Switch to:
Also traded in: Austria, Brazil, Chile, Germany, Mexico, Switzerland, UK

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.06
MDLZ's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
91% of the 1650 Companies
in the Global Confectioners industry.

( Industry Median: 0.66 vs. MDLZ: 0.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
MDLZ' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.01  Med: 0.06 Max: 0.23
Current: 0.06
0.01
0.23
Equity-to-Asset 0.41
MDLZ's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
67% of the 1616 Companies
in the Global Confectioners industry.

( Industry Median: 0.52 vs. MDLZ: 0.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
MDLZ' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.28  Med: 0.43 Max: 0.52
Current: 0.41
0.28
0.52
Debt-to-Equity 0.71
MDLZ's Debt-to-Equity is ranked lower than
62% of the 1229 Companies
in the Global Confectioners industry.

( Industry Median: 0.49 vs. MDLZ: 0.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-Equity only.
MDLZ' s Debt-to-Equity Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.36  Med: 0.63 Max: 1.84
Current: 0.71
0.36
1.84
Debt-to-EBITDA 3.93
MDLZ's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
67% of the 1276 Companies
in the Global Confectioners industry.

( Industry Median: 2.51 vs. MDLZ: 3.93 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-EBITDA only.
MDLZ' s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.64  Med: 4.24 Max: 7.75
Current: 3.93
1.64
7.75
Interest Coverage 10.75
MDLZ's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
61% of the 1440 Companies
in the Global Confectioners industry.

( Industry Median: 17.00 vs. MDLZ: 10.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
MDLZ' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.64  Med: 4.11 Max: 10.75
Current: 10.75
1.64
10.75
Piotroski F-Score: 7
Altman Z-Score: 1.96
Beneish M-Score: -2.46
WACC vs ROIC
5.50%
7.47%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 16.18
MDLZ's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
79% of the 1650 Companies
in the Global Confectioners industry.

( Industry Median: 5.63 vs. MDLZ: 16.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
MDLZ' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.01  Med: 11.77 Max: 16.18
Current: 16.18
8.01
16.18
Net Margin % 12.31
MDLZ's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
82% of the 1651 Companies
in the Global Confectioners industry.

( Industry Median: 3.83 vs. MDLZ: 12.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
MDLZ' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.38  Med: 9.34 Max: 24.52
Current: 12.31
6.38
24.52
ROE % 12.43
MDLZ's ROE % is ranked higher than
61% of the 1617 Companies
in the Global Confectioners industry.

( Industry Median: 8.32 vs. MDLZ: 12.43 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
MDLZ' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.24  Med: 11.53 Max: 26.06
Current: 12.43
6.24
26.06
ROA % 5.12
MDLZ's ROA % is ranked higher than
56% of the 1682 Companies
in the Global Confectioners industry.

( Industry Median: 3.80 vs. MDLZ: 5.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
MDLZ' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.67  Med: 4.53 Max: 11.21
Current: 5.12
2.67
11.21
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 46.17
MDLZ's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
83% of the 1673 Companies
in the Global Confectioners industry.

( Industry Median: 12.67 vs. MDLZ: 46.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
MDLZ' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 18.51  Med: 32.55 Max: 93.39
Current: 46.17
18.51
93.39
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -5.50
MDLZ's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
77% of the 1460 Companies
in the Global Confectioners industry.

( Industry Median: 2.60 vs. MDLZ: -5.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
MDLZ' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -17.9  Med: 1 Max: 10
Current: -5.5
-17.9
10
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate 3.30
MDLZ's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
59% of the 1292 Companies
in the Global Confectioners industry.

( Industry Median: 6.70 vs. MDLZ: 3.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
MDLZ' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -18.1  Med: -2.9 Max: 33.7
Current: 3.3
-18.1
33.7
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate 14.30
MDLZ's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked higher than
60% of the 1196 Companies
in the Global Confectioners industry.

( Industry Median: 8.30 vs. MDLZ: 14.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
MDLZ' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -36.4  Med: 0 Max: 71.5
Current: 14.3
-36.4
71.5
GuruFocus has detected 2 Warning Signs with Mondelez International Inc MDLZ.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» MDLZ's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2018-08-02)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q3 2017

MDLZ Guru Trades in Q3 2017

Paul Tudor Jones 13,309 sh (New)
Pioneer Investments 4,044,516 sh (+348.91%)
Ken Fisher 9,735 sh (+29.94%)
George Soros 1,750,031 sh (+29.34%)
Jerome Dodson 765,500 sh (+15.98%)
Signature Select Canadian Fund 98,800 sh (+0.82%)
First Eagle Investment 5,536 sh (unchged)
Jeff Auxier 41,144 sh (unchged)
Dodge & Cox 11,840 sh (unchged)
Jeremy Grantham 410,000 sh (unchged)
Warren Buffett 578,000 sh (unchged)
Caxton Associates 275,000 sh (unchged)
Ray Dalio Sold Out
Murray Stahl 34,977 sh (-0.58%)
Mario Gabelli 3,182,326 sh (-0.63%)
Bill Ackman 13,927,445 sh (-3.92%)
Joel Greenblatt 142,332 sh (-25.57%)
Jeremy Grantham 297,663 sh (-40.92%)
Jim Simons 1,744,398 sh (-49.11%)
Caxton Associates 63,000 sh (-80.13%)
» More
Q4 2017

