Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany, Mexico

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.12
LEN's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
82% of the 761 Companies
in the Global Residential Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 2.09 vs. LEN: 0.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
LEN' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.01  Med: 0.12 Max: 0.77
Current: 0.12
0.01
0.77
Equity-to-Asset 0.45
LEN's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
52% of the 718 Companies
in the Global Residential Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.45 vs. LEN: 0.45 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
LEN' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.28  Med: 0.38 Max: 0.5
Current: 0.45
0.28
0.5
Debt-to-Equity 0.91
LEN's Debt-to-Equity is ranked lower than
68% of the 432 Companies
in the Global Residential Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.61 vs. LEN: 0.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-Equity only.
LEN' s Debt-to-Equity Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.45  Med: 0.85 Max: 1.97
Current: 0.91
0.45
1.97
Debt-to-EBITDA 4.68
LEN's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
66% of the 551 Companies
in the Global Residential Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 3.49 vs. LEN: 4.68 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-EBITDA only.
LEN' s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -5.48  Med: 5.49 Max: 23.24
Current: 4.68
-5.48
23.24
Interest Coverage 585.86
LEN's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
70% of the 602 Companies
in the Global Residential Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 17.32 vs. LEN: 585.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
LEN' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.14  Med: 7.3 Max: 585.86
Current: 585.86
1.14
585.86
Piotroski F-Score: 5
Altman Z-Score: 2.95
Beneish M-Score: -2.41
WACC vs ROIC
6.74%
6.67%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 10.90
LEN's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
78% of the 746 Companies
in the Global Residential Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 3.42 vs. LEN: 10.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
LEN' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -25.78  Med: 5.88 Max: 11.85
Current: 10.9
-25.78
11.85
Net Margin % 6.65
LEN's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
75% of the 747 Companies
in the Global Residential Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 2.49 vs. LEN: 6.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
LEN' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -24.24  Med: 5.59 Max: 16.54
Current: 6.65
-24.24
16.54
ROE % 11.34
LEN's ROE % is ranked higher than
69% of the 703 Companies
in the Global Residential Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 5.82 vs. LEN: 11.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
LEN' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -40.76  Med: 8.12 Max: 21.87
Current: 11.34
-40.76
21.87
ROA % 5.07
LEN's ROA % is ranked higher than
71% of the 775 Companies
in the Global Residential Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 2.20 vs. LEN: 5.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
LEN' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -18.05  Med: 2.81 Max: 6.96
Current: 5.07
-18.05
6.96
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 13.82
LEN's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
58% of the 765 Companies
in the Global Residential Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 9.88 vs. LEN: 13.82 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
LEN' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -41.64  Med: 5.29 Max: 14.46
Current: 13.82
-41.64
14.46
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate 21.80
LEN's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
89% of the 713 Companies
in the Global Residential Construction industry.

( Industry Median: -0.80 vs. LEN: 21.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
LEN' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -43.4  Med: 17.4 Max: 29.8
Current: 21.8
-43.4
29.8
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate 18.90
LEN's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked higher than
74% of the 630 Companies
in the Global Residential Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 3.20 vs. LEN: 18.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
LEN' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -12.1  Med: 22.9 Max: 62
Current: 18.9
-12.1
62
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate 22.30
LEN's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked higher than
71% of the 580 Companies
in the Global Residential Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 6.40 vs. LEN: 22.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
LEN' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 15.9 Max: 80
Current: 22.3
0
80
GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Signs with Lennar Corp LEN.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» LEN's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-12-19)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q4 2016

LEN Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Paul Tudor Jones 12,300 sh (New)
Jim Simons 1,188,400 sh (New)
Martin Whitman 571,000 sh (New)
David Dreman 9,564 sh (+1100.00%)
Ray Dalio 294,971 sh (+666.74%)
Third Avenue Management 2,951,947 sh (+199.93%)
Ronald Muhlenkamp 8,100 sh (unchged)
Steven Cohen 15,000 sh (unchged)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss Sold Out
John Burbank Sold Out
Scott Black 50,227 sh (-0.51%)
Ken Heebner 1,370,000 sh (-26.74%)
Steven Cohen 302,400 sh (-51.89%)
Murray Stahl 32,021 sh (-65.25%)
» More
Q1 2017

