Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.07
THS's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
86% of the 1622 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 0.63 vs. THS: 0.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
THS' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0.02 Max: 3.82
Current: 0.07
0
3.82
Equity-to-Asset 0.39
THS's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
70% of the 1597 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 0.52 vs. THS: 0.39 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
THS' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.38  Med: 0.46 Max: 0.84
Current: 0.39
0.38
0.84
Debt-to-Equity 1.04
THS's Debt-to-Equity is ranked lower than
77% of the 1204 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 0.51 vs. THS: 1.04 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-Equity only.
THS' s Debt-to-Equity Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.01  Med: 0.76 Max: 1.12
Current: 1.04
0.01
1.12
Debt-to-EBITDA 13.98
THS's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
94% of the 1266 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 2.60 vs. THS: 13.98 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-EBITDA only.
THS' s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.14  Med: 3.77 Max: 13.98
Current: 13.98
2.14
13.98
Piotroski F-Score: 5
Altman Z-Score: 1.79
Beneish M-Score: -3.05
WACC vs ROIC
3.87%
-3.16%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % -1.93
THS's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
84% of the 1615 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 5.66 vs. THS: -1.93 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
THS' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1.93  Med: 7.63 Max: 9.72
Current: -1.93
-1.93
9.72
Net Margin % -3.84
THS's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
86% of the 1613 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 3.91 vs. THS: -3.84 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
THS' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -3.84  Med: 3.69 Max: 5.38
Current: -3.84
-3.84
5.38
ROE % -9.40
THS's ROE % is ranked lower than
89% of the 1580 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 8.59 vs. THS: -9.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
THS' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -10.49  Med: 7 Max: 11.82
Current: -9.4
-10.49
11.82
ROA % -3.70
THS's ROA % is ranked lower than
87% of the 1647 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 3.91 vs. THS: -3.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
THS' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -4.46  Med: 3.4 Max: 5.94
Current: -3.7
-4.46
5.94
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % -4.83
THS's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
87% of the 1635 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 13.31 vs. THS: -4.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
THS' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -4.83  Med: 21.15 Max: 32.76
Current: -4.83
-4.83
32.76
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate 21.80
THS's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
93% of the 1446 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 2.60 vs. THS: 21.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
THS' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.4  Med: 9.7 Max: 28
Current: 21.8
0.4
28
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate -20.50
THS's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
87% of the 1286 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 6.50 vs. THS: -20.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
THS' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -24.1  Med: 3.5 Max: 34.8
Current: -20.5
-24.1
34.8
GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Signs with Treehouse Foods Inc THS.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» THS's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-11-02)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q4 2016

THS Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Diamond Hill Capital 381,908 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 100,000 sh (+2510.28%)
NWQ Managers 968,474 sh (+17.64%)
David Rolfe 1,800,662 sh (+3.49%)
John Burbank Sold Out
Steven Cohen Sold Out
Jim Simons Sold Out
Ken Fisher 684,124 sh (-3.73%)
Ron Baron 1,012,120 sh (-21.17%)
» More
Q1 2017

THS Guru Trades in Q1 2017

Joel Greenblatt 24,832 sh (New)
First Eagle Investment 136,880 sh (New)
Jim Simons 121,000 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 431,092 sh (+331.09%)
Diamond Hill Capital 391,336 sh (+2.47%)
Ron Baron 988,311 sh (-2.35%)
Ken Fisher 667,509 sh (-2.43%)
NWQ Managers 927,741 sh (-4.21%)
David Rolfe 1,719,021 sh (-4.53%)
» More
Q2 2017

THS Guru Trades in Q2 2017

Alan Fournier 323,843 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 116,972 sh (+371.05%)
NWQ Managers 1,161,319 sh (+25.18%)
Ken Fisher 737,094 sh (+10.42%)
Diamond Hill Capital 391,756 sh (+0.11%)
First Eagle Investment Sold Out
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Ron Baron 941,861 sh (-4.70%)
David Rolfe 1,294,463 sh (-24.70%)
Jim Simons 4,300 sh (-96.45%)
» More
Q3 2017

THS Guru Trades in Q3 2017

Diamond Hill Capital 391,599 sh (-0.04%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with THS

