Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.01
NYSE:ETP's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
79% of the 99 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 0.06 vs. NYSE:ETP: 0.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
NYSE:ETP' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.01  Med: 0.02 Max: N/A
Current: 0.01
Equity-to-Asset 0.50
NYSE:ETP's Equity-to-Asset is ranked higher than
65% of the 109 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 0.42 vs. NYSE:ETP: 0.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
NYSE:ETP' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.06  Med: 0.3 Max: 0.5
Current: 0.5
0.06
0.5
Interest Coverage 1.76
NYSE:ETP's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
80% of the 106 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 4.23 vs. NYSE:ETP: 1.76 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
NYSE:ETP' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.37  Med: 2.61 Max: 4.73
Current: 1.76
1.37
4.73
Piotroski F-Score: 6
Altman Z-Score: 2.98
Beneish M-Score: -3.35
WACC vs ROIC
7.93%
4.76%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 8.66
NYSE:ETP's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
68% of the 110 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 19.67 vs. NYSE:ETP: 8.66 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
NYSE:ETP' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.35  Med: 10.45 Max: 20.81
Current: 8.66
3.35
20.81
Net Margin % 2.71
NYSE:ETP's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
70% of the 110 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 8.84 vs. NYSE:ETP: 2.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
NYSE:ETP' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.94  Med: 9.58 Max: 14.61
Current: 2.71
0.94
14.61
ROE % -2.63
NYSE:ETP's ROE % is ranked lower than
78% of the 111 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 7.13 vs. NYSE:ETP: -2.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
NYSE:ETP' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -5.12  Med: 5.02 Max: 28.31
Current: -2.63
-5.12
28.31
ROA % 0.99
NYSE:ETP's ROA % is ranked lower than
69% of the 115 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 3.74 vs. NYSE:ETP: 0.99 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
NYSE:ETP' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.44  Med: 5.01 Max: 10.27
Current: 0.99
0.44
10.27
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 4.42
NYSE:ETP's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
73% of the 113 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 8.60 vs. NYSE:ETP: 4.42 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
NYSE:ETP' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.73  Med: 10.83 Max: 18.73
Current: 4.42
3.73
18.73
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -32.60
NYSE:ETP's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
88% of the 84 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: -7.90 vs. NYSE:ETP: -32.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
NYSE:ETP' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -38.9  Med: 4.4 Max: 81
Current: -32.6
-38.9
81
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate -4.10
NYSE:ETP's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
68% of the 76 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 3.50 vs. NYSE:ETP: -4.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
NYSE:ETP' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -26.1  Med: 6.1 Max: 40.8
Current: -4.1
-26.1
40.8
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate 107.80
NYSE:ETP's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked higher than
95% of the 64 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 7.90 vs. NYSE:ETP: 107.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
NYSE:ETP' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 11.5 Max: 129.2
Current: 107.8
0
129.2
GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with Energy Transfer Partners LP $NYSE:ETP.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» NYSE:ETP's 30-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - Midstream » Oil & Gas Midstream    NAICS: 453998    SIC: 4922
Compare:NYSE:SE, NYSE:WMB, NYSE:PAA, NYSE:ETE, NYSE:WPZ, NYSE:MMP, NYSE:OKS, NYSE:SEP, NYSE:PBA, NYSE:TRP, NYSE:MPLX, AMEX:LNG, NYSE:KMI, AMEX:CQP, NYSE:OKE, NYSE:SHLX, NYSE:WGP, NYSE:BPL, NYSE:TRGP, NYSE:WES » details
Traded in other countries:4ETA.Germany,
Headquarter Location:USA
Energy Transfer Partners LP is engaged in natural gas operations. Its segments are Intrastate Transportation & Storage, Interstate Transportation & Storage, Midstream, Liquids Transportation & Services, Investment in Sunoco Logistics, Retail Marketing.

Energy Transfer Partners is a diversified master limited partnership with a strong platform of crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids assets. In addition to its wholly owned assets, Energy Transfer also holds a 46% LP interest in Sunoco LP and a 65% LP interest with 100% GP interest in PennTex Midstream Partners. The partnership holds favorable positions in key hydrocarbon-producing regions throughout the U.S.

