Switch to:
Also traded in: Canada, Germany, Switzerland, UK

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.17
CCJ's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
83% of the 1545 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 291.20 vs. CCJ: 0.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
CCJ' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.02  Med: 0.25 Max: N/A
Current: 0.17
Equity-to-Asset 0.64
CCJ's Equity-to-Asset is ranked higher than
58% of the 724 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 0.60 vs. CCJ: 0.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
CCJ' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.5  Med: 0.64 Max: 0.87
Current: 0.64
0.5
0.87
Piotroski F-Score: 4
Altman Z-Score: 2.02
Beneish M-Score: -2.64
WACC vs ROIC
6.23%
-1.65%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % -7.89
CCJ's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
62% of the 743 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 1.28 vs. CCJ: -7.89 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
CCJ' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -5.83  Med: 15.71 Max: 69.98
Current: -7.89
-5.83
69.98
Net Margin % -6.53
CCJ's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
55% of the 746 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 0.29 vs. CCJ: -6.53 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
CCJ' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.53  Med: 15.71 Max: 47.49
Current: -6.53
-2.53
47.49
ROE % -2.95
CCJ's ROE % is ranked higher than
68% of the 1395 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -10.31 vs. CCJ: -2.95 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
CCJ' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1.14  Med: 7.78 Max: 26.31
Current: -2.95
-1.14
26.31
ROA % -1.87
CCJ's ROA % is ranked higher than
71% of the 1566 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -9.58 vs. CCJ: -1.87 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
CCJ' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.72  Med: 5.1 Max: 15.27
Current: -1.87
-0.72
15.27
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % -2.88
CCJ's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
69% of the 1487 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -13.76 vs. CCJ: -2.88 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
CCJ' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1.31  Med: 7.31 Max: 18.97
Current: -2.88
-1.31
18.97
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -0.10
CCJ's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
58% of the 624 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -3.70 vs. CCJ: -0.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
CCJ' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -7  Med: 6.1 Max: 28.5
Current: -0.1
-7
28.5
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate -14.40
CCJ's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked higher than
55% of the 1105 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -18.10 vs. CCJ: -14.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
CCJ' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -31  Med: 6.7 Max: 53.4
Current: -14.4
-31
53.4
GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Signs with Cameco Corp $CCJ.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» CCJ's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-07-28 Est.)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2016

CCJ Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Jim Simons 358,500 sh (+7.05%)
Ray Dalio 126,900 sh (+1.04%)
Chuck Royce 24,500 sh (unchged)
David Dreman 1,807 sh (-9.06%)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 15,083,243 sh (-10.15%)
» More
Q3 2016

CCJ Guru Trades in Q3 2016

NWQ Managers 1,787,731 sh (New)
First Eagle Investment 313,300 sh (New)
Jim Simons 1,443,500 sh (+302.65%)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 16,144,413 sh (+7.04%)
Chuck Royce 24,500 sh (unchged)
David Dreman 1,724 sh (-4.59%)
Ray Dalio 119,700 sh (-5.67%)
» More
Q4 2016

CCJ Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Charles Brandes 1,885,782 sh (New)
Ronald Muhlenkamp 551,392 sh (New)
NWQ Managers 2,136,147 sh (+19.49%)
First Eagle Investment 313,300 sh (unchged)
Chuck Royce 24,500 sh (unchged)
David Dreman Sold Out
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 13,962,723 sh (-13.51%)
Ray Dalio 96,600 sh (-19.30%)
Jim Simons 388,500 sh (-73.09%)
» More
Q1 2017

CCJ Guru Trades in Q1 2017

Joel Greenblatt 438,813 sh (New)
Ronald Muhlenkamp 871,688 sh (+58.09%)
Ray Dalio 97,654 sh (+1.09%)
NWQ Managers 2,146,262 sh (+0.47%)
Chuck Royce 24,500 sh (unchged)
First Eagle Investment 313,300 sh (unchged)
Ronald Muhlenkamp 2,000 sh (unchged)
Jim Simons Sold Out
Charles Brandes 1,669,615 sh (-11.46%)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 6,941,519 sh (-50.29%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with NYSE:CCJ

