Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 3.40
CO's Cash-to-Debt is ranked higher than
69% of the 91 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 0.78 vs. CO: 3.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
CO' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.86  Med: 5.67 Max: No Debt
Current: 3.4
Equity-to-Asset 0.36
CO's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
64% of the 92 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 0.48 vs. CO: 0.36 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
CO' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.35  Med: 0.42 Max: 0.78
Current: 0.36
0.35
0.78
Interest Coverage 2.21
CO's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
90% of the 77 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 30.04 vs. CO: 2.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
CO' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.77  Med: 40.5 Max: No Debt
Current: 2.21
Piotroski F-Score: 4
Altman Z-Score: 1.98
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 34.75
CO's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
96% of the 92 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 7.12 vs. CO: 34.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
CO' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 28.86  Med: 37 Max: 40.49
Current: 34.75
28.86
40.49
Net Margin % 16.46
CO's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
86% of the 91 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 5.44 vs. CO: 16.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
CO' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 13.72  Med: 21.37 Max: 34.69
Current: 16.46
13.72
34.69
ROE % 7.05
CO's ROE % is ranked lower than
59% of the 85 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 10.15 vs. CO: 7.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
CO' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -4.86  Med: 7.71 Max: 11.82
Current: 7.05
-4.86
11.82
ROA % 2.52
CO's ROA % is ranked lower than
62% of the 92 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 4.31 vs. CO: 2.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
CO' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -3.67  Med: 3.38 Max: 7.93
Current: 2.52
-3.67
7.93
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 50.09
CO's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
70% of the 92 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 18.40 vs. CO: 50.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
CO' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -10.49  Med: 44.63 Max: 62.56
Current: 50.09
-10.49
62.56
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate 5.70
CO's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
62% of the 65 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 3.50 vs. CO: 5.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
CO' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 5.7 Max: 34.4
Current: 5.7
0
34.4
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate 2.00
CO's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
58% of the 59 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 4.20 vs. CO: 2.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
CO' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2  Med: 21.9 Max: 46
Current: 2
2
46
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate -7.10
CO's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked lower than
67% of the 54 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 2.70 vs. CO: -7.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
CO' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -8.4  Med: 17.5 Max: 327.8
Current: -7.1
-8.4
327.8
GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Signs with China Cord Blood Corp $CO.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» CO's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-11-18 Est.)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2016

CO Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Jim Simons 749,000 sh (+3.75%)
» More
Q3 2016

CO Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Jim Simons 834,600 sh (+11.43%)
» More
Q4 2016

CO Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Jim Simons 806,800 sh (-3.33%)
» More
Q1 2017

CO Guru Trades in Q1 2017

Charles Brandes 39,542 sh (New)
Jim Simons 859,500 sh (+6.53%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with CO

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Personal Services » Personal Services    NAICS: 621991 
Compare:HKSE:01830, HKSE:08358, HKSE:00922, HKSE:08145, HKSE:08082, HKSE:00079, HKSE:08296, HKSE:08108 » details
Traded in other countries:6CB.Germany,
Headquarter Location:Hong Kong
China Cord Blood Corp provides cord blood banking services. The Company provides cord blood processing and storage services for expectant parents interested in capturing the evolving medical treatments & technologies such as cord blood transplants.

