Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.01
ETP's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
80% of the 94 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 0.06 vs. ETP: 0.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
ETP' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.01  Med: 0.02 Max: N/A
Current: 0.01
Equity-to-Asset 0.35
ETP's Equity-to-Asset is ranked higher than
65% of the 104 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 0.42 vs. ETP: 0.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
ETP' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.06  Med: 0.3 Max: 0.5
Current: 0.35
0.06
0.5
Interest Coverage 1.72
ETP's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
80% of the 103 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 4.46 vs. ETP: 1.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
ETP' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.37  Med: 2.61 Max: 4.73
Current: 1.72
1.37
4.73
Piotroski F-Score: 4
Altman Z-Score: 0.66
Beneish M-Score: -2.51
WACC vs ROIC
7.91%
4.31%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 8.24
ETP's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
69% of the 105 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 19.67 vs. ETP: 8.24 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
ETP' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.35  Med: 10.45 Max: 20.81
Current: 8.24
3.35
20.81
Net Margin % 1.79
ETP's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
70% of the 105 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 10.31 vs. ETP: 1.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
ETP' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.94  Med: 9.58 Max: 14.61
Current: 1.79
0.94
14.61
ROE % -2.99
ETP's ROE % is ranked lower than
79% of the 106 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 7.22 vs. ETP: -2.99 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
ETP' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -5.12  Med: 5.02 Max: 28.31
Current: -2.99
-5.12
28.31
ROA % 0.67
ETP's ROA % is ranked lower than
68% of the 111 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 4.01 vs. ETP: 0.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
ETP' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.44  Med: 5.01 Max: 10.27
Current: 0.67
0.44
10.27
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 4.28
ETP's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
73% of the 108 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 9.39 vs. ETP: 4.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
ETP' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.73  Med: 10.83 Max: 18.73
Current: 4.28
3.73
18.73
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -32.60
ETP's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
88% of the 83 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: -7.90 vs. ETP: -32.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
ETP' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -38.9  Med: 4.4 Max: 81
Current: -32.6
-38.9
81
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate -4.10
ETP's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
69% of the 75 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 3.80 vs. ETP: -4.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
ETP' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -26.1  Med: 6.1 Max: 40.8
Current: -4.1
-26.1
40.8
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate 107.80
ETP's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked higher than
95% of the 63 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 8.40 vs. ETP: 107.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
ETP' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 11.5 Max: 129.2
Current: 107.8
0
129.2
GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Signs with Energy Transfer Partners LP $ETP.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» ETP's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-11-08 Est.)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q3 2016

ETP Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Howard Marks 217,000 sh (New)
Jim Simons 1,378,431 sh (New)
David Tepper 11,615,657 sh (+1.76%)
Leon Cooperman 1,237,713 sh (-8.61%)
Jim Simons 444,600 sh (-38.89%)
» More
Q4 2016

ETP Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Ronald Muhlenkamp 11,440 sh (New)
T Boone Pickens 108,900 sh (New)
Jim Simons 837,100 sh (+88.28%)
Howard Marks 267,000 sh (+23.04%)
David Tepper 11,961,842 sh (+2.98%)
Leon Cooperman 839,661 sh (-32.16%)
Jim Simons 567,031 sh (-58.86%)
» More
Q1 2017

ETP Guru Trades in Q1 2017

Leon Cooperman 1,373,361 sh (+63.56%)
Ronald Muhlenkamp 11,440 sh (+50.00%)
T Boone Pickens 97,662 sh (+34.52%)
Howard Marks 267,000 sh (unchged)
David Tepper 11,961,842 sh (unchged)
Jim Simons Sold Out
Jim Simons 315,200 sh (-44.41%)
» More
Q2 2017

ETP Guru Trades in Q2 2017

T Boone Pickens 409,116 sh (+179.27%)
Ronald Muhlenkamp 24,960 sh (+45.45%)
David Tepper 14,841,247 sh (+24.07%)
Howard Marks 267,000 sh (unchged)
Jim Simons Sold Out
Leon Cooperman 1,169,142 sh (-14.87%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with ETP

