Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany, Netherlands

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.06
NYSE:CLB's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
87% of the 250 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 0.50 vs. NYSE:CLB: 0.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
NYSE:CLB' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.03  Med: 0.14 Max: 0.87
Current: 0.06
0.03
0.87
Equity-to-Asset 0.25
NYSE:CLB's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
84% of the 253 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 0.51 vs. NYSE:CLB: 0.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
NYSE:CLB' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.06  Med: 0.45 Max: 0.66
Current: 0.25
-0.06
0.66
Debt-to-Equity 1.59
NYSE:CLB's Debt-to-Equity is ranked lower than
80% of the 204 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 0.48 vs. NYSE:CLB: 1.59 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-Equity only.
NYSE:CLB' s Debt-to-Equity Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -34.96  Med: 0.61 Max: 376.01
Current: 1.59
-34.96
376.01
Debt-to-EBITDA 1.92
NYSE:CLB's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
66% of the 150 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 4.37 vs. NYSE:CLB: 1.92 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-EBITDA only.
NYSE:CLB' s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.63  Med: 0.89 Max: 2.29
Current: 1.92
0.63
2.29
Interest Coverage 9.17
NYSE:CLB's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
56% of the 118 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 16.73 vs. NYSE:CLB: 9.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
NYSE:CLB' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.45  Med: 18.67 Max: 72.07
Current: 9.17
7.45
72.07
Piotroski F-Score: 6
Altman Z-Score: 8.01
Beneish M-Score: -2.53
WACC vs ROIC
9.86%
22.66%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 15.55
NYSE:CLB's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
88% of the 255 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: -4.51 vs. NYSE:CLB: 15.55 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
NYSE:CLB' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 14.49  Med: 27.53 Max: 31.93
Current: 15.55
14.49
31.93
Net Margin % 11.80
NYSE:CLB's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
89% of the 255 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: -6.40 vs. NYSE:CLB: 11.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
NYSE:CLB' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.74  Med: 18.15 Max: 23.73
Current: 11.8
10.74
23.73
ROE % 47.24
NYSE:CLB's ROE % is ranked higher than
96% of the 249 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: -5.01 vs. NYSE:CLB: 47.24 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
NYSE:CLB' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 47.24  Med: 112.83 Max: 392.58
Current: 47.24
47.24
392.58
ROA % 12.63
NYSE:CLB's ROA % is ranked higher than
95% of the 257 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: -2.79 vs. NYSE:CLB: 12.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
NYSE:CLB' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.66  Med: 24.82 Max: 38.59
Current: 12.63
10.66
38.59
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 45.75
NYSE:CLB's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
95% of the 255 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: -3.53 vs. NYSE:CLB: 45.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
NYSE:CLB' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 39.53  Med: 110.15 Max: 122.49
Current: 45.75
39.53
122.49
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -16.40
NYSE:CLB's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
52% of the 233 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: -15.10 vs. NYSE:CLB: -16.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
NYSE:CLB' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -16.4  Med: 10.6 Max: 37.8
Current: -16.4
-16.4
37.8
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate -30.80
NYSE:CLB's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
70% of the 149 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: -14.90 vs. NYSE:CLB: -30.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
NYSE:CLB' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -30.8  Med: 8.8 Max: 56.5
Current: -30.8
-30.8
56.5
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate -34.90
NYSE:CLB's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked lower than
73% of the 120 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: -16.00 vs. NYSE:CLB: -34.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
NYSE:CLB' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -38.4  Med: 16.5 Max: 72.3
Current: -34.9
-38.4
72.3
GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Signs with Core Laboratories NV NYSE:CLB.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» NYSE:CLB's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-10-23)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q3 2016

CLB Guru Trades in Q3 2016

David Rolfe 1,893,080 sh (+12.19%)
John Rogers 262,624 sh (+5.06%)
Tom Gayner 110,000 sh (unchged)
Ray Dalio Sold Out
Pioneer Investments Sold Out
Columbia Wanger 128,528 sh (-2.41%)
Jim Simons 221,900 sh (-8.04%)
Ron Baron 18,450 sh (-15.17%)
» More
Q4 2016