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

GuruDate Trades Impact to Portfolio Price Range * (?) Current Price Change from Average Current Shares
NWQ Managers 2017-06-30 Add 25.18%0.26%$75.85 - $89.94 $ 67.50-18%1,161,319
Ron Baron 2017-06-30 Reduce -4.70%0.02%$75.85 - $89.94 $ 67.50-18%941,861
Ken Fisher 2017-06-30 Add 10.42%0.01%$75.85 - $89.94 $ 67.50-18%737,094
Joel Greenblatt 2017-06-30 Add 371.05%0.1%$75.85 - $89.94 $ 67.50-18%116,972
First Eagle Investment 2017-06-30 Sold Out 0.03%$75.85 - $89.94 $ 67.50-18%0
Ron Baron 2017-03-31 Reduce -2.35%0.01%$71.3 - $86.84 $ 67.50-16%988,311
NWQ Managers 2017-03-31 Reduce -4.21%0.04%$71.3 - $86.84 $ 67.50-16%927,741
Ken Fisher 2017-03-31 Reduce -2.43%$71.3 - $86.84 $ 67.50-16%667,509
First Eagle Investment 2017-03-31 New Buy0.03%$71.3 - $86.84 $ 67.50-16%136,880
Joel Greenblatt 2017-03-31 New Buy0.03%$71.3 - $86.84 $ 67.50-16%24,832
Ron Baron 2016-12-31 Reduce -21.17%0.12%$63.34 - $88.6 $ 67.50-12%1,012,120
NWQ Managers 2016-12-31 Add 17.64%0.14%$63.34 - $88.6 $ 67.50-12%968,474
Ken Fisher 2016-12-31 Reduce -3.73%$63.34 - $88.6 $ 67.50-12%684,124
Premium More recent guru trades are included for Premium Members only!!
Premium More recent guru trades are included for USA Subscribe Members only!!
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Consumer Packaged Goods » Packaged Foods    NAICS: 311422    SIC: 2032
Compare:OSL:LSG, TSE:2875, LSE:TATE, NYSE:FLO, TSE:2212, NAS:SAFM, XMCE:EBRO, NAS:LNCE, TSE:2809, NAS:HAIN, XSWX:EMMN, TSX:MFI, XPAR:FBEL, TSE:2871, NAS:LANC, MEX:LALA B, SZSE:002311, BOM:500676, OSTO:AAK, PHS:SMC » details
Traded in other countries:T4H.Germany,
Headquarter Location:USA
Treehouse Foods Inc along with its subsidiaries is engaged in manufacturing consumer packaged food and beverage. Its products include snack nuts, retail bakery, beverages, salad dressings, cookies and crackers, cereals, pickles, Mexican & other sauces.

Treehouse Foods Inc along with its subsidiaries is engaged in manufacturing consumer packaged food and beverage. Its products include snack nuts, retail bakery, beverages, salad dressings, cookies and crackers, cereals, pickles, Mexican & other sauces.

Guru Investment Theses on Treehouse Foods Inc

David Rolfe Comments on TreeHouse - Oct 16, 2017

After a relatively short holding period of just 12 months, we sold our TreeHouse (NYSE:THS) position. After the acquisition of the Private Brands business from ConAgra in November of 2015, the Company became by far the largest manufacturer and distributor of private label grocery products in the U.S. With notable size and scale through unmatched scale in both manufacturing and distribution, we believed TreeHouse would significantly benefit from the secular shift toward private label, particularly in higher margin natural and organic segments, while driving out costs in lower growth segments. Specifically, the shift toward private label brands was one of the rare growth opportunities in the increasingly cut-throat battles in nearly every aisle of the grocery store business. We see private brands all around us in our local family-owned grocery stores and in the big national chain stores, as well as food retailers that are uniquely private label – Whole Foods, Trader Joe’s, Aldi, and Costco.

Our investment thesis began to be challenged earlier in the year, as forecasted synergies from the Private Brands acquisition were slow to emerge. In addition, the cadence and frequency of privately-owned businesses pricing bids began to shorten from the industry standard 12-month pricing, rendering significant volatility to financial results – particularly at the earnings line. The Company’s response – like most of the industry’s – has been to protect revenues by reducing prices. By this point our original thesis was compromised enough that we sold our position to redeploy capital back into more promising portfolio positions.



From David Rolfe (Trades, Portfolio)'s Wedgewood Partners 3rd quarter shareholder letter.