MDLZ Guru Trades in Q4 2017

HOTCHKIS & WILEY 3,563,500 sh (New)
Ray Dalio 16,028 sh (New)
Julian Robertson 30,000 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 76,380 sh (New)
Caxton Associates 145,926 sh (+131.63%)
Bill Ackman 23,256,402 sh (+66.98%)
Pioneer Investments 6,448,426 sh (+59.44%)
Ken Fisher 11,208 sh (+15.13%)
Jerome Dodson 805,500 sh (+5.23%)
Mario Gabelli 3,193,498 sh (+0.35%)
First Eagle Investment 5,536 sh (unchged)
Jeremy Grantham 350,000 sh (unchged)
Caxton Associates 75,000 sh (unchged)
Dodge & Cox 11,840 sh (unchged)
Warren Buffett 578,000 sh (unchged)
Jim Simons Sold Out
George Soros Sold Out
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Jeff Auxier 40,960 sh (-0.45%)
Murray Stahl 32,374 sh (-7.44%)
Joel Greenblatt 130,886 sh (-8.04%)
Jeremy Grantham 44,482 sh (-85.06%)
» More
Q1 2018

MDLZ Guru Trades in Q1 2018

Jim Simons 1,987,198 sh (New)
Sarah Ketterer 2,740,323 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 231,118 sh (New)
Jeremy Grantham 164,055 sh (+268.81%)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 5,615,800 sh (+57.59%)
Jerome Dodson 870,500 sh (+8.07%)
Pioneer Investments 6,593,542 sh (+2.25%)
Jeff Auxier 41,652 sh (+1.69%)
Dodge & Cox 11,840 sh (unchged)
Jeremy Grantham 340,000 sh (unchged)
Julian Robertson 30,000 sh (unchged)
Warren Buffett 578,000 sh (unchged)
Ray Dalio Sold Out
Steven Cohen Sold Out
First Eagle Investment Sold Out
Murray Stahl 31,616 sh (-2.34%)
Ken Fisher 10,815 sh (-3.51%)
Mario Gabelli 3,062,138 sh (-4.11%)
Bill Ackman 16,156,591 sh (-30.53%)
Joel Greenblatt 58,310 sh (-55.45%)
Caxton Associates 27,171 sh (-81.38%)
» More
Q2 2018

MDLZ Guru Trades in Q2 2018

Steven Romick 4,290,352 sh (New)
Jerome Dodson 935,500 sh (+7.47%)
Ken Fisher 11,114 sh (+2.76%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with MDLZ

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

GuruDate Trades Impact to Portfolio Price Range * (?) Current Price Change from Average Current Shares
Ken Fisher 2018-06-30 Add 2.76%$37.57 - $42.23 $ 42.355%11,114
Bill Ackman 2018-03-31 Reduce -30.53%5.17%$40.51 - $45.87 $ 42.35-3%16,156,591
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 2018-03-31 Add 57.59%0.34%$40.51 - $45.87 $ 42.35-3%5,615,800
Mario Gabelli 2018-03-31 Reduce -4.11%0.04%$40.51 - $45.87 $ 42.35-3%3,062,138
Joel Greenblatt 2018-03-31 Reduce -55.45%0.04%$40.51 - $45.87 $ 42.35-3%58,310
Ken Fisher 2018-03-31 Reduce -3.51%$40.51 - $45.87 $ 42.35-3%10,815
First Eagle Investment 2018-03-31 Sold Out $40.51 - $45.87 $ 42.35-3%0
Bill Ackman 2017-12-31 Add 66.98%6.8%$39.3 - $43.42 $ 42.351%23,256,402
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 2017-12-31 New Buy0.58%$39.3 - $43.42 $ 42.351%3,563,500
Mario Gabelli 2017-12-31 Add 0.35%$39.3 - $43.42 $ 42.351%3,193,498
Joel Greenblatt 2017-12-31 Reduce -8.04%0.01%$39.3 - $43.42 $ 42.351%130,886
Julian Robertson 2017-12-31 New Buy0.2%$39.3 - $43.42 $ 42.351%30,000
Ken Fisher 2017-12-31 Add 15.13%$39.3 - $43.42 $ 42.351%11,208
George Soros 2017-12-31 Sold Out 2.13%$39.3 - $43.42 $ 42.351%0
Bill Ackman 2017-10-06 Reduce -2.05%0.23%Premium Member Access $41.1 $ 42.353%13,642,445
Bill Ackman 2017-09-30 Reduce -3.92%0.41%$40.05 - $44.24 $ 42.35-0%13,927,445
Mario Gabelli 2017-09-30 Reduce -0.63%0.01%$40.05 - $44.24 $ 42.35-0%3,182,326
George Soros 2017-09-30 Add 29.34%0.48%$40.05 - $44.24 $ 42.35-0%1,750,031
Joel Greenblatt 2017-09-30 Reduce -25.57%0.03%$40.05 - $44.24 $ 42.35-0%142,332
Ken Fisher 2017-09-30 Add 29.94%$40.05 - $44.24 $ 42.35-0%9,735
Bill Ackman 2017-09-26 Reduce -3.92%0.38%Premium Member Access $40.63 $ 42.354%13,927,445
Premium More recent guru trades are included for Premium Members only!!
Premium More recent guru trades are included for USA Subscribe Members only!!
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Consumer Packaged Goods » Confectioners    NAICS: 311919    SIC: 2053
Compare:NYSE:HSY, XSWX:LISPE, XSWX:BARN, XKRX:004990, ISX:MYOR, XKRX:271560, TSE:2206, XTER:SZU, TSE:2201, CAS:CSR, IST:ULKER, BSP:SMTO3, TSE:2222, SZSE:000576, XKRX:001800, NYSE:TR, TSE:2109, OSTO:CLA B, TSE:2220, JSE:TON » details
Traded in other countries:MDLZ.Austria, MDLZ34.Brazil, MDLZ.Chile, KTF.Germany, MDLZ.Mexico, MDLZ.Switzerland, 0R0G.UK,
Headquarter Location:USA
Mondelez International Inc is associated with the confectionery industry. It manufactures and markets snack food and beverage products like biscuits, chocolate, gum and candy, and beverages.The sale of biscuits generate maximum revenue for the company.

