Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.57
INT's Cash-to-Debt is ranked higher than
53% of the 162 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing industry.

( Industry Median: 0.53 vs. INT: 0.57 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
INT' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.09  Med: 6.71 Max: N/A
Current: 0.57
Equity-to-Asset 0.37
INT's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
57% of the 159 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing industry.

( Industry Median: 0.42 vs. INT: 0.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
INT' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.21  Med: 0.44 Max: 0.75
Current: 0.37
0.21
0.75
Interest Coverage 3.67
INT's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
72% of the 147 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing industry.

( Industry Median: 10.09 vs. INT: 3.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
INT' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.67  Med: 13.86 Max: 44.76
Current: 3.67
3.67
44.76
Piotroski F-Score: 5
Altman Z-Score: 7.06
Beneish M-Score: -2.30
WACC vs ROIC
7.88%
6.96%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 0.59
INT's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
83% of the 160 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing industry.

( Industry Median: 3.48 vs. INT: 0.59 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
INT' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.59  Med: 0.72 Max: 1.36
Current: 0.59
0.59
1.36
Net Margin % 0.35
INT's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
76% of the 161 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing industry.

( Industry Median: 2.09 vs. INT: 0.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
INT' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.35  Med: 0.54 Max: 1.04
Current: 0.35
0.35
1.04
ROE % 5.45
INT's ROE % is ranked lower than
64% of the 158 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing industry.

( Industry Median: 10.23 vs. INT: 5.45 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
INT' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.45  Med: 13.77 Max: 19.24
Current: 5.45
5.45
19.24
ROA % 2.12
INT's ROA % is ranked lower than
62% of the 163 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing industry.

( Industry Median: 4.14 vs. INT: 2.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
INT' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.12  Med: 4.76 Max: 7.43
Current: 2.12
2.12
7.43
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 14.44
INT's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
57% of the 162 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing industry.

( Industry Median: 13.46 vs. INT: 14.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
INT' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 14.44  Med: 26.34 Max: 74.99
Current: 14.44
14.44
74.99
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -12.60
INT's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
73% of the 145 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing industry.

( Industry Median: -6.40 vs. INT: -12.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
INT' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -12.6  Med: 24.3 Max: 115.8
Current: -12.6
-12.6
115.8
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate -4.10
INT's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
70% of the 128 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing industry.

( Industry Median: 5.10 vs. INT: -4.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
INT' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -39.8  Med: 14.1 Max: 110.6
Current: -4.1
-39.8
110.6
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate -13.80
INT's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked lower than
80% of the 106 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing industry.

( Industry Median: 8.60 vs. INT: -13.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
INT' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -13.8  Med: 14.6 Max: 130.5
Current: -13.8
-13.8
130.5
GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Signs with World Fuel Services Corp $INT.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» INT's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-07-27 Est.)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2016

INT Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Paul Tudor Jones 22,349 sh (+121.32%)
Joel Greenblatt 413,729 sh (+70.70%)
Chuck Royce 99,300 sh (+5.30%)
Third Avenue Management 123,282 sh (unchged)
Keeley Asset Management Corp 49,780 sh (-7.61%)
Jim Simons 281,000 sh (-34.02%)
» More
Q3 2016

INT Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Third Avenue Management 134,679 sh (+9.24%)
Keeley Asset Management Corp 49,780 sh (unchged)
Chuck Royce 99,300 sh (unchged)
Joel Greenblatt 336,127 sh (-18.76%)
Paul Tudor Jones 13,930 sh (-37.67%)
Jim Simons 137,100 sh (-51.21%)
» More
Q4 2016

INT Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Chuck Royce 119,800 sh (+20.64%)
Jim Simons 160,100 sh (+16.78%)
Third Avenue Management 151,019 sh (+12.13%)
Paul Tudor Jones 14,700 sh (+5.53%)
Keeley Asset Management Corp 46,870 sh (-5.85%)
Joel Greenblatt 16,183 sh (-95.19%)
» More
Q1 2017

INT Guru Trades in Q1 2017

Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 526 sh (New)
Charles Brandes 248,805 sh (New)
Chuck Royce 324,800 sh (+171.12%)
Paul Tudor Jones 20,336 sh (+38.34%)
Third Avenue Management 166,319 sh (+10.13%)
Joel Greenblatt Sold Out
Jim Simons Sold Out
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with INT

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - Refining & Marketing » Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing    NAICS: 424720    SIC: 5172
Compare:NYSE:IOC, NYSE:PBF, OTCPK:PKIUF, OTCPK:SAAFY, NYSE:CVI, NYSE:NGL, NYSE:DK, NYSE:CVRR, NYSE:SUN, NYSE:WNR, NYSE:ALJ, NYSE:CAPL, NYSE:ALDW, NYSE:SRLP, NYSE:HFC, NYSE:FGP, NAS:REGI, NYSE:BPT, NYSE:VVV, NAS:CLNE » details
Traded in other countries:WFK.Germany,
Headquarter Location:USA
World Fuel Services Corp is an energy management company. The Company offers fuel & related products and services to commercial airlines, second and third tier airlines, regional and low cost carriers. Its business segments are aviation, marine and land.

