Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany, Mexico

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.37
NYSE:ATW's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
52% of the 67 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.38 vs. NYSE:ATW: 0.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
NYSE:ATW' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.04  Med: 0.3 Max: No Debt
Current: 0.37
Equity-to-Asset 0.70
NYSE:ATW's Equity-to-Asset is ranked higher than
76% of the 58 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.58 vs. NYSE:ATW: 0.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
NYSE:ATW' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.49  Med: 0.64 Max: 0.86
Current: 0.7
0.49
0.86
Interest Coverage 0.64
NYSE:ATW's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
77% of the 39 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 6.78 vs. NYSE:ATW: 0.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
NYSE:ATW' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.29  Med: 61 Max: 173.48
Current: 0.64
4.29
173.48
Piotroski F-Score: 4
Altman Z-Score: 1.37
Beneish M-Score: -3.49
WACC vs ROIC
7.96%
1.05%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 6.22
NYSE:ATW's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
72% of the 61 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -3.07 vs. NYSE:ATW: 6.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
NYSE:ATW' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 28.83  Med: 40.47 Max: 50.95
Current: 6.22
28.83
50.95
Net Margin % -3.06
NYSE:ATW's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
80% of the 61 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -14.82 vs. NYSE:ATW: -3.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
NYSE:ATW' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 25.99  Med: 34.53 Max: 42.75
Current: -3.06
25.99
42.75
ROE % -0.58
NYSE:ATW's ROE % is ranked higher than
74% of the 62 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -6.45 vs. NYSE:ATW: -0.58 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
NYSE:ATW' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.59  Med: 17.43 Max: 29.52
Current: -0.58
8.59
29.52
ROA % -0.41
NYSE:ATW's ROA % is ranked higher than
76% of the 68 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -3.82 vs. NYSE:ATW: -0.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
NYSE:ATW' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.68  Med: 11.93 Max: 23.7
Current: -0.41
5.68
23.7
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 1.16
NYSE:ATW's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
73% of the 66 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -4.17 vs. NYSE:ATW: 1.16 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
NYSE:ATW' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.61  Med: 16.97 Max: 33.16
Current: 1.16
8.61
33.16
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -0.90
NYSE:ATW's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
83% of the 58 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -23.90 vs. NYSE:ATW: -0.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
NYSE:ATW' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -8.5  Med: 15.2 Max: 51.1
Current: -0.9
-8.5
51.1
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate 0.50
NYSE:ATW's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked higher than
70% of the 53 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -15.40 vs. NYSE:ATW: 0.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
NYSE:ATW' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -20.7  Med: 21.8 Max: 64.4
Current: 0.5
-20.7
64.4
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate -8.40
NYSE:ATW's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked higher than
64% of the 33 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -15.10 vs. NYSE:ATW: -8.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
NYSE:ATW' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -45.1  Med: 8.1 Max: 152.8
Current: -8.4
-45.1
152.8
GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with Atwood Oceanics Inc $NYSE:ATW.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» NYSE:ATW's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-11-14 Est.)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q3 2016

ATW Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Paul Tudor Jones 33,400 sh (+100.00%)
Jeremy Grantham 64,166 sh (+64.53%)
Arnold Van Den Berg 1,858,920 sh (+51.81%)
Chuck Royce 135,909 sh (unchged)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 42,726 sh (-2.17%)
Joel Greenblatt 656,675 sh (-44.45%)
» More
Q4 2016

ATW Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Chuck Royce 248,050 sh (+82.51%)
Jeremy Grantham 112,581 sh (+75.45%)
Arnold Van Den Berg 2,108,799 sh (+13.44%)
Joel Greenblatt 703,121 sh (+7.07%)
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss Sold Out
» More
Q1 2017

ATW Guru Trades in Q1 2017

Charles Brandes 12,283 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 31,500 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 1,876,400 sh (New)
Arnold Van Den Berg 2,631,439 sh (+24.78%)
Steven Cohen 150,000 sh (unchged)
Chuck Royce Sold Out
Jeremy Grantham 46,800 sh (-58.43%)
Joel Greenblatt 195,868 sh (-72.14%)
» More
Q2 2017

