead, but Not the Same The industry may never return to its heyday
The offshore drilling sector has been in steady decline since the oil price crash began in 2014. Read more...
Loews Corporation Announces Quarterly Dividend On Common Stock
Loews Corporation Reports Net Income Of $295 Million For The First Quarter Of 2017
Loews Corporation to Release First Quarter 2017 Results on May 1
Diamond Offshore to Release First Quarter 2017 Results on May 1
Loews Corporation Agrees to Acquire Consolidated Container Company
Grantham's Investments of the Last 2 Quarters Stocks the guru bought in both the 3rd and 4th quarters
Jeremy Grantham (Trades, Portfolio) is the chairman of the board of Grantham Mayo Van Otterloo, a Boston-based asset management firm. The guru manages a portfolio composed of 499 stocks with a total value of $18.552 billion. In the third and fourth quarters of 2016 the guru bought shares in the following stocks: Read more...
Great Lakes Announces Changes to Board of Directors

OAK BROOK, Ill., Jan. 26, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (the “Company” or “Great Lakes”) (NASDAQ:GLDD), the largest provider of dredging services in the United States and a major provider of environmental and remediation services, today announced that Lawrence R. Dickerson and D. Michael Steuert have been appointed to the Board of Director’s 2019 director class, effective January 24, 2017. Mr. Dickerson has been appointed to the Compensation Committee, and Mr. Steuert has been appointed to the Audit Committee.  With the addition of Messrs. Dickerson and Steuert, the Board will expand to nine members.  The Board is expected to be reduced to eight members as of the 2017 Annual Meeting. 
The Company also announced today that current Board Member Peter Deutsch has elected to withdraw his name from consideration for the 2017 slate of nominees.  Mr. Deutsch is a Member of the Audit Committee and a Member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Mr. Dickerson spent 34 years at Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. (NYSE:NYSE:DO), a deepwater oil  and gas drilling contractor, where he served as President and Chief Executive Officer from 2008 until his retirement in 2014.  Prior to his service as President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Dickerson served as Chief Financial Officer (CFO), during which he helped take the company public, and Chief Operating Officer, during which he gained substantial operating and commercial experience.  In addition to being a seasoned executive, Mr. Dickerson has significant board experience.  He has been a Member of the Board of Directors on the boards of Murphy Oil Corporation (MUR), a gas exploration and production company, and Oil States International (NYSE:NYSE:OIS), an oilfield equipment services company, since 2014.  Mr. Dickerson is on the Audit and Nominating and Governance Committees at Murphy Oil Corporation and on the Audit Committee at Oil States International.  He was Chairman of the Board of Directors at Hercules Offshore, Inc. from 2015 to 2016, an offshore drilling company, and he was a director of on the Board of Directors Global Industries, Ltd. from 2008 - 2012, a subsea construction company that was sold to Technip in 2011.  Mr. Steuert served as senior vice president (SVP) and CFO of Fluor Corporation (NYSE:NYSE:FLR), one of the world’s largest publicly traded engineering, procurement, construction, maintenance, and project management companies, from 2001 until his retirement in 2012.  Prior to his service at Fluor, Mr. Steuert served as SVP and CFO of Litton Industries Inc., a defense contractor acquired by Northrop Grumman Corporation in 2001, and as SVP and CFO of GenCorp Inc., now Aerojet Rocketdyne, a technology-based aerospace and defense company, from 1990 to 1999.  Mr. Steuert started his career at TRW Inc. In addition to his extensive executive leadership experience, Mr. Steuert has substantial board experience.  He has been a Member of the Board of Directors of LNG Ltd. (ASX:LNG) since 2015 and is a member of the Board’s Audit Committee and Chairman of its Risk Committee.  He has been a Member of the Board of Directors of Weyerhaeuser Co. (NYSE:NYSE:WY) since 2004 and is Chairman and Financial expert of the Audit Committee and is a member of the Corporate Responsibility and Governance Committee. Robert B. Uhler, P.E., Chairman of the Board, commented, “Larry and Mike bring a wealth of relevant valuable experience to the GLDD Board.  I am confident each will contribute to the GLDD Board and to management’s goal of delivering long-term shareholder value for the Company.  On behalf of the Board, I welcome both of them and look forward to working with them.” Mr. Uhler continued, “These appointments follow our previous announcements that Lasse Petterson and Ryan Levenson joined the Great Lakes Board in late December. The addition of these new directors reflects our commitment to Board refreshment and further strengthens our Board of Directors.  Finally, on behalf of the Board, I’d like to extend our sincere gratitude to Mr. Deutsch for his service and commitment to the Board over the past several years.” The Company Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (“Great Lakes” or the “Company”) is the largest provider of dredging services in the United States and the only U.S. dredging company with significant international operations. The Company is also a significant provider of environmental and remediation services on land and water.  The Company employs civil, ocean and mechanical engineering staff in its estimating, production and project management functions.  In its over 126-year history, the Company has never failed to complete a marine project. Great Lakes has a disciplined training program for engineers that ensures experienced-based performance as they advance through Company operations. Great Lakes also owns and operates the largest and most diverse fleet in the U.S. dredging industry, comprised of over 200 specialized vessels. Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements in this press release may constitute "forward-looking" statements as defined in Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the "PSLRA") or in releases made by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), all as may be amended from time to time. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Great Lakes and its subsidiaries, or industry results, to differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Statements that are not historical fact are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements can be identified by, among other things, the use of forward-looking language, such as the words "plan," "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "intend," "estimate," "project," "may," "would," "could," "should," "seeks," or "scheduled to," or other similar words, or the negative of these terms or other variations of these terms or comparable language, or by discussion of strategy or intentions. These cautionary statements are being made pursuant to the Exchange Act and the PSLRA with the intention of obtaining the benefits of the "safe harbor" provisions of such laws. Great Lakes cautions investors that any forward-looking statements made by Great Lakes are not guarantees or indicative of future performance. Important assumptions and other important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those forward-looking statements with respect to Great Lakes, include, but are not limited to: our ability to obtain federal government dredging and other contracts; our ability to qualify as an eligible bidder under government contract criteria and to compete successfully against other qualified bidders; risks associated with cost over-runs, operating cost inflation and potential claims for liquidated damages, particularly with respect to our fixed cost contracts; the timing of our performance on contracts; significant liabilities that could be imposed were we to fail to comply with government contracting regulations; risks related to international dredging operations, including instability in the Middle East; a significant negative change to large, single customer contracts from which a significant portion of our international revenue is derived; changes in previously-recorded revenue and profit due to our use of the percentage-of-completion method of accounting; consequences of any lapse in disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting; changes in the amount of our estimated backlog; our ability to obtain bonding or letters of credit; increasing costs to operate and maintain aging vessels; equipment or mechanical failures; acquisition integration and consolidation risks; liabilities related to our historical demolition business; impacts of legal and regulatory proceedings; unforeseen delays and cost overruns related to the construction of new vessels; our becoming liable for the obligations of joint ventures, partners and subcontractors; capital and operational costs due to environmental regulations; unionized labor force work stoppages; maintaining an adequate level of insurance coverage; information technology security breaches; our substantial amount of indebtedness; restrictions imposed by financing covenants; the impact of adverse capital and credit market conditions; limitations on our hedging strategy imposed by new statutory and regulatory requirements for derivative transactions; foreign exchange risks; changes in macroeconomic indicators and the overall business climate; and losses attributable to our investments in privately financed projects. For additional information on these and other risks and uncertainties, please see Item 1A. "Risk Factors" of Great Lakes' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, and in other securities filings by Great Lakes with the SEC. Although Great Lakes believes that its plans, intentions and expectations reflected in or suggested by such forward-looking statements are reasonable, actual results could differ materially from a projection or assumption in any forward-looking statements. Great Lakes' future financial condition and results of operations, as well as any forward-looking statements, are subject to change and inherent risks and uncertainties. The forward-looking statements contained in this press release are made only as of the date hereof and Great Lakes does not have or undertake any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, subsequent events or otherwise, unless otherwise required by law. Source: Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation GLDD CORP
For further information contact:
Mary Morrissey, Investor Relations
630-574-3467