Check out David Rolfe latest stock trades

David Rolfe Comments on Treehouse Foods - Apr 14, 2017

Treehouse Foods (NYSE:THS) was one of our better performers in the first quarter. Remember that we added to our position on weakness in Q4, after what we viewed as a confluence of unfortunate, shorter-term events, plus we saw a lot of reassurance in the Company’s Q4 report that our long-term thesis remains intact. In the fourth quarter, revenues rebounded in the acquired Private Brands business; the Company continued to deliver on Private Brands synergies and cost savings; and the legacy Treehouse business continued to report healthy volume growth, which was well ahead of the broad industry, along with improving margins. Furthermore, there were several signs within the quarter that large retailers were aggressively culling their business with major brands and shifting more shelf space to private label programs, as traditional branded food players continue to struggle with declining volumes, and as established retailers face competition from alternative retailers such as Aldi and Trader Joe’s, both of which depend heavily on private label. This industry-wide shift to private label share has been trending for many years and remains a primary tenet of our long-term thesis for Treehouse, and this shorter -term plateau shift in share gains validates our longer-term thinking. Finally, we see it as likely that the Company should be able to deliver results ahead of market expectations as we move through 2017, given that the Company has factored roughly flat earnings growth in its legacy business into its full-year guidance, yet the strong results of this business in recent quarters, as well as the signs we are seeing of an acceleration in near-term private label share gains across the industry, lead us to believe that this guidance will prove conservative. Over the longer term, we remain believers in the Company’s ability to deliver healthy growth in earnings and cash flows as it wrings value from the Private Brands acquisition, consolidates the growing private label industry, and diverts its internal resources to higher-growth/higher-margin categories while continually removing operating costs.

From David Rolfe (Trades, Portfolio)'s Wedgewood Partners first-quarter 2017 shareholder letter.

Check out David Rolfe latest stock trades

David Rolfe Comments on TreeHouse Foods - Jan 16, 2017

TreeHouse Foods (NYSE:THS) was a relative detractor from performance during the quarter after a confluence of a few unfortunate, though we think transient, events. The Company unexpectedly missed its quarterly earnings estimates and reduced 2016 guidance, despite having had a few wins earlier in the year not long after closing the Private Brands acquisition in January. The Company reiterated, however, its long-term accretion guidance for Private Brands. From the time the merger was announced (late 2015), we had seen multiple areas where we think this longer-term guidance is still understated. Because of our belief in this cushion management built into their original guidance, we remain comfortable that they will be able to hit their long-term growth expectations, despite these shorter-term issues.

On the same day the Company announced its disappointing Q3, the company also announced that their COO, Chris Sliva, was leaving the company. He turned up as the new CEO of a small food company a few days later. Fortunately - the only bit of good news on the day - Dennis Riordan, the retiring CFO, reversed his retirement on this news, announcing that he would stay on as President/COO for as long as he was needed.

The market took all of this news badly, combining the poorly timed management changes with what we view as unrelated short-term issues in Private Brands, and concluded that there were serious institutional issues with the company. We think we just had a confluence of unfortunate events. After speaking with management, we remain comfortable with the depth and breadth of the Company’s executive leadership, which is heavily supplemented by the engagement of their board of directors. We also continue to be quite optimistic about the long-term potential of the combined Private Brands and legacy TreeHouse businesses. As the largest manufacturer and distributor of private label grocery products in the U.S., we believe TreeHouse should benefit from the secular shift toward private label, particularly in higher margin natural and organic segments, while driving out costs in lower growth segments, through unmatched scale in both manufacturing and distribution. We remain optimistic about the significant upside reward at TreeHouse, relative to diminished downside risks, and added to our positions on weakness during the quarter.

From David Rolfe (Trades, Portfolio)'s fourth quarter 2016 Wedgewood Partners investor letter.



Check out David Rolfe latest stock trades

David Rolfe Comments on TreeHouse Foods Inc. - Oct 21, 2016

We initiated positions in TreeHouse Foods, Inc. (NYSE:THS) during the third quarter. TreeHouse is the largest private label food manufacturer and distributor in North America. An aphorism in the private label industry is that “a grocer is only as good as their private label.” As such, private label food has been growing its share of the North American food industry over the past several years, as consumers have sought value in comparison with branded food, and as grocery retailers and other food vendors have pursued the greater profitability to themselves of private label products. This trend primarily began in national-brand equivalents, in which TreeHouse and other private label manufacturers offer products of comparable quality to brand names but at better prices. However, much of TreeHouse’s growth in recent years has come from premium products, which often might be natural/organic/healthy choices and possibly of even greater quality or featuring greater innovation (flavors/recipes) than competing branded products. Having evolved from simply offering retail customers a "good/better/best" option of national brand equivalents, the Company has begun to offer deeper category segmentation and insights, while developing and manufacturing multi-tiered pricing assortments, so their retail customers can better compete under the pricing umbrella typically created by higher priced national brands. Many of TreeHouse’s best customers, including large, growing retailers such as Trader Joe’s, Aldi’s, Amazon, and Kroger, have embraced this more complete portfolio strategy of private label products, which offers the retailers not only improved profitability but also better sales opportunities, as well. In addition, TreeHouse’s scale and presence in over 20 food categories, enhances its value proposition, which is to help grocery customers hone in on this secular trend towards customized store brands.