ATW Guru Trades in Q2 2017

Jeremy Grantham 97,240 sh (+107.78%)
Charles Brandes 12,283 sh (unchged)
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Arnold Van Den Berg 2,567,209 sh (-2.44%)
Joel Greenblatt 11,156 sh (-94.30%)
Steven Cohen 20,800 sh (-98.89%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with NYSE:ATW

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

GuruDate Trades Impact to Portfolio Price Range * (?) Current Price Change from Average Current Shares
Arnold Van Den Berg 2017-06-30 Reduce -2.44%0.09%$7.18 - $10.23 $ 6.26-28%2,567,209
Joel Greenblatt 2017-06-30 Reduce -94.30%0.02%$7.18 - $10.23 $ 6.26-27%11,156
Arnold Van Den Berg 2017-03-31 Add 24.78%0.74%$8.92 - $14.05 $ 6.26-44%2,631,439
Joel Greenblatt 2017-03-31 Reduce -72.14%0.09%$8.92 - $14.05 $ 6.26-44%195,868
Charles Brandes 2017-03-31 New Buy$8.92 - $14.05 $ 6.26-44%12,283
Arnold Van Den Berg 2016-12-31 Add 13.44%0.52%$7.14 - $13.98 $ 6.26-36%2,108,799
Joel Greenblatt 2016-12-31 Add 7.07%0.01%$7.14 - $13.98 $ 6.26-36%703,121
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 2016-12-31 Sold Out $7.14 - $13.98 $ 6.26-36%0
Arnold Van Den Berg 2016-09-30 Add 51.81%0.89%$6.48 - $13.66 $ 6.26-34%1,858,920
Joel Greenblatt 2016-09-30 Reduce -44.45%0.08%$6.48 - $13.66 $ 6.26-34%656,675
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 2016-09-30 Reduce -2.17%$6.48 - $13.66 $ 6.26-34%42,726
Premium More recent guru trades are included for Premium Members only!!
Premium More recent guru trades are included for USA Subscribe Members only!!
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - Drilling » Oil & Gas Drilling    NAICS: 213111    SIC: 1381
Compare:NYSE:SBR, NYSE:UNT, NYSE:PES, TSX:XDC, OTCPK:GULTU, AMEX:CEI, OTCPK:PGNPQ, OTCPK:AEGG, NYSE:RDC, NYSE:DO, NAS:PTEN, NYSE:HP, NYSE:RSPP » details
Traded in other countries:AWZ.Germany, ATW.Mexico,
Headquarter Location:USA
Atwood Oceanics Inc is engaged in the oil & gas sector. Its core business involves offshore offshore drilling and completion of developmental oil and gas wells.

Atwood Oceanics, Inc. is an offshore drilling company that offers drilling and completion of exploratory and development oil and gas wells. An array of unique drilling units is offered globally in the offshore market. Rig options can differ by operative depth of water, bottom condition, environment and geographical area, and by drilling and operating requirement. The main fleet options consist of deepwater semisubmersibles, jackups, and ultra-deepwater rigs. The majority of Atwood's revenue is derived globally from major integrated oil and natural gas companies and independent oil and gas companies.

Guru Investment Theses on Atwood Oceanics Inc

Bruce Berkowitz Comments on Atwood Oceanics - Jan 31, 2017

Stressed energy markets led us to invest in senior bonds of offshore driller Atwood Oceanics (NYSE:ATW). The bonds were purchased at attractive prices relative to the backlog of future cash flow from drilling operations and the value of Atwood’s modernized fleet. Thus far, Atwood has weathered tough conditions as the industry slowly rebalances between rig supply and demand in a lower commodity price environment. Atwood’s management has reduced cash operating costs by 25% while extending contracts with customers and suppliers. Atwood also reduced the outstanding senior bond class by over 30% through debt repurchases and raised liquidity through an equity offering. All actions combine to give us comfort that Atwood is positioned to capitalize on the eventual upcycle.



From Bruce Berkowitz (Trades, Portfolio)'s Fairholme Fund (Trades, Portfolio) annual shareholder letter 2016.