Read more...
Offshore Drillers: Beware the Value Trap Offshore drillers may appear to be undervalued, but the industry is in turmoil
Times are hard for value investors. The bull market that has been in place since the financial crisis is the second longest-running bull market in history and such an extended period of rising asset prices has made it tough to find any value investments. There are still sectors that offer value, but they are not the most attractive. The offshore drilling sector is one such example. Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
Forward PE Ratio 14.99
DO's Forward PE Ratio is ranked lower than
75% of the 12 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 9.56 vs. DO: 14.99 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PB Ratio 0.38
DO's PB Ratio is ranked higher than
68% of the 60 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.56 vs. DO: 0.38 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
DO' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.37  Med: 2.11 Max: 6.91
Current: 0.38
0.37
6.91
PS Ratio 0.94
DO's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
53% of the 62 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.84 vs. DO: 0.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
DO' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.94  Med: 2.84 Max: 7.74
Current: 0.94
0.94
7.74
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 2.82
DO's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
52% of the 42 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. DO: 2.82 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
DO' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.76  Med: 7.04 Max: 22.15
Current: 2.82
2.76
22.15
Shiller PE Ratio 2.05
DO's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked higher than
81% of the 16 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 5.78 vs. DO: 2.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
DO' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.04  Med: 13.22 Max: 69.79
Current: 2.05
2.04
69.79
Current Ratio 2.56
DO's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
61% of the 71 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 1.97 vs. DO: 2.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
DO' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.8  Med: 4.23 Max: 11.34
Current: 2.56
0.8
11.34
Quick Ratio 2.56
DO's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
68% of the 71 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 1.71 vs. DO: 2.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
DO' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.8  Med: 4.11 Max: 10.93
Current: 2.56
0.8
10.93
Days Sales Outstanding 66.80
DO's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
55% of the 51 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 65.65 vs. DO: 66.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
DO' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 53.84  Med: 59.05 Max: 79.51
Current: 66.8
53.84
79.51
Days Payable 15.10
DO's Days Payable is ranked lower than
91% of the 45 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 49.09 vs. DO: 15.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
DO' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 13.3  Med: 21.55 Max: 45.36
Current: 15.1
13.3
45.36