For more than five years now, Mondelez has operated independently, following the split from the former Kraft Food's North American grocery business in October 2012. The firm is a leading player in the global snack arena, with a portfolio that consists of biscuits (41% of sales), chocolate (30%), gum/candy (15%), beverage (5.5%), and cheese and grocery (8.5%). Mondelez's portfolio includes well-known brands like Oreo, Chips Ahoy, Halls, Trident, and Cadbury. The firm derives around one third of revenue from developing markets, nearly 40% from Europe, and about one fourth from North America.

Guru Investment Theses on Mondelez International Inc

Bill Ackman Comments on Mondelez International - May 17, 2018

Mondelez International, Inc. (NASDAQ:MDLZ)

Mondelez reported first quarter 2018 results on May 1st. Organic sales growth for the quarter was 2.4%, with over 70% of this increase driven by volume and product mix, and the balance from pricing. This was the third consecutive quarter with both organic sales growth in the 2% to 3% range, and a positive contribution from volume and product mix. All regions outside of North America posted solid growth, including 5.5% growth in emerging markets, which represent nearly 40% of the company’s sales. North America, which accounts for less than 25% of the company’s sales, declined 1.8% in the quarter driven by ongoing weakness in gum, as well as transitory issues including inventory destocking at retailers, and poor supply chain execution. Encouragingly, consumer demand for Mondelez’s core cookie and cracker brands, which generate over 80% of the company’s sales in North America, appears robust, with retail sales for these brands growing 2.5% in the quarter.

Operating profit margins expanded by 30 basis points to 16.7%, as a continued reduction in overhead costs more than offset a decline in gross margin driven by unfavorable product mix, higher commodity costs, and freight inflation in North America. In contrast to most US-centric consumer packaged goods (“CPG”) companies that expect lower gross margins in the near-to-medium term, Mondelez management still expects gross margins to expand in the full year, reflecting both the company’s limited US presence, as well as the significant opportunity that exists to expand margins beyond current levels. EPS grew 19% as reported, or 10% on a constant-currency basis, driven by good operating performance as well as lower interest expense and share repurchases. We believe that Mondelez, with its advantaged category and geographic footprint, is one of the few CPG companies that should continue to deliver sustained double-digit EPS growth even in the current environment.

Despite posting results that were in-line with or better than those of its key global and snack-focused peers in the quarter, Mondelez continues to trade at an unwarranted discount to both its peers and intrinsic value. MDLZ is currently trading at approximately 15.5 times forward earnings, which is a trough valuation for the company since the spin-off of Kraft Foods in October 2012, and a 25% discount to its average valuation multiple since then. While some recent share price weakness has been driven by investor rotation out of consumer staples due in part to the rising interest rate environment, we believe that investors are wrongly penalizing MDLZ for the significant challenges facing more US-focused, center-of-plate packaged food companies that continue to experience organic sales declines. We believe that Mondelez’s valuation gap should close as the company continues to report differentiated results over the coming quarters, and as investors gain more comfort with the new CEO who will reveal the results of the company’s strategic review at the end of the summer.

From Bill Ackman (Trades, Portfolio)'s first-quarter 2018 shareholder letter.



Check out Bill Ackman latest stock trades

Bill Ackman Comments on Mondelez - Nov 16, 2017

We believe that Mondelez (NASDAQ:MDLZ) is currently substantially undervalued given its high business quality, long-term secular growth potential – especially in emerging markets – and substantial opportunity to improve profit margins. Today, Mondelez trades at 17 times our estimate for 2018 earnings per share, a discount to the S&P 500 market multiple, for a business whose attributes are substantially better than the average company in the S&P 500.

Despite its advantaged snack categories and extensive global footprint, Mondelez is currently trading more in line with US-focused, so-called center-of-plate (non-snacks) packaged food companies that, unlike Mondelez, are facing unprecedented volume losses in a difficult US grocery environment.

Mondelez’s global food peers such as Nestle and PepsiCo, and sweet snacks-focused peers like Hershey currently trade at approximately 21 times 2018 earnings per share, a nearly 25% premium to Mondelez. We expect this valuation gap to close over the coming quarters as investors gain further clarity around three concerns that we believe cause this significant trading discount to intrinsic value: (1) uncertainty regarding the US grocery landscape; (2) concerns about the company’s growth potential; and (3) apprehension regarding the upcoming CEO transition later this month.

Mondelez made good progress in beginning to address these concerns when it reported third quarter 2017 results on October 30, 2017. For the quarter, Mondelez delivered underlying organic sales growth of 2.2%, approximately one-third from volume and product mix, and the remainder from pricing. This was a marked improvement from the first half of the year, and was broadly in-line with the growth rates of the company’s categories and its global and snacks-focused peers in the quarter. This performance reflects two inherent advantages in Mondelez’s portfolio: (1) only 25% of the company’s sales are generated in the US, and roughly 37% of its sales are in the faster-growing developing markets; and (2) 85% of the company’s sales are in snacks which enjoy higher barriers to entry and superior long-term growth prospects versus other packaged food categories.