CLB Guru Trades in Q4 2016

John Rogers 274,344 sh (+4.46%)
Tom Gayner 110,000 sh (unchged)
Jim Simons Sold Out
Ron Baron 17,150 sh (-7.05%)
David Rolfe 1,646,324 sh (-13.03%)
Columbia Wanger 99,606 sh (-22.50%)
» More
Q1 2017

CLB Guru Trades in Q1 2017

Jim Simons 172,100 sh (New)
Columbia Wanger 145,011 sh (+45.58%)
John Rogers 312,146 sh (+13.78%)
Tom Gayner 110,000 sh (unchged)
David Rolfe 1,575,658 sh (-4.29%)
Ron Baron 11,450 sh (-33.24%)
» More
Q2 2017

CLB Guru Trades in Q2 2017

Paul Tudor Jones 14,343 sh (New)
John Rogers 323,383 sh (+3.60%)
Tom Gayner 110,000 sh (unchged)
Ron Baron 10,550 sh (-7.86%)
David Rolfe 1,262,264 sh (-19.89%)
Jim Simons 116,200 sh (-32.48%)
Columbia Wanger 84,952 sh (-41.42%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with CLB

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

GuruDate Trades Impact to Portfolio Price Range * (?) Current Price Change from Average Current Shares
John Rogers 2017-06-30 Add 3.60%0.01%$98.23 - $117.44 $ 91.08-16%323,383
Ron Baron 2017-06-30 Reduce -7.86%$98.23 - $117.44 $ 91.08-16%10,550
John Rogers 2017-03-31 Add 13.78%0.05%$109 - $125.37 $ 91.08-22%312,146
Ron Baron 2017-03-31 Reduce -33.24%$109 - $125.37 $ 91.08-22%11,450
John Rogers 2016-12-31 Add 4.46%0.02%$96.8 - $122.22 $ 91.08-18%274,344
Ron Baron 2016-12-31 Reduce -7.05%$96.8 - $122.22 $ 91.08-18%17,150
Premium More recent guru trades are included for Premium Members only!!
Premium More recent guru trades are included for USA Subscribe Members only!!
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - Services » Oil & Gas Equipment & Services    NAICS: 213112    SIC: 1389
Compare:MIL:SPM, SHSE:600583, NYSE:WFT, XAMS:SBMO, LSE:WG., OSL:SUBC, NYSE:RES, LSE:AMFW, SHSE:600339, ASX:WOR, NYSE:OII, OSL:TGS, XKLS:5218, SZSE:002353, SZSE:002680, LSE:PFC, NYSE:MDR, NYSE:CJ, AMEX:SRCI, NYSE:FRAC » details
Traded in other countries:CEI.Germany, CLB.Netherlands,
Headquarter Location:Netherlands
Core Laboratories NV is a provider of proprietary and patented reservoir description, production enhancement & reservoir management services to the oil and gas industry. The company operates in more than 50 countries.

Core Laboratories is an oil-services company that helps oil and gas companies better understand how to improve production levels and economics with core and reservoir analysis. The company operates in more than 50 countries and has more than 5,000 employees.

Guru Investment Theses on Core Laboratories NV

David Rolfe Comments on Core Labs - Jul 17, 2017

Despite oil’s bear market performance, year to date, oil development activity in North America has exhibited a “V”-shaped recovery, with the U.S. oil rig count more than doubling over last year’s depressed levels. We think Core Labs’ (NYSE:CLB) Production Enhancement (PE) unit is most levered to North American development budgets, as they provide niche completion products and services, especially when the one-size-fits-all completion systems of competitors run into the limits of applicability. During the quarter, Core Labs’ PE unit reported 15% year-on-year revenue growth, and 19% sequential revenue growth, along with healthy margin expansion. While Core Labs’ other business unit, Reservoir Description (RD), reported less impressive growth – flat sequentially, and down slightly over last year – RD is much less cyclical than the PE unit and we think will likely return to more robust growth as international production budgets inevitably inflect higher, after an unprecedented 3-year decline.

We think the market largely has ignored the fact that OPEC and its partners have been behaving remarkably rationally over the last several quarters—a marked departure from what we had seen for the prior two years. In fact, compliance with the production cuts agreed upon late last year has been historically high. We believe that most of the governments involved, many of which are quasi-authoritarian, are uneasily watching the events unfolding in member states, where the unwinding of governmental ability to placate populations with the proceeds of high oil prices is causing massive unrest (e.g., Venezuela). We believe it remains in OPEC’s long-term interest to do everything it can to support oil prices.