LEN Guru Trades in Q1 2017

Ken Fisher 4,025 sh (New)
Andreas Halvorsen 5,425,514 sh (New)
Caxton Associates 90,000 sh (New)
Ken Heebner 2,130,000 sh (+55.47%)
Third Avenue Management 2,956,713 sh (+0.16%)
Martin Whitman 589,518 sh (+3.24%)
David Dreman 9,564 sh (unchged)
Ronald Muhlenkamp 8,100 sh (unchged)
Steven Cohen Sold Out
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Jim Simons Sold Out
Scott Black 46,628 sh (-7.17%)
Murray Stahl 29,225 sh (-8.73%)
Ray Dalio 190,617 sh (-35.38%)
» More
Q2 2017

LEN Guru Trades in Q2 2017

Paul Tudor Jones 23,363 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 35,000 sh (New)
Ken Fisher 4,052 sh (+0.67%)
Ronald Muhlenkamp 8,100 sh (unchged)
Martin Whitman 589,518 sh (unchged)
Caxton Associates Sold Out
Andreas Halvorsen 5,365,456 sh (-1.11%)
Scott Black 45,558 sh (-2.29%)
Third Avenue Management 2,870,041 sh (-2.93%)
David Dreman 8,441 sh (-11.74%)
Ray Dalio 111,328 sh (-41.60%)
Ken Heebner 850,000 sh (-60.09%)
Murray Stahl 10,431 sh (-64.31%)
» More
Q3 2017

LEN Guru Trades in Q3 2017

Andreas Halvorsen 9,511,145 sh (+77.27%)
Ken Heebner 1,090,000 sh (+28.24%)
Murray Stahl 10,558 sh (+1.22%)
Ronald Muhlenkamp 8,100 sh (unchged)
David Dreman 8,441 sh (unchged)
Martin Whitman 589,518 sh (unchged)
Ken Fisher Sold Out
Ray Dalio Sold Out
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Steven Cohen Sold Out
Third Avenue Management 2,869,290 sh (-0.03%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with LEN

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

GuruDate Trades Impact to Portfolio Price Range * (?) Current Price Change from Average Current Shares
Third Avenue Management 2017-09-30 Reduce -0.03%$48.89 - $53.53 $ 59.1215%2,926,676
Ken Heebner 2017-09-30 Add 28.24%0.55%$48.89 - $53.53 $ 59.1215%1,111,800
Ken Fisher 2017-09-30 Sold Out $48.89 - $53.53 $ 59.1215%0
Third Avenue Management 2017-06-30 Reduce -2.93%0.2%$48.75 - $52.87 $ 59.1217%2,927,442
Ken Heebner 2017-06-30 Reduce -60.09%2.89%$48.75 - $52.87 $ 59.1217%867,000
David Dreman 2017-06-30 Reduce -11.74%0.03%$48.75 - $52.87 $ 59.1217%8,610
Ken Fisher 2017-06-30 Add 0.67%$48.75 - $52.87 $ 59.1217%4,133
Third Avenue Management 2017-03-31 Add 0.16%0.01%$42.08 - $51.93 $ 59.1227%3,015,847
Ken Heebner 2017-03-31 Add 55.47%1.72%$42.08 - $51.93 $ 59.1227%2,172,600
Ken Fisher 2017-03-31 New Buy$42.08 - $51.93 $ 59.1227%4,105
Martin Whitman 2017-01-31 Add 3.24%0.07%$39.95 - $46.01 $ 59.1239%601,308
Third Avenue Management 2016-12-31 Add 199.93%3.83%$39.55 - $44.77 $ 59.1242%3,010,986
Ken Heebner 2016-12-31 Reduce -26.74%1%$39.55 - $44.77 $ 59.1242%1,397,400
David Dreman 2016-12-31 Add 1100.00%0.21%$39.55 - $44.77 $ 59.1242%9,755
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 2016-12-31 Sold Out 0.12%$39.55 - $44.77 $ 59.1242%0
Premium More recent guru trades are included for Premium Members only!!
Premium More recent guru trades are included for USA Subscribe Members only!!
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Homebuilding & Construction » Residential Construction    NAICS: 236115    SIC: 6513
Compare:TSE:1928, NYSE:NVR, LSE:PSN, NYSE:DHI, TSE:4204, NYSE:PHM, LSE:BDEV, LSE:TW., NYSE:TOL, LSE:BKG, LSE:BWY, NYSE:CAA, TSE:1808, LSE:RDW, TSE:1911, NYSE:TMHC, NYSE:TPH, NYSE:KBH, TSE:4681, LSE:BVS » details
Traded in other countries:LNN.Germany, LEN.Mexico,
Headquarter Location:USA
Lennar Corp is a homebuilding service provider. Its operations include the construction and sale of single-family attached and detached homes, and to a lesser extent multi-level residential buildings.

