Switch to:
Also traded in: Belgium, Germany, Mexico, Switzerland, UK

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.16
NAS:GT's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
79% of the 1241 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 0.75 vs. NAS:GT: 0.16 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
NAS:GT' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.04  Med: 0.21 Max: N/A
Current: 0.16
Equity-to-Asset 0.28
NAS:GT's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
82% of the 1235 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 0.49 vs. NAS:GT: 0.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
NAS:GT' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.05  Med: 0.22 Max: 0.35
Current: 0.28
-0.05
0.35
Interest Coverage 4.29
NAS:GT's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
77% of the 1098 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 18.66 vs. NAS:GT: 4.29 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
NAS:GT' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.61  Med: 3.11 Max: 4.22
Current: 4.29
1.61
4.22
Piotroski F-Score: 7
Altman Z-Score: 2.15
Beneish M-Score: -2.62
WACC vs ROIC
10.06%
17.24%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 10.41
NAS:GT's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
77% of the 1244 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 5.42 vs. NAS:GT: 10.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
NAS:GT' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.04  Med: 4.99 Max: 10.35
Current: 10.41
-0.04
10.35
Net Margin % 8.22
NAS:GT's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
76% of the 1244 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 4.01 vs. NAS:GT: 8.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
NAS:GT' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.3  Med: 1.69 Max: 13.52
Current: 8.22
-2.3
13.52
ROE % 28.31
NAS:GT's ROE % is ranked higher than
92% of the 1220 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 8.90 vs. NAS:GT: 28.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
NAS:GT' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -42.69  Med: 31.36 Max: 93.75
Current: 28.31
-42.69
93.75
ROA % 7.37
NAS:GT's ROA % is ranked higher than
73% of the 1259 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 3.99 vs. NAS:GT: 7.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
NAS:GT' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.53  Med: 1.92 Max: 13.79
Current: 7.37
-2.53
13.79
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 19.16
NAS:GT's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
64% of the 1254 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 14.15 vs. NAS:GT: 19.16 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
NAS:GT' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.59  Med: 12.17 Max: 21.64
Current: 19.16
-0.59
21.64
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -6.90
NAS:GT's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
81% of the 1091 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 3.40 vs. NAS:GT: -6.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
NAS:GT' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -13.9  Med: -1.3 Max: 10.3
Current: -6.9
-13.9
10.3
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate 7.60
NAS:GT's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked higher than
50% of the 1005 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 7.60 vs. NAS:GT: 7.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
NAS:GT' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -39.9  Med: -0.2 Max: 67.4
Current: 7.6
-39.9
67.4
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate 27.60
NAS:GT's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked higher than
77% of the 895 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 7.20 vs. NAS:GT: 27.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
NAS:GT' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -54.5  Med: 1.9 Max: 91
Current: 27.6
-54.5
91
GuruFocus has detected 1 Warning Sign with Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co $NAS:GT.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» NAS:GT's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-07-28 Est.)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2016

GT Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Caxton Associates 1,896,100 sh (New)
Jeremy Grantham 325,700 sh (+611.14%)
Steven Cohen 1,035,000 sh (+241.02%)
T Boone Pickens 189,487 sh (+65.45%)
Lee Ainslie 91,100 sh (+63.06%)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 3,177,036 sh (+18.18%)
Diamond Hill Capital 5,827,832 sh (+12.79%)
Scott Black 80,079 sh (+11.12%)
Pioneer Investments 1,683,350 sh (+6.99%)
John Buckingham 213,610 sh (+0.05%)
Mario Gabelli 13,600 sh (unchged)
Jim Simons Sold Out
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
David Dreman 11,496 sh (-9.47%)
David Tepper 709,076 sh (-25.59%)
Joel Greenblatt 145,394 sh (-73.51%)
» More
Q3 2016

GT Guru Trades in Q3 2016

T Boone Pickens 271,570 sh (+43.32%)
David Tepper 859,076 sh (+21.15%)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 3,634,336 sh (+14.39%)
Diamond Hill Capital 6,143,650 sh (+5.42%)
David Dreman 11,496 sh (unchged)
Mario Gabelli 13,600 sh (unchged)
Caxton Associates 350,000 sh (unchged)
Lee Ainslie Sold Out
Caxton Associates Sold Out
Joel Greenblatt Sold Out
John Buckingham 211,208 sh (-1.12%)
Scott Black 74,499 sh (-6.97%)
Pioneer Investments 1,488,984 sh (-11.55%)
Jeremy Grantham 176,403 sh (-45.84%)
Steven Cohen 15,000 sh (-98.55%)
» More
Q4 2016