Despite the headlines crowing about tight U.S. oil output, we think there is less than meets the eye. According to EIA, data through April 2017, U.S. onshore production has risen just 350,000 barrels per day (bbl/d) above its September 2016 trough, which should be more than offset by global demand growth of over 1 million bbl/d, in addition to the over 1 million bbl/d in OPEC production cuts. In addition, oil rig counts in some of the U.S.’s most prolific shale basins have started plateauing as early as April (Eagle Ford), as the full-cycle economics of $40-$50 oil is challenging to even the best operators. Furthermore, setting aside debates about the short-term price of oil, we note that we are now in the middle of a third year of constrained investment in the development of large-scale fields, and we continue to believe that this will lead to a longer-term supply-demand imbalance. We believe much of this imbalance will have to be cured through catch-up investments, particularly in international markets, which should benefit Schlumberger both from a demand and pricing standpoint. We believe Core Labs is more focused on maintaining pricing throughout the cycle, and we think that they will drive growth by doing more work in more basins, globally.



From David Rolfe (Trades, Portfolio)'s Wedgewood Partners second-quarter 2017 shareholder letter.

Check out David Rolfe latest stock trades

David Rolfe Comments on Core Labs - Apr 14, 2017

Both of our oil service stocks corrected from recent January highs during the first quarter. Recall that from late January 2016 lows (remember fears of “ $20 oil?”), SLB rallied from $61 to $87 in mid-January 2017; a +43% gain. CLB (NYSE:CLB) rallied from $89 to $125 in early January 2017; a gain of +40%. (Note the stock raced to $135 in May last year, too.) The profit-taking was not too surprising after sharp stock price advances over the past year. The cause was two-fold. First, an unusually weak seasonally (winter maintenance) refinery pause. Second, the unusually large build-up of OPEC inventories before the commencement date of agreed-upon supply cuts. On the demand front, global oil-demand estimates continue to be revised upward, continuing a 7-year trend. Our thesis in these two stocks continues to play out as expected. Supply/demand continues to come into balance after the recent depression in the oil patch. Oil is back to over $50 again. Oil service activity is quite robust in North America. Oil service company pricing inflation has snapped back after recent deflation. International spending remains at depressed levels. Net, net, the oil service industry remains in the early innings of our expectation of a multi-year recovery.

We think Core Labs is at the leading edge of a multi-year rebound in the E&P capex spending cycle. Core Labs’ revenues are derived from providing high-return, niche products and services for E&P companies that are looking to increase the output of already producing wells. The majority of the Company’s revenues are derived from their Reservoir Description (RD) business, which is focused on studying a fluid and core samples from a client’s oil or gas field, and then providing critical data sets on how to better produce from existing wells. The revenue stream of this business tend to be much less cyclical compared to most of the industry, as Core Labs’ RD services represent a small fraction of the client’s production budget, yet produces sizable returns. The Company’s more activity-driven business – Production Enhancement – grew 15% sequentially, and has begun to see the benefits of increased E&P spending, as clients work through a large backlog of uncompleted wells, particularly in unconventional North American basins. We expect this business to lead the return to growth in the short term, while Core Labs’ steadier, high-margin, Reservoir Description business should drive growth longer-term, particularly as international E&P spending begins rebounding later this year and into 2018.

From David Rolfe (Trades, Portfolio)'s Wedgewood Partners first-quarter 2017 shareholder letter.

Check out David Rolfe latest stock trades

Baron Energy and Resources Fund Comments on Core Laboratories N.V. - Nov 21, 2016

Core Laboratories N.V. (NYSE:CLB) is a leading provider of core and fluid analysis to the oil and gas industry. Shares fell on moderated short-term growth and margin recovery estimates and reduced revenue guidance. Core Labs dominates its niche, has limited competition, provides value added, non-commoditized services, and generates the highest returns on equity and capital in the industry. We believe strong secular growth drivers in each of its three businesses will allow it to outgrow other oilfield service companies while generating premium returns.



From Baron Energy and Resources third quarter 2016 commentary.



Check out Ron Baron latest stock trades

David Rolfe Comments on Core Labs - Oct 21, 2016

Core Labs (NYSE:CLB) was the third largest detractor from our relative performance during the third quarter. While “energy” continues to be a four-letter word at this point in the cycle of U.S. growth investing,5 we continue to think that Core Labs’ value proposition is worthy of multi-cycle consideration. We estimate that roughly 85% of the Company’s revenues are generated by providing equipment and services for the upkeep of their customers’ existing carbon producing fields. As such, the majority of the value that Core Labs provides its customers is not directly predicated on the activity of drillings rigs, or even on the short-term price of oil. For instance, the Company’s Reservoir Description business generated over 60% of consolidated revenues during the trailing 12 months. Reservoir Description revenues have declined just -16% from their trailing 12-month peak (set during late 2013 through mid 2014 – when oil traded at twice today’s levels). A significant portion of Core Labs’ revenues are generated outside the United States, so we estimate revenues in Reservoir Description have probably fallen by a high single digit percent, constant currency – despite the E&P industry (Core Labs’ customers) drastically cutting budgets by between - 30% and -75% during that timeframe. Thus, a significant portion of Core Labs’ business is very well insulated from the vagaries of short-term oil price fluctuations. Although the margins of this segment have suffered more than revenues, we expect that margins have bottomed and should rapidly rebound with E&P spending budgets, as Core Labs’ management has prudently balanced costs without sacrificing personnel capacity.

From David Rolfe (Trades, Portfolio)'s Wedgewood Partners third-quarter 2016 shareholder letter.

Check out David Rolfe latest stock trades

David Rolfe Comments on Core Labs - Oct 17, 2016

Core Labs (NYSE:CLB) was the third largest detractor from our relative performance during the third quarter. While “energy” continues to be a four-letter word at this point in the cycle of U.S. growth investing,5 we continue to think that Core Labs’ value proposition is worthy of multi-cycle consideration. We estimate that roughly 85% of the Company’s revenues are generated by providing equipment and services for the upkeep of their customers’ existing carbon producing fields. As such, the majority of the value that Core Labs provides its customers is not directly predicated on the activity of drillings rigs, or even on the short-term price of oil. For instance, the Company’s Reservoir Description business generated over 60% of consolidated revenues during the trailing 12 months. Reservoir Description revenues have declined just -16% from their trailing 12-month peak (set during late 2013 through mid 2014 – when oil traded at twice today’s levels). A significant portion of Core Labs’ revenues are generated outside the United States, so we estimate revenues in Reservoir Description have probably fallen by a high single digit percent, constant currency – despite the E&P industry (Core Labs’ customers) drastically cutting budgets by between - 30% and -75% during that timeframe. Thus, a significant portion of Core Labs’ business is very well insulated from the vagaries of short-term oil price fluctuations. Although the margins of this segment have suffered more than revenues, we expect that margins have bottomed and should rapidly rebound with E&P spending budgets, as Core Labs’ management has prudently balanced costs without sacrificing personnel capacity.



From Wedgewood Partners' third quarter 2016 shareholder commentary.



Check out David Rolfe latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about Core Laboratories NV

Core Lab Announces Q4 2017 Quarterly Dividend
Core Laboratories' Third Quarter 2017 Webcast At 7:30 A.M. CDT / 2:30 P.M. CEST On October 24, 2017
Core Lab Reports On Impact Of Hurricane Harvey, Updates Third Quarter 2017 Guidance
Fracture ID and Core Laboratories Launch the Horizontal Reservoir Characterization Consortium - Midland Basin
David Rolfe Comments on Core Labs Guru stock highlight
Despite oil’s bear market performance, year to date, oil development activity in North America has exhibited a “V”-shaped recovery, with the U.S. oil rig count more than doubling over last year’s depressed levels. We think Core Labs’ (NYSE:CLB) Production Enhancement (PE) unit is most levered to North American development budgets, as they provide niche completion products and services, especially when the one-size-fits-all completion systems of competitors run into the limits of applicability. During the quarter, Core Labs’ PE unit reported 15% year-on-year revenue growth, and 19% sequential revenue growth, along with healthy margin expansion. While Core Labs’ other business unit, Reservoir Description (RD), reported less impressive growth – flat sequentially, and down slightly over last year – RD is much less cyclical than the PE unit and we think will likely return to more robust growth as international production budgets inevitably inflect higher, after an unprecedented 3-year decline.

We think Read more...
Core Lab Announces Q2 2017 Quarterly Dividend
David Rolfe Comments on Core Labs Guru stock highlight
Both of our oil service stocks corrected from recent January highs during the first quarter. Recall that from late January 2016 lows (remember fears of “ $20 oil?”), SLB rallied from $61 to $87 in mid-January 2017; a +43% gain. CLB (NYSE:CLB) rallied from $89 to $125 in early January 2017; a gain of +40%. (Note the stock raced to $135 in May last year, too.) The profit-taking was not too surprising after sharp stock price advances over the past year. The cause was two-fold. First, an unusually weak seasonally (winter maintenance) refinery pause. Second, the unusually large build-up of OPEC inventories before the commencement date of agreed-upon supply cuts. On the demand front, global oil-demand estimates continue to be revised upward, continuing a 7-year trend. Our thesis in these two stocks continues to play out as expected. Supply/demand continues to come into balance after the recent depression in the oil patch. Oil is back to over $50 again. Oil service activity is quite robust in North America. Oil service company pricing inflation has snapped back after recent deflation. International spending remains at depressed levels. Net, net, the oil service industry remains Read more...
Core Laboratories' First Quarter 2017 Webcast At 7:30 a.m. CDT / 2:30 p.m. CEST On April 20, 2017
Energy Sector Showing Good Value Potential A deeper analysis of the Shiller PE valuation
As of Dec. 1, the U.S. stock market’s total market cap to gross domestic product is 123.5%, about a 5% increase from Nov. 4 valuations. Even though the overall stock market is overvalued, some sectors are relatively undervalued. Among the sectors, the energy sector has the lowest median Shiller price-earnings ratio, suggesting potential value-increasing opportunities. Read more...
Baron Energy and Resources Fund Comments on Core Laboratories N.V. Guru stock highlight
Core Laboratories N.V. (NYSE:CLB) is a leading provider of core and fluid analysis to the oil and gas industry. Shares fell on moderated short-term growth and margin recovery estimates and reduced revenue guidance. Core Labs dominates its niche, has limited competition, provides value added, non-commoditized services, and generates the highest returns on equity and capital in the industry. We believe strong secular growth drivers in each of its three businesses will allow it to outgrow other oilfield service companies while generating premium returns. Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 55.51
CLB's PE Ratio is ranked lower than
81% of the 91 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 19.50 vs. CLB: 55.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
CLB' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.71  Med: 28.92 Max: 85.75
Current: 55.51
9.71
85.75
Forward PE Ratio 33.00
CLB's Forward PE Ratio is ranked lower than
74% of the 62 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 20.12 vs. CLB: 33.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 55.51
CLB's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked lower than
81% of the 93 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 19.50 vs. CLB: 55.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
CLB' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.7  Med: 28.92 Max: 85.75
Current: 55.51
9.7
85.75
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 69.25
CLB's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked lower than
80% of the 56 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 18.10 vs. CLB: 69.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
CLB' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.7  Med: 28.24 Max: 81.26
Current: 69.25
10.7
81.26
PB Ratio 27.30
CLB's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
99% of the 247 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.19 vs. CLB: 27.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
CLB' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.39  Med: 30.76 Max: 4703.85
Current: 27.3
6.39
4703.85
PS Ratio 6.56
CLB's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
91% of the 244 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.11 vs. CLB: 6.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
CLB' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.58  Med: 5.5 Max: 9.19
Current: 6.56
1.58
9.19
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 44.49
CLB's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
86% of the 102 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 13.05 vs. CLB: 44.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
CLB' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.97  Med: 27.68 Max: 52.25
Current: 44.49
9.97
52.25
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 37.91
CLB's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
87% of the 142 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 8.92 vs. CLB: 37.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
CLB' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.95  Med: 23.27 Max: 44.47
Current: 37.91
7.95
44.47
EV-to-EBIT 44.35
CLB's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
76% of the 106 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 16.84 vs. CLB: 44.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
CLB' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.5  Med: 20.45 Max: 66.8
Current: 44.35
6.5
66.8
EV-to-EBITDA 34.90
CLB's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
83% of the 167 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 12.82 vs. CLB: 34.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
CLB' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.8  Med: 18.7 Max: 50.9
Current: 34.9
5.8
50.9
EV-to-Revenue 6.89
CLB's EV-to-Revenue is ranked lower than
89% of the 250 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.85 vs. CLB: 6.89 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-Revenue only.
CLB' s EV-to-Revenue Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.7  Med: 5.8 Max: 9.7
Current: 6.89
1.7
9.7
Shiller PE Ratio 24.91
CLB's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked lower than
72% of the 64 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 18.37 vs. CLB: 24.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
CLB' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 24.53  Med: 55.87 Max: 132.43
Current: 24.91
24.53
132.43
Current Ratio 2.05
CLB's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
56% of the 250 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.85 vs. CLB: 2.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
CLB' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.71  Med: 2.38 Max: 5.71
Current: 2.05
0.71
5.71
Quick Ratio 1.69
CLB's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
55% of the 250 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.55 vs. CLB: 1.69 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
CLB' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.63  Med: 1.96 Max: 4.41
Current: 1.69
0.63
4.41
Days Inventory 29.75
CLB's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
59% of the 201 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 50.63 vs. CLB: 29.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
CLB' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 22.76  Med: 26.59 Max: 30.77
Current: 29.75
22.76
30.77
Days Sales Outstanding 76.58
CLB's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
58% of the 219 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 86.21 vs. CLB: 76.58 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
CLB' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 66.31  Med: 68.72 Max: 76.58
Current: 76.58
66.31
76.58
Days Payable 33.63
CLB's Days Payable is ranked lower than
74% of the 154 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 56.67 vs. CLB: 33.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
CLB' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 22.94  Med: 28.74 Max: 35.46
Current: 33.63
22.94
35.46

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 2.41
CLB's Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
51% of the 190 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 2.57 vs. CLB: 2.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
CLB' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.08  Med: 0.84 Max: 2.46
Current: 2.41
0.08
2.46
Dividend Payout Ratio 1.35
CLB's Dividend Payout Ratio is ranked lower than
75% of the 67 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. CLB: 1.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout Ratio only.
CLB' s Dividend Payout Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.04  Med: 0.25 Max: 1.51
Current: 1.35
0.04
1.51
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate 19.80
CLB's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked higher than
85% of the 112 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: -38.30 vs. CLB: 19.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
CLB' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0 Max: 115.4
Current: 19.8
0
115.4
Forward Dividend Yield % 2.33
CLB's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
54% of the 169 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 2.51 vs. CLB: 2.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 6.02
CLB's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked higher than
68% of the 317 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 4.19 vs. CLB: 6.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
CLB' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.2  Med: 2.1 Max: 6.15
Current: 6.02
0.2
6.15
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio 0.70
CLB's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
89% of the 183 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: -4.20 vs. CLB: 0.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
CLB' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -15.7  Med: 0.3 Max: 7.6
Current: 0.7
-15.7
7.6

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 2.04
CLB's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked lower than
75% of the 114 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.07 vs. CLB: 2.04 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
CLB' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.08  Med: 2.47 Max: 28.12
Current: 2.04
1.08
28.12
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 1.19
CLB's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked lower than
72% of the 218 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 0.95 vs. CLB: 1.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
CLB' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.16  Med: 0.54 Max: 1.6
Current: 1.19
0.16
1.6
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 2.27
CLB's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
69% of the 259 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: -1.98 vs. CLB: 2.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
CLB' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.5  Med: 4.9 Max: 15.4
Current: 2.27
1.5
15.4
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % -15.28
CLB's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
62% of the 143 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: -5.40 vs. CLB: -15.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
CLB' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -15.8  Med: 17.1 Max: 53.1
Current: -15.28
-15.8
53.1

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $614.74
EPS (TTM) $ 1.64
Beta1.65
Short Percentage of Float22.75%
52-Week Range $86.55 - 125.83
Shares Outstanding (Mil)44.14

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18 Dec19
Revenue (Mil $) 664 753 789
EPS ($) 1.98 2.82 3.56
EPS without NRI ($) 1.98 2.82 3.56
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
29.35%
Dividends per Share ($) 1.90 1.90 2.20

Piotroski F-Score Details

Piotroski F-Score: 66
Positive ROAY
Positive CFROAY
Higher ROA yoyY
CFROA > ROAY
Lower Leverage yoyN
Higher Current Ratio yoyY
Less Shares Outstanding yoyN
Higher Gross Margin yoyN
Higher Asset Turnover yoyY

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}