Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.01
AR's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
100% of the 449 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.72 vs. AR: 0.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
AR' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0.01 Max: N/A
Current: 0.01
Equity-to-Asset 0.51
AR's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
58% of the 423 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.51 vs. AR: 0.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
AR' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.33  Med: 0.43 Max: 0.54
Current: 0.51
0.33
0.54
Piotroski F-Score: 3
Altman Z-Score: 0.67
Beneish M-Score: -3.20
WACC vs ROIC
5.90%
-2.25%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % -24.93
AR's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
56% of the 429 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -45.13 vs. AR: -24.93 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
AR' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -55.94  Med: 47.77 Max: 76.8
Current: -24.93
-55.94
76.8
Net Margin % -25.93
AR's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
50% of the 429 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -49.17 vs. AR: -25.93 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
AR' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -48.66  Med: 23.8 Max: 182.86
Current: -25.93
-48.66
182.86
ROE % -8.78
AR's ROE % is ranked lower than
51% of the 420 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -13.16 vs. AR: -8.78 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
AR' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -15.7  Med: 8.08 Max: 40.09
Current: -8.78
-15.7
40.09
ROA % -4.02
AR's ROA % is ranked higher than
59% of the 496 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -9.02 vs. AR: -4.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
AR' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -7.7  Med: 3.48 Max: 20.73
Current: -4.02
-7.7
20.73
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % -4.82
AR's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
57% of the 470 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -13.05 vs. AR: -4.82 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
AR' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -8.53  Med: 16.05 Max: 35.92
Current: -4.82
-8.53
35.92
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate 5.70
AR's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
82% of the 369 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -18.20 vs. AR: 5.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
AR' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 31.75 Max: 72.6
Current: 5.7
0
72.6
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate 217.50
AR's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked higher than
97% of the 272 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -11.00 vs. AR: 217.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
AR' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 46.8 Max: 217.5
Current: 217.5
0
217.5
GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with Antero Resources Corp $AR.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» AR's 30-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2016

AR Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Steven Cohen 23,300 sh (New)
Ron Baron 71,800 sh (New)
Jim Simons 14,800 sh (New)
Leon Cooperman 280,800 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 94,854 sh (+232.82%)
Glenn Greenberg 9,285,336 sh (+120.81%)
David Swensen 8,874,073 sh (+1.52%)
David Tepper Sold Out
Seth Klarman 14,505,881 sh (-32.55%)
» More
Q3 2016

AR Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Alan Fournier 2,215,700 sh (New)
Jim Simons 905,100 sh (+6015.54%)
Ron Baron 90,800 sh (+26.46%)
Steven Cohen 29,168 sh (+25.18%)
Seth Klarman 14,505,881 sh (unchged)
Leon Cooperman Sold Out
Glenn Greenberg 9,216,626 sh (-0.74%)
David Swensen 3,468,136 sh (-60.92%)
Paul Tudor Jones 11,504 sh (-87.87%)
» More
Q4 2016

AR Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Caxton Associates 38,244 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 1,491,428 sh (+5013.23%)
Alan Fournier 2,653,240 sh (+19.75%)
Glenn Greenberg 9,647,226 sh (+4.67%)
Seth Klarman 14,505,881 sh (unchged)
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Ron Baron 85,200 sh (-6.17%)
Jim Simons 695,800 sh (-23.12%)
David Swensen 2,320,051 sh (-33.10%)
» More
Q1 2017

AR Guru Trades in Q1 2017

David Swensen 3,988,487 sh (+71.91%)
Alan Fournier 3,629,205 sh (+36.78%)
Glenn Greenberg 10,593,829 sh (+9.81%)
Seth Klarman 14,505,881 sh (unchged)
Ron Baron 85,200 sh (unchged)
Jim Simons Sold Out
Caxton Associates Sold Out
Steven Cohen Sold Out
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with AR