GT Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Caxton Associates 110,000 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 7,340 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 257,731 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 907,500 sh (+5950.00%)
David Dreman 12,895 sh (+12.17%)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 3,909,836 sh (+7.58%)
Diamond Hill Capital 6,476,443 sh (+5.42%)
Mario Gabelli 13,600 sh (unchged)
T Boone Pickens 271,570 sh (unchged)
Scott Black 74,234 sh (-0.36%)
John Buckingham 209,205 sh (-0.95%)
Jeremy Grantham 171,437 sh (-2.82%)
Pioneer Investments 1,438,213 sh (-3.41%)
David Tepper 236,951 sh (-72.42%)
» More
Q1 2017

GT Guru Trades in Q1 2017

Robert Olstein 113,000 sh (New)
Jim Simons 316,600 sh (New)
George Soros 46,500 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 493,599 sh (+91.52%)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 7,021,395 sh (+79.58%)
Jeremy Grantham 198,900 sh (+16.02%)
Pioneer Investments 1,448,785 sh (+0.74%)
Mario Gabelli 13,600 sh (unchged)
David Dreman 12,895 sh (unchged)
Scott Black Sold Out
Caxton Associates Sold Out
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
John Buckingham 202,717 sh (-3.10%)
Diamond Hill Capital 6,262,140 sh (-3.31%)
T Boone Pickens 164,710 sh (-39.35%)
David Tepper 75,951 sh (-67.95%)
Steven Cohen 100,000 sh (-88.98%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with GT

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Preferred stocks of Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co

SymbolPriceYieldDescription
GTPRA0.003.90

Business Description

Industry: Autos » Rubber & Plastics    NAICS: 326211    SIC: 3011
Compare:NYSE:CSL, OTCPK:NKRKY, OTCPK:SMTUF, NYSE:TSE, NYSE:CTB, OTCPK:FLRAF, OTCPK:TGLVY, NYSE:WMS, OTCPK:SEIGF, NYSE:MYE, NYSE:TG, NAS:CXDC, OTCPK:ABSSF, AMEX:CMT, OTCPK:PLTYF, NAS:DSWL, NAS:CTIB, OTCPK:VYST, OTCPK:GLGI, OTCPK:STCC » details
Traded in other countries:GT.Belgium, GTR.Germany, GT.Mexico, GT.Switzerland, 0QLL.UK,
Headquarter Location:USA
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co is engaged in manufacturing of tires. The Company develops, manufactures, markets and distributes tires for various applications. It also manufactures and markets rubber-related chemicals for various applications.

Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co manufactures and sells a variety of rubber tires under the Goodyear brand name. The firm's tires are used for automobiles, trucks, buses, aircraft, motorcycles, mining equipment, farm equipment, and industrial equipment. The majority of tires sold are replacement tire units, however, the company also sells tires directly to original equipment manufacturers of vehicles and machines where replacement tires are sold. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company operated its business through three operating segments representing its regional tire businesses: Americas; Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA); and Asia Pacific.