We expect the company’s growth rate to accelerate further given tailwinds from (1) an improving global macroeconomic environment, particularly in emerging markets, (2) a weakening US dollar which increases the value of Mondelez’s international sales while boosting the purchasing power of consumers overseas, (3) favorable near-term competitive dynamics in US cookies and crackers, (4) the abatement of revenue headwinds from management’s historical actions to eliminate unprofitable, low-growth SKUs, and (5) the significant opportunity to better utilize advertising and promotion (“A&P”), trade, and innovation investment to drive growth. In contrast, we anticipate that US-focused, center-of-plate packaged food companies will fare much more poorly going forward given headwinds to both volume and pricing from an ongoing shift to fresh food, a bigger push into US grocery by Amazon and other discounters, and the proliferation of challenger brands and private label competition.

Operating profit margins expanded in the third quarter to 16.9%, as the company’s zero-based budgeting program continued to deliver cost reductions in overheads. Year-to-date operating profit margins were 16.5%, putting the company well on its way towards management’s goal of a mid-16% margin for 2017. There has been a fair amount of investor concern about a potential earnings “rebase” under the new CEO Dirk Van de Put, which current management addressed directly on the third quarter earnings call by strongly reiterating the company’s commitment to its 2018 operating profit margin target of 17% to 18%.

We were encouraged by management’s comments, but have long been confident that a “rebase” will not occur given: (1) the substantial capital invested over the last several years to upgrade the manufacturing base and reduce product and procurement complexity; (2) a strong current portfolio of products, given the significant SKU rationalization over the last three years; (3) the healthy 9% of sales that the company currently invests in A&P, which is at the high end of its peer group given its scale; and (4) the fact that 2018 margin goals are still materially below optimized levels. We believe that the board will hold Mr. Van de Put accountable for realistic stretch goals for both growth and profitability. We will continue to closely monitor the company’s performance and plan to engage with Mr. Van de Put as soon as practicable.

From Bill Ackman (Trades, Portfolio)'s third quarter 2017 shareholder letter.

Check out Bill Ackman latest stock trades

Bill Ackman Comments on Mondelez - May 12, 2017

Mondelez (NASDAQ:MDLZ) reported first quarter 2017 results on May 2nd. Organic sales growth for the quarter was 0.6%, driven by pricing growth of 1.1% and a volume decline of 0.5% that includes the impact of management’s efforts to cull low-margin, non-core products. All regions experienced growth with the exception of North America. Management expects North America to improve in the second half of the year due to the exit of a key competitor in direct store delivery, major innovation launches such as the new well-being cracker brand Véa, and a recent change in regional leadership.

Despite the modest top-line growth, operating profit margins expanded significantly to 16.8%, driven primarily by a reduction in overhead costs as a percentage of sales reflecting the implementation of zero-based budgeting and the rollout of global shared services. These gains were achieved despite investments in innovation, white space initiatives ahead of revenue that will build more meaningfully over the second half of the year, and headwinds from commodity costs and geographic mix. Management remains committed to its 2018 operating profit margin target of 17% to 18%, and has stated that it has good visibility to expand margins after 2018.

Mondelez is one of the few large-cap packaged food companies that is demonstrating both margin expansion and top-line organic growth. Given Mondelez’s innovation pipeline and market share opportunities, we expect organic sales growth to improve in the second half of the year. Over the long-term, we believe that Mondelez’s categories and geographic footprint give it a significant competitive advantage, especially in the emerging markets where Mondelez’s large market shares and robust routes to market should drive accelerated growth.

From Bill Ackman (Trades, Portfolio)'s first quarter 2017 shareholder letter.


Check out Bill Ackman latest stock trades

Mario Gabelli Comments on Mondelez International Inc. - May 10, 2017

Mondelez International Inc. (2.0%) (MDLZ – $43.08 – NASDAQ) (NASDAQ:MDLZ), headquartered in Deerfield, Illinois, is the renamed Kraft Foods Inc. following the tax-free spin-off to shareholders of the North American grocery business on October 1, 2012. Following the contribution of coffee into a new joint venture, nearly 85% of Mondelēz’s $26 billion of revenue is derived from snacking, including leading brands such as Oreo, LU and Ritz biscuits, Trident gum, and Cadbury and Milka chocolates. On July 2, 2015 Mondelēz combined its coffee business with D.E Master Blenders 1753 to form a new coffee company, Jacobs Douwe Egberts. Subsequently, MDLZ exchanged part of its stake in this coffee joint venture for 24% ownership in Keurig Green Mountain, which was acquired by an investor group led by JAB Holding Co. in March 2016. This narrows the company’s product focus, as only 15% of revenue will be outside snacks — mostly Tang beverages and other products including Philadelphia cream cheese, which management may look to divest in the future as it executes on its plan to accelerate growth and improve margins in the faster growing snack business.

From Mario Gabelli (Trades, Portfolio)'s Gabelli Equity Income Fund 2017 first quarter shareholder commentary.