Top Ranked Articles about Energy Transfer Partners LP

Weekly Top Insider Buys Highlight for the Week of June 23 The largest Insider Buys were for Medtronic PLC, Energy Transfer Partners LP, Williams Companies and Coty
The largest Insider Buys this week were for Medtronic PLC (NYSE:MDT), Energy Transfer Partners LP (NYSE:ETP), Williams Companies Inc. (NYSE:WMB) and Coty Inc. (NYSE:COTY). Read more...
PennTex Midstream Partners to Be Removed from the Alerian Small Cap MLP Index
PennTex Midstream Announces Expiration of Energy Transfer Tender Offer
Weekly Top Insider Buys Highlight for the Week of May 26 The largest Insider Buys this week were for Coty Inc. (COTY), Energy Transfer Partners LP (ETP), Anadarko Petroleum Corp. (APC) and Parsley Energy Inc. (PE)
The largest Insider buys this week were for Coty Inc. (NYSE:COTY), Energy Transfer Partners LP (NYSE:ETP), Anadarko Petroleum Corp. (NYSE:APC) and Parsley Energy Inc. (NYSE:PE). Read more...
Energy Transfer Equity Announces Dividend Forward dividend yield is 6.11%
Energy Transfer Equity (NYSE:ETE) announced a quarterly dividend of 28.5 cents April 28 with an ex-dividend date of May 8 and a payment date of May 19. With the dividend announcement the stock has a forward dividend yield of 6.11%. Read more...
Energy Transfer Partners Expected to Be Removed from the Alerian Index Series
DEADLINE ALERT: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Reminds Investors of Class Action Against Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (ETP) & Lead Plaintiff Deadline: March 27, 2017

NEW YORK, March 23, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Attorney Advertising -- Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC reminds investors that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (“ETP” or the “Company”) (:ETP) and certain of its officers, on behalf of shareholders who purchased ETP securities. Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: http://www.bgandg.com/etp. This class action seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 regarding the proposed acquisition of ETP common units by Sunoco Logistics Partners (“SXL”), through its wholly owned subsidiary SXL Acquisition Sub LP. On November 21, 2016, ETP and SXL mutually announced that the companies had entered a definitive merger agreement under which ETP would be acquired by SXL in a unit-for-unit transaction with each ETP common unitholder receiving 1.5 common units, representing limited partner interests in SXL, for each ETP common unit. The complaint alleges that the proposed consideration is insufficient for ETP’s true value and its growth prospects.  The complaint also alleges that the Form S-4 Registration Statement, the prospectus and proxy statement filed with the SEC provides materially incomplete and misleading information regarding ETP and the proposed merger, in violation of the Exchange Act. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint you can visit the firm’s site: http://www.bgandg.com/etp  or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Investor Relations Analyst, Yael Hurwitz of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 212-697-6484. If you suffered a loss in ETP you have until March 27, 2017 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff.  Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as a lead plaintiff.
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a corporate litigation boutique.  Our primary expertise is the aggressive pursuit of litigation claims on behalf of our clients.  In addition to representing institutions and other investor plaintiffs in class action security litigation, the firm’s expertise includes general corporate and commercial litigation, as well as securities arbitration.   Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
Contact:
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
Peretz Bronstein or Yael Hurwitz
212-697-6484 | [email protected]

Read more...
David Tepper Takes Big Risks for Big Rewards What can we learn from looking into the life and work of the top scoring guru?
SHAREHOLDER ALERT - Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Reminds Investors of Class Action Against Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (ETP) and Lead Plaintiff Deadline - March 27, 2017

NEW YORK, Feb. 16, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Attorney Advertising -- Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC reminds investors that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (“ETP” or the “Company”) (NYSE:NYSE:ETP) and certain of its officers, on behalf of shareholders who purchased ETP securities. Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: http://www.bgandg.com/etp. This class action seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 regarding the proposed acquisition of ETP common units by Sunoco Logistics Partners (“SXL”), through its wholly owned subsidiary SXL Acquisition Sub LP. On November 21, 2016, ETP and SXL mutually announced that the companies had entered a definitive merger agreement under which ETP would be acquired by SXL in a unit-for-unit transaction with each ETP common unitholder receiving 1.5 common units, representing limited partner interests in SXL, for each ETP common unit. The complaint alleges that the proposed consideration is insufficient for ETP’s true value and its growth prospects.  The complaint also alleges that the Form S-4 Registration Statement, the prospectus and proxy statement filed with the SEC provides materially incomplete and misleading information regarding ETP and the proposed merger, in violation of the Exchange Act. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint you can visit the firm’s site: http://www.bgandg.com/etp  or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Investor Relations Analyst, Yael Hurwitz of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 212-697-6484. If you suffered a loss in ETP you have until March 27, 2017 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff.  Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as a lead plaintiff.
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a corporate litigation boutique.  Our primary expertise is the aggressive pursuit of litigation claims on behalf of our clients.  In addition to representing institutions and other investor plaintiffs in class action security litigation, the firm’s expertise includes general corporate and commercial litigation, as well as securities arbitration.   Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
Contact:
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
Peretz Bronstein or Yael Hurwitz
212-697-6484 | [email protected]