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - E&P » Oil & Gas E&P    NAICS: 211111    SIC: 1311
Compare:NYSE:NFX, OTCPK:SVRGF, OTCPK:LUPEY, NYSE:RRC, OTCPK:TRMLF, NYSE:EGN, OTCPK:PREKF, NYSE:CPG, OTCPK:OISHF, NYSE:NFG, NYSE:CHK, OTCPK:AETUF, NYSE:WPX, OTCPK:SSLTY, NYSE:MUR, NYSE:RICE, NYSE:VET, OTCPK:TUWOY, NAS:FANG, NAS:CDEV » details
Traded in other countries:7A6.Germany,
Headquarter Location:USA
Antero Resources, based in the United States, is a part of the oil & gas industry. While most of its sales accounted to natural gas, it also sold oil on a minor scale.

Antero Resources, based in Denver, engages in the exploration for and production of natural gas in the United States and Canada. At the end of 2016, the company reported proved reserves of 15.4 trillion cubic feet of natural gas equivalent. Daily production averaged approximately 1,848 mmcfe/d in 2016, at a ratio of 25% liquids/75% natural gas.

Top Ranked Articles about Antero Resources Corp

Argonaut Gold Acquires Land, Submits Permit Application and Files the Technical Report for its San Agustin Project

TORONTO, ONTARIO--(Marketwired - Jun 13, 2016) - Argonaut Gold Inc. (TSX:AR) (the "Company", "Argonaut Gold" or "Argonaut") is pleased to announce that it has come to an agreement to acquire the necessary land to develop its San Agustin project in Durango, Mexico. This recent land agreement allowed the Company to file for the required Change in Use of Soil permit. The Company expects to make a construction decision during the second half of 2016.
Pete Dougherty, President & CEO stated: "With the EIS already completed and now that we have come to an agreement on the land for the San Agustin project and filed our permit application, we expect to receive a permit decision during the third quarter of 2016. Assuming a positive construction decision in the fourth quarter of 2016, we would anticipate first gold production from San Agustin in the third quarter of 2017."
Argonaut also confirms the filing of the Technical Report for the updated Preliminary Economic Assessment (see press release dated April 29, 2016) in relation to its San Agustin project in Durango, Mexico, pursuant to National Instrument 43-101 of the Canadian Securities Administrators.
For further information on the San Agustin project, please see the Technical Report titled "Technical Report and Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment San Agustin Heap Leach Project Durango, Mexico" effective date of April 29, 2016 and available on www.sedar.com and on the Company's website, www.argonautgold.com.
About Argonaut Gold Argonaut Gold is a Canadian gold company engaged in exploration, mine development and production activities. Its primary assets are the production stage El Castillo mine in Durango, Mexico, and La Colorada mine in Sonora, Mexico. Advanced exploration stage projects include the San Antonio project in Baja California Sur, Mexico, the Magino project in Ontario, Canada and the San Agustin project in Durango, Mexico. The Company also has several exploration stage projects, all of which are located in North America. Creating Value Beyond Gold Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-looking Statements
This press release contains certain "forward-looking statements" and "forward-looking information" under applicable Canadian securities laws concerning the business, operations and financial performance and condition of Argonaut Gold Inc. ("Argonaut" or "Argonaut Gold"). Forward-looking statements and forward-looking information include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to estimation of mineral resources at mineral projects of Argonaut; the realization of mineral reserve and resource estimates; the receipt of necessary permits; the timing and amount of estimated future production; economics of production; estimated production and mine life of the various mineral projects of Argonaut; the future price of gold and silver; synergies and financial impact of completed acquisitions; the benefits of the development potential of the properties of Argonaut; success of exploration activities and currency exchange rate fluctuations. Except for statements of historical fact relating to Argonaut, certain information contained herein constitutes forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are frequently characterized by words such as "plan," "expect," "project," "intend," "believe," "anticipate", "estimate" and other similar words, or statements that certain events or conditions "may" or "will" occur. Forward-looking statements are based on the opinions and estimates of management at the date the statements are made, and are based on a number of assumptions and subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Many of these assumptions are based on factors and events that are not within the control of Argonaut and there is no assurance they will prove to be correct. Factors that could cause actual results to vary materially from results anticipated by such forward-looking statements include variations in metal grades, permitting delays, changes in market conditions, variations in recovery rates, risks relating to international operations, fluctuating metal prices and currency exchange rates, changes in project parameters, the possibility of project cost overruns or unanticipated costs and expenses, labour disputes and other risks of the mining industry, failure of plant, equipment or processes to operate as anticipated. These factors are discussed in greater detail in Argonaut's most recent Annual Information Form and in the most recent Management Discussion and Analysis filed on SEDAR, which also provide additional general assumptions in connection with these statements. Argonaut cautions that the foregoing list of important factors is not exhaustive. Investors and others who base themselves on forward-looking statements should carefully consider the above factors as well as the uncertainties they represent and the risk they entail. Argonaut believes that the expectations reflected in those forward-looking statements are reasonable, but no assurance can be given that these expectations will prove to be correct and such forward-looking statements included in this press release should not be unduly relied upon. These statements speak only as of the date of this press release. Argonaut undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking statements if circumstances or management's estimates or opinions should change except as required by applicable securities laws. Although Argonaut has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be anticipated, estimated or intended. Statements concerning mineral reserve and resource estimates may also be deemed to constitute forward-looking statements to the extent they involve estimates of the mineralization that will be encountered if the property is developed.