The Company has been growing successfully through acquisition since its formation in 2005. TreeHouse has driven value in its acquired businesses by bringing to bear greater operational capabilities and expertise, greater resources behind innovation and customer research, much greater scale and buying power, and an extensive existing customer list into which the acquired businesses could sell. In early 2016, TreeHouse completed the transformational acquisition of the Private Brands business of ConAgra Foods, effectively doubling TreeHouse’s revenue base and operating footprint while removing its only private label competitor of any meaningful size, all at what we view as an attractive purchase price. The acquired business had struggled under the ownership of ConAgra, which historically had been a branded player and which had not understood the different skill set required to operate a private label business. We believe that TreeHouse comprehensively understands these operational issues and already has begun to remedy them. Better execution at the acquired business, which will drive improving revenue growth and margins, combined with significant cost savings opportunities as a result of the combined companies’ greatly enhanced scale, will allow TreeHouse to deliver roughly 70% earnings growth from the time of the acquisition to the completion of its integration in 2018. During this integration, we likely will see smaller tuck-in acquisitions, as the company’s capital structure still allows it to be active in consolidating the industry. We estimate that the company has less than 10% market share in North America, with plenty of room to expand organically and through acquisition, both within its current 20+ product categories and in adjacent and new categories.

We think TreeHouse’s dominant scale and attractive growth opportunity are unique enough to warrant an initial position in portfolios. As the company executes its strategy, we expect strong operating earnings growth to drive the performance of the stock, which we think currently trades at an attractive price to growth multiple.

From David Rolfe (Trades, Portfolio)'s Wedgewood Partners third-quarter 2016 shareholder letter.

Check out David Rolfe latest stock trades

David Rolfe Comments on TreeHouse Foods - Oct 17, 2016

We initiated positions in TreeHouse Foods, Inc. (NYSE:THS) during the third quarter. TreeHouse is the largest private label food manufacturer and distributor in North America. An aphorism in the private label industry is that “a grocer is only as good as their private label.” As such, private label food has been growing its share of the North American food industry over the past several years, as consumers have sought value in comparison with branded food, and as grocery retailers and other food vendors have pursued the greater profitability to themselves of private label products. This trend primarily began in national-brand equivalents, in which TreeHouse and other private label manufacturers offer products of comparable quality to brand names but at better prices. However, much of TreeHouse’s growth in recent years has come from premium products, which often might be natural/organic/healthy choices and possibly of even greater quality or featuring greater innovation (flavors/recipes) than competing branded products. Having evolved from simply offering retail customers a "good/better/best" option of national brand equivalents, the Company has begun to offer deeper category segmentation and insights, while developing and manufacturing multi-tiered pricing assortments, so their retail customers can better compete under the pricing umbrella typically created by higher priced national brands. Many of TreeHouse’s best customers, including large, growing retailers such as Trader Joe’s, Aldi’s, Amazon, and Kroger, have embraced this more complete portfolio strategy of private label products, which offers the retailers not only improved profitability but also better sales opportunities, as well. In addition, TreeHouse’s scale and presence in over 20 food categories, enhances its value proposition, which is to help grocery customers hone in on this secular trend towards customized store brands.