Top Ranked Articles about Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co

Caxton Associates Curbs Kraft Heinz, Sells Goodyear An overview of the firm's largest 3rd-quarter trades
Caxton Associates (Trades, Portfolio) manages a portfolio of 182 stocks with a total value of $2,956 million. The firm's largest third-quarter trades are as follows: Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 6.81
GT's PE Ratio is ranked higher than
89% of the 1026 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 17.93 vs. GT: 6.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
GT' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.58  Med: 13.56 Max: 1025.33
Current: 6.81
2.58
1025.33
Forward PE Ratio 7.94
GT's Forward PE Ratio is ranked higher than
63% of the 293 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 9.79 vs. GT: 7.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 6.81
GT's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked higher than
89% of the 1023 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 17.86 vs. GT: 6.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
GT' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.58  Med: 14.41 Max: 62.5
Current: 6.81
2.58
62.5
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 10.81
GT's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked higher than
60% of the 566 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 17.08 vs. GT: 10.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
GT' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.25  Med: 7.25 Max: 64.83
Current: 10.81
2.25
64.83
PB Ratio 1.71
GT's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
57% of the 1212 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.71 vs. GT: 1.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
GT' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.38  Med: 3.82 Max: 102.99
Current: 1.71
0.38
102.99
PS Ratio 0.56
GT's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
60% of the 1220 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 0.83 vs. GT: 0.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
GT' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.05  Med: 0.24 Max: 0.63
Current: 0.56
0.05
0.63
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 14.80
GT's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
61% of the 482 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 15.13 vs. GT: 14.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
GT' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.55  Med: 12.87 Max: 34.7
Current: 14.8
2.55
34.7
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 5.31
GT's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
66% of the 647 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 8.70 vs. GT: 5.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
GT' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.58  Med: 5.56 Max: 118.57
Current: 5.31
1.58
118.57
EV-to-EBIT 8.58
GT's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
86% of the 1383 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 13.17 vs. GT: 8.58 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
GT' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -145.4  Med: 10 Max: 79.9
Current: 8.58
-145.4
79.9
EV-to-EBITDA 5.81
GT's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
90% of the 1412 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 9.05 vs. GT: 5.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
GT' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.5  Med: 6 Max: 100.2
Current: 5.81
3.5
100.2
PEG Ratio 1.24
GT's PEG Ratio is ranked higher than
58% of the 579 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.63 vs. GT: 1.24 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG Ratio only.
GT' s PEG Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.21  Med: 1.05 Max: 14.75
Current: 1.24
0.21
14.75
Shiller PE Ratio 15.17
GT's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked higher than
73% of the 207 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 28.83 vs. GT: 15.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
GT' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 15.04  Med: 24.02 Max: 74.64
Current: 15.17
15.04
74.64
Current Ratio 1.29
GT's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
70% of the 1111 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.56 vs. GT: 1.29 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
GT' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.19  Med: 1.51 Max: 2.25
Current: 1.29
1.19
2.25
Quick Ratio 0.71
GT's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
82% of the 1111 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.13 vs. GT: 0.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
GT' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.61  Med: 0.86 Max: 1.62
Current: 0.71
0.61
1.62
Days Inventory 89.62
GT's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
73% of the 1204 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 57.00 vs. GT: 89.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
GT' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 64.01  Med: 73.79 Max: 89.62
Current: 89.62
64.01
89.62
Days Sales Outstanding 54.63
GT's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
70% of the 999 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 61.70 vs. GT: 54.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
GT' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 42.6  Med: 45.58 Max: 57.66
Current: 54.63
42.6
57.66
Days Payable 87.02
GT's Days Payable is ranked higher than
73% of the 956 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 55.61 vs. GT: 87.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
GT' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 55.56  Med: 72.22 Max: 87.02
Current: 87.02
55.56
87.02

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 1.15
GT's Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
79% of the 1322 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.95 vs. GT: 1.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
GT' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.19  Med: 0.83 Max: 1.15
Current: 1.15
0.19
1.15
Dividend Payout Ratio 0.07
GT's Dividend Payout Ratio is ranked higher than
98% of the 861 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 0.29 vs. GT: 0.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout Ratio only.
GT' s Dividend Payout Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.02  Med: 0.05 Max: 0.22
Current: 0.07
0.02
0.22
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate 83.70
GT's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked higher than
97% of the 661 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 9.70 vs. GT: 83.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
GT' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: -38.3 Max: 83.7
Current: 83.7
0
83.7
Forward Dividend Yield % 1.26
GT's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
81% of the 1291 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 2.09 vs. GT: 1.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 1.15
GT's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked lower than
81% of the 1603 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.78 vs. GT: 1.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
GT' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.19  Med: 0.82 Max: 1.18
Current: 1.15
0.19
1.18
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -0.50
GT's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
64% of the 570 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: -2.10 vs. GT: -0.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
GT' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -11  Med: -1.5 Max: -0.1
Current: -0.5
-11
-0.1