Lennar is the second-largest builder in the United States, with homebuilding operations in 19 states. The company's homebuilding operations target first-time, move-up, and active adult homebuyers under the Lennar brand name. Lennar's financial services segment provides mortgage financing and related services to its homebuyers and third parties. The Miami-based Lennar is also involved in ancillary multifamily construction, real estate investment, and asset management (Rialto), and master-planned community development (FivePoint) operations.

Guru Investment Theses on Lennar Corp

Third Avenue Management Comments on Lennar - Feb 01, 2017

We initiated Lennar (NYSE:LEN) in October, and thus wrote up our comments in our prior shareholder letter, but due to the shift in our letter cadence, we are republishing our thoughts from our initial purchase.

Marty Whitman said in October 1996: "Given Third Avenue's investment criteria, it is more accurate to view the situation as the industry selecting the Fund, rather than Third Avenue choosing the industries in which to invest' We think this quote superbly describes the opportunity the Value Fund saw in establishing a position in Lennar Corporation common in the quarter, as the shares sold off somewhat inexplicably from nearly $50 per share at their recent peak and allowed us to establish a position at just over $41.

We have followed Lennar for years as the Real Estate team reviewed the position at our weekly research meetings, and think the investment case has only improved on a fundamental level despite the widening valuation discount in the shares. Lennar meets every tenant of our investment philosophy.

The balance sheet is strong and improving. Homebuilding net debt to total capital has fallen to 33% as of FY4Q16. Much of this improvement is the result of management's soft pivot land strategy, which is reducing the duration of its owned land bank and converting its undervalued balance sheet assets into cash.

From a compounding point of view, Lennar continues to build value through developing its land bank into saleable housing units, and by monetizing further transaction values through its mortgage origination and title insurance offerings to its home buyers. Notably, we are pleased and supportive of Lennar's offer to acquire WCIC Communities (WCIC), a top holding of the Third Avenue Small-Cap Value Fund, as Miami-based Lennar knows WCIC's 100% based Florida assets intimately. Lennar not only sees compelling opportunities to monetize WCIC's over 14,000 homesites, but also synergy opportunities from management and supplier overlap. Further, in our opinion, Lennar negotiated an extremely good price for WCIC, which, when considering the value of WCIC's brokerage operation and the hidden value of WCIC's owned coastal tower pads, will likely bring tremendous value as Lennar has a strong balance sheet to move construction of these assets forward.

Lennar's resource conversion outlook is compelling, with management likely to monetize its non-homebuilding investments in FivePoint and Rialto over the next 12-18 months through sales or spin-outs, and then over time, potentially further monetize its Multi-Family and even its Financial Services divisions through sales or partnerships. The value creation of Rialto, its 3rd party asset-light asset management unit with over $7.3 billion in AUM, and of FivePoint, its development and management company with over 40,000 homesites and 20 million square feet of commercial real estate assets in highly coveted California markets are, in our opinion, completely overlooked by the markets from a net asset value perspective, as their income statement impact today belies their true value to Lennar despite being worth more than 25% of the underlying value.