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Metals & Mining » Industrial Metals & Minerals    NAICS: 212291    SIC: 616
Compare:OTCPK:KIROY, NYSE:BVN, NYSE:SLCA, OTCPK:KZMYY, OTCPK:ILKAY, OTCPK:EXXAY, OTCPK:IVPAF, OTCPK:VDNRF, NYSE:CMP, NYSE:SWC, OTCPK:IMPUY, OTCPK:HCHDF, NAS:GSM, OTCPK:POYYF, NYSE:CLF, NYSE:PVG, OTCPK:MFRVF, OTCPK:IPGDF, OTCPK:ANGPY, OTCPK:PTNDY » details
Traded in other countries:CCO.Canada, CJ6.Germany, CCO.Switzerland, 0R35.UK,
Headquarter Location:Canada
Cameco Corp is engaged in the exploration and the development, mining, refining, conversion, fabrication and trading of uranium for sale as fuel for generating electricity in nuclear power reactors in Canada and other countries.

Cameco is one of the world's largest uranium producers. The flagship McArthur River mine in Saskatchewan accounted for roughly 50% of output. Cameco intends to increase annual uranium production substantially over the next several years. In addition to its large uranium mining business, Cameco owns a uranium marketing business and operates uranium conversion and fabrication facilities.

Top Ranked Articles about Cameco Corp

Cameco Updates Production Outlook for Cigar Lake

SASKATOON, SASKATCHEWAN--(Marketwired - May 31, 2016) - Cameco (TSX:CCO)(NYSE:CCJ) announced today that the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) has approved an application by AREVA Resources Canada Inc. (AREVA) to increase the annual licensed production capacity of the McClean Lake milling operation to 24 million pounds of uranium concentrate (U3O8). Ore from Cameco's Cigar Lake mine is milled and packaged at the McClean Lake operation which is majority owned and operated by AREVA. Approval of AREVA's application permits Cameco to meet its 2016 Cigar Lake production outlook of 16 million packaged pounds of uranium concentrate (Cameco's share 8 million pounds). Prior to the approval, the McClean Lake mill's operating licence had an annual production limit of 13 million pounds. The Cigar Lake mine is expected to reach its full annual production of 18 million pounds (Cameco's share 9 million pounds) in 2017. The Cigar Lake mine is owned by Cameco (50.025%), AREVA Resources Canada Inc. (37.1%), Idemitsu Canada Resources Ltd. (7.875%) and TEPCO Resources Inc. (5.0%) and is operated by Cameco. Profile Cameco is one of the world's largest uranium producers, a significant supplier of conversion services and one of two Candu fuel manufacturers in Canada. Our competitive position is based on our controlling ownership of the world's largest high-grade reserves and low-cost operations. Our uranium products are used to generate clean electricity in nuclear power plants around the world. We also explore for uranium in the Americas, Australia and Asia. Our shares trade on the Toronto and New York stock exchanges. Our head office is in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Information and Statements The statements regarding Cameco's expectation concerning production at Cigar Lake in 2016 and 2017 are "forward-looking information" or a "forward-looking statement" within the meaning of Canadian and U.S. securities laws. This information is based upon a number of assumptions that, while considered reasonable by management, are subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies. We have assumed that: our Cigar Lake development, mining and production plans succeed, the jet boring mining method works as anticipated, and the deposit freezes as planned; modification and expansion of the McClean Lake mill are completed as planned and the mill is able to process Cigar Lake ore as expected; there is no material delay or disruption in our plans as a result of ground movements, cave-ins, additional water inflows, a failure of seals or plugs used for previous water inflows, natural phenomena, delay in acquiring critical equipment, equipment failure, performance of the water treatment system, or other causes; there are no labour shortages; there are no labour disputes during the collective bargaining process with unionized employees at the McClean Lake Mill; we and AREVA obtain contractors, equipment, operating parts, supplies, regulatory permits and approvals when needed; and that our mineral reserves estimate and the assumptions it is based on are reliable. This forward-looking information also involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause actual results and developments to differ materially from those expressed or implied.