Check out Mario Gabelli latest stock trades

Mario Gabelli Comments on Mondelez International - May 09, 2017

Mondelez International Inc.(1.0%)(MDLZ – $44.33 –NASDAQ) (NASDAQ:MDLZ), headquartered in Deerfield, Illinois, is the renamed Kraft Foods Inc. following the tax-free spin-off to shareholders of the North American grocery business on October 1, 2012. Following the contribution of coffee into a new joint venture, nearly 85% of Mondelēz’s $27 billion of revenue is derived from snacking, including leading brands such as Oreo, LU and Ritz biscuits, Trident gum, and Cadbury and Milka chocolates. On July 2, 2015 Mondelēz combined its coffee business with D.E Master Blenders 1753 to form a new coffee company, Jacobs Douwe Egberts. Subsequently, MDLZ exchanged part of its stake in this coffee joint venture for 24% ownership in Keurig Green Mountain, which was acquired by an investor group led by JAB Holding Co. in March 2016. This narrows the company’s product focus, as only 15% of revenue will be outside snacks — mostly Tang beverages and other products including Philadelphia cream cheese, which management may look to divest in the future as it executes on its plan to accelerate growth and improve margins in the faster growing snack business. On June 30, Hershey confirmed that it received and rejected a preliminary indication of interest from Mondelēz to acquire Hershey for $107 per share in cash and stock, demonstrating Mondelēz’s continued interest in pursuing acquisitions while remaining an independent company.



From the Gabelli Value 25 Fund first quarter 2017 shareholder letter.



Check out Mario Gabelli latest stock trades

Bill Ackman Comments on Mondelez - May 08, 2017

Mondelez (NASDAQ:MDLZ) was created out of the breakup of Kraft Foods in 2012, and today is one of the largest global snacks companies with 2016 revenues of $26 billion. Branded biscuits, chocolate, and confectionary businesses are wonderful businesses because of their high category margins, large economic moats, high returns on capital, and attractive long-term global growth potential. Mondelez has the most attractive stable of sweet snack brands of any publicly traded food company with seven brands that each generate over $1 billion in annual sales, many of which have been building brand equity with consumers for over one hundred years. Despite owning some of the best brands in the industry, Mondelez has among the lowest profit margins in large cap packaged food, presenting a meaningful opportunity to increase efficiency that management is currently addressing.

Mondelez made good progress on this productivity opportunity in 2016. Operating profit margins expanded by 220 basis points to 15.3%, driven primarily by a reduction in overhead costs as a percentage of sales reflecting the implementation of zero-based budgeting and the rollout of global shared services, as well as an increase in gross margin reflecting the company’s supply chain transformation. Management remains committed to its 2018 operating profit margin target of 17% to 18%, and has stated that they have good visibility to expand margins even further beyond 2018.

Mondelez’s underlying organic sales growth in 2016 was generally in-line with the company’s categories at 2.2%, tempered by a slowdown in developing markets. We note that Mondelez is one of the few large publicly traded packaged food companies that are demonstrating any underlying volume growth, however modest. While the global growth rate of Mondelez’s snacking categories moderated over the course of the year, primarily due to macroeconomic headwinds, we continue to believe that the long-term outlook for these categories remains robust, especially in the developing markets where Mondelez has large market shares and hard-to-replicate routes to market.

While consolidation in packaged foods could represent an opportunity for Mondelez, we believe the business is an attractive investment assuming no contribution from mergers or acquisitions. Sustained operating improvements should continue to drive attractive shareholder returns.

Mondelez’s total shareholder return, including dividends, was 0.5% in 2016.

From 2016 annual letter to shareholders of Pershing Square by Bill Ackman (Trades, Portfolio).

Check out Bill Ackman latest stock trades

Bill Ackman Comments on Mondelez - Mar 30, 2017

Mondelez (NASDAQ:MDLZ) was created out of the breakup of Kraft Foods in 2012, and today is one of the largest global snacks companies with 2016 revenues of $26 billion. Branded biscuits, chocolate, and confectionary businesses are wonderful businesses because of their high category margins, large economic moats, high returns on capital, and attractive long-term global growth potential. Mondelez has the most attractive stable of sweet snack brands of any publicly traded food company with seven brands that each generate over $1 billion in annual sales, many of which have been building brand equity with consumers for over one hundred years. Despite owning some of the best brands in the industry, Mondelez has among the lowest profit margins in large cap packaged food, presenting a meaningful opportunity to increase efficiency that management is currently addressing.

Mondelez made good progress on this productivity opportunity in 2016. Operating profit margins expanded by 220 basis points to 15.3%, driven primarily by a reduction in overhead costs as a percentage of sales reflecting the implementation of zero-based budgeting and the rollout of global shared services, as well as an increase in gross margin reflecting the company’s supply chain transformation. Management remains committed to its 2018 operating profit margin target of 17% to 18%, and has stated that they have good visibility to expand margins even further beyond 2018.

Mondelez’s underlying organic sales growth in 2016 was generally in-line with the company’s categories at 2.2%, tempered by a slowdown in developing markets. We note that Mondelez is one of the few large publicly traded packaged food companies that are demonstrating any underlying volume growth, however modest. While the global growth rate of Mondelez’s snacking categories moderated over the course of the year, primarily due to macroeconomic headwinds, we continue to believe that the long-term outlook for these categories remains robust, especially in the developing markets where Mondelez has large market shares and hard-to-replicate routes to market.

While consolidation in packaged foods could represent an opportunity for Mondelez, we believe the business is an attractive investment assuming no contribution from mergers or acquisitions. Sustained operating improvements should continue to drive attractive shareholder returns.

Mondelez’s total shareholder return, including dividends, was 0.5% in 2016.



From Bill Ackman (Trades, Portfolio)'s Pershing Square 2016 annual report.