Perhaps Lennar's most exciting aspect is the strength of the investment case and current undervaluation taken without the likely strong tailwind of an improving housing cycle. At our Value Conference we talked about taking advantage of optically poor headlines, and Lennar is a real-time example. We think some of the weakness in Lennar shares in October was due to a weak single family home starts number for September, down 9.5%. The noise of monthly home start numbers do not impact the long-term value we see in Lerman While Lennar's sales and earnings are likely to strengthen as the single family construction cycle continues to recover from an extended cyclical low looking back to 2007, we see this as icing on the cake of our strong investment case. At our cost of just over $41 per share, we see over 25% upside to our estimate of fair trading value of $53 per share, and longer term potential for shares to trade to over $66 per share if the single family cycle gains steam. trade to over $66 per share if the single family cycle gains steam.

From Third Avenue Management (Trades, Portfolio)'s fourth calendar quarter 2016 shareholder letter.

Check out Third Avenue Management,Martin Whitman latest stock trades

Third Avenue Comments on Lennar - Dec 13, 2016

At our Value Conference, our colleagues on the Real Estate team revisited one of Marty Whitman's quotes from October 1996: "Given Third Avenue's investment criteria, it is more accurate to view the situation as the industry selecting the Fund, rather than Third Avenue choosing the industries in which to invest!' We think this quote superbly describes the opportunity the Value Fund saw in establishing a position in Lennar Corporation common in the quarter, as the shares somewhat inexplicably sold off from nearly $50 at their recent peak and allowed us to establish a position at just over $41 per share.

We have followed Lennar (NYSE:LEN) for years as the Real Estate team reviewed the position at our weekly research meetings, and think the investment case has only improved on a fundamental level despite the widening valuation discount in the shares. Lennar meets every tenant of our investment philosophy.

The balance sheet is strong and improving. Net debt to total capital has fallen 5.3% since year-end 2011 to 45.8% as of 3Q16, and net debt to total assets is not challenging at 37%. Much of this improvement is the result of management's soft pivot land strategy, which is reducing the duration of its owned land bank and converting its undervalued balance sheet assets into cash. This balance sheet improvement should continue as Lennar's $400 million redeemable convertible debt matures in November 2016, which should further reduce balance sheet leverage by 200 basis points.

From a compounding point of view, Lennar continues to build value through developing its land bank into saleable housing units, and by monetizing further transaction values through its mortgage origination and title insurance offerings to its home buyers. Notably, we are pleased and supportive of Lennar's offer to acquire WCIC Communities (NYSE:WCIC), a top holding of the Third Avenue Small-Cap Value Fund, as Miami-based Lennar knows WCIC's 100% based Florida assets intimately. Lennar not only sees compelling opportunities to monetize WCIC's over 14,000 homesites, but also synergy opportunities from management and supplier overlap. Further, in our opinion, Lennar negotiated an extremely good price for WCIC, which when considering the value of WCIC's brokerage operation and the hidden value of WCIC's owned coastal tower pads, will likely bring tremendous value as Lennar has a strong balance sheet to move construction of these assets forward.

Lennar's resource conversion outlook is compelling, with management likely to monetize its non-homebuilding investments in FivePoint and Rialto over the next 12-18 months through sales or spin-outs, and then over time, potentially further monetize its Multi-Family and even its Financial Services divisions through sales or partnerships. The value creation of Rialto, its 3rd party asset-light asset management unit with over $7.3 billion in AUM, and of FivePoint, its development and management company with over 40,000 homesites and 20 million square feet of commercial real estate assets in highly coveted California markets are, in our opinion, completely overlooked by the markets from a net asset value perspective, as their income statement impact today belies their true value to Lennar despite being worth more than 25% of the underlying value.

Perhaps Lennar's most exciting aspect is the strength of the investment case and current undervaluation taken without the likely strong tailwind of an improving housing cycle. At our Value Conference we talked about taking advantage of optically poor headlines, and Lennar is another real-time example. We think some of the weakness in Lennar shares in October was due to a weak single family home starts number for September, down 9.5%. The noise of monthly home start numbers do not impact the long-term value we see in Lerman While Lennar's sales and earnings are likely to strengthen as the single family construction cycle continues to recover from an extended cyclical low looking back to 2007, we see this as icing on the cake of our strong investment case. At our cost of just over $41 per share, we see over 25% upside to our estimate of fair trading value of $53, and longer term potential for shares to trade to over $66 per share if the single family cycle gains steam.



