GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Healthcare » Biotechnology » Cell Source Inc (OTCPK:CLCS) » Definitions » Piotroski F-Score

Cell Source (Cell Source) Piotroski F-Score : 2 (As of Apr. 26, 2024)


View and export this data going back to 2014. Start your Free Trial

What is Cell Source Piotroski F-Score?

Warning Sign:

Piotroski F-Score of 2 is low, which usually implies poor business operation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Cell Source has an F-score of 2. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Cell Source's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

CLCS' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1   Med: 3   Max: 5
Current: 2

During the past 11 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Cell Source was 5. The lowest was 1. And the median was 3.


Cell Source Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for Cell Source's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

Cell Source Piotroski F-Score Chart

Cell Source Annual Data
Trend Dec13 Dec14 Dec15 Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 3.00 2.00 5.00 3.00 3.00

Cell Source Quarterly Data
Dec18 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Mar20 Jun20 Sep20 Dec20 Mar21 Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 2.00

Competitive Comparison of Cell Source's Piotroski F-Score

For the Biotechnology subindustry, Cell Source's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Cell Source's Piotroski F-Score Distribution in the Biotechnology Industry

For the Biotechnology industry and Healthcare sector, Cell Source's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Cell Source's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Sep23) TTM:Last Year (Sep22) TTM:
Net Income was -1.337 + -1.692 + -1.242 + -1.338 = $-5.61 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -0.723 + -0.31 + -1.036 + -0.28 = $-2.35 Mil.
Revenue was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Sep22)
to the end of this year (Sep23) was
(0.361 + 0.41 + 0.232 + 0.362 + 0.248) / 5 = $0.3226 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Sep22) was $0.36 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $0.25 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $16.28 Mil.
Net Income was -0.835 + -1.293 + -1.286 + -1.252 = $-4.67 Mil.

Revenue was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Sep21)
to the end of last year (Sep22) was
(0.861 + 0.314 + 0.277 + 0.045 + 0.361) / 5 = $0.3716 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Sep21) was $0.86 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $0.36 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $12.32 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Cell Source's current Net Income (TTM) was -5.61. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Cell Source's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -2.35. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Sep22)
=-5.609/0.361
=-15.53739612

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Sep21)
=-4.666/0.861
=-5.41927991

Cell Source's return on assets of this year was -15.53739612. Cell Source's return on assets of last year was -5.41927991. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Cell Source's current Net Income (TTM) was -5.61. Cell Source's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -2.35. ==> -2.35 > -5.61 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Sep23)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Sep22 to Sep23
=0/0.3226
=0

Gearing (Last Year: Sep22)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Sep21 to Sep22
=0/0.3716
=0

Cell Source's gearing of this year was 0. Cell Source's gearing of last year was 0. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Sep23)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0.248/16.279
=0.01523435

Current Ratio (Last Year: Sep22)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0.361/12.315
=0.02931384

Cell Source's current ratio of this year was 0.01523435. Cell Source's current ratio of last year was 0.02931384. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Cell Source's number of shares in issue this year was 38.192. Cell Source's number of shares in issue last year was 35.241. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0/0
=

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0/0
=

Cell Source's gross margin of this year was . Cell Source's gross margin of last year was . ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Sep22)
=0/0.361
=0

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Sep21)
=0/0.861
=0

Cell Source's asset turnover of this year was 0. Cell Source's asset turnover of last year was 0. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+0+0+1+1+0+0+0+0
=2

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Cell Source has an F-score of 2. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

Cell Source  (OTCPK:CLCS) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Cell Source Piotroski F-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of Cell Source's Piotroski F-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


Cell Source (Cell Source) Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
N/A
Address
57 West 57th Street, Suite 400, New York, NY, USA, 10019
Cell Source Inc is a biotechnology company focused on developing cell therapy treatments focused on immunotherapy. The company is involved with the development of proprietary immune system management technology. The company's subsidiary commercializes a suite of inventions relating to certain cancer treatments. Its other products include Anti-rejection Veto Cell tolerance therapy for both matched and mismatched allogeneic bone marrow transplantations and Anti-rejection Veto Cell tolerance therapy for both matched and mismatched organ transplantation.
Executives
George Verstraete director 341 LAKEWOOD DRIVE, BLOOMFIELD HILLS MI 48304
Darlene Soave director, 10 percent owner 341 LAKEWOOD DRIVE, BLOOMFIELD HILLS MI 48304
Yair Reisner 10 percent owner
Yoram Drucker director 31 DOV SADAN ST., JERUSALEM L3 97844
Dennis M Brown director 100 SAN MATEO DR, MENLO PARK CA 94025
Itamar Shimrat director, officer: CEO and CFO C/O CELL SOURCE, INC., 65 YIGAL ALON STREET, TEL AVIV L3 67433
David Zolty director C/O CELL SOURCE, INC., 65 YIGAL ALON STREET, TEL AVIV L3 67433
Benzion Abraham Friedman director, 10 percent owner C/O CELL SOURCE INC, 65 YIGALL ALON STREET, TEL AVIV L3 67433

Cell Source (Cell Source) Headlines