Switch to:

Ingevity Piotroski F-Score

: 7 (As of Today)
View and export this data going back to 2016. Start your Free Trial

Good Sign:

Piotroski F-Score is 7, indicating very healthy situation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Ingevity has an F-score of 7. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

NYSE:NGVT' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4   Med: 6   Max: 8
Current: 7

4
8

During the past 8 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Ingevity was 8. The lowest was 4. And the median was 6.


Ingevity Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* All numbers are in millions except for per share data and ratio. All numbers are in their local exchange's currency.

* Premium members only.

Ingevity Annual Data
Dec12 Dec13 Dec14 Dec15 Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19
Piotroski F-Score Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only N/A 4.00 8.00 7.00 5.00

Ingevity Quarterly Data
Sep15 Dec15 Mar16 Jun16 Sep16 Dec16 Mar17 Jun17 Sep17 Dec17 Mar18 Jun18 Sep18 Dec18 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Mar20 Jun20
Piotroski F-Score Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 5.00 6.00 5.00 7.00 7.00

Competitive Comparison
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap.


Ingevity Piotroski F-Score Distribution

* The bar in red indicates where Ingevity's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* All numbers are in millions except for per share data and ratio. All numbers are in their local exchange's currency.

This Year (Jun20) TTM:Last Year (Jun19) TTM:
Net Income was 59.9 + 44.3 + 45.3 + 20.2 = $170 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 118.7 + 85.5 + 60.2 + 48.9 = $313 Mil.
Revenue was 359.9 + 303.4 + 288.2 + 270.6 = $1,222 Mil.
Gross Profit was 139.5 + 111 + 114.6 + 83.9 = $449 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Jun19)
to the end of this year (Jun20) was
(2129.5 + 2118.8 + 2141.7 + 2353.3 + 2195.5) / 5 = $2187.76 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Jun19) was $2,130 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $1,342 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $580 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $188 Mil.
Net Income was 49.5 + 42.1 + 22.7 + 56.8 = $171 Mil.

Revenue was 311.2 + 278.6 + 276.8 + 352.8 = $1,219 Mil.
Gross Profit was 118.6 + 97.6 + 97.1 + 134.4 = $448 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Jun18)
to the end of last year (Jun19) was
(1314.6 + 1291.9 + 1315.2 + 2107.2 + 2129.5) / 5 = $1631.68 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Jun18) was $1,315 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $1,405 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $492 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $216 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Ingevity's current Net Income (TTM) was 170. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Ingevity's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 313. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jun19)
=169.7/2129.5
=0.07969007

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jun18)
=171.1/1314.6
=0.13015366

Ingevity's return on assets of this year was 0.07969007. Ingevity's return on assets of last year was 0.13015366. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Ingevity's current Net Income (TTM) was 170. Ingevity's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 313. ==> 313 > 170 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Jun20)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jun19 to Jun20
=1341.6/2187.76
=0.61322997

Gearing (Last Year: Jun19)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jun18 to Jun19
=1404.5/1631.68
=0.86076927

Ingevity's gearing of this year was 0.61322997. Ingevity's gearing of last year was 0.86076927. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Jun20)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=579.7/187.9
=3.08515168

Current Ratio (Last Year: Jun19)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=491.6/216
=2.27592593

Ingevity's current ratio of this year was 3.08515168. Ingevity's current ratio of last year was 2.27592593. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Ingevity's number of shares in issue this year was 41.37. Ingevity's number of shares in issue last year was 42.202. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=449/1222.1
=0.36740038

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=447.7/1219.4
=0.36714778

Ingevity's gross margin of this year was 0.36740038. Ingevity's gross margin of last year was 0.36714778. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Jun19)
=1222.1/2129.5
=0.57389058

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Jun18)
=1219.4/1314.6
=0.92758253

Ingevity's asset turnover of this year was 0.57389058. Ingevity's asset turnover of last year was 0.92758253. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+0+1+1+1+1+1+0
=7

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Ingevity has an F-score of 7. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

Ingevity  (NYSE:NGVT) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Ingevity Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Ingevity Piotroski F-Score Headlines

No Headline

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)