Read more...
T. Boone Pickens Buys 4 New Stocks, Sells 3 Others Guru makes adjustments to his oil empire in 4th quarter
Oil tycoon T Boone Pickens (Trades, Portfolio) gained four new holdings and sold out of three others during the final quarter of 2016. Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
Forward PE Ratio 23.75
ETP's Forward PE Ratio is ranked lower than
57% of the 67 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 21.28 vs. ETP: 23.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PB Ratio 2.08
ETP's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
52% of the 109 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 1.78 vs. ETP: 2.08 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
ETP' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.64  Med: 1.75 Max: 3.3
Current: 2.08
0.64
3.3
PS Ratio 0.67
ETP's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
83% of the 109 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 2.82 vs. ETP: 0.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
ETP' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.28  Med: 0.88 Max: 1.87
Current: 0.67
0.28
1.87
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 4.63
ETP's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
88% of the 98 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 8.92 vs. ETP: 4.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
ETP' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.06  Med: 6.99 Max: 11.07
Current: 4.63
3.06
11.07
EV-to-EBIT 24.13
ETP's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
63% of the 98 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 20.78 vs. ETP: 24.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
ETP' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.7  Med: 15.2 Max: 44.5
Current: 24.13
7.7
44.5
EV-to-EBITDA 11.54
ETP's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
81% of the 104 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 14.23 vs. ETP: 11.54 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
ETP' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.3  Med: 11.2 Max: 18.2
Current: 11.54
6.3
18.2
Shiller PE Ratio 16.65
ETP's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked higher than
80% of the 46 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 23.30 vs. ETP: 16.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
ETP' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.44  Med: 20.42 Max: 44.26
Current: 16.65
10.44
44.26
Current Ratio 1.19
ETP's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
57% of the 113 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 1.11 vs. ETP: 1.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
ETP' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.16  Med: 1.03 Max: 1.81
Current: 1.19
0.16
1.81
Quick Ratio 0.80
ETP's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
62% of the 113 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 0.99 vs. ETP: 0.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
ETP' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.12  Med: 0.77 Max: 1.37
Current: 0.8
0.12
1.37
Days Inventory 33.38
ETP's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
78% of the 86 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 14.87 vs. ETP: 33.38 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
ETP' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.98  Med: 22.69 Max: 34.68
Current: 33.38
10.98
34.68
Days Sales Outstanding 32.55
ETP's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
60% of the 99 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 34.60 vs. ETP: 32.55 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
ETP' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 22.11  Med: 32.21 Max: 67.64
Current: 32.55
22.11
67.64
Days Payable 49.11
ETP's Days Payable is ranked higher than
57% of the 82 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 45.44 vs. ETP: 49.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
ETP' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 18.02  Med: 30.89 Max: 82.89
Current: 49.11
18.02
82.89

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 12.98
ETP's Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
89% of the 115 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 7.62 vs. ETP: 12.98 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
ETP' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.4  Med: 7.57 Max: 17.33
Current: 12.98
4.4
17.33
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate 5.60
ETP's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked lower than
63% of the 63 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 8.70 vs. ETP: 5.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
ETP' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 5 Max: 31.3
Current: 5.6
0
31.3
Forward Dividend Yield % 10.91
ETP's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
86% of the 112 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 8.54 vs. ETP: 10.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 15.92
ETP's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked higher than
77% of the 114 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 10.04 vs. ETP: 15.92 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
ETP' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.3  Med: 9.12 Max: 20.88
Current: 15.92
5.3
20.88
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -21.10
ETP's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked lower than
74% of the 74 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: -8.80 vs. ETP: -21.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
ETP' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -73.6  Med: -21.1 Max: -11.8
Current: -21.1
-73.6
-11.8