China Cord Blood Corporation was formerly known as Pantheon China Acquisition Corp. On November 3, 2008, the Company entered into an agreement and plan of merger, conversion and share exchange (Merger Agreement) with China Cord Blood Services Corporation (CCBS) and certain shareholders of CCBS, including Golden Meditech Company Limited. The Plan of Merger was approved on June 29, 2009. The closing of business combination transaction between Pantheon and CCBS took place on June 30, 2009, and Pantheon changed its name to China Cord Blood Corporation. China Cord Blood Corporation is now the cord blood bank operator in China, with exclusive licenses to operate in Beijing Municipality and Guangdong Province. The company provides cord blood banking services in China. It provides cord blood processing and storage services for expectant parents interested in capturing the opportunities made available by evolving medical treatments and technologies such as cord blood transplants. It also preserves cord blood units donated by the public, provide matching services on such donated units and deliver matching units to patients in need of transplants. Its Beijing-based subsidiary, Jiachenhong, was the operator of the first licensed cord blood bank in China. The PRC government only grants one cord blood banking license per province or municipality. According to the Notice on Guiding Principles Regarding Planning and Establishment of the Blood Station published by China's MOH in December 2005, and also an extension notice published in February 2011, the PRC government intends to authorize up to ten cord blood banks. To date, it has authorized seven such licenses. Its operations currently benefit from multiple exclusive cord blood banking licenses issued in China, including its licenses for Beijing, Guangdong and Zhejiang. It also has a 19.9% equity interest in Qilu, the operator of the exclusive licensed cord blood bank in Shandong province. Its cord blood banking operations consist of its subscription services, which involve the preservation of cord blood for expectant parents as a precautionary healthcare measure for the benefit of their children and other family members. Its subscription services accounted for 99.5%, 99.4% and 99.5% of its revenues for the years ended March 31, 2010, 2011 and 2012, respectively. Its subscribers are required to enter into a subscription contract with it prior to the birth of their children. The contract provides for the collection of cord blood from their newborns at one of its collaborating hospitals and preservation of the cord blood for an initial storage period up to 18 years. On the 18th anniversary, the child, who will have reached adulthood, will have the exclusive right to decide whether to extend the subscription for its services or to relinquish ownership of his or her cord blood for donation to its banks.

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 44.73
CO's PE Ratio is ranked lower than
80% of the 70 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 20.11 vs. CO: 44.73 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
CO' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.33  Med: 18.66 Max: 1150.52
Current: 44.73
8.33
1150.52
PE Ratio without NRI 44.73
CO's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked lower than
81% of the 69 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 20.11 vs. CO: 44.73 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
CO' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.33  Med: 18.66 Max: 1093.87
Current: 44.73
8.33
1093.87
PB Ratio 2.88
CO's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
56% of the 82 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 2.33 vs. CO: 2.88 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
CO' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.93  Med: 1.49 Max: 5.18
Current: 2.88
0.93
5.18
PS Ratio 6.83
CO's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
86% of the 87 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.34 vs. CO: 6.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
CO' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.29  Med: 3.79 Max: 49.65
Current: 6.83
2.29
49.65
EV-to-EBIT 9.92
CO's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
81% of the 72 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 16.08 vs. CO: 9.92 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
CO' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -315.1  Med: 4.1 Max: 162.9
Current: 9.92
-315.1
162.9
EV-to-EBITDA 9.92
CO's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
69% of the 74 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 12.48 vs. CO: 9.92 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
CO' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -315.1  Med: 4.1 Max: 162.9
Current: 9.92
-315.1
162.9
PEG Ratio 3.54
CO's PEG Ratio is ranked lower than
69% of the 32 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 2.15 vs. CO: 3.54 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG Ratio only.
CO' s PEG Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.44  Med: 1.64 Max: 5.18
Current: 3.54
0.44
5.18
Current Ratio 2.45
CO's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
81% of the 89 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.29 vs. CO: 2.45 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
CO' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.45  Med: 5.61 Max: 73.11
Current: 2.45
2.45
73.11
Quick Ratio 2.43
CO's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
84% of the 89 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.18 vs. CO: 2.43 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
CO' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.43  Med: 5.56 Max: 73.11
Current: 2.43
2.43
73.11
Days Inventory 72.51
CO's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
85% of the 75 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 17.66 vs. CO: 72.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
CO' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 14.08  Med: 28.8 Max: 77.86
Current: 72.51
14.08
77.86
Days Sales Outstanding 53.11
CO's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
83% of the 81 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 20.29 vs. CO: 53.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
CO' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 50.7  Med: 69.4 Max: 85.62
Current: 53.11
50.7
85.62
Days Payable 27.73
CO's Days Payable is ranked lower than
53% of the 72 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 29.96 vs. CO: 27.73 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
CO' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 23.8  Med: 33.44 Max: 35.81
Current: 27.73
23.8
35.81

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -3.10
CO's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked lower than
60% of the 48 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: -1.10 vs. CO: -3.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
CO' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -120.9  Med: -3.1 Max: 1.1
Current: -3.1
-120.9
1.1