Check out Bruce Berkowitz latest stock trades

Bruce Berkowitz Comments on Atwood - Aug 02, 2016

The Funds own senior bonds of Atwood (NYSE:ATW) due 2020 with a 17% yield to maturity. Year-to-date, Atwood has retired over 30% these bonds due 2020 via open market purchases and a $150 million cash tender offer announced in late June. These events indicate that management believes it has the financial wherewithal to meet all obligations and take advantage of market mispricing. An existing $220 million cash balance, available credit line, and current contractual backlog provide ample liquidity. Atwood’s fleet of 11 high-spec rigs has a superb operating record and management continues to blend and extend transaction dates with both customers and suppliers.




From Bruce Berkowitz (Trades, Portfolio)'s first-half 2016 letter to shareholders.

Check out Bruce Berkowitz latest stock trades

FPA Capital Fund Comments on Atwood - Dec 09, 2015

During the third quarter, we sold our investment in Atwood (NYSE:ATW) and reinvested the proceeds in PTEN. There are many things to like about Atwood, including their young fleet of high-spec rigs, their significant revenue backlog, their industry leading margins and revenue efficiency, their track record of safe operations, and their seasoned board of directors. The problem with Atwood is they have debt maturing in the next three years. While we imagine the cycle may have turned by then, we always look for a margin of safety and have chosen to reinvest this capital into other energy names with more favorable balance sheets is beyond reproach. Unlike land drilling, if a rig runs out of work it costs a lot of money to store (particularly floating rigs). We do not know if the cycle will last beyond the time when the bulk of Atwood’s revenue backlog runs out. The recent credit facility amendment greatly reduced Atwood’s flexibility and puts shareholders in a position where if they guess wrong about when the cycle turns they may lose their entire investment. We were not willing to underwrite that.

By selling the shares of Atwood and reinvesting in Patterson we do give up some revenue backlog, but we pick up another well run dividend paying company at a discount to tangible book value with a much better balance sheet and greater liquidity. Crucially, it costs very little money to store Patterson’s land drilling rigs or pressure pumping equipment in a yard if either are idled. We have confidence that by selling Atwood and investing in Patterson we have reduced our downside risk. Recall that we executed a similar swap in the first quarter of this year, when we replaced our Ensco holding with Helmerich & Payne for the very same reasons: similar upside but significantly greater downside protection.

From FPA Capital Fund (Trades, Portfolio)'s third quarter 2015 letter to shareholders.

Check out FPA Capital Fund latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about Atwood Oceanics Inc

SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Monteverde & Associates PC Announces An Investigation Of Atwood Oceanics, Inc. - ATW
WeissLaw LLP: The Atwood Oceanics, Inc. Merger May Not Be in the Best Interests of ATW Shareholders
Covered Call reports for Atwood Oceanics, Inc., iRobot, Micron, Palo Alto Networks and Tesla Motors include trade ideas that offer returns of 19% or more!
ATWOOD OCEANICS INVESTOR ALERT BY THE FORMER ATTORNEY GENERAL OF LOUISIANA: Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC Investigates Adequacy of Price and Process in Proposed Sale of Atwood Oceanics, Inc.
Harwood Feffer LLP Announces Investigation of Atwood Oceanics, Inc.
ATWOOD (ATW) ALERT: J&W Investigates Proposed Sale of Atwood Oceanics, Inc.; Are Shareholders Getting a Fair Price?
8 Stocks Van Den Berg Continues to Buy Guru increased these holdings in the last 2 quarters
Arnold Van Den Berg (Trades, Portfolio), a value investor, founded Century Management in 1974. In both first-quarter 2017 and fourth-quarter 2016 the guru bought shares in the following stocks. Read more...
Bruce Berkowitz Comments on Atwood Oceanics Guru stock highlight
Stressed energy markets led us to invest in senior bonds of offshore driller Atwood Oceanics (NYSE:ATW). The bonds were purchased at attractive prices relative to the backlog of future cash flow from drilling operations and the value of Atwood’s modernized fleet. Thus far, Atwood has weathered tough conditions as the industry slowly rebalances between rig supply and demand in a lower commodity price environment. Atwood’s management has reduced cash operating costs by 25% while extending contracts with customers and suppliers. Atwood also reduced the outstanding senior bond class by over 30% through debt repurchases and raised liquidity through an equity offering. All actions combine to give us comfort that Atwood is positioned to capitalize on the eventual upcycle. Read more...
22 Questions With Value Investor Jon Forbes 'Keep at it and be patient, trust your analysis so much that the immediate price is not something that will worry you'
1. How and why did you get started investing? What is your background? Read more...
Arnold Van Den Berg Makes One Buy and Three Large Increases in 3rd Quarter Outperforming fund reports portfolio
Century Management founder Arnold Van Den Berg (Trades, Portfolio) added one new stock to his portfolio and made significant increases to his positions in three others in the third quarter, he reported Monday. Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PB Ratio 0.15
ATW's PB Ratio is ranked higher than
88% of the 58 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.59 vs. ATW: 0.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
ATW' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.12  Med: 1.56 Max: 5.07
Current: 0.15
0.12
5.07
PS Ratio 0.70
ATW's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
58% of the 59 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.85 vs. ATW: 0.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
ATW' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.27  Med: 3.48 Max: 8.06
Current: 0.7
0.27
8.06
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 2.97
ATW's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
61% of the 28 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 3.22 vs. ATW: 2.97 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
ATW' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.09  Med: 23.07 Max: 445.93
Current: 2.97
1.09
445.93
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 1.24
ATW's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
74% of the 39 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 2.93 vs. ATW: 1.24 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
ATW' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.58  Med: 7.68 Max: 20.62
Current: 1.24
0.58
20.62
EV-to-EBIT 26.34
ATW's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
53% of the 30 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 7.70 vs. ATW: 26.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
ATW' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3  Med: 9.5 Max: 32.5
Current: 26.34
3
32.5
EV-to-EBITDA 6.11
ATW's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
67% of the 45 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 7.64 vs. ATW: 6.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
ATW' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.4  Med: 7.8 Max: 15.9
Current: 6.11
2.4
15.9
Shiller PE Ratio 1.41
ATW's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked higher than
87% of the 16 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 5.73 vs. ATW: 1.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
ATW' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.32  Med: 18.62 Max: 68.83
Current: 1.41
1.32
68.83
Current Ratio 8.79
ATW's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
88% of the 68 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 1.97 vs. ATW: 8.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
ATW' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.61  Med: 2.96 Max: 12.18
Current: 8.79
0.61
12.18
Quick Ratio 7.45
ATW's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
88% of the 68 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 1.71 vs. ATW: 7.45 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
ATW' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.49  Med: 2.47 Max: 11.23
Current: 7.45
0.49
11.23
Days Inventory 142.49
ATW's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
82% of the 44 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 35.53 vs. ATW: 142.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
ATW' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 47.68  Med: 77.38 Max: 111.22
Current: 142.49
47.68
111.22
Days Sales Outstanding 45.19
ATW's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
80% of the 49 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 65.65 vs. ATW: 45.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
ATW' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 40.44  Med: 72.41 Max: 94.08
Current: 45.19
40.44
94.08
Days Payable 47.46
ATW's Days Payable is ranked lower than
75% of the 44 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 47.99 vs. ATW: 47.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
ATW' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 22.7  Med: 49.79 Max: 184.52
Current: 47.46
22.7
184.52

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 0.74
ATW's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked lower than
58% of the 96 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 5.70 vs. ATW: 0.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
ATW' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.73  Med: 3.07 Max: 14.65
Current: 0.74
0.73
14.65
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -0.40
ATW's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
68% of the 50 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -3.60 vs. ATW: -0.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
ATW' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -19.9  Med: -0.6 Max: 0.4
Current: -0.4
-19.9
0.4