The Company has been growing successfully through acquisition since its formation in 2005. TreeHouse has driven value in its acquired businesses by bringing to bear greater operational capabilities and expertise, greater resources behind innovation and customer research, much greater scale and buying power, and an extensive existing customer list into which the acquired businesses could sell. In early 2016, TreeHouse completed the transformational acquisition of the Private Brands business of ConAgra Foods, effectively doubling TreeHouse’s revenue base and operating footprint while removing its only private label competitor of any meaningful size, all at what we view as an attractive purchase price. The acquired business had struggled under the ownership of ConAgra, which historically had been a branded player and which had not understood the different skill set required to operate a private label business. We believe that TreeHouse comprehensively understands these operational issues and already has begun to remedy them. Better execution at the acquired business, which will drive improving revenue growth and margins, combined with significant cost savings opportunities as a result of the combined companies’ greatly enhanced scale, will allow TreeHouse to deliver roughly 70% earnings growth from the time of the acquisition to the completion of its integration in 2018. During this integration, we likely will see smaller tuck-in acquisitions, as the company’s capital structure still allows it to be active in consolidating the industry. We estimate that the company has less than 10% market share in North America, with plenty of room to expand organically and through acquisition, both within its current 20+ product categories and in adjacent and new categories.



We think TreeHouse’s dominant scale and attractive growth opportunity are unique enough to warrant an initial position in portfolios. As the company executes its strategy, we expect strong operating earnings growth to drive the performance of the stock, which we think currently trades at an attractive price to growth multiple.



From Wedgewood Partners' third quarter 2016 shareholder commentary.



Check out David Rolfe latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about Treehouse Foods Inc

David Rolfe Comments on TreeHouse Guru stock highlight
After a relatively short holding period of just 12 months, we sold our TreeHouse (NYSE:THS) position. After the acquisition of the Private Brands business from ConAgra in November of 2015, the Company became by far the largest manufacturer and distributor of private label grocery products in the U.S. With notable size and scale through unmatched scale in both manufacturing and distribution, we believed TreeHouse would significantly benefit from the secular shift toward private label, particularly in higher margin natural and organic segments, while driving out costs in lower growth segments. Specifically, the shift toward private label brands was one of the rare growth opportunities in the increasingly cut-throat battles in nearly every aisle of the grocery store business. We see private brands all around us in our local family-owned grocery stores and in the big national chain stores, as well as food retailers that are uniquely private label – Whole Foods, Trader Joe’s, Aldi, and Costco.

Our investment thesis Read more...
TreeHouse Foods Announces Webcast of Third Quarter 2017 Earnings Conference Call
TreeHouse Foods, Inc. to Present at Barclays Back-to-School Consumer Conference
TreeHouse Foods Announces Plans to Close Brooklyn Park, Minn. and Plymouth, Ind. Facilities; Removal of Non-Peanut Packaging Operations From Dothan, Ala. Facility
TreeHouse Foods, Inc. Announces the Appointment of Robert B. Aiken, Jr. as President and Chief Operating Officer
TreeHouse Foods Announces Webcast of Second Quarter 2017 Earnings Conference Call
TreeHouse Foods, Inc. Completes the Sale of Soup and Infant Feeding
TreeHouse Foods, Inc. Announces Definitive Agreement to Sell Soup and Infant Feeding Business to an Affiliate of Insight Equity
David Rolfe Comments on Treehouse Foods Guru stock highlight
Treehouse Foods (NYSE:THS) was one of our better performers in the first quarter. Remember that we added to our position on weakness in Q4, after what we viewed as a confluence of unfortunate, shorter-term events, plus we saw a lot of reassurance in the Company’s Q4 report that our long-term thesis remains intact. In the fourth quarter, revenues rebounded in the acquired Private Brands business; the Company continued to deliver on Private Brands synergies and cost savings; and the legacy Treehouse business continued to report healthy volume growth, which was well ahead of the broad industry, along with improving margins. Furthermore, there were several signs within the quarter that large retailers were aggressively culling their business with major brands and shifting more shelf space to private label programs, as traditional branded food players continue to struggle with declining volumes, and as established retailers face competition from alternative retailers such as Aldi and Trader Joe’s, both of which depend heavily on private label. This industry-wide shift to private label share has been trending for many years and remains Read more...
TreeHouse Foods Announces Management Developments to Capitalize on Growth Opportunities; Appoints Moe Alkemade as Chief Strategy Officer

