Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.04
FANG's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
86% of the 468 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.65 vs. FANG: 0.04 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
FANG' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.01  Med: 0.09 Max: N/A
Current: 0.04
Equity-to-Asset 0.73
FANG's Equity-to-Asset is ranked higher than
73% of the 425 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.52 vs. FANG: 0.73 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
FANG' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.41  Med: 0.61 Max: 0.79
Current: 0.73
0.41
0.79
Interest Coverage 1.82
FANG's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
84% of the 237 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 24.79 vs. FANG: 1.82 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
FANG' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.82  Med: 8.88 Max: 121.64
Current: 1.82
1.82
121.64
Piotroski F-Score: 6
Altman Z-Score: 3.07
Beneish M-Score: -2.12
WACC vs ROIC
4.36%
2.09%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 11.17
FANG's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
76% of the 436 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -23.06 vs. FANG: 11.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
FANG' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -165.71  Med: 26.89 Max: 45.77
Current: 11.17
-165.71
45.77
Net Margin % 0.62
FANG's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
68% of the 434 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -29.08 vs. FANG: 0.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
FANG' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -123.26  Med: -11.03 Max: 39.09
Current: 0.62
-123.26
39.09
ROE % 0.14
FANG's ROE % is ranked higher than
70% of the 425 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -8.78 vs. FANG: 0.14 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
FANG' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -30.36  Med: -1.77 Max: 14.92
Current: 0.14
-30.36
14.92
ROA % 0.10
FANG's ROA % is ranked higher than
73% of the 511 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -7.02 vs. FANG: 0.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
FANG' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -18.84  Med: -1.44 Max: 8.39
Current: 0.1
-18.84
8.39
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 0.53
FANG's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
70% of the 483 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -8.12 vs. FANG: 0.53 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
FANG' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -26.31  Med: 3.54 Max: 15.87
Current: 0.53
-26.31
15.87
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate 12.60
FANG's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
89% of the 374 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -21.40 vs. FANG: 12.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
FANG' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 12.6 Max: 62.1
Current: 12.6
0
62.1
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate -42.80
FANG's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
76% of the 308 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -21.00 vs. FANG: -42.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
FANG' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: -21.4 Max: 127.5
Current: -42.8
0
127.5
GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Signs with Diamondback Energy Inc $FANG.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» FANG's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-08-02 Est.)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - E&P » Oil & Gas E&P    NAICS: 211111    SIC: 1311
Compare:NYSE:PE, NYSE:XEC, NYSE:ECA, OTCPK:OISHF, NYSE:EQT, NYSE:MRO, OTCPK:PTXLF, NYSE:AR, OTCPK:LNDNF, NYSE:COG, OTCPK:SVRGF, NYSE:CLR, NYSE:RRC, NYSE:NFX, OTCPK:TRMLF, NYSE:RICE, NYSE:NBL, OTCPK:PREKF, NYSE:NFG, OTCPK:DETNF » details
Traded in other countries:7DB.Germany,
Headquarter Location:USA
Diamondback Energy Inc is an independent oil and gas producer in the United States. The company operates exclusively in the Permian (Midland) Basin.

Diamondback Energy is an independent oil and gas producer in the United States. The company operates exclusively in the Permian (Midland) Basin. At the end of 2016, the company reported net proven reserves of 205 million barrels of oil equivalent. Net production averaged about 43,000 barrels per day in 2016, at a ratio of 73% oil, 15% natural gas liquids, and 11% natural gas.

Top Ranked Articles about Diamondback Energy Inc

Viper Energy Partners LP, a Subsidiary of Diamondback Energy, Inc., Reports First Quarter 2017 Financial and Operating Results
Diamondback Energy, Inc. Schedules First Quarter 2017 Conference Call for May 3, 2017
Viper Energy Partners LP, a Subsidiary of Diamondback Energy, Inc., Schedules First Quarter 2017 Conference Call for May 3, 2017
Viper Energy Partners LP, a Subsidiary of Diamondback Energy, Inc., Announces Appointment to the Board of Directors