They include the risks: that an unexpected geological, hydrological or underground condition or an additional water inflow delays or disrupts our plans; of natural phenomena, labour disputes during the collective bargaining process with unionized workers at the McClean Lake mill, equipment failure, performance of the water treatment system, delay in obtaining the required contractors, equipment, operating parts and supplies or other reasons cause a material delay or disruption in our plans; that our development, mining or production plans for Cigar Lake are delayed or do not succeed, including as a result of any difficulties with the jet boring mining method or freezing the deposit to meet production targets, or any difficulties with the McClean Lake mill modifications or expansion or milling of Cigar Lake ore; and that our mineral reserves estimate is not reliable. Please also see our most recent annual information form, annual MD&A and quarterly MD&A for other risks and assumptions relevant to the forward-looking information in this news release. We are providing this forward-looking information to help you understand management's views regarding Cigar Lake and McClean Lake and it may not be appropriate for other purposes. Cameco does not undertake any obligation to update or revise forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except to the extent legally required. Qualified Person The above scientific and technical information related to the Cigar Lake mining operation was approved by Les Yesnik, general manager, Cigar Lake, who is a qualified person for the purpose of National Instrument 43-101.





Investor inquiries:
Cory Kos
(306) 956-8176
Media inquiries:
Rob Gereghty
(306) 956-6190




Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
Forward PE Ratio 33.22
CCJ's Forward PE Ratio is ranked lower than
79% of the 583 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 17.01 vs. CCJ: 33.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PB Ratio 0.96
CCJ's PB Ratio is ranked higher than
72% of the 1388 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 2.03 vs. CCJ: 0.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
CCJ' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.76  Med: 1.8 Max: 7.02
Current: 0.96
0.76
7.02
PS Ratio 2.08
CCJ's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
57% of the 672 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 1.84 vs. CCJ: 2.08 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
CCJ' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.64  Med: 4.06 Max: 12.11
Current: 2.08
1.64
12.11
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 12.78
CCJ's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
83% of the 237 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 17.07 vs. CCJ: 12.78 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
CCJ' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 12.71  Med: 63.3 Max: 19680
Current: 12.78
12.71
19680
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 8.64
CCJ's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
78% of the 385 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 8.68 vs. CCJ: 8.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
CCJ' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.4  Med: 17.52 Max: 174
Current: 8.64
7.4
174
EV-to-EBIT -34.97
CCJ's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 904 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 20.02 vs. CCJ: -34.97 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
CCJ' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1892.1  Med: 23.4 Max: 238.3
Current: -34.97
-1892.1
238.3
EV-to-EBITDA 33.50
CCJ's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
79% of the 971 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 10.14 vs. CCJ: 33.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
CCJ' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.3  Med: 19.2 Max: 39.3
Current: 33.5
8.3
39.3
Shiller PE Ratio 12.22
CCJ's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked higher than
68% of the 183 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 24.05 vs. CCJ: 12.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
CCJ' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.52  Med: 19.66 Max: 165.26
Current: 12.22
9.52
165.26
Current Ratio 5.37
CCJ's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
67% of the 1502 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 2.17 vs. CCJ: 5.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
CCJ' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.27  Med: 3.66 Max: 8.1
Current: 5.37
1.27
8.1
Quick Ratio 1.54
CCJ's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
51% of the 1502 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 1.71 vs. CCJ: 1.54 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
CCJ' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.58  Med: 1.57 Max: 3.62
Current: 1.54
0.58
3.62
Days Inventory 260.63
CCJ's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
94% of the 606 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 76.92 vs. CCJ: 260.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
CCJ' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 113.13  Med: 138 Max: 238.63
Current: 260.63
113.13
238.63
Days Sales Outstanding 17.02
CCJ's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
50% of the 600 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 36.83 vs. CCJ: 17.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
CCJ' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 31.39  Med: 66.11 Max: 93.66
Current: 17.02
31.39
93.66
Days Payable 38.67
CCJ's Days Payable is ranked lower than
56% of the 464 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 47.37 vs. CCJ: 38.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
CCJ' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 35.32  Med: 54.31 Max: 154.53
Current: 38.67
35.32
154.53