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 2.99
ETP's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
54% of the 97 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 2.69 vs. ETP: 2.99 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
ETP' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.56  Med: 3.45 Max: 52.94
Current: 2.99
1.56
52.94
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.77
ETP's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
86% of the 100 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 1.04 vs. ETP: 0.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
ETP' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.34  Med: 0.92 Max: 2.01
Current: 0.77
0.34
2.01
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 4.13
ETP's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
54% of the 114 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 4.50 vs. ETP: 4.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
ETP' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.2  Med: 6.6 Max: 13
Current: 4.13
2.2
13
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % -33.79
ETP's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
97% of the 61 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 0.26 vs. ETP: -33.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
ETP' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -34.5  Med: 2.4 Max: 36
Current: -33.79
-34.5
36

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $21,048.00
EPS (TTM) $ -0.33
Beta1.47
Short Percentage of Float3.54%
52-Week Range $18.31 - 29.00
Shares Outstanding (Mil)1,368.91

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18 Dec19
Revenue (Mil $) 32,209 35,719 36,867
EPS ($) 0.68 0.44 1.48
EPS without NRI ($) 0.68 0.44 1.48
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
N/A
Dividends per Share ($) 2.40 2.53 2.57
» More Articles for ETP

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Credit Suisse Income Fund Announces Monthly Dividend Jun 27 2017 
GAMCO Analyst: Is VMware a Compelling Investment Idea in Data Infrastructure? Jun 26 2017 
Gabelli TV: 2017 American Water Works Annual Conference Recap Jun 26 2017 
Monthly Dividend Stocks to Pay Your Bills Jun 26 2017 
The Rubicon Project: Who Is Selling and Why It's Creating a Bargain Price Jun 26 2017 
Sports, Stocks and the Magic Quadrants Jun 26 2017 
Israel Englander More Than Doubles Stake in Carter's Jun 27 2017 
GMO Global Equity Insights - Whiplash: On Value, Growth and Ignoring the Fundamentals Jun 26 2017 
Dan Loeb's Third Point Letter on $3.5 Billion Nestle Purchase, Plans to Sells L'Oreal Jun 26 2017 
Canaries in the Coal Mine – What to Watch as Stocks Continue to Make New Highs Jun 26 2017 

More From Other Websites
Are Institutional Investors Bullish on EEP, ETP, PAA, and GEL? Jun 29 2017
Energy Transfer, Kogas, and Shell Sign a Memorandum of Understanding to Study Joint Participation in... Jun 29 2017
Short Interest in Energy Transfer Partners, Genesis Energy Rose Jun 29 2017
ETP, EEP, PAA, and GEL: A Leverage Analysis Jun 28 2017
Enbridge Energy Partners’ Leverage: A Key Concern Jun 28 2017
Energy Transfer Equity Is Trading below Its Historical Average Jun 28 2017
Energy Transfer Partners Had $32 Billion in Debt at the End of 1Q17 Jun 28 2017
Analyzing the Yields Offered by ETP, EEP, PAA, and GEL Jun 27 2017
Energy Transfer Equity’s Price Forecast amid Market Uncertainties Jun 27 2017
Are Energy Transfer Partners’ Earnings Stable? Jun 27 2017
Do Options Traders Know Something About Energy Transfer Equity (ETE) Stock We Don't? Jun 27 2017
Why Did Energy Transfer Equity Rise 6.1% Last Week? Jun 27 2017
ETP, EEP, PAA, GEL: Analyzing Top MLPs Yielding More Than 9% Jun 27 2017
Don’t Buy Energy Transfer Partners LP (ETP) Stock for Income, Sell It! Jun 26 2017
Why ETP Is among the Worst-Performing Large-Cap MLPs Jun 26 2017
Weekly Top Insider Buys Highlight for the Week of June 23 Jun 24 2017
Avoid Energy Transfer Partners LP (ETP) Stock Until This Is Resolved Jun 23 2017
Energy Transfer's Dakota Line to Operate During Legal Row Jun 23 2017
Energy Transfer's Pipeline Spill Problem Is Causing It Another Headache Jun 22 2017
The Company Behind the Dakota Pipeline Is Spilling Toxic Fluid in Ohio Jun 22 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}