Argonaut Gold Inc.
Dan Symons
Vice President, Investor Relations
416-716-6466
[email protected]




Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
Forward PE Ratio 65.79
AR's Forward PE Ratio is ranked lower than
66% of the 283 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 23.70 vs. AR: 65.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PB Ratio 0.87
AR's PB Ratio is ranked higher than
52% of the 420 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.22 vs. AR: 0.87 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
AR' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.87  Med: 1.36 Max: 4.9
Current: 0.87
0.87
4.9
PS Ratio 3.00
AR's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
54% of the 405 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 3.60 vs. AR: 3.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
AR' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.22  Med: 3.13 Max: 12.81
Current: 3
1.22
12.81
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 168.16
AR's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
86% of the 125 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 15.92 vs. AR: 168.16 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
AR' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 16.07  Med: 45.06 Max: 202.63
Current: 168.16
16.07
202.63
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 4.98
AR's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
65% of the 267 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 8.20 vs. AR: 4.98 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
AR' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.98  Med: 7.6 Max: 30.7
Current: 4.98
4.98
30.7
EV-to-EBIT -21.18
AR's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 209 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 16.34 vs. AR: -21.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
AR' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -662.6  Med: 7.5 Max: 151.2
Current: -21.18
-662.6
151.2
EV-to-EBITDA 46.94
AR's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 399 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 12.98 vs. AR: 46.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
AR' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -80.7  Med: 10.15 Max: 66.9
Current: 46.94
-80.7
66.9
Current Ratio 0.70
AR's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
77% of the 480 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.23 vs. AR: 0.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
AR' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.41  Med: 0.72 Max: 1.92
Current: 0.7
0.41
1.92
Quick Ratio 0.70
AR's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
76% of the 479 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.12 vs. AR: 0.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
AR' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.41  Med: 0.72 Max: 1.92
Current: 0.7
0.41
1.92
Days Sales Outstanding 6.07
AR's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
95% of the 381 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 55.27 vs. AR: 6.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
AR' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.07  Med: 9.54 Max: 15.59
Current: 6.07
6.07
15.59
Days Payable 9.06
AR's Days Payable is ranked lower than
88% of the 238 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 88.02 vs. AR: 9.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
AR' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.06  Med: 385.23 Max: 675.02
Current: 9.06
9.06
675.02

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 1.41
AR's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked lower than
84% of the 404 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 2.73 vs. AR: 1.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
AR' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0 Max: 1.44
Current: 1.41
0
1.44
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -6.30
AR's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
61% of the 365 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -9.80 vs. AR: -6.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
AR' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -6.3  Med: -0.95 Max: 0
Current: -6.3
-6.3
0

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 0.87
AR's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked higher than
54% of the 393 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.28 vs. AR: 0.87 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
AR' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.87  Med: 1.55 Max: 4.88
Current: 0.87
0.87
4.88
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.96
AR's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked lower than
63% of the 345 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.02 vs. AR: 0.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
AR' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.4  Med: 1.02 Max: 4.09
Current: 0.96
0.4
4.09
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % -4.72
AR's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
74% of the 565 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -3.19 vs. AR: -4.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
AR' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -4.72  Med: 8.55 Max: 22
Current: -4.72
-4.72
22

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $2,219
EPS (TTM) $ -2.12
Beta0.91
Short Percentage of Float8.03%
52-Week Range $20.17 - 30.50
Shares Outstanding (Mil)315.45

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18
Revenue (Mil $) 3,313 4,396
EPS ($) 0.32 0.93
EPS without NRI ($) 0.32 0.93
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
12.17%
Dividends per Share ($)
» More Articles for NYSE:AR

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Antero Resources Announces First Quarter 2017 Earnings Release Date and Conference Call Apr 24 2017 
Antero Midstream Partners Will Continue to Excel Apr 11 2017 
Robust Guidance Clears Path for Upside Feb 09 2017 
Production Growth to Take Antero Resources Higher Nov 14 2016 
Hold Antero Midstream for Long-Term Aug 23 2016 
Bullish Momentum Will Continue for Antero Resources Jul 25 2016 
Argonaut Gold Acquires Land, Submits Permit Application and Files the Technical Report for its San A Jun 13 2016 
Bullish on Antero Midstream for Long Term May 12 2016 
Remain Bullish on Antero Resources After Results May 09 2016 
Argonaut Gold Announces First Quarter 2016 Earnings per Share of $0.03; Cash Balance Increases to $4 May 03 2016 

More From Other Websites
Antero Resources Corp. :AR-US: Earnings Analysis: Q1, 2017 By the Numbers : May 29, 2017 May 29 2017
Hedge Funds’ Net Long Position in US Natural Gas Hit a New High May 29 2017
Energy Stocks that Could Outdo Natural Gas May 23 2017
Antero Resources Corp. – Value Analysis (NYSE:AR) : May 23, 2017 May 23 2017
Ultimate Stock-Pickers: Top 10 High-Conviction and New-Money Purchases May 23 2017
Antero Resources Corp. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bullish Manner : AR-US : May 22, 2017 May 22 2017
Why Did US Natural Gas Consumption Hit a 3-Month Low? May 15 2017
US Natural Gas Production Hit a 2-Year Low May 15 2017
Edited Transcript of AR earnings conference call or presentation 9-May-17 3:00pm GMT May 14 2017
Lower Rise in US Natural Gas Inventories Boosted Prices May 12 2017
Which Natural Gas Stocks Are Ignoring the Bears? May 09 2017
Antero Resources beats Street 1Q forecasts May 08 2017
Antero Resources Reports First Quarter 2017 Financial and Operational Results May 08 2017
Regional Breakdown: How US Natural Gas Inventories Trended May 05 2017
Will US Natural Gas Futures Test 2016 High? May 05 2017
Is a Surprise Coming for ANTERO RESOURCES (AR) This Earnings Season? May 04 2017
Antero Midstream GP raises $875 million in U.S. IPO May 03 2017
Antero Midstream raises $875 million in IPO - source May 03 2017
These Gas-Weighted Stocks Could Beat Natural Gas May 02 2017
Dril-Quip (DRQ) Q1 Earnings Beat Estimates, Decrease Y/Y May 01 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)