Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 3/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Equity-to-Asset 0.03
CQP's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
93% of the 104 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 0.42 vs. CQP: 0.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
CQP' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.33  Med: 0.03 Max: 0.44
Current: 0.03
-0.33
0.44
Debt-to-Equity 32.97
CQP's Debt-to-Equity is ranked lower than
99% of the 92 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 0.91 vs. CQP: 32.97 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-Equity only.
CQP' s Debt-to-Equity Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -12.11  Med: -3.92 Max: 36.52
Current: 32.97
-12.11
36.52
Interest Coverage 1.27
CQP's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
91% of the 103 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 4.46 vs. CQP: 1.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
CQP' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.22  Med: 0.7 Max: 2.23
Current: 1.27
0.22
2.23
Piotroski F-Score: 7
Altman Z-Score: 0.80
Beneish M-Score: 3.54
WACC vs ROIC
4.77%
4.39%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 24.10
CQP's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
57% of the 105 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 19.67 vs. CQP: 24.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
CQP' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -114.27  Med: 14.46 Max: 78.68
Current: 24.1
-114.27
78.68
Net Margin % 0.81
CQP's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
89% of the 105 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 10.31 vs. CQP: 0.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
CQP' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -990.08  Med: -89.58 Max: 0.81
Current: 0.81
-990.08
0.81
ROE % 9.99
CQP's ROE % is ranked lower than
92% of the 106 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 7.22 vs. CQP: 9.99 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
CQP' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -45.82  Med: -36.01 Max: 9.99
Current: 9.99
-45.82
9.99
ROA % 0.14
CQP's ROA % is ranked lower than
79% of the 111 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 4.01 vs. CQP: 0.14 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
CQP' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -7.89  Med: -5.1 Max: 0.17
Current: 0.14
-7.89
0.17
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 4.29
CQP's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
79% of the 108 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 9.39 vs. CQP: 4.29 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
CQP' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -3.04  Med: 0.76 Max: 20.59
Current: 4.29
-3.04
20.59
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate 58.90
CQP's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
95% of the 83 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: -7.90 vs. CQP: 58.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
CQP' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: -23 Max: 165.4
Current: 58.9
0
165.4
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate -8.10
CQP's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked lower than
78% of the 63 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 8.40 vs. CQP: -8.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
CQP' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 8.1 Max: 225.9
Current: -8.1
0
225.9
GuruFocus has detected 7 Warning Signs with Cheniere Energy Partners LP $CQP.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» CQP's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-11-03 Est.)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q1 2016

CQP Guru Trades in Q1 2016

T Boone Pickens 16,795 sh (-70.54%)
» More
Q2 2016

CQP Guru Trades in Q2 2016

T Boone Pickens Sold Out
» More
Q1 2017

CQP Guru Trades in Q1 2017

T Boone Pickens 44,937 sh (New)
» More
Q2 2017

CQP Guru Trades in Q2 2017

Jim Simons 56,600 sh (New)
T Boone Pickens Sold Out
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with CQP

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

GuruDate Trades Impact to Portfolio Price Range * (?) Current Price Change from Average Current Shares
T Boone Pickens 2017-06-30 Sold Out 0.67%$30.19 - $33.07 $ 27.03-15%0
T Boone Pickens 2017-03-31 New Buy0.67%$28.11 - $33.14 $ 27.03-12%44,937
Premium More recent guru trades are included for Premium Members only!!
Premium More recent guru trades are included for USA Subscribe Members only!!
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - Midstream » Oil & Gas Midstream    NAICS: 486210    SIC: 4924
Compare:NYSE:SEP, NYSE:MPLX, NYSE:PAA, NYSE:MMP, AMEX:LNG, NYSE:TRGP, NYSE:WGP, NYSE:WES, NYSE:BPL, NYSE:EEP, NYSE:ETE, NYSE:ENBL, NYSE:EQM, NYSE:AM, AMEX:CQH, NYSE:ENLK, NYSE:PSXP, NYSE:ANDX, NYSE:OKE, NYSE:SHLX » details
Traded in other countries:C64.Germany,
Headquarter Location:USA
Cheniere Energy Partners LP engages in the liquified natural gas export business. The firm operates through its Sabine Pass liquefaction/terminal/pipeline facilities in Louisiana.