Check out Bill Ackman latest stock trades

Bill Ackman Comments on Mondelez - Dec 09, 2016

On October 26, Mondelez (NASDAQ:MDLZ) reported third quarter 2016 results. Underlying organic growth was generally in-line with the company’s categories at nearly 2%, including volume growth of 1.3%. This was the third straight quarter of positive underlying volume growth and a sequential acceleration from the second quarter. We note that Mondelez is one of the few large cap packaged food companies that is demonstrating any underlying volume growth, however modest. While the global growth rate of Mondelez’s snacking categories has moderated over the course of the year primarily due to macroeconomic headwinds, we continue to believe that the long-term outlook for these categories remains robust, especially in the emerging markets where Mondelez has large market shares and robust routes to market.

Operating profit margins expanded by 220 basis points to 15.8% in the quarter, driven primarily by a reduction in overhead costs as a percentage of sales reflecting the implementation of zero-based budgeting and the rollout of global shared services, as well as an increase in gross margin reflecting the company’s supply chain transformation. Year-to-date, the company continues to show progress with its significant cost savings opportunity and productivity initiatives, and remains on track to reach its 2018 margin target of 17% to 18% with further upside beyond 2018.

From Bill Ackman (Trades, Portfolio)'s Pershing Square third-quarter shareholder letter.

Check out Bill Ackman latest stock trades

Mario Gabelli Comments on Mondelez International Inc. - Nov 02, 2016

Mondelez International Inc. (NASDAQ:MDLZ) (2.0%) (MDLZ $43.90 – NASDAQ) headquartered in Deerfield, Illinois, is the renamed Kraft Foods Inc. following the tax-free spin-off to shareholders of the North American grocery business on October 1, 2012. Mondelēz’s approximately $26 billion of revenue is derived primarily from snacking, which includes leading brands such as Oreo, LU and Ritz biscuits, Trident gum and Cadbury and Milka chocolates. On July 2, 2015 Mondelēz combined its coffee business with DE Master Blenders 1753 to form a new coffee company, Jacobs Douwe Egberts. Subsequently, MDLZ exchanged part of its stake in this coffee joint venture for 24% ownership in Keurig Green Mountain, which was acquired by an investor group led by JAB Holding Co. in March 2016. This narrows the company’s product focus, as only 15% of revenue will be outside snacks — mostly Tang beverages and other products, such as Philadelphia cream cheese, which management may look to divest in the future as it executes on its plan to accelerate growth and improve margins in the faster-growing snack business. On August 26, Mondelez confirmed that discussions relating to a potential combination with Hershey had ended. Hershey initially confirmed on June 30 that it received and rejected a preliminary indication of interest from Mondelēz to acquire Hershey for $107 per share in cash and stock, demonstrating Mondelez’s continued interest in pursuing acquisitions while remaining an independent company.

From Mario Gabelli (Trades, Portfolio)'s Equity Income Fund 3rd quarter 2016 commentary.

Check out Mario Gabelli latest stock trades

Bill Ackman Comments on Mondelez - Aug 29, 2016

On June 30, 2016, press reports, which were later confirmed, stated that Mondelez (NASDAQ:MDLZ) had made an offer to acquire The Hershey Company for $107 per share in a half-cash, half-stock transaction. While an acquisition of Hershey would certainly strengthen Mondelez's confectionery presence in North America, whether or not a deal creates value for shareholders depends on the price paid, the acquisition currency used and, as importantly, the potential for significant cost savings at Hershey.

We believe that Mondelez shares are currently undervalued, and that the issuance of Mondelez stock at current prices to fund the acquisition of Hershey would likely be costly for Mondelez shareholders. More importantly, if Mondelez were to acquire Hershey or any other company, management must continue to be accountable for its own target of 17% to 18% operating profit margins by 2018 at the existing Mondelez business, excluding the impact or benefit of any acquisitions. We expect that shareholders would fmd it unacceptable for an acquisition of Hershey by Mondelez to delay or derail the productivity and cost savings transformation currently underway at the company.

On July 27, 2016, Mondelez reported second quarter 2016 results. Underlying organic growth was generally in-line with Mondelez's categories at 2.5%, including volume growth of nearly 1% which was a sequential acceleration of 60 basis points from the first quarter. While we believe that the long-term outlook for the global snacks categories in which Mondelez participates remains robust, the company is currently facing short-term headwinds from slowing emerging market economies.

Operating profit margins expanded by 265 basis points to 15% in the quarter driven primarily by a 200 basis point reduction in overhead costs as a percentage of sales reflecting the implementation of zero-based budgeting as well as an increase in gross margin reflecting the company's supply chain transformation. Year-to-date, the company continues to show progress with its significant cost savings opportunity and productivity initiatives.

From Bill Ackman (Trades, Portfolio)'s mid-year 2016 letter.

Check out Bill Ackman latest stock trades

Jerome Dodson Comments on Mondelez - Jul 26, 2016

Mondelez (NASDAQ:MDLZ), a leading snack company with iconic brands such as Oreo, Trident and Cadbury, contributed 32 basis points to the Fund’s return, as its stock rose 13.4% from $40.12 to $45.51. The stock spiked at the end of the quarter after the company made a $23 billion bid for Hershey in an effort to create the world’s largest candy maker. Although Hershey swiftly rejected the offer, Mondelez’s stock still rallied, because Mondelez itself is an acquisition target. Many investors believe Mondelez approached Hershey in order to fend off an acquirer. While we don’t know how economy. U.S. investors are worried that slowing European growth will reduce export demand for American companies. Additionally, the decline in value of the British pound and euro make a bad situation worse, because revenue earned in these currencies is now worth less when converted into U.S. dollars. If this story about concerns over a foreign economy sounds familiar, that’s because it is. The S&P 500 has endured two 10% corrections over the past year due to China’s slowing economy and falling currency. China and the European Union together represent one-third of the global economy, so there are good reasons to be concerned.