World Fuel Services Corp was incorporated in Florida in July 1984. The Company is a fuel logistics, transaction management and payment processing company, which provides energy management solutions to the aviation, marine and land transportation industries. It has three reportable operating business segments: Marine, Aviation and Land. In the aviation segment, the Company offers fuel and related products and services to commercial airlines, second and third tier airlines, cargo carriers, regional and low cost carriers, airports, fixed based operators, corporate fleets, fractional operators, private aircraft, military fleets and to the United States ("U.S.") and foreign governments as well as intergovernmental organizations. Its marine segment product and service offerings include fuel, lubricants and related products and services to customers, including international container and tanker fleets, commercial cruise lines, yachts and time charter operators, offshore rig owners and operators, the U.S. and foreign governments as well as other fuel suppliers. In the land segment, the Company offers fuel, crude oil, lubricants, natural gas and related products and services to customers including petroleum distributors operating in the land transportation market, retail petroleum operators, and industrial, commercial, residential and government customers. It competes with oil producers that market fuel directly to the large commercial airlines, shipping companies and petroleum distributors operating in the land transportation market as well as fuel resellers. The Company is subject to substantial regulation by federal, state and local government agencies, inside and outside the U.S, which enforce laws and regulations governing the transportation, sale, storage and disposal of fuel and the collection, transportation, processing, storage, use and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes, including waste oil and petroleum products.

Guru Investment Theses on World Fuel Services Corp

Sequoia Fund Comments on World Fuel Services - Aug 27, 2015

Question:



I have a question about World Fuel (NYSE:INT). I wanted to ask about the level of confidence that you have in volume growth and pricing trends in the marine, aviation, and land segment over the mid-to-long term and how important you think acquisitions are to the future. I find those mid-to-longer term numbers hard to get my hands around.



Rory Priday:



We did too. We do not own the stock anymore. As I mentioned last year, World Fuel Services is a fuel supplier. It gets credit from some of the major oil companies and uses that credit to buy fuel to sell to various customers in marine, aviation, and land markets. When you talk to the company’s managers, they will point out that World Fuel has very small shares of those markets; so you can get excited about the potential. Any time you look at an investment, you want to look at what percentage of its market it has and how big it can get. One of its biggest competitors in marine fuel went into bankruptcy late last year, but the trouble is that it is still going to be pretty difficult for the company to grow organically at a good enough pace in each of its markets. The markets may be huge, but there are structural reasons why organic growth is difficult to come by.



We thought that most of the growth going forward would come from acquisitions, which is fine — the management team has been terrific. It has presided over a lot of value creation. Mike Kasbar is a great operator and has built a really nice company. The company does smart acquisitions. If you run through the list of deals, on average over the last five or six years, World Fuel probably earns, by my math, between 10% − 12% on its acquisitions. If you had a company that was not growing at all organically and it could invest all its earnings at 10% − 12% each year, it could grow earnings at that rate. But we did not feel confident, owning something like that over a long period of time, that it would get a bigger at a fast enough pace to meet our hurdle rate. So that is why we are out of it.



Bob Goldfarb:



We sold World Fuel Services because it reported a very strong quarter, which to a fair extent was based on the volatility of oil prices, which usually benefits the company. Going back to an earlier question, there are some occasions when we are selling into strength, and others when we are selling because there is a disappointment.





From Ruane, Cunniff & Goldfarb Investor Day 2015 Transcript Part I.



Check out Ruane Cunniff latest stock trades

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 23.64
INT's PE Ratio is ranked lower than
69% of the 135 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing industry.

( Industry Median: 12.61 vs. INT: 23.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
INT' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.25  Med: 15.05 Max: 27.6
Current: 23.64
5.25
27.6
PE Ratio without NRI 23.64
INT's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked lower than
68% of the 133 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing industry.

( Industry Median: 12.62 vs. INT: 23.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
INT' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.2  Med: 15.05 Max: 27.6
Current: 23.64
5.2
27.6
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 16.43
INT's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked lower than
66% of the 82 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing industry.

( Industry Median: 13.11 vs. INT: 16.43 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
INT' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.76  Med: 16.48 Max: 200.46
Current: 16.43
1.76
200.46
PB Ratio 1.27
INT's PB Ratio is ranked higher than
57% of the 159 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing industry.

( Industry Median: 1.52 vs. INT: 1.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
INT' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.86  Med: 1.86 Max: 3.78
Current: 1.27
0.86
3.78
PS Ratio 0.08
INT's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
96% of the 158 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing industry.

( Industry Median: 0.41 vs. INT: 0.08 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
INT' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.03  Med: 0.09 Max: 0.15
Current: 0.08
0.03
0.15
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 14.54
INT's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
65% of the 89 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing industry.

( Industry Median: 11.91 vs. INT: 14.54 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
INT' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.6  Med: 17.39 Max: 140.06
Current: 14.54
1.6
140.06
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 12.25
INT's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
73% of the 108 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing industry.

( Industry Median: 6.92 vs. INT: 12.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
INT' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.59  Med: 13.37 Max: 324.89
Current: 12.25
1.59
324.89
EV-to-EBIT 17.22
INT's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
69% of the 185 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing industry.

( Industry Median: 11.51 vs. INT: 17.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
INT' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.2  Med: 11.7 Max: 19.9
Current: 17.22
2.2
19.9
EV-to-EBITDA 11.45
INT's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
66% of the 190 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing industry.

( Industry Median: 8.01 vs. INT: 11.45 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
INT' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2  Med: 10.1 Max: 16.9
Current: 11.45
2
16.9
PEG Ratio 118.00
INT's PEG Ratio is ranked lower than
95% of the 55 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing industry.

( Industry Median: 1.46 vs. INT: 118.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG Ratio only.
INT' s PEG Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.19  Med: 0.72 Max: 118
Current: 118
0.19
118
Shiller PE Ratio 14.53
INT's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked higher than
67% of the 27 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing industry.

( Industry Median: 18.44 vs. INT: 14.53 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
INT' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 11.53  Med: 23.6 Max: 54.04
Current: 14.53
11.53
54.04
Current Ratio 1.71
INT's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
76% of the 153 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing industry.

( Industry Median: 1.36 vs. INT: 1.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
INT' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.31  Med: 1.66 Max: 2.97
Current: 1.71
1.31
2.97
Quick Ratio 1.49
INT's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
76% of the 153 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing industry.

( Industry Median: 0.96 vs. INT: 1.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
INT' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.18  Med: 1.54 Max: 2.62
Current: 1.49
1.18
2.62
Days Inventory 5.29
INT's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
88% of the 154 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing industry.

( Industry Median: 28.35 vs. INT: 5.29 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
INT' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.33  Med: 4.18 Max: 5.71
Current: 5.29
1.33
5.71
Days Sales Outstanding 26.86
INT's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
62% of the 120 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing industry.

( Industry Median: 26.50 vs. INT: 26.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
INT' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 13.33  Med: 22.54 Max: 36.44
Current: 26.86
13.33
36.44
Days Payable 21.69
INT's Days Payable is ranked lower than
64% of the 104 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing industry.

( Industry Median: 33.76 vs. INT: 21.69 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
INT' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 11.06  Med: 19.23 Max: 28.88
Current: 21.69
11.06
28.88

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 0.67
INT's Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 222 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing industry.

( Industry Median: 3.37 vs. INT: 0.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
INT' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.28  Med: 0.42 Max: 0.89
Current: 0.67
0.28
0.89
Dividend Payout Ratio 0.16
INT's Dividend Payout Ratio is ranked higher than
90% of the 126 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing industry.

( Industry Median: 0.41 vs. INT: 0.16 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout Ratio only.
INT' s Dividend Payout Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.04  Med: 0.06 Max: 0.16
Current: 0.16
0.04
0.16
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate 17.00
INT's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked higher than
58% of the 81 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing industry.

( Industry Median: 11.10 vs. INT: 17.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
INT' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0 Max: 31.5
Current: 17
0
31.5
Forward Dividend Yield % 0.67
INT's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 223 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing industry.

( Industry Median: 3.90 vs. INT: 0.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 1.13
INT's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 222 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing industry.

( Industry Median: 5.63 vs. INT: 1.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
INT' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.48  Med: 0.72 Max: 1.52
Current: 1.13
0.48
1.52
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio 0.90
INT's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
76% of the 70 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing industry.

( Industry Median: -1.90 vs. INT: 0.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
INT' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -14.3  Med: -2.3 Max: 5.9
Current: 0.9
-14.3
5.9

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value 8.66
INT's Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value is ranked lower than
61% of the 54 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing industry.

( Industry Median: 5.34 vs. INT: 8.66 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value only.
INT' s Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.05  Med: 3.63 Max: 44
Current: 8.66
1.05
44
Price-to-Tangible-Book 4.11
INT's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
73% of the 146 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing industry.

( Industry Median: 1.68 vs. INT: 4.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
INT' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.93  Med: 2.79 Max: 5.79
Current: 4.11
0.93
5.79
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 0.76
INT's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked higher than
60% of the 81 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing industry.

( Industry Median: 1.12 vs. INT: 0.76 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
INT' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.47  Med: 1.35 Max: 9.3
Current: 0.76
0.47
9.3
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.92
INT's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
70% of the 140 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing industry.

( Industry Median: 1.36 vs. INT: 0.92 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
INT' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.38  Med: 1.38 Max: 8.8
Current: 0.92
0.38
8.8
Price-to-Graham-Number 2.08
INT's Price-to-Graham-Number is ranked lower than
72% of the 109 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing industry.

( Industry Median: 1.03 vs. INT: 2.08 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Graham-Number only.
INT' s Price-to-Graham-Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.56  Med: 1.33 Max: 2.38
Current: 2.08
0.56
2.38
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 5.81
INT's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
59% of the 217 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing industry.

( Industry Median: 7.44 vs. INT: 5.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
INT' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5  Med: 8.55 Max: 45.1
Current: 5.81
5
45.1
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % 8.78
INT's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked higher than
57% of the 76 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing industry.

( Industry Median: 6.42 vs. INT: 8.78 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
INT' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8  Med: 24 Max: 38.8
Current: 8.78
8
38.8

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $30,019
EPS (TTM) $ 1.52
Beta1.21
Short Percentage of Float3.03%
52-Week Range $34.79 - 49.38
Shares Outstanding (Mil)69.06
» More Articles for INT

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Third Avenue Continues to Buy Amgen, 8 Others May 24 2017 
Stocks Reach Their 3-Year Lows Mar 25 2017 
Undervalued Stocks With Low P/E Among Meridian Fund's Holdings Oct 22 2015 
Sequoia Fund Comments on World Fuel Services Aug 27 2015 
Ruane, Cunniff & Goldfarb Investor Day 2015 Transcript Part I Aug 27 2015 
Why World Fuel Services Is A Bargain Below $50 Jul 24 2015 
This Fuel Company Is Worth Buying For Long-Term Returns May 04 2015 
Ruane Cunniff Sells Portions of Five of its Top 10 Stakes Mar 13 2015 
Lountzis Asset Management Comments on World Fuel Services Mar 21 2014 
World Fuel Services: Fueling a Growing World Oct 23 2013 

More From Other Websites
World Fuel Services Corporation Declares Regular Quarterly Cash Dividend May 25 2017
ETFs with exposure to World Fuel Services Corp. : May 15, 2017 May 15 2017
World Fuel Services Corp. :INT-US: Earnings Analysis: Q1, 2017 By the Numbers : May 1, 2017 May 01 2017
Edited Transcript of INT earnings conference call or presentation 27-Apr-17 9:00pm GMT May 01 2017
World Fuel Services posts 1Q profit Apr 27 2017
World Fuel Services Corp. – Value Analysis (NYSE:INT) : April 27, 2017 Apr 27 2017
World Fuel Services Corporation Reports First Quarter 2017 Earnings Apr 27 2017
World Fuel Services Corp. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bullish Manner : INT-US : April... Apr 26 2017
World Fuel Services Corporation to Host First Quarter 2017 Earnings Conference Call Apr 13 2017
World Fuel Services Corp. : INT-US: Dividend Analysis : March 17th, 2017 (record date) : By the... Apr 06 2017
Near-Term Uncertainties to Weigh on These Energy Stocks Mar 28 2017
Stocks Reach Their 3-Year Lows Mar 25 2017
The Whole Story On Microsoft Tapping ARM To Break Intel's Datacenter Monopoly Mar 10 2017
What Makes World Fuel Services (INT) a Strong Sell? Feb 22 2017
Oil and Gas Stock Roundup: Not Everyone Is Optimistic Feb 18 2017
World Fuel Services Corp. :INT-US: Earnings Analysis: 2016 By the Numbers : February 17, 2017 Feb 17 2017
World Fuel Services Corp Stock Sinks After Earnings Miss Feb 15 2017
Edited Transcript of INT earnings conference call or presentation 14-Feb-17 10:00pm GMT Feb 15 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)