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

GuruDate Trades Impact to Portfolio Price Range * (?) Current Price Change from Average Current Shares
David Tepper 2017-06-30 Add 24.07%0.87%$18.46 - $24.35 $ 17.96-20%14,841,247
Leon Cooperman 2017-06-30 Reduce -14.87%0.3%$18.46 - $24.35 $ 17.96-20%1,169,142
T Boone Pickens 2017-06-30 Add 179.27%2.57%$18.46 - $24.35 $ 17.96-19%409,116
Ronald Muhlenkamp 2017-06-30 Add 45.45%0.05%$18.46 - $24.35 $ 17.96-19%24,960
Leon Cooperman 2017-03-31 Add 63.56%0.78%$23.15 - $26.71 $ 17.96-28%1,373,361
T Boone Pickens 2017-03-31 Add 34.52%0.42%$22.95 - $26.4 $ 17.96-28%146,493
Ronald Muhlenkamp 2017-03-31 Add 50.00%0.04%$22.95 - $26.4 $ 17.96-28%17,160
David Tepper 2016-12-31 Add 2.98%0.22%$33.16 - $39.37 $ 17.96-50%11,961,842
Leon Cooperman 2016-12-31 Reduce -32.16%0.45%$33.16 - $39.37 $ 17.96-50%839,661
T Boone Pickens 2016-12-31 New Buy1.22%$33.16 - $39.37 $ 17.96-50%108,900
Ronald Muhlenkamp 2016-12-31 New Buy0.13%$33.16 - $39.37 $ 17.96-50%11,440
David Tepper 2016-09-30 Add 1.76%0.17%$35.81 - $42.85 $ 17.96-54%11,615,657
Leon Cooperman 2016-09-30 Reduce -8.61%0.13%$35.81 - $42.85 $ 17.96-54%1,237,713
Premium More recent guru trades are included for Premium Members only!!
Premium More recent guru trades are included for USA Subscribe Members only!!
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - Midstream » Oil & Gas Midstream    NAICS: 453998    SIC: 4922
Compare:NYSE:WMB, NYSE:OKE, NYSE:ETE, NYSE:MMP, NYSE:OKS, NYSE:WPZ, NYSE:PAA, AMEX:CQP, NYSE:SEP, NYSE:MPLX, AMEX:LNG, NYSE:TRGP, NYSE:KMI, NYSE:WGP, NYSE:WES, NYSE:BPL, NYSE:EEP, NYSE:ENBL, NYSE:EQM, AMEX:CQH » details
Traded in other countries:4ETA.Germany,
Headquarter Location:USA
Energy Transfer Partners LP is engaged in the crude oil operations consist of an integrated set of pipeline, terminalling, and acquisition and marketing of crude oil from producers to end-user markets.

Energy Transfer Partners is a diversified master limited partnership with a strong platform of crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids assets primarily in Texas, Florida, and the U.S. midcontinent region. Following the merger with Sunoco Logistics Partners, ETP transports 15 trillion Btu per day of natural gas and 2.7 million barrels per day of crude oil through its system. ETP owns stakes in publicly traded Sunoco LP and PennTex Midstream Partners. It also will be a part owner in the Lake Charles LNG export facility.

Top Ranked Articles about Energy Transfer Partners LP

Weekly CEO Buys Highlights Insiders invest in Energy Transfer Partners, American Assets, Intrexon, Hostess and Akamai
According to GuruFocus Insider Data, these are the largest CEO buys during the past week.  Read more...
Weekly Top Insider Buys Highlight for the Week of June 30 The largest Insider Buys this week were for Energy Transfer Partners LP, The Kroger Co., Dollar Tree Inc. and Lululemon Athletica Inc.
The largest Insider Buys this week were for Energy Transfer Partners LP (NYSE:ETP), The Kroger Co. (NYSE:KR), Dollar Tree Inc. (NASDAQ:DLTR) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (NASDAQ:LULU). Read more...
Weekly Top Insider Buys Highlight for the Week of June 23 The largest Insider Buys were for Medtronic PLC, Energy Transfer Partners LP, Williams Companies and Coty
The largest Insider Buys this week were for Medtronic PLC (NYSE:MDT), Energy Transfer Partners LP (NYSE:ETP), Williams Companies Inc. (NYSE:WMB) and Coty Inc. (NYSE:COTY). Read more...
PennTex Midstream Partners to Be Removed from the Alerian Small Cap MLP Index
PennTex Midstream Announces Expiration of Energy Transfer Tender Offer
Weekly Top Insider Buys Highlight for the Week of May 26 The largest Insider Buys this week were for Coty Inc. (COTY), Energy Transfer Partners LP (ETP), Anadarko Petroleum Corp. (APC) and Parsley Energy Inc. (PE)
The largest Insider buys this week were for Coty Inc. (NYSE:COTY), Energy Transfer Partners LP (NYSE:ETP), Anadarko Petroleum Corp. (NYSE:APC) and Parsley Energy Inc. (NYSE:PE). Read more...
Energy Transfer Equity Announces Dividend Forward dividend yield is 6.11%
Energy Transfer Equity (NYSE:ETE) announced a quarterly dividend of 28.5 cents April 28 with an ex-dividend date of May 8 and a payment date of May 19. With the dividend announcement the stock has a forward dividend yield of 6.11%. Read more...
Energy Transfer Partners Expected to Be Removed from the Alerian Index Series
DEADLINE ALERT: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Reminds Investors of Class Action Against Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (ETP) & Lead Plaintiff Deadline: March 27, 2017

NEW YORK, March 23, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Attorney Advertising -- Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC reminds investors that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (“ETP” or the “Company”) (:ETP) and certain of its officers, on behalf of shareholders who purchased ETP securities. Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: http://www.bgandg.com/etp. This class action seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 regarding the proposed acquisition of ETP common units by Sunoco Logistics Partners (“SXL”), through its wholly owned subsidiary SXL Acquisition Sub LP. On November 21, 2016, ETP and SXL mutually announced that the companies had entered a definitive merger agreement under which ETP would be acquired by SXL in a unit-for-unit transaction with each ETP common unitholder receiving 1.5 common units, representing limited partner interests in SXL, for each ETP common unit. The complaint alleges that the proposed consideration is insufficient for ETP’s true value and its growth prospects.  The complaint also alleges that the Form S-4 Registration Statement, the prospectus and proxy statement filed with the SEC provides materially incomplete and misleading information regarding ETP and the proposed merger, in violation of the Exchange Act. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint you can visit the firm’s site: http://www.bgandg.com/etp  or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Investor Relations Analyst, Yael Hurwitz of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 212-697-6484. If you suffered a loss in ETP you have until March 27, 2017 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff.  Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as a lead plaintiff.
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a corporate litigation boutique.  Our primary expertise is the aggressive pursuit of litigation claims on behalf of our clients.  In addition to representing institutions and other investor plaintiffs in class action security litigation, the firm’s expertise includes general corporate and commercial litigation, as well as securities arbitration.   Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
Contact:
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
Peretz Bronstein or Yael Hurwitz
212-697-6484 | [email protected]

Read more...
David Tepper Takes Big Risks for Big Rewards What can we learn from looking into the life and work of the top scoring guru?

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
Forward PE Ratio 30.30
ETP's Forward PE Ratio is ranked lower than
62% of the 66 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 21.01 vs. ETP: 30.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PB Ratio 0.95
ETP's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
55% of the 105 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 1.81 vs. ETP: 0.95 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
ETP' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.64  Med: 1.73 Max: 3.3
Current: 0.95
0.64
3.3
PS Ratio 0.62
ETP's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
84% of the 104 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 2.85 vs. ETP: 0.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
ETP' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.28  Med: 0.79 Max: 1.87
Current: 0.62
0.28
1.87
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 4.31
ETP's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
88% of the 93 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 8.96 vs. ETP: 4.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
ETP' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.06  Med: 7 Max: 11.07
Current: 4.31
3.06
11.07
EV-to-EBIT 33.40
ETP's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
64% of the 95 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 20.97 vs. ETP: 33.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
ETP' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.7  Med: 15.4 Max: 33.61
Current: 33.4
7.7
33.61
EV-to-EBITDA 15.51
ETP's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
80% of the 100 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 14.22 vs. ETP: 15.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
ETP' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.3  Med: 11.2 Max: 16.1
Current: 15.51
6.3
16.1
Shiller PE Ratio 15.45
ETP's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked higher than
78% of the 45 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 23.85 vs. ETP: 15.45 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
ETP' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.44  Med: 20.39 Max: 44.26
Current: 15.45
10.44
44.26
Current Ratio 0.77
ETP's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
55% of the 108 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 1.14 vs. ETP: 0.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
ETP' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.16  Med: 1.03 Max: 1.81
Current: 0.77
0.16
1.81
Quick Ratio 0.55
ETP's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
64% of the 108 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 0.99 vs. ETP: 0.55 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
ETP' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.12  Med: 0.76 Max: 1.37
Current: 0.55
0.12
1.37
Days Inventory 32.67
ETP's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
78% of the 83 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 14.87 vs. ETP: 32.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
ETP' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.98  Med: 22.69 Max: 34.68
Current: 32.67
10.98
34.68
Days Sales Outstanding 47.62
ETP's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
59% of the 94 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 34.60 vs. ETP: 47.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
ETP' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 22.11  Med: 32.21 Max: 67.64
Current: 47.62
22.11
67.64
Days Payable 65.53
ETP's Days Payable is ranked higher than
57% of the 79 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 45.57 vs. ETP: 65.53 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
ETP' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 18.02  Med: 30.89 Max: 82.89
Current: 65.53
18.02
82.89