From Third Avenue Management (Trades, Portfolio)'s Value Fund fourth quarter commentary.

Check out Third Avenue Management latest stock trades

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 17.39
LEN's PE Ratio is ranked higher than
52% of the 537 Companies
in the Global Residential Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 15.71 vs. LEN: 17.39 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
LEN' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.42  Med: 16.04 Max: 69.28
Current: 17.39
10.42
69.28
Forward PE Ratio 12.25
LEN's Forward PE Ratio is ranked lower than
53% of the 43 Companies
in the Global Residential Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 10.37 vs. LEN: 12.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 17.39
LEN's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked higher than
51% of the 539 Companies
in the Global Residential Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 15.63 vs. LEN: 17.39 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
LEN' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.39  Med: 16.06 Max: 67.93
Current: 17.39
10.39
67.93
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 22.95
LEN's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked lower than
81% of the 234 Companies
in the Global Residential Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 16.40 vs. LEN: 22.95 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
LEN' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.06  Med: 21.32 Max: 527.87
Current: 22.95
1.06
527.87
PB Ratio 1.88
LEN's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
65% of the 694 Companies
in the Global Residential Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.18 vs. LEN: 1.88 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
LEN' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.22  Med: 1.5 Max: 2.37
Current: 1.88
0.22
2.37
PS Ratio 1.15
LEN's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
59% of the 732 Companies
in the Global Residential Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.78 vs. LEN: 1.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
LEN' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.13  Med: 1.05 Max: 2.3
Current: 1.15
0.13
2.3
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 18.09
LEN's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
74% of the 174 Companies
in the Global Residential Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 13.04 vs. LEN: 18.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
LEN' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.52  Med: 7.96 Max: 131.6
Current: 18.09
0.52
131.6
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 16.71
LEN's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
80% of the 240 Companies
in the Global Residential Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 10.88 vs. LEN: 16.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
LEN' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.52  Med: 8.23 Max: 882.38
Current: 16.71
0.52
882.38
EV-to-EBIT 14.23
LEN's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
56% of the 592 Companies
in the Global Residential Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 12.58 vs. LEN: 14.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
LEN' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -37  Med: 13.9 Max: 62.4
Current: 14.23
-37
62.4
EV-to-EBITDA 13.62
LEN's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
62% of the 621 Companies
in the Global Residential Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 10.05 vs. LEN: 13.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
LEN' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -40.7  Med: 13.4 Max: 53.9
Current: 13.62
-40.7
53.9
EV-to-Revenue 1.64
LEN's EV-to-Revenue is ranked lower than
65% of the 738 Companies
in the Global Residential Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.04 vs. LEN: 1.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-Revenue only.
LEN' s EV-to-Revenue Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.4  Med: 1.9 Max: 3.5
Current: 1.64
0.4
3.5
PEG Ratio 0.40
LEN's PEG Ratio is ranked higher than
79% of the 264 Companies
in the Global Residential Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.17 vs. LEN: 0.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG Ratio only.
LEN' s PEG Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.22  Med: 0.29 Max: 1.89
Current: 0.4
0.22
1.89
Current Ratio 5.24
LEN's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
89% of the 514 Companies
in the Global Residential Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.66 vs. LEN: 5.24 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
LEN' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.63  Med: 5.11 Max: 28.04
Current: 5.24
1.63
28.04
Quick Ratio 0.56
LEN's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
62% of the 514 Companies
in the Global Residential Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.97 vs. LEN: 0.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
LEN' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.16  Med: 0.75 Max: 6.16
Current: 0.56
0.16
6.16
Days Inventory 353.32
LEN's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
92% of the 681 Companies
in the Global Residential Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 82.10 vs. LEN: 353.32 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
LEN' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 178.06  Med: 409.4 Max: 537.43
Current: 353.32
178.06
537.43
Days Sales Outstanding 13.27
LEN's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
77% of the 635 Companies
in the Global Residential Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 49.38 vs. LEN: 13.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
LEN' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.48  Med: 2.62 Max: 15.35
Current: 13.27
1.48
15.35
Days Payable 22.41
LEN's Days Payable is ranked lower than
74% of the 600 Companies
in the Global Residential Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 43.11 vs. LEN: 22.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
LEN' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.86  Med: 21.74 Max: 25.34
Current: 22.41
10.86
25.34