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Net-Cash 31.15
CO's Price-to-Net-Cash is ranked lower than
100% of the 13 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 19.50 vs. CO: 31.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Net-Cash only.
CO' s Price-to-Net-Cash Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.44  Med: 15.83 Max: 125.38
Current: 31.15
1.44
125.38
Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value 15.82
CO's Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value is ranked lower than
67% of the 27 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 12.14 vs. CO: 15.82 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value only.
CO' s Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.43  Med: 6.57 Max: 56.78
Current: 15.82
1.43
56.78
Price-to-Tangible-Book 2.99
CO's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
52% of the 67 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 2.72 vs. CO: 2.99 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
CO' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.07  Med: 1.52 Max: 5.41
Current: 2.99
1.07
5.41
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 4.03
CO's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked lower than
82% of the 50 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.41 vs. CO: 4.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
CO' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.06  Med: 1.84 Max: 4.05
Current: 4.03
1.06
4.05
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 1.81
CO's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked lower than
81% of the 78 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.12 vs. CO: 1.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
CO' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.61  Med: 1.03 Max: 11.09
Current: 1.81
0.61
11.09
Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value 5.33
CO's Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value is ranked lower than
94% of the 16 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 2.00 vs. CO: 5.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value only.
CO' s Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.7  Med: 1.55 Max: 5.36
Current: 5.33
0.7
5.36
Price-to-Graham-Number 2.42
CO's Price-to-Graham-Number is ranked lower than
73% of the 51 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.55 vs. CO: 2.42 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Graham-Number only.
CO' s Price-to-Graham-Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.7  Med: 1.34 Max: 13.83
Current: 2.42
0.7
13.83
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 10.05
CO's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
85% of the 92 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 5.28 vs. CO: 10.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
CO' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -3389.4  Med: 23.5 Max: 159
Current: 10.05
-3389.4
159
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % 9.91
CO's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked higher than
62% of the 47 Companies
in the Global Personal Services industry.

( Industry Median: 5.24 vs. CO: 9.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
CO' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1  Med: 9.9 Max: 37.3
Current: 9.91
1
37.3

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $112.19
EPS (TTM) $ 0.23
Beta0.49
Short Percentage of Float2.37%
52-Week Range $4.27 - 10.51
Shares Outstanding (Mil)73.00
» More Articles for CO

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
China Cord Blood Corporation to Report Fourth Quarter and Full Year of Fiscal 2017 Financial Results Jun 14 2017 
China Cord Blood Corporation Announces Termination of Evaluation and Negotiation Regarding "Going Pr Apr 13 2017 
China Cord Blood Corporation Receives Notification of Exercise of 7% Senior Convertible Notes Apr 06 2017 
China Cord Blood Corporation Announces Executive Change Mar 31 2017 
Canadian Orebodies Exploring Non Resource Revenue Generating Opportunities Sep 28 2015 
52 Week High Companies: V, FAST, DLTR, CO, TJX Dec 19 2011 

More From Other Websites
Here's What a Breakup of Procter & Gamble Would Look Like Jul 19 2017
Featured Company News - Thermo Fisher's Companion Diagnostic Test to Screen Multiple Non-Small Cell... Jun 26 2017
China Cord Blood posts 4Q profit Jun 21 2017
China Cord Blood Corporation Reports Financial Results for the Fourth Quarter and Full Year of... Jun 21 2017
China Cord Blood Corporation to Report Fourth Quarter and Full Year of Fiscal 2017 Financial Results Jun 14 2017
China Cord Blood Corp.: Strong price momentum but will it sustain? Apr 14 2017
China Cord Blood Corporation Announces Termination of Evaluation and Negotiation Regarding "Going... Apr 13 2017
China Cord Blood Corporation Receives Notification of Exercise of 7% Senior Convertible Notes Apr 06 2017
China Cord Blood Corporation Announces Executive Change Mar 31 2017
China Cord Blood Corp. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bullish Manner : CO-US : March 23,... Mar 23 2017
China Cord Blood Corp. :CO-US: Earnings Analysis: Q3, 2017 By the Numbers : March 15, 2017 Mar 15 2017
China Cord Blood Corporation Reports Financial Results for the Third Quarter and First Nine Months... Feb 24 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}