GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Technology » Software » Chinasoft International Ltd (HKSE:00354) » Definitions » Piotroski F-Score

Chinasoft International (HKSE:00354) Piotroski F-Score : 5 (As of Apr. 25, 2024)


View and export this data going back to 2003. Start your Free Trial

What is Chinasoft International Piotroski F-Score?

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Chinasoft International has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Chinasoft International's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

HKSE:00354' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3   Med: 5   Max: 6
Current: 5

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Chinasoft International was 6. The lowest was 3. And the median was 5.


Chinasoft International Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for Chinasoft International's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

Chinasoft International Piotroski F-Score Chart

Chinasoft International Annual Data
Trend Dec14 Dec15 Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 4.00 6.00 4.00 5.00 -

Chinasoft International Semi-Annual Data
Jun14 Dec14 Jun15 Dec15 Jun16 Dec16 Jun17 Dec17 Jun18 Dec18 Jun19 Dec19 Jun20 Dec20 Jun21 Dec21 Jun22 Dec22 Jun23 Dec23
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 4.00 - 5.00 - -

Competitive Comparison of Chinasoft International's Piotroski F-Score

For the Information Technology Services subindustry, Chinasoft International's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Chinasoft International's Piotroski F-Score Distribution in the Software Industry

For the Software industry and Technology sector, Chinasoft International's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Chinasoft International's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Dec22) TTM:Last Year (Dec21) TTM:
Net Income was HK$848 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was HK$854 Mil.
Revenue was HK$22,340 Mil.
Gross Profit was HK$5,137 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Dec21)
to the end of this year (Dec22) was (20696.306 + 18944.825) / 2 = HK$19820.5655 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Dec21) was HK$20,696 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was HK$1,413 Mil.
Total Current Assets was HK$15,188 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was HK$3,968 Mil.
Net Income was HK$1,392 Mil.

Revenue was HK$22,528 Mil.
Gross Profit was HK$6,005 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Dec20)
to the end of last year (Dec21) was (15513.707 + 20696.306) / 2 = HK$18105.0065 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Dec20) was HK$15,514 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was HK$1,539 Mil.
Total Current Assets was HK$16,554 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was HK$4,880 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Chinasoft International's current Net Income (TTM) was 848. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Chinasoft International's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 854. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec21)
=848.079/20696.306
=0.04097731

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec20)
=1392.11/15513.707
=0.08973419

Chinasoft International's return on assets of this year was 0.04097731. Chinasoft International's return on assets of last year was 0.08973419. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Chinasoft International's current Net Income (TTM) was 848. Chinasoft International's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 854. ==> 854 > 848 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Dec22)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec21 to Dec22
=1412.636/19820.5655
=0.07127123

Gearing (Last Year: Dec21)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec20 to Dec21
=1538.946/18105.0065
=0.08500113

Chinasoft International's gearing of this year was 0.07127123. Chinasoft International's gearing of last year was 0.08500113. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Dec22)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=15187.903/3968.007
=3.82758977

Current Ratio (Last Year: Dec21)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=16554.342/4880.238
=3.39211776

Chinasoft International's current ratio of this year was 3.82758977. Chinasoft International's current ratio of last year was 3.39211776. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Chinasoft International's number of shares in issue this year was 3015.572. Chinasoft International's number of shares in issue last year was 2960.695. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=5137.078/22340.069
=0.22994907

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=6005.083/22527.844
=0.2665627

Chinasoft International's gross margin of this year was 0.22994907. Chinasoft International's gross margin of last year was 0.2665627. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Dec21)
=22340.069/20696.306
=1.07942301

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Dec20)
=22527.844/15513.707
=1.45212514

Chinasoft International's asset turnover of this year was 1.07942301. Chinasoft International's asset turnover of last year was 1.45212514. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+0+1+1+1+0+0+0
=5

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Chinasoft International has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Chinasoft International  (HKSE:00354) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Chinasoft International Piotroski F-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of Chinasoft International's Piotroski F-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


Chinasoft International (HKSE:00354) Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
Address
No. 2 Kexuiyuan South Road, North Wing, 12th Floor, Raycom Infotech Park, Tower C, Haidian District, Zhongguancun, Beijing, CHN, 100190
Chinasoft International Ltd is a technology software and information technology service enterprise. It provides end-to-end IT software, solutions, and services to global clients and has extensive experience in consulting, design, implementation, and services in digital applications of new technologies such as cloud computing, artificial intelligence, big data, the Internet of Things, and 5G, fully supporting clients' digital transformation. It has two segments: The Technical professional services group segment provides services that include business and IT consulting, application development, system integration, product engineering, and enterprise management. The Internet IT services group segment provides cloud-based consulting services.

Chinasoft International (HKSE:00354) Headlines

No Headlines