MIDLAND, Texas, March 29, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Travis Stice, Chief Executive Officer of Viper Energy Partners LP (NASDAQ:VNOM) ("Viper" or the “Company”), a subsidiary of Diamondback Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ:FANG) ("Diamondback"), is pleased to announce the appointment of Spencer D. Armour, III to the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of its General Partner and its Audit Committee, effective March 22, 2017.
Mr. Armour has over 30 years of executive and entrepreneurial experience in the energy services industry. Mr. Armour currently serves as President of PT Petroleum LLC in Midland, Texas. He was the Vice President of Corporate Development for Basic Energy Services, Inc. from 2007 to 2008, which acquired Sledge Drilling Corp., a company Mr. Armour co-founded and served as Chief Executive Officer for from 2005 to 2006. From 1998 through 2005, he served as Executive Vice President of Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc., which acquired Lone Star Mud, Inc., a company Mr. Armour founded and served as President for from 1986 to 1997. Mr. Armour has served as a director of ProPetro Holding Corp. since February 2013. He also served on the Patterson – UTI Board of Directors from 1999 through 2001. Mr. Armour received a B.S. in Economics from the University of Houston in 1977 and was appointed to the University of Houston System Board of Regents in 2011 by former Texas Governor Rick Perry. Mr. Stice continued, “We are thrilled to have Spencer join Viper’s Board of Directors. With over three decades of energy services experience and a deep knowledge of industry dynamics within the Permian Basin, Spencer adds further depth and expertise to Viper’s leadership and is well suited to serve as a Director of the General Partner.”  About Viper Energy Partners LP Viper is a limited partnership formed by Diamondback to own, acquire and exploit oil and natural gas properties in North America, with a focus on oil-weighted basins, primarily the Permian Basin in West Texas. About Diamondback Energy, Inc. Diamondback is an independent oil and natural gas Company headquartered in Midland, Texas focused on the acquisition, development, exploration and exploitation of unconventional, onshore oil and natural gas reserves in the Permian Basin in West Texas. Diamondback's activities are primarily focused on the horizontal exploitation of multiple intervals within the Wolfcamp, Spraberry, Clearfork, Bone Spring and Cline formations.
Investor Contact:
Adam Lawlis
1 432.221.7467
[email protected]

Read more...
Diamondback Energy, Inc. Expands Management Team

MIDLAND, Texas, March 15, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Diamondback Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ:FANG) (“Diamondback” or the “Company”) today announced it has expanded its officer group, creating Executive Officer, Senior Vice President and Vice President officer levels consistent with and to further accommodate the Company’s growth.   
Travis Stice, Chief Executive Officer, announced that Michael L. Hollis was promoted to President and Chief Operating Officer, and that Thomas F. Hawkins has joined the Company as Senior Vice President of Land.   Mr. Stice also stated that Teresa L. Dick, Randall J. Holder, Paul S. Molnar and Russell D. Pantermuehl were promoted to Executive Vice President positions, Mathew Kaes Van’t Hof was promoted to Senior Vice President, and the Company designated four new Vice President positions. Also announced was the promotion of Adam T. Lawlis to Director, Investor Relations. The Company’s senior management team is: Executive Officers * Travis D. Stice  Chief Executive Officer* Michael L. Hollis  President & Chief Operating Officer* Teresa L. Dick  Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President and Assistant Secretary* Randall J. Holder  Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary* Paul S. Molnar  Executive Vice President, Exploration and Business Development* Russell D. Pantermuehl  Executive Vice President, Reservoir Engineering Sr. Vice Presidents * Thomas F. Hawkins  Senior Vice President, Land* Mathew Kaes Van’t Hof  Senior Vice President, Strategy and Corporate Development Vice Presidents * Kara B. Blubaugh-Few  Vice President, Accounting and Controller* David L. Cannon  Vice President, Geoscience* W. Marc Dingler IV  Vice President, Legal and Deputy General Counsel* Daniel N. Wesson  Vice President, Operations, Delaware Basin Mr. Stice further stated, “These promotions reflect the contributions made by these individuals in growing Diamondback Energy into one of the premier oil companies in the Permian Basin. This expansion of the executive team allows us to provide additional development opportunities and recognize employees as we continue to drive superior shareholder returns. Further, the Board of Directors’ promotion of Mr. Hollis to President and Chief Operating Officer recognizes his outstanding leadership as Chief Operating Officer for the last two years.”  About Diamondback Energy, Inc. Diamondback is an independent oil and natural gas Company headquartered in Midland, Texas focused on the acquisition, development, exploration and exploitation of unconventional, onshore oil and natural gas reserves in the Permian Basin in West Texas. Diamondback's activities are primarily focused on the horizontal exploitation of multiple intervals within the Wolfcamp, Spraberry, Clearfork, Bone Spring and Cline formations.
Investor Contact:
Adam Lawlis
1 432.221.7467
[email protected]


Read more...
Diamondback Energy, Inc. Announces Closing of Acquisition from Brigham Resources

MIDLAND, Texas, March 01, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Diamondback Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ:FANG) ("Diamondback" or the "Company") today announced the closing of its previously announced acquisition of leasehold interests and related assets from Brigham Resources Operating, LLC and Brigham Resources Midstream, LLC ("the Sellers" or "Brigham Resources") for an aggregate purchase price of $2.55 billion. The incremental purchase price is attributable to the acquisition of additional leasehold acreage as well as mineral interests on the properties and other post effective date adjustments. 
On February 28, 2017, the Company completed the acquisition of 80,185 net leasehold acres in Pecos and Reeves counties, which includes an incremental 3,866 net leasehold acres from the 76,319 net leasehold acres previously announced in December 2016. Also included are mineral interests covering 1,321 net royalty acres, including an incremental 172 net royalty acres from the 1,149 net royalty acres initially disclosed. "Diamondback's successful completion of this transaction represents the collective efforts of our team to secure a leading resource footprint in the Southern Delaware Basin. With the transaction completed, our focus now shifts to developing this asset and expanding our track record of achieving efficient, low-cost operations from the Midland Basin into the Delaware Basin,” stated Travis Stice, Chief Executive Officer of Diamondback. About Diamondback Energy, Inc. Diamondback is an independent oil and natural gas Company headquartered in Midland, Texas focused on the acquisition, development, exploration and exploitation of unconventional, onshore oil and natural gas reserves in the Permian Basin in West Texas. Diamondback's activities are primarily focused on the horizontal exploitation of multiple intervals within the Wolfcamp, Spraberry, Clearfork, Bone Spring and Cline formations. Forward Looking Statements This news release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. All statements, other than historical facts, that address activities that Diamondback assumes, plans, expects, believes, intends or anticipates (and other similar expressions) will, should or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements, including specifically the statements regarding the proposed activities associated with the assets included in the acquisition announced above. The forward-looking statements are based on management's current beliefs, based on currently available information, as to the outcome and timing of future events. These forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties that could cause the results to differ materially from those expected by the management of Diamondback. Information concerning these risks and other factors can be found in Diamondback's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including its Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K, which can be obtained free of charge on the Securities and Exchange Commission's web site at http://www.sec.gov. Diamondback undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement.
Investor Contact:

Adam Lawlis

1 432.221.7467

[email protected]

Read more...
12 Questions With Joseph Calandro 'When I was teaching, the Marvel bankruptcy case was by far the most popular case I taught'
1. How and why did you get started investing? What is your background? Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
Forward PE Ratio 23.70
FANG's Forward PE Ratio is ranked lower than
61% of the 119 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 19.34 vs. FANG: 23.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PB Ratio 1.87
FANG's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
67% of the 429 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.16 vs. FANG: 1.87 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
FANG' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.41  Med: 2.49 Max: 4.09
Current: 1.87
1.41
4.09
PS Ratio 10.71
FANG's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
81% of the 401 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 2.87 vs. FANG: 10.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
FANG' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.65  Med: 10.84 Max: 16.1
Current: 10.71
5.65
16.1
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 16.80
FANG's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
82% of the 272 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 6.30 vs. FANG: 16.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
FANG' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.87  Med: 14.79 Max: 25.67
Current: 16.8
7.87
25.67
EV-to-EBIT 531.42
FANG's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
97% of the 173 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 14.29 vs. FANG: 531.42 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
FANG' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -105.2  Med: 20.75 Max: 592.6
Current: 531.42
-105.2
592.6
EV-to-EBITDA 47.07
FANG's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
93% of the 266 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 10.51 vs. FANG: 47.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
FANG' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -62.4  Med: 16.1 Max: 159.6
Current: 47.07
-62.4
159.6
Current Ratio 0.81
FANG's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
64% of the 497 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.27 vs. FANG: 0.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
FANG' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.45  Med: 0.83 Max: 8.56
Current: 0.81
0.45
8.56
Quick Ratio 0.80
FANG's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
63% of the 496 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.17 vs. FANG: 0.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
FANG' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.34  Med: 0.79 Max: 8.55
Current: 0.8
0.34
8.55
Days Inventory 5.05
FANG's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
88% of the 204 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 28.39 vs. FANG: 5.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
FANG' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.05  Med: 49.1 Max: 232.78
Current: 5.05
5.05
232.78
Days Sales Outstanding 45.12
FANG's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
58% of the 386 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 51.71 vs. FANG: 45.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
FANG' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 29.42  Med: 61.39 Max: 163.23
Current: 45.12
29.42
163.23
Days Payable 49.45
FANG's Days Payable is ranked lower than
65% of the 255 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 86.03 vs. FANG: 49.45 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
FANG' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 27.96  Med: 173.65 Max: 715.14
Current: 49.45
27.96
715.14

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -18.30
FANG's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked lower than
67% of the 376 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -10.50 vs. FANG: -18.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
FANG' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -36  Med: -18.3 Max: 0
Current: -18.3
-36
0

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 1.86
FANG's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
64% of the 402 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.21 vs. FANG: 1.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
FANG' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.53  Med: 2.4 Max: 4.05
Current: 1.86
1.53
4.05
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.99
FANG's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked lower than
60% of the 370 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.86 vs. FANG: 0.99 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
FANG' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.59  Med: 1 Max: 1.4
Current: 0.99
0.59
1.4
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 0.19
FANG's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
67% of the 513 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -3.91 vs. FANG: 0.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
FANG' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -14.9  Med: 2.35 Max: 8.6
Current: 0.19
-14.9
8.6

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $674.86
EPS (TTM) $ -0.34
Beta0.37
Short Percentage of Float4.73%
52-Week Range $82.80 - 114.00
Shares Outstanding (Mil)56.89

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18 Dec19
Revenue (Mil $) 1,161 1,520 2,393
EPS ($) 4.29 5.01 10.14
EPS without NRI ($) 4.29 5.01 10.14
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
39.11%
Dividends per Share ($)
» More Articles for FANG

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Annaly Capital Management: Attractive 9.5% Dividend Yield, but Interest Rates Are a Major Risk Jun 25 2017 
Never a Better Time to Pile on Chipotle Jun 25 2017 
Boeing Takes Lead Over Airbus With $30 Billion Worth of Orders on Day 1 of Paris Air Show Jun 25 2017 
Berkshire Hathaway’s Recent Investment: Home Capital Group Jun 25 2017 
Stocks That Fell to 3-Year Lows in the Week of June 23 Jun 24 2017 
Weekly Top Insider Buys Highlight for the Week of June 23 Jun 24 2017 
ID Watchdog Announces Special and Annual General Meeting Date and Record Date Jun 23 2017 
Ironclad Performance Wear Postpones 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders Jun 23 2017 
Delta and Korean Air Create Leading trans-Pacific Joint Venture Jun 23 2017 
Harwood Feffer LLP Announces Investigation of EnerNOC, Inc. Jun 23 2017 

More From Other Websites
These Oil-Weighted Stocks Could Sink with Oil Jun 27 2017
How Acquisitions and Divestitures Will Affect Marathon Oil’s Debt Jun 26 2017
Are Hedge Funds Expecting A Permian Bubble? Jun 21 2017
Marathon Oil’s Stock Outperformed Crude Oil and Peers Last Week Jun 21 2017
Chart in Focus: Stone Energy’s Operating Netbacks Jun 20 2017
Analyzing Stone Energy’s 1Q17 Production Costs and Margins Jun 20 2017
ETFs with exposure to Diamondback Energy, Inc. : June 19, 2017 Jun 19 2017
FAANG Alternatives in Unloved Names & Sectors Jun 19 2017
Stone Energy: A Crude Oil-Weighted Upstream Company Jun 16 2017
Marathon Oil Stock and How It Performed Last Week Jun 13 2017
3 Monster Stocks in the Making Jun 10 2017
What Happened to ConocoPhillips Stock Last Week? Jun 05 2017
Examining Denbury’s 1Q17 Production Costs and Margins Jun 05 2017
Cramer's lightning round: I'm blessing this chipmaker for a quick trade Jun 02 2017
Analyzing Denbury Resources’ Realized Price Effectiveness Jun 02 2017
Denbury Resources: A Crude Oil–Weighted Upstream Company Jun 01 2017
ETFs with exposure to Diamondback Energy, Inc. : May 30, 2017 May 30 2017
Diamondback Energy, Inc. :FANG-US: Earnings Analysis: Q1, 2017 By the Numbers : May 29, 2017 May 29 2017
Oil hits a rough patch, but this investor is still bullis... May 26 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}