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
Forward PE Ratio 19.92
THS's Forward PE Ratio is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 156 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 18.55 vs. THS: 19.92 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 150.41
THS's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked lower than
95% of the 717 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 21.00 vs. THS: 150.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
THS' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.9  Med: 17.66 Max: 1000.67
Current: 150.41
5.9
1000.67
PB Ratio 1.52
THS's PB Ratio is ranked higher than
56% of the 1570 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.75 vs. THS: 1.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
THS' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.99  Med: 1.8 Max: 2.29
Current: 1.52
0.99
2.29
PS Ratio 0.60
THS's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
67% of the 1560 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.05 vs. THS: 0.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
THS' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.46  Med: 0.98 Max: 1.26
Current: 0.6
0.46
1.26
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 10.06
THS's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
78% of the 647 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 21.47 vs. THS: 10.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
THS' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.77  Med: 16.86 Max: 33.09
Current: 10.06
5.77
33.09
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 6.81
THS's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
75% of the 862 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 12.32 vs. THS: 6.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
THS' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.94  Med: 10.86 Max: 17.38
Current: 6.81
3.94
17.38
EV-to-EBIT -59.79
THS's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 1363 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 15.31 vs. THS: -59.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
THS' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -281.8  Med: 16.4 Max: 45.4
Current: -59.79
-281.8
45.4
EV-to-EBITDA 33.44
THS's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
87% of the 1416 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 12.00 vs. THS: 33.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
THS' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.9  Med: 11.6 Max: 38.9
Current: 33.44
7.9
38.9
EV-to-Revenue 0.98
THS's EV-to-Revenue is ranked higher than
59% of the 1597 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.24 vs. THS: 0.98 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-Revenue only.
THS' s EV-to-Revenue Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.8  Med: 1.4 Max: 2.1
Current: 0.98
0.8
2.1
Shiller PE Ratio 41.78
THS's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked lower than
76% of the 338 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 26.07 vs. THS: 41.78 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
THS' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 28.28  Med: 40.61 Max: 52.93
Current: 41.78
28.28
52.93
Current Ratio 2.08
THS's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
65% of the 1474 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.58 vs. THS: 2.08 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
THS' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.76  Med: 2.69 Max: 3.24
Current: 2.08
0.76
3.24
Quick Ratio 0.81
THS's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
66% of the 1474 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.07 vs. THS: 0.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
THS' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.19  Med: 0.78 Max: 1.29
Current: 0.81
0.19
1.29
Days Inventory 69.75
THS's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
54% of the 1517 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 64.96 vs. THS: 69.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
THS' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 56.46  Med: 76.79 Max: 102.12
Current: 69.75
56.46
102.12
Days Sales Outstanding 20.05
THS's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
74% of the 1192 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 37.42 vs. THS: 20.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
THS' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 20.05  Med: 23.7 Max: 28.95
Current: 20.05
20.05
28.95
Days Payable 40.30
THS's Days Payable is ranked lower than
54% of the 1086 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 43.95 vs. THS: 40.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
THS' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 25.27  Med: 30.33 Max: 40.82
Current: 40.3
25.27
40.82

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 4.60
THS's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked higher than
77% of the 2184 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 2.34 vs. THS: 4.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
THS' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0 Max: 0
Current: 4.6
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -15.90
THS's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked lower than
83% of the 808 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: -1.80 vs. THS: -15.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
THS' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -15.9  Med: -1 Max: 0
Current: -15.9
-15.9
0

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 0.84
THS's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked higher than
78% of the 700 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.55 vs. THS: 0.84 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
THS' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.76  Med: 1.05 Max: 1.5
Current: 0.84
0.76
1.5
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.61
THS's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
91% of the 1397 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.09 vs. THS: 0.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
THS' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.57  Med: 1.03 Max: 1.29
Current: 0.61
0.57
1.29
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % -1.67
THS's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
86% of the 1643 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 5.53 vs. THS: -1.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
THS' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1.7  Med: 5.8 Max: 9.7
Current: -1.67
-1.7
9.7
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % -1.54
THS's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
72% of the 847 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 7.84 vs. THS: -1.54 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
THS' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.9  Med: 21.7 Max: 41.3
Current: -1.54
-2.9
41.3

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $6,421.93
EPS (TTM) $ -4.45
Beta0.12
Short Percentage of Float15.13%
52-Week Range $62.64 - 90.42
Shares Outstanding (Mil)57.19

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18 Dec19
Revenue (Mil $) 6,275 6,178 6,336
EPS ($) 3.15 3.40 3.81
EPS without NRI ($) 3.15 3.40 3.81
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
N/A
Dividends per Share ($)

Piotroski F-Score Details

Piotroski F-Score: 55
Positive ROAN
Positive CFROAY
Higher ROA yoyN
CFROA > ROAY
Lower Leverage yoyY
Higher Current Ratio yoyN
Less Shares Outstanding yoyY
Higher Gross Margin yoyY
Higher Asset Turnover yoyN

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}