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate -100.00
DO's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked lower than
57% of the 28 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -43.30 vs. DO: -100.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
DO' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0 Max: 52.9
Current: -100
0
52.9
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 0.68
DO's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked lower than
96% of the 89 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 5.70 vs. DO: 0.68 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
DO' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.35  Med: 0.73 Max: 3.02
Current: 0.68
0.35
3.02
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio 0.50
DO's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
86% of the 51 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -2.60 vs. DO: 0.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
DO' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.6  Med: 0.4 Max: 12.1
Current: 0.5
-2.6
12.1

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 0.38
DO's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked higher than
74% of the 57 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.61 vs. DO: 0.38 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
DO' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.38  Med: 2.44 Max: 6.85
Current: 0.38
0.38
6.85
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 0.41
DO's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked higher than
62% of the 32 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.76 vs. DO: 0.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
DO' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.41  Med: 1.28 Max: 6.87
Current: 0.41
0.41
6.87
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.33
DO's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
69% of the 61 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.57 vs. DO: 0.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
DO' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.33  Med: 1.41 Max: 3.24
Current: 0.33
0.33
3.24
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % -13.28
DO's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
73% of the 70 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -2.15 vs. DO: -13.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
DO' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -19.5  Med: 9.45 Max: 25.7
Current: -13.28
-19.5
25.7
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % -19.04
DO's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
74% of the 31 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -6.43 vs. DO: -19.04 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
DO' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -22.2  Med: 18.3 Max: 80.8
Current: -19.04
-22.2
80.8

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $1,504.03
EPS (TTM) $ -3.19
Beta1.23
Short Percentage of Float43.52%
52-Week Range $10.09 - 26.49
Shares Outstanding (Mil)137.22

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18 Dec19
Revenue (Mil $) 1,500 1,430 1,085
EPS ($) 0.65 0.38 -0.50
EPS without NRI ($) 0.65 0.38 -0.50
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
2.95%
Dividends per Share ($)
» More Articles for DO

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Loews Corporation Completes Acquisition of Consolidated Container Company May 22 2017 
Offshore Drilling: Not Dead, but Not the Same May 11 2017 
Loews Corporation Announces Quarterly Dividend On Common Stock May 09 2017 
Diamond Offshore Is a Medium-Term Opportunity May 02 2017 
Loews Corporation Reports Net Income Of $295 Million For The First Quarter Of 2017 May 01 2017 
Loews Corporation to Release First Quarter 2017 Results on May 1 Apr 18 2017 
Diamond Offshore to Release First Quarter 2017 Results on May 1 Apr 18 2017 
Loews Corporation Agrees to Acquire Consolidated Container Company Apr 11 2017 
Grantham's Investments of the Last 2 Quarters Mar 29 2017 
Diamond Offshore Remains Attractive After Quarterly Results Feb 07 2017 

More From Other Websites
US Natural Gas Rig Count, Production, and Consumption Jun 26 2017
Offshore Drilling Last Week: Stock Performance and Rig Count as of June 16 Jun 21 2017
Will the US Crude Oil Rig Count Pressure Oil Prices? Jun 19 2017
The Rise and Fall of Seadrill Jun 12 2017
Oil Prices Sink on Shock U.S. Crude Inventory Build Jun 08 2017
Oil Services Stocks Set New Post-Election Lows Even As Nymex Crude Oil Attempts To Bottom Jun 06 2017
Noble Received 2 Upgrades in May Jun 01 2017
Diamond Offshore (DO) Down 14.4% Since Earnings Report: Can It Rebound? Jun 01 2017
ETFs with exposure to Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. : May 31, 2017 May 31 2017
Seadrill Stock: Worst Performer among Its Peers in May May 31 2017
Atwood-Ensco Deal Could Lead To More Oilfield Services M&A May 30 2017
US Crude Oil Rig Count: Spoilsport for Crude Oil Prices in 2017? May 30 2017
Will the US Natural Gas Rig Count Hit a New High in 2017? May 29 2017
Transocean: Not Out of the Woods? May 26 2017
So Goldman Sachs Just Upgraded This Offshore Driller… May 23 2017
Loews Corporation Completes Acquisition of Consolidated Container Company May 22 2017
US Crude Oil Rigs Reach the Highest Level since April 2015 May 22 2017
Loews Corporation CEO James S. Tisch to Speak at the Bernstein Strategic Decisions Conference May 18 2017
How Drilling Productivity Report Could Impact Production and Prices May 15 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}