Cheniere Energy Partners is a master limited partnership engaged in the LNG export business through its Sabine Pass liquefaction/terminal/pipeline facilities in Louisiana. Upon completion in 2016-18, Cheniere will have four LNG liquefaction trains with total capacity of about 18 mtpa. The firm is exploring options for two more trains at Sabine Pass. CQP's general partner is Cheniere Energy Inc., which also indirectly owns about a 47% stake in CQP's LP units through its controlling stake in Cheniere Energy Partners LP Holdings.

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
Forward PE Ratio 14.18
CQP's Forward PE Ratio is ranked lower than
71% of the 66 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 21.01 vs. CQP: 14.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PB Ratio 18.77
CQP's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
95% of the 105 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 1.81 vs. CQP: 18.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
CQP' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.31  Med: 10.3 Max: 25.95
Current: 18.77
3.31
25.95
PS Ratio 3.34
CQP's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
80% of the 104 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 2.85 vs. CQP: 3.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
CQP' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.33  Med: 15.21 Max: 75.27
Current: 3.34
3.33
75.27
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 21.64
CQP's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
98% of the 93 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 8.96 vs. CQP: 21.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
CQP' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.09  Med: 35.4 Max: 4940
Current: 21.64
7.09
4940
EV-to-EBIT 46.75
CQP's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
87% of the 95 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 20.97 vs. CQP: 46.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
CQP' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1695.4  Med: 14.8 Max: 2147.3
Current: 46.75
-1695.4
2147.3
EV-to-EBITDA 33.02
CQP's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
92% of the 100 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 14.22 vs. CQP: 33.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
CQP' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2478.7  Med: 23.8 Max: 4210.1
Current: 33.02
-2478.7
4210.1
EV-to-Revenue 10.54
CQP's EV-to-Revenue is ranked lower than
93% of the 105 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 4.61 vs. CQP: 10.54 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-Revenue only.
CQP' s EV-to-Revenue Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.9  Med: 31.5 Max: 220.9
Current: 10.54
8.9
220.9
Current Ratio 1.95
CQP's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
81% of the 108 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 1.14 vs. CQP: 1.95 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
CQP' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.22  Med: 1.81 Max: 4.76
Current: 1.95
0.22
4.76
Quick Ratio 1.80
CQP's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
81% of the 108 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 0.99 vs. CQP: 1.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
CQP' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.21  Med: 1.79 Max: 4.76
Current: 1.8
0.21
4.76
Days Inventory 16.26
CQP's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
60% of the 83 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 14.87 vs. CQP: 16.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
CQP' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 16.26  Med: 35.24 Max: 39.29
Current: 16.26
16.26
39.29
Days Sales Outstanding 18.22
CQP's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
80% of the 94 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 34.60 vs. CQP: 18.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
CQP' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.05  Med: 7.55 Max: 114.46
Current: 18.22
0.05
114.46
Days Payable 9.26
CQP's Days Payable is ranked lower than
86% of the 79 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 45.57 vs. CQP: 9.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
CQP' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.26  Med: 41.8 Max: 491
Current: 9.26
9.26
491

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 6.26
CQP's Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
73% of the 155 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 6.35 vs. CQP: 6.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
CQP' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.97  Med: 6.69 Max: 42.08
Current: 6.26
4.97
42.08
Dividend Payout Ratio 80.95
CQP's Dividend Payout Ratio is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 130 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 1.46 vs. CQP: 80.95 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout Ratio only.
CQP' s Dividend Payout Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 80.95  Med: 85 Max: 85
Current: 80.95
80.95
85
Forward Dividend Yield % 6.21
CQP's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
71% of the 157 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 4.19 vs. CQP: 6.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 6.26
CQP's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked lower than
91% of the 157 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 9.25 vs. CQP: 6.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
CQP' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.97  Med: 6.69 Max: 42.08
Current: 6.26
4.97
42.08