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 0.27
LEN's Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
93% of the 498 Companies
in the Global Residential Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 2.00 vs. LEN: 0.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
LEN' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.26  Med: 0.6 Max: 14.29
Current: 0.27
0.26
14.29
Dividend Payout Ratio 0.05
LEN's Dividend Payout Ratio is ranked higher than
95% of the 324 Companies
in the Global Residential Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.31 vs. LEN: 0.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout Ratio only.
LEN' s Dividend Payout Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.04  Med: 0.06 Max: 0.33
Current: 0.05
0.04
0.33
Forward Dividend Yield % 0.27
LEN's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
95% of the 472 Companies
in the Global Residential Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 2.36 vs. LEN: 0.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 0.27
LEN's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked lower than
92% of the 660 Companies
in the Global Residential Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 2.56 vs. LEN: 0.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
LEN' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.26  Med: 0.6 Max: 14.29
Current: 0.27
0.26
14.29
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -4.70
LEN's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked lower than
64% of the 324 Companies
in the Global Residential Construction industry.

( Industry Median: -0.90 vs. LEN: -4.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
LEN' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -17.5  Med: -4.7 Max: -0.1
Current: -4.7
-17.5
-0.1

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value 4.65
LEN's Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value is ranked lower than
58% of the 285 Companies
in the Global Residential Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 3.16 vs. LEN: 4.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value only.
LEN' s Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.81  Med: 4.55 Max: 242.29
Current: 4.65
0.81
242.29
Price-to-Tangible-Book 1.93
LEN's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
64% of the 686 Companies
in the Global Residential Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.20 vs. LEN: 1.93 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
LEN' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.4  Med: 1.56 Max: 2.96
Current: 1.93
0.4
2.96
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 10.63
LEN's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 261 Companies
in the Global Residential Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.23 vs. LEN: 10.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
LEN' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.14  Med: 1.34 Max: 82.47
Current: 10.63
0.14
82.47
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 1.09
LEN's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
70% of the 684 Companies
in the Global Residential Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.21 vs. LEN: 1.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
LEN' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.23  Med: 0.6 Max: 1.94
Current: 1.09
0.23
1.94
Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value 0.70
LEN's Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value is ranked higher than
65% of the 159 Companies
in the Global Residential Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.85 vs. LEN: 0.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value only.
LEN' s Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.21  Med: 0.49 Max: 4.75
Current: 0.7
0.21
4.75
Price-to-Graham-Number 1.22
LEN's Price-to-Graham-Number is ranked lower than
53% of the 364 Companies
in the Global Residential Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.03 vs. LEN: 1.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Graham-Number only.
LEN' s Price-to-Graham-Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.31  Med: 0.91 Max: 2.85
Current: 1.22
0.31
2.85
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 7.06
LEN's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
57% of the 770 Companies
in the Global Residential Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 5.50 vs. LEN: 7.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
LEN' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -73.7  Med: 3.1 Max: 9.1
Current: 7.06
-73.7
9.1
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % 30.99
LEN's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked higher than
87% of the 337 Companies
in the Global Residential Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 9.32 vs. LEN: 30.99 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
LEN' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -4.8  Med: 11.5 Max: 47.1
Current: 30.99
-4.8
47.1

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $12,237.42
EPS (TTM) $ 3.40
Beta1.25
Short Percentage of Float3.20%
52-Week Range $41.01 - 59.32
Shares Outstanding (Mil)239.97

Analyst Estimate

Nov17 Nov18 Nov19
Revenue (Mil $) 12,481 14,302 15,447
EPS ($) 3.90 4.82 5.40
EPS without NRI ($) 3.90 4.82 5.40
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
16.97%
Dividends per Share ($) 0.16 0.16 0.16

Piotroski F-Score Details

Piotroski F-Score: 55
Positive ROAY
Positive CFROAY
Higher ROA yoyN
CFROA > ROAY
Lower Leverage yoyN
Higher Current Ratio yoyY
Less Shares Outstanding yoyN
Higher Gross Margin yoyN
Higher Asset Turnover yoyY

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}