Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany, Mexico, UK

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 1.12
FLR's Cash-to-Debt is ranked higher than
57% of the 1011 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.79 vs. FLR: 1.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
FLR' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.26  Med: 3.83 Max: 51.38
Current: 1.12
0.26
51.38
Equity-to-Asset 0.33
FLR's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
67% of the 1000 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.44 vs. FLR: 0.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
FLR' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.25  Med: 0.36 Max: 0.47
Current: 0.33
0.25
0.47
Debt-to-Equity 0.57
FLR's Debt-to-Equity is ranked lower than
54% of the 852 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.46 vs. FLR: 0.57 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-Equity only.
FLR' s Debt-to-Equity Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.01  Med: 0.16 Max: 0.57
Current: 0.57
0.01
0.57
Debt-to-EBITDA 2.24
FLR's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
57% of the 816 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 2.52 vs. FLR: 2.24 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-EBITDA only.
FLR' s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.1  Med: 0.5 Max: 2.38
Current: 2.24
0.1
2.38
Interest Coverage 6.89
FLR's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
64% of the 905 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 19.93 vs. FLR: 6.89 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
FLR' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.3  Med: 40.98 Max: 111.66
Current: 6.89
6.3
111.66
Piotroski F-Score: 5
Altman Z-Score: 3.71
Beneish M-Score: -2.45
WACC vs ROIC
12.77%
10.62%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 2.66
FLR's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
77% of the 1008 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 6.48 vs. FLR: 2.66 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
FLR' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.18  Med: 4.28 Max: 5.65
Current: 2.66
2.18
5.65
Net Margin % 1.21
FLR's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
75% of the 1008 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 3.99 vs. FLR: 1.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
FLR'