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 18.77
CQP's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
94% of the 94 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 2.78 vs. CQP: 18.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
CQP' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.49  Med: 10.88 Max: 25.85
Current: 18.77
3.49
25.85
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.22
CQP's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
96% of the 97 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 1.04 vs. CQP: 0.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
CQP' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.22  Med: 1 Max: 2.7
Current: 0.22
0.22
2.7
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 2.13
CQP's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
76% of the 109 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 4.47 vs. CQP: 2.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
CQP' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1.1  Med: 0.7 Max: 9.1
Current: 2.13
-1.1
9.1

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $2,765.02
EPS (TTM) $ -0.01
Beta0.76
Short Percentage of Float3.50%
52-Week Range $25.97 - 33.47
Shares Outstanding (Mil)484.00

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18 Dec19
Revenue (Mil $)
EPS ($) 1.44 1.93 3.06
EPS without NRI ($) 1.44 1.93 3.06
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
N/A
Dividends per Share ($) 2.78
» More Articles for CQP

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Cheniere Partners Announces Upsize and Pricing of $1.5 Billion Senior Notes due 2025 Sep 12 2017 
Cheniere Partners Announces Offering of $1.0 Billion Senior Notes due 2025 Sep 11 2017 
Cheniere Energy Partners LP Holdings, LLC Declares Quarterly Dividend Aug 04 2017 
Cheniere Energy Partners Declares Quarterly Distributions Jul 21 2017 
Cheniere Energy Partners LP Holdings, LLC Declares Quarterly Dividend May 09 2017 
Cheniere Energy Partners LP Holdings, LLC Reports First Quarter 2017 Results May 04 2017 
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. Reports First Quarter 2017 Results May 04 2017 
Cheniere Energy Partners LP Holdings, LLC Posts 2016 Annual Report Apr 28 2017 
Cheniere Energy Partners Declares Quarterly Distributions Apr 21 2017 
Cheniere Energy Celebrates 100th LNG Cargo Apr 03 2017 

More From Other Websites
Cheniere Partners Announces Upsize and Pricing of $1.5 Billion Senior Notes due 2025 Sep 12 2017
Cheniere Energy (CQP) Announces $1B Senior Notes Offering Sep 12 2017
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. -- Moody's assigns Ba2 Corporate Family Rating and Senior Note Rating... Sep 11 2017
Cheniere Partners Announces Offering of $1.0 Billion Senior Notes due 2025 Sep 11 2017
Oil CEOs on Harvey's Impact in 90 Seconds Sep 08 2017
Cheniere CEO on Hurricane Harvey. LNG Supplies Sep 07 2017
Are Wall Street Analysts Still Bullish on Cheniere Energy? Aug 30 2017
Cheniere Energy Has Lost More than 15% in 2H17 Aug 30 2017
Cheniere reports minor damage from Harvey at Texas LNG facility Aug 28 2017
Cheniere Energy Delivers First US LNG Cargo to Lithuania Aug 22 2017
3 Stocks to Buy With Dividends Yielding More Than 6% Aug 17 2017
How Cheniere Energy, Inc. Makes Most of Its Money Aug 16 2017
What Analysts Recommend for Cheniere Energy after 2Q17 Earnings Aug 14 2017
Why Cheniere Energy Stock Is Weak despite Strong Earnings Aug 14 2017
Cheniere Energy Posts Strong 2Q17 Results, Increases Guidance Aug 11 2017
Cheniere Energy Partners posts 2Q profit Aug 08 2017
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. Reports Second Quarter 2017 Results Aug 08 2017
Cheniere Energy Partners LP Holdings, LLC Reports Second Quarter 2017 Results Aug 08 2017
Cheniere Reports Second Quarter 2017 Results, Raises Full Year Guidance Aug 08 2017
What Analysts Recommend for Cheniere Energy before 2Q17 Results Aug 07 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}