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 3.20
CCJ's Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
61% of the 667 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 2.13 vs. CCJ: 3.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
CCJ' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.29  Med: 1.66 Max: 3.82
Current: 3.2
0.29
3.82
Forward Dividend Yield % 3.17
CCJ's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
58% of the 636 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 2.05 vs. CCJ: 3.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 3.20
CCJ's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked higher than
57% of the 895 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 2.23 vs. CCJ: 3.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
CCJ' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.29  Med: 1.66 Max: 3.82
Current: 3.2
0.29
3.82

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 1.00
CCJ's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked higher than
74% of the 1342 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 2.29 vs. CCJ: 1.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
CCJ' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.49  Med: 1.73 Max: 6.65
Current: 1
0.49
6.65
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 1.25
CCJ's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked higher than
66% of the 325 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 2.03 vs. CCJ: 1.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
CCJ' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.08  Med: 2.19 Max: 8.16
Current: 1.25
1.08
8.16
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.51
CCJ's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
83% of the 518 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 1.05 vs. CCJ: 0.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
CCJ' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.32  Med: 0.97 Max: 2.51
Current: 0.51
0.32
2.51
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % -2.86
CCJ's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
52% of the 1748 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -0.10 vs. CCJ: -2.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
CCJ' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.4  Med: 3.6 Max: 9.4
Current: -2.86
0.4
9.4
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % -18.13
CCJ's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
71% of the 305 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -2.06 vs. CCJ: -18.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
CCJ' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -23.2  Med: 3.6 Max: 28.5
Current: -18.13
-23.2
28.5

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $1,831
EPS (TTM) $ -0.31
Beta1.28
Short Percentage of Float0.00%
52-Week Range $7.41 - 13.36
Shares Outstanding (Mil)395.79

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18 Dec19
Revenue (Mil $) 1,568 1,759 1,917
EPS ($) 0.27 0.53 0.80
EPS without NRI ($) 0.27 0.53 0.80
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
N/A
Dividends per Share ($)
» More Articles for NYSE:CCJ

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Ronald Muhlenkamp Gains 4 New Holdings, Sells 2 Others Feb 10 2017 
Know the Most Explosive Stocks of 2017 Jan 25 2017 
It Is Time to Buy Cameco Jan 05 2017 
Cameco Still Might Not be a Buy Sep 14 2016 
Will Uranium Ever be a Buy? Aug 30 2016 
Cameco Updates Production Outlook for Cigar Lake May 31 2016 
Cameco and Kazatomprom Sign Agreement to Restructure JV Inkai May 27 2016 
Cameco Announces Election of Directors May 11 2016 
Cameco Announces Operational Changes in Saskatchewan and the United States Apr 21 2016 
Cameco Reports Document Filings Mar 29 2016 

More From Other Websites
ETFs with exposure to Cameco Corp. : May 26, 2017 May 26 2017
Better Buy: Cameco Corporation vs. Denison Mines May 15 2017
Cameco annonce des changements dans la direction et fait part de l'élection des administrateurs May 12 2017
Cameco Announces Senior Management Changes and Election of Directors May 11 2017
Better Buy: Cameco Corporation vs. Teck Resources May 09 2017
Cameco Corp. :CCJ-US: Earnings Analysis: Q1, 2017 By the Numbers : May 3, 2017 May 03 2017
Another Tough Quarter for Cameco Corp, but There Were Bright Spots May 02 2017
Is Management Really to Blame for Cameco's Woes? Apr 28 2017
Cameco reports 1Q loss Apr 28 2017
Cameco posts bigger-than-expected loss on scrapped Tepco contract Apr 28 2017
Uranium producer Cameco posts loss vs year-ago profit Apr 28 2017
Cameco reports first quarter results Apr 28 2017
5 Things You Didn't Know About Cameco Corp. Apr 24 2017
How Sustainable Is Cameco Corporation's Dividend? Apr 20 2017
Better Buy: Cameco Corporation vs. NexGen Energy Apr 18 2017
Today's Research Reports on Stocks to Watch: Northern Dynasty Minerals and Cameco Apr 13 2017
Cameco Corp. – Value Analysis (NYSE:CCJ) : April 12, 2017 Apr 12 2017
New Strong Sell Stocks for April 12th Apr 12 2017
Cameco Corp. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bullish Manner : CCJ-US : April 11, 2017 Apr 11 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)