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 0.15
ATW's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked higher than
87% of the 55 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.61 vs. ATW: 0.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
ATW' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.17  Med: 1.52 Max: 6.22
Current: 0.15
0.17
6.22
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 0.31
ATW's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked higher than
66% of the 32 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.77 vs. ATW: 0.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
ATW' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.4  Med: 4.38 Max: 71.4
Current: 0.31
0.4
71.4
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.20
ATW's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
76% of the 58 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.61 vs. ATW: 0.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
ATW' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.13  Med: 0.86 Max: 2.46
Current: 0.2
0.13
2.46
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 3.80
ATW's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
76% of the 67 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -0.90 vs. ATW: 3.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
ATW' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.1  Med: 10.5 Max: 33.4
Current: 3.8
3.1
33.4
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % -23.35
ATW's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
58% of the 31 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -7.20 vs. ATW: -23.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
ATW' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -51.3  Med: 10.1 Max: 50
Current: -23.35
-51.3
50

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $631.17
EPS (TTM) $ -0.21
Beta2.80
Short Percentage of Float99.62%
52-Week Range $5.96 - 15.37
Shares Outstanding (Mil)80.46

Analyst Estimate

Sep17 Sep18 Sep19
Revenue (Mil $) 488 349 388
EPS ($) -1.67 -2.94 -2.38
EPS without NRI ($) -1.67 -2.94 -2.38
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
N/A
Dividends per Share ($)
» More Articles for ATW

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Offshore Drillers: We’re Not There Yet Jul 18 2017 
WeissLaw LLP: The Atwood Oceanics, Inc. Merger May Not Be in the Best Interests of ATW Shareholders Jun 02 2017 
Covered Call reports for Atwood Oceanics, Inc., iRobot, Micron, Palo Alto Networks and Tesla Motors Jun 02 2017 
ATWOOD OCEANICS INVESTOR ALERT BY THE FORMER ATTORNEY GENERAL OF LOUISIANA: Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC I Jun 01 2017 
Is Atwood Acquisition Positive for Ensco? Jun 01 2017 
Harwood Feffer LLP Announces Investigation of Atwood Oceanics, Inc. May 30 2017 
ATWOOD (ATW) ALERT: J&W Investigates Proposed Sale of Atwood Oceanics, Inc.; Are Shareholders Gettin May 30 2017 
8 Stocks Van Den Berg Continues to Buy May 03 2017 
Undervalued Stocks With Growing Book Values Mar 21 2017 
7 Undervalued Stocks With Growing EPS Feb 23 2017 

More From Other Websites
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Monteverde & Associates PC Announces An Investigation Of Atwood Oceanics, Inc. -... Aug 18 2017
Ensco plc and Atwood Oceanics, Inc. File Definitive Proxy Materials in Connection with Pending... Aug 18 2017
Seadrill Makes an Important Announcement Before Its 2Q17 Results Aug 18 2017
Atwood Oceanics: New Contracts and Analyst Revisions Aug 18 2017
Seadrill Partners Stock Rose 17.9% in the Last Trading Session Aug 18 2017
Ensco's Management Shares Its Vision for the Future of the Offshore Industry Aug 17 2017
Analysts Differ On Transocean's Pricey Acquisition Of Songa Aug 15 2017
Transocean: Let's Make a Deal? Aug 15 2017
Atwood Oceanics' Rig Approves One-Well Contract From Kosmos Aug 15 2017
Will US Crude Oil Rig Counts Rescue Crude Oil Bulls? Aug 14 2017
Analyzing Transocean’s 2Q17 Earnings Aug 10 2017
ATWOOD OCEANICS ANNOUNCES CONTRACT FOR THE ATWOOD ACHIEVER Aug 09 2017
Is the US Crude Oil Rig Count Slowing Down? Aug 07 2017
Atwood Oceanics reports 3Q loss Aug 04 2017
[$$] Ensco Shareholder Urges Rejection of Atwood Oceanics Deal Aug 03 2017
Atwood Oceanics Announces Fiscal 2017 Third Quarter Earnings Aug 03 2017
Is Ensco Still Committed to ATW Acquisition despite Price Drops? Aug 03 2017
Why Ensco Expects a Spike in 3Q17 Drilling Costs Aug 01 2017
Ensco's Earnings May Not Impress Investors, but Its Outlook Might Jul 31 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}