From Jerome Dodson (Trades, Portfolio)'s Parnassus Fund second quarter 2016 commentary.

Check out Jerome Dodson latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about Mondelez International Inc

Steven Romick's Top 7 New Buys in 2nd Quarter Top buys include Buffett's Wells Fargo and Ackman's Mondelez
Steven Romick (Trades, Portfolio), portfolio manager of the FPA Crescent Fund, disclosed on Thursday that his top four new buys are Jefferies Financial Group Inc. (NYSE:JEF), Comcast Corp. (NASDAQ:CMCSA), Charter Communications Inc. (NASDAQ:CHTR) and Wells Fargo & Co. (NYSE:WFC). Romick also initiated a stake in Bill Ackman (Trades, Portfolio)’s Mondelez International Inc. (NASDAQ:MDLZ). Read more...
Mondelēz International to Report Q2 Earnings on July 25, 2018
Bill Ackman’s Top 4 Holdings as of June Guru’s top holdings include Oreo manufacturer and two restaurants
According to GuruFocus’ top 10 holdings pages, Pershing Square fund manager Bill Ackman (Trades, Portfolio)’s top four holdings as of June 30 are Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE:QSR), Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. (NYSE:CMG), Automatic Data Processing Inc. (NASDAQ:ADP) and Mondelez International Inc. (NASDAQ:MDLZ). Read more...
Genpact and Mondelēz International Co-innovate to Transform Operations for Growth through Faster, Smarter Insights from Finance Data
Mondelēz International Names Luca Zaramella as Chief Financial Officer
Mondelēz International Invests $200 Million in Czech Biscuit Plant to Accelerate Growth in Europe
TM Capital advises longtime client, Tate's Bake Shop, a portfolio company of The Riverside Company, in its sale to Mondelēz International, Inc. for approximately $500 million
Mondelēz International Completes Acquisition of Tate’s Bake Shop
Mondelēz International to Present at the Deutsche Bank Global Consumer Conference
Mondelēz International Expands Its Sustainable Wheat Program to Cover 100% of European Biscuits by 2022

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 19.99
MDLZ's PE Ratio is ranked lower than
57% of the 1316 Companies
in the Global Confectioners industry.

( Industry Median: 20.69 vs. MDLZ: 19.99 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
MDLZ' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.72  Med: 13.18 Max: 79.3
Current: 19.99
6.72
79.3
Forward PE Ratio 17.48
MDLZ's Forward PE Ratio is ranked higher than
56% of the 194 Companies
in the Global Confectioners industry.

( Industry Median: 19.34 vs. MDLZ: 17.48 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 19.99
MDLZ's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked lower than
57% of the 1310 Companies
in the Global Confectioners industry.

( Industry Median: 20.84 vs. MDLZ: 19.99 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
MDLZ' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.19  Med: 25.77 Max: 1390.5
Current: 19.99
8.19
1390.5
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 23.23
MDLZ's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked lower than
96% of the 715 Companies
in the Global Confectioners industry.

( Industry Median: 21.99 vs. MDLZ: 23.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
MDLZ' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.03  Med: 16.09 Max: 124.86
Current: 23.23
6.03
124.86
PB Ratio 2.37
MDLZ's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
65% of the 1603 Companies
in the Global Confectioners industry.

( Industry Median: 1.70 vs. MDLZ: 2.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
MDLZ' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.93  Med: 1.54 Max: 3.04
Current: 2.37
0.93
3.04
PS Ratio 2.45
MDLZ's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
78% of the 1585 Companies
in the Global Confectioners industry.

( Industry Median: 1.06 vs. MDLZ: 2.45 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
MDLZ' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.54  Med: 1.61 Max: 2.87
Current: 2.45
0.54
2.87
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 25.10
MDLZ's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
76% of the 645 Companies
in the Global Confectioners industry.

( Industry Median: 21.10 vs. MDLZ: 25.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
MDLZ' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.87  Med: 18.62 Max: 47.39
Current: 25.1
6.87
47.39
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 18.10
MDLZ's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
78% of the 887 Companies
in the Global Confectioners industry.

( Industry Median: 12.78 vs. MDLZ: 18.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
MDLZ' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.88  Med: 10.77 Max: 26.63
Current: 18.1
4.88
26.63
EV-to-EBIT 20.29
MDLZ's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
70% of the 1374 Companies
in the Global Confectioners industry.

( Industry Median: 15.75 vs. MDLZ: 20.29 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
MDLZ' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.2  Med: 22.1 Max: 95.5
Current: 20.29
8.2
95.5
EV-to-EBITDA 16.79
MDLZ's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
70% of the 1432 Companies
in the Global Confectioners industry.

( Industry Median: 12.61 vs. MDLZ: 16.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
MDLZ' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7  Med: 16 Max: 38.2
Current: 16.79
7
38.2
EV-to-Revenue 3.05
MDLZ's EV-to-Revenue is ranked lower than
79% of the 1628 Companies
in the Global Confectioners industry.

( Industry Median: 1.26 vs. MDLZ: 3.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-Revenue only.
MDLZ' s EV-to-Revenue Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1  Med: 2.1 Max: 3.5
Current: 3.05
1
3.5
PEG Ratio 11.88
MDLZ's PEG Ratio is ranked lower than
92% of the 626 Companies
in the Global Confectioners industry.

( Industry Median: 1.94 vs. MDLZ: 11.88 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG Ratio only.
MDLZ' s PEG Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.44  Med: 4.23 Max: 36.75
Current: 11.88
0.44
36.75
Shiller PE Ratio 18.22
MDLZ's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked higher than
64% of the 385 Companies
in the Global Confectioners industry.

( Industry Median: 25.39 vs. MDLZ: 18.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
MDLZ' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.17  Med: 17.07 Max: 23.36
Current: 18.22
8.17
23.36
Current Ratio 0.50
MDLZ's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
95% of the 1490 Companies
in the Global Confectioners industry.

( Industry Median: 1.61 vs. MDLZ: 0.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
MDLZ' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.48  Med: 0.92 Max: 1.24
Current: 0.5
0.48
1.24
Quick Ratio 0.34
MDLZ's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
94% of the 1489 Companies
in the Global Confectioners industry.

( Industry Median: 1.09 vs. MDLZ: 0.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
MDLZ' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.31  Med: 0.57 Max: 0.85
Current: 0.34
0.31
0.85
Days Inventory 61.09
MDLZ's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
53% of the 1561 Companies
in the Global Confectioners industry.

( Industry Median: 63.56 vs. MDLZ: 61.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
MDLZ' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 52.57  Med: 61.11 Max: 88.53
Current: 61.09
52.57
88.53
Days Sales Outstanding 43.29
MDLZ's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
52% of the 1218 Companies
in the Global Confectioners industry.

( Industry Median: 39.55 vs. MDLZ: 43.29 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
MDLZ' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 32.44  Med: 44.28 Max: 75.8
Current: 43.29
32.44
75.8
Days Payable 131.82
MDLZ's Days Payable is ranked higher than
88% of the 1106 Companies
in the Global Confectioners industry.

( Industry Median: 45.63 vs. MDLZ: 131.82 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
MDLZ' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 45.32  Med: 89.08 Max: 131.82
Current: 131.82
45.32
131.82

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 2.07
MDLZ's Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
52% of the 1724 Companies
in the Global Confectioners industry.

( Industry Median: 1.93 vs. MDLZ: 2.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
MDLZ' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.29  Med: 3.58 Max: 8.06
Current: 2.07
1.29
8.06
Dividend Payout Ratio 0.40
MDLZ's Dividend Payout Ratio is ranked higher than
51% of the 1050 Companies
in the Global Confectioners industry.

( Industry Median: 0.33 vs. MDLZ: 0.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout Ratio only.
MDLZ' s Dividend Payout Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.14  Med: 0.65 Max: 3.05
Current: 0.4
0.14
3.05
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate 12.20
MDLZ's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked higher than
69% of the 716 Companies
in the Global Confectioners industry.

( Industry Median: 5.10 vs. MDLZ: 12.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
MDLZ' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 3.7 Max: 43.6
Current: 12.2
0
43.6
Forward Dividend Yield % 2.05
MDLZ's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
51% of the 1647 Companies
in the Global Confectioners industry.

( Industry Median: 1.97 vs. MDLZ: 2.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 2.05
MDLZ's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked lower than
56% of the 2256 Companies
in the Global Confectioners industry.

( Industry Median: 2.35 vs. MDLZ: 2.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
MDLZ' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.28  Med: 3.56 Max: 8.02
Current: 2.05
1.28
8.02
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio 3.60
MDLZ's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
96% of the 797 Companies
in the Global Confectioners industry.

( Industry Median: -2.30 vs. MDLZ: 3.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
MDLZ' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -33.8  Med: 1.2 Max: 4.2
Current: 3.6
-33.8
4.2

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 1.38
MDLZ's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked higher than
50% of the 738 Companies
in the Global Confectioners industry.

( Industry Median: 1.53 vs. MDLZ: 1.38 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
MDLZ' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.5  Med: 0.84 Max: 1.54
Current: 1.38
0.5
1.54
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 1.52
MDLZ's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked lower than
81% of the 1380 Companies
in the Global Confectioners industry.

( Industry Median: 1.09 vs. MDLZ: 1.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
MDLZ' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.34  Med: 0.76 Max: 1.68
Current: 1.52
0.34
1.68
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 4.93
MDLZ's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
58% of the 1676 Companies
in the Global Confectioners industry.

( Industry Median: 5.21 vs. MDLZ: 4.93 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
MDLZ' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1  Med: 4.5 Max: 12.2
Current: 4.93
1
12.2
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % 5.38
MDLZ's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
57% of the 909 Companies
in the Global Confectioners industry.

( Industry Median: 8.20 vs. MDLZ: 5.38 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
MDLZ' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -8.1  Med: 5.4 Max: 23.9
Current: 5.38
-8.1
23.9

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $26,247.00
EPS (TTM) $ 2.12
Beta0.61
Volatility13.51%
52-Week Range $37.42 - 46.54
Shares Outstanding (Mil)1,475.07

Analyst Estimate

Dec18 Dec19 Dec20
Revenue (Mil $) 26,707 27,244 27,568
EBIT (Mil $) 4,490 4,692 4,805
EBITDA (Mil $) 5,356 5,585 5,727
EPS ($) 2.42 2.59 2.74
EPS without NRI ($) 2.42 2.59 2.74
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
9.38%
Dividends per Share ($) 0.89 0.98 1.12

Piotroski F-Score Details

Piotroski F-Score: 77
Positive ROAY
Positive CFROAY
Higher ROA yoyY
CFROA > ROAY
Lower Leverage yoyN
Higher Current Ratio yoyN
Less Shares Outstanding yoyY
Higher Gross Margin yoyY
Higher Asset Turnover yoyY

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}