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 13.88
ETP's Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
90% of the 155 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 6.35 vs. ETP: 13.88 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
ETP' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.4  Med: 7.6 Max: 17.33
Current: 13.88
4.4
17.33
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate 5.60
ETP's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked lower than
63% of the 62 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 8.40 vs. ETP: 5.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
ETP' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 5 Max: 31.3
Current: 5.6
0
31.3
Forward Dividend Yield % 12.05
ETP's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
90% of the 157 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 4.19 vs. ETP: 12.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 16.73
ETP's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked higher than
85% of the 157 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 9.25 vs. ETP: 16.73 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
ETP' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.3  Med: 9.16 Max: 20.88
Current: 16.73
5.3
20.88
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -21.10
ETP's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked lower than
74% of the 73 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: -8.80 vs. ETP: -21.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
ETP' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -73.6  Med: -21.1 Max: -11.8
Current: -21.1
-73.6
-11.8

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 1.52
ETP's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
55% of the 94 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 2.78 vs. ETP: 1.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
ETP' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.51  Med: 3.39 Max: 52.94
Current: 1.52
1.51
52.94
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.77
ETP's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
84% of the 97 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 1.04 vs. ETP: 0.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
ETP' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.38  Med: 0.94 Max: 2.24
Current: 0.77
0.38
2.24
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 3.00
ETP's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
56% of the 109 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 4.47 vs. ETP: 3.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
ETP' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.98  Med: 6.5 Max: 13
Current: 3
2.98
13
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % -32.98
ETP's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
97% of the 60 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 0.32 vs. ETP: -32.98 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
ETP' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -33  Med: 2.35 Max: 36
Current: -32.98
-33
36

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $22,335.00
EPS (TTM) $ -0.43
Beta1.48
Short Percentage of Float3.17%
52-Week Range $17.85 - 27.68
Shares Outstanding (Mil)1,383.52

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18 Dec19
Revenue (Mil $) 31,672 37,037 38,959
EPS ($) 0.57 0.40 1.24
EPS without NRI ($) 0.57 0.40 1.24
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
N/A
Dividends per Share ($) 2.21 2.43 2.58
» More Articles for ETP

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Weekly Top Insider Buys Highlight for the Week of June 30 Jul 02 2017 
Weekly Top Insider Buys Highlight for the Week of June 23 Jun 24 2017 
PennTex Midstream Partners to Be Removed from the Alerian Small Cap MLP Index Jun 20 2017 
PennTex Midstream Announces Expiration of Energy Transfer Tender Offer Jun 20 2017 
Sunoco: Business Is Transforming, yet Risks Remain Jun 16 2017 
Undervalued MLP With a 7% Yield Jun 13 2017 
Weekly Top Insider Buys Highlight for the Week of May 26 May 27 2017 
Energy Transfer Partners Grows Revenue by Nearly 54% May 18 2017 
Energy Transfer Equity Announces Dividend May 01 2017 
Energy Transfer Partners Expected to Be Removed from the Alerian Index Series Apr 25 2017 

More From Other Websites
Weekly CEO Buys Highlights Aug 21 2017
Why ETP’s Rover Pipeline Could Be Operational Soon Aug 21 2017
3 Great Stocks You Can Buy on Sale Aug 19 2017
Behind the Opposition to ETP’s Dakota Access Pipeline Aug 18 2017
Controversy in the Pipelines of KMI, ETP, TRP, ENB Aug 18 2017
Why Increasing Takeaway Capacity Could Benefit Permian Producers Aug 18 2017
What Analysts Recommend for ETE Aug 17 2017
BofA Merrill Lynch Added Position in ETE during Q2 Aug 17 2017
Implied Volatility Surging for Energy Transfer (ETP) Stock Options Aug 17 2017
What Does Energy Transfer Equity’s Current Valuation Indicate? Aug 17 2017
Do Energy Transfer Equity’s Technical Indicators Hint at a Price Rise? Aug 16 2017
How Market Reacted to Energy Transfer Partners’ Secondary Offering Aug 16 2017
What Do Permian Changes Mean For Pipelines? Aug 16 2017
Energy Transfer Thanks You For Your Generosity Aug 16 2017
Can Energy Transfer Partners Gain Upward Momentum after 2Q17? Aug 16 2017
Energy Transfer Partners LP – Value Analysis (NYSE:ETP) : August 15, 2017 Aug 15 2017
MLP Earnings Wrap-Up for the Week Ended August 11 Aug 15 2017
Dakota Access developer granted hearing delay in dispute Aug 15 2017
The Latest: North Dakota gets $10M for Dakota Access costs Aug 15 2017
The Zacks Analyst Blog Highlights: United Technologies, NVIDIA, Raytheon, Simon Property and Energy... Aug 15 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}