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 1.99
GT's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
58% of the 1164 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.87 vs. GT: 1.99 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
GT' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.47  Med: 2.18 Max: 511.9
Current: 1.99
0.47
511.9
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 2.01
GT's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked lower than
75% of the 604 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.34 vs. GT: 2.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
GT' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.48  Med: 2.2 Max: 56.81
Current: 2.01
0.48
56.81
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 2.32
GT's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked lower than
89% of the 1091 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.25 vs. GT: 2.32 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
GT' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.26  Med: 1.18 Max: 3.89
Current: 2.32
0.26
3.89
Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value 1.14
GT's Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 334 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.11 vs. GT: 1.14 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value only.
GT' s Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.25  Med: 1.15 Max: 5.29
Current: 1.14
0.25
5.29
Price-to-Graham-Number 0.78
GT's Price-to-Graham-Number is ranked higher than
64% of the 833 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.21 vs. GT: 0.78 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Graham-Number only.
GT' s Price-to-Graham-Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.54  Med: 1.14 Max: 29.05
Current: 0.78
0.54
29.05
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 11.66
GT's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
88% of the 1578 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 6.83 vs. GT: 11.66 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
GT' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.3  Med: 9.7 Max: 17.5
Current: 11.66
1.3
17.5
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % 4.71
GT's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked higher than
50% of the 748 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 7.34 vs. GT: 4.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
GT' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -63.1  Med: 4.6 Max: 42.1
Current: 4.71
-63.1
42.1

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $15,166
EPS (TTM) $ 4.71
Beta1.82
Short Percentage of Float6.28%
52-Week Range $24.31 - 37.20
Shares Outstanding (Mil)251.93

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18
Revenue (Mil $) 15,847 16,400
EPS ($) 3.97 5.05
EPS without NRI ($) 3.97 5.05
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
N/A
Dividends per Share ($) 0.40 0.40
» More Articles for NAS:GT

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Robert Olstein's Largest 1st-Quarter Buys May 11 2017 
Goodyear to Award $28,000 in Grants, Scholarships at 19th Annual STEM Career Day Apr 27 2017 
Goodyear Will Redeem $700 Million in Senior Notes Apr 14 2017 
Goodyear to Announce First Quarter 2017 Financial Results Apr 13 2017 
Goodyear Declares Dividend on Common Stock Apr 11 2017 
Goodyear Positioned to Gain from Industry Trends Apr 10 2017 
Caxton Associates Curbs Kraft Heinz, Sells Goodyear Nov 18 2016 
Caxton Associates Exits Coca-Cola, Buys Raytheon Sep 13 2016 
Gilead, Expedia Are Largely Undervalued Mar 17 2016 
Goodyear Tire Among Companies Trading With Very Low PE Feb 17 2016 

More From Other Websites
Goodyear Logo to Be Featured on Cleveland Cavaliers Jerseys May 16 2017
NBA Jersey Sponsorships Keep Coming: Cavaliers Sign Deal With Akron's Own Goodyear Tire May 15 2017
ETFs with exposure to Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. : May 15, 2017 May 15 2017
NBA-Cavaliers jerseys to have Goodyear logo next season May 15 2017
Goodyear, Cleveland Cavaliers Announce Relationship Built on Shared Principles of Drive,... May 15 2017
Post Earnings Coverage as Goodyear's Sales and Earnings Numbers Outperformed Market Estimates May 11 2017
Goodyear building 3rd airship in Ohio, will be ready in 2018 May 08 2017
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. :GT-US: Earnings Analysis: Q1, 2017 By the Numbers : May 2, 2017 May 02 2017
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : GT-US : May 2,... May 02 2017
Edited Transcript of GT earnings conference call or presentation 28-Apr-17 1:00pm GMT May 01 2017
Company News for May 01, 2017 May 01 2017
Goodyear (GT) Earnings, Revenues Beat Estimates in Q1 Apr 28 2017
Goodyear Tire profit beats estimates on price hikes Apr 28 2017
Goodyear (GT) Q1 Earnings and Sales Beat Estimates Apr 28 2017
Goodyear Tire beats profit expectations, but sales miss Apr 28 2017
Goodyear tops Street 1Q forecasts Apr 28 2017
Goodyear Tire profit falls 9.8 pct Apr 28 2017
Goodyear Reports First Quarter 2017 Results Apr 28 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat