GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Industrials » Business Services » Li & Fung Ltd (OTCPK:LFUGF) » Definitions » Piotroski F-Score

Li & Fung (Li & Fung) Piotroski F-Score : 0 (As of Apr. 25, 2024)


View and export this data going back to . Start your Free Trial

What is Li & Fung Piotroski F-Score?

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Li & Fung has an F-score of 7. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Li & Fung's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:


Li & Fung Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for Li & Fung's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

Li & Fung Piotroski F-Score Chart

Li & Fung Annual Data
Trend Dec10 Dec11 Dec12 Dec13 Dec14 Dec15 Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 7.00 5.00 4.00 6.00 7.00

Li & Fung Semi-Annual Data
Jun10 Dec10 Jun11 Dec11 Jun12 Dec12 Jun13 Dec13 Jun14 Dec14 Jun15 Dec15 Jun16 Dec16 Jun17 Dec17 Jun18 Dec18 Jun19 Dec19
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 4.00 - 6.00 - 7.00

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Dec19) TTM:Last Year (Dec18) TTM:
Net Income was $51 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was $281 Mil.
Revenue was $11,413 Mil.
Gross Profit was $1,192 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Dec18)
to the end of this year (Dec19) was (5716.59 + 5799.864) / 2 = $5758.227 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Dec18) was $5,717 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $1,095 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $2,860 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $2,574 Mil.
Net Income was $33 Mil.

Revenue was $12,701 Mil.
Gross Profit was $1,305 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Dec17)
to the end of last year (Dec18) was (6931.027 + 5716.59) / 2 = $6323.8085 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Dec17) was $6,931 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $1,044 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $2,749 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $2,794 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Li & Fung's current Net Income (TTM) was 51. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Li & Fung's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 281. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec18)
=50.873/5716.59
=0.00889919

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec17)
=32.817/6931.027
=0.0047348

Li & Fung's return on assets of this year was 0.00889919. Li & Fung's return on assets of last year was 0.0047348. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Li & Fung's current Net Income (TTM) was 51. Li & Fung's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 281. ==> 281 > 51 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Dec19)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec18 to Dec19
=1095.158/5758.227
=0.19019014

Gearing (Last Year: Dec18)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec17 to Dec18
=1043.603/6323.8085
=0.16502761

Li & Fung's gearing of this year was 0.19019014. Li & Fung's gearing of last year was 0.16502761. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Dec19)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=2859.843/2573.857
=1.11111184

Current Ratio (Last Year: Dec18)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=2748.787/2794.024
=0.98380937

Li & Fung's current ratio of this year was 1.11111184. Li & Fung's current ratio of last year was 0.98380937. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Li & Fung's number of shares in issue this year was 8389.268. Li & Fung's number of shares in issue last year was 8369.665. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=1191.591/11413.312
=0.10440361

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=1305.338/12700.744
=0.1027765

Li & Fung's gross margin of this year was 0.10440361. Li & Fung's gross margin of last year was 0.1027765. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Dec18)
=11413.312/5716.59
=1.9965245

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Dec17)
=12700.744/6931.027
=1.83244763

Li & Fung's asset turnover of this year was 1.9965245. Li & Fung's asset turnover of last year was 1.83244763. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+1+1+0+1+0+1+1
=7

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Li & Fung has an F-score of 7. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

Li & Fung  (OTCPK:LFUGF) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Li & Fung Piotroski F-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of Li & Fung's Piotroski F-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


Li & Fung (Li & Fung) Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
N/A
Address
31 Victoria Street, Victoria Place, 5th Floor, Hamilton, BMU, HM 10
Li & Fung Ltd is a supply-chain manager that serves retailers globally with sourcing and logistics services. The company's operating segment includes Services and Products. It generates maximum revenue from the Services segment. The Services segment consists of Supply Chain Solutions and Logistics businesses. Its Products segment consists of the Onshore Wholesale business and the three Product Verticals (furniture, beauty, and sweaters) representing its principal-to-principal business. Geographically, it derives a majority of revenue from the United States of America.

Li & Fung (Li & Fung) Headlines

From GuruFocus

GuruFocus Names Two Dividend Growers

By Monica Wolfe Monica Wolfe 06-10-2014