Switch to:
Also traded in: Austria, Germany, Italy, Mexico, Switzerland

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.49
MU's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
73% of the 855 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Memory industry.

( Industry Median: 1.62 vs. MU: 0.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
MU' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.23  Med: 0.7 Max: 6.96
Current: 0.49
0.23
6.96
Equity-to-Asset 0.53
MU's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
60% of the 852 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Memory industry.

( Industry Median: 0.60 vs. MU: 0.53 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
MU' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.43  Med: 0.66 Max: 0.85
Current: 0.53
0.43
0.85
Debt-to-Equity 0.60
MU's Debt-to-Equity is ranked lower than
65% of the 647 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Memory industry.

( Industry Median: 0.36 vs. MU: 0.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-Equity only.
MU' s Debt-to-Equity Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.07  Med: 0.21 Max: 0.82
Current: 0.6
0.07
0.82
Debt-to-EBITDA 1.15
MU's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
60% of the 546 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Memory industry.

( Industry Median: 1.78 vs. MU: 1.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-EBITDA only.
MU' s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.59  Med: 1.56 Max: 5.43
Current: 1.15
0.59
5.43
Interest Coverage 9.76
MU's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
74% of the 667 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Memory industry.

( Industry Median: 55.34 vs. MU: 9.76 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
MU' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.38  Med: 8.08 Max: 9.76
Current: 9.76
0.38
9.76
Piotroski F-Score: 8
Altman Z-Score: 3.80
Beneish M-Score: -2.36
WACC vs ROIC
13.73%
25.93%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 28.88
MU's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
95% of the 853 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Memory industry.

( Industry Median: 5.72 vs. MU: 28.88 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
MU' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -34.89  Med: 5.63 Max: 28.88
Current: 28.88
-34.89
28.88
Net Margin % 25.04
MU's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
94% of the 853 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Memory industry.

( Industry Median: 4.67 vs. MU: 25.04 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
MU' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -39.18  Med: 7.51 Max: 25.04
Current: 25.04
-39.18
25.04
ROE % 34.63
MU's ROE % is ranked higher than
96% of the 837 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Memory industry.

( Industry Median: 5.98 vs. MU: 34.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
MU' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -33.82  Med: 8.08 Max: 34.63
Current: 34.63
-33.82
34.63
ROA % 16.28
MU's ROA % is ranked higher than
92% of the 862 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Memory industry.

( Industry Median: 3.09 vs. MU: 16.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
MU' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -15.12  Med: 4.13 Max: 16.28
Current: 16.28
-15.12
16.28
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 29.84
MU's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
75% of the 860 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Memory industry.

( Industry Median: 10.68 vs. MU: 29.84 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
MU' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -19.21  Med: 11.9 Max: 30.44
Current: 29.84
-19.21
30.44
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate 8.90
MU's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
69% of the 784 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Memory industry.

( Industry Median: 2.80 vs. MU: 8.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
MU' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -21.5  Med: 7.9 Max: 64.5
Current: 8.9
-21.5
64.5
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate 24.60
MU's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked higher than
50% of the 639 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Memory industry.

( Industry Median: 5.60 vs. MU: 24.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
MU' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -76.3  Med: 16.2 Max: 216
Current: 24.6
-76.3
216
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate 20.20
MU's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked higher than
66% of the 584 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Memory industry.

( Industry Median: 4.80 vs. MU: 20.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
MU' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -60.7  Med: 37.1 Max: 360.3
Current: 20.2
-60.7
360.3
GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Signs with Micron Technology Inc MU.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» MU's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-12-21)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q4 2016

MU Guru Trades in Q4 2016

David Tepper 3,250,000 sh (New)
Jeremy Grantham 9,900 sh (New)
Jim Simons 844,736 sh (+1515.17%)
Steven Cohen 5,042,400 sh (+78.18%)
Caxton Associates 342,475 sh (+50.08%)
Chris Davis 32,055 sh (unchged)
NWQ Managers 12,636 sh (unchged)
Paul Singer 780,000 sh (unchged)
First Eagle Investment Sold Out
Richard Snow Sold Out
Stanley Druckenmiller Sold Out
PRIMECAP Management 62,122,100 sh (-0.02%)
Donald Smith 14,779,020 sh (-3.08%)
Jerome Dodson 2,000,000 sh (-13.04%)
Ken Heebner 3,060,000 sh (-14.04%)
Paul Tudor Jones 23,914 sh (-76.06%)
Pioneer Investments 616,386 sh (-80.33%)
» More
Q1 2017

MU Guru Trades in Q1 2017

David Einhorn 1,600,000 sh (New)
John Hussman 200,000 sh (New)
Ray Dalio 405,342 sh (New)
Jeremy Grantham 670,400 sh (+6671.72%)
Paul Tudor Jones 100,969 sh (+322.22%)
David Tepper 6,690,000 sh (+105.85%)
Caxton Associates 472,542 sh (+37.98%)
Pioneer Investments 650,097 sh (+5.47%)
PRIMECAP Management 62,155,800 sh (+0.05%)
NWQ Managers 12,636 sh (unchged)
Jim Simons Sold Out
Donald Smith 13,782,244 sh (-6.74%)
Ken Heebner 2,630,000 sh (-14.05%)
Signature Select Canadian Fund 611,100 sh (-16.52%)
Chris Davis 16,028 sh (-50.00%)
Steven Cohen 1,444,200 sh (-71.36%)
Jerome Dodson 100,000 sh (-95.00%)
» More
Q2 2017

MU Guru Trades in Q2 2017

Jerome Dodson 700,000 sh (+600.00%)
Pioneer Investments 2,590,309 sh (+298.45%)
Paul Tudor Jones 320,532 sh (+217.46%)
Steven Cohen 3,046,535 sh (+110.95%)
David Tepper 12,900,000 sh (+92.83%)
David Einhorn 2,650,000 sh (+65.63%)
Jeremy Grantham 1,019,400 sh (+52.06%)
NWQ Managers 12,636 sh (unchged)
John Hussman Sold Out
Ray Dalio Sold Out
Donald Smith 13,349,250 sh (-3.14%)
PRIMECAP Management 59,000,700 sh (-5.08%)
Ken Heebner 2,250,000 sh (-14.45%)
Chris Davis 12,828 sh (-19.97%)
Caxton Associates 215,750 sh (-54.34%)
» More
Q3 2017

MU Guru Trades in Q3 2017

Ray Dalio 99,983 sh (New)
Jim Simons 6,730,936 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 1,477,788 sh (New)
David Einhorn 5,021,900 sh (+89.51%)
Caxton Associates 379,200 sh (+75.76%)
Pioneer Investments 3,969,870 sh (+53.26%)
David Tepper 17,053,999 sh (+32.20%)
Paul Tudor Jones 377,657 sh (+17.82%)
NWQ Managers 12,636 sh (unchged)
Jerome Dodson Sold Out
Chris Davis Sold Out
PRIMECAP Management 58,581,800 sh (-0.71%)
Ken Heebner 2,110,000 sh (-6.22%)
Donald Smith 12,109,847 sh (-9.28%)
Jeremy Grantham 894,600 sh (-12.24%)
Steven Cohen 1,530,600 sh (-49.76%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with MU

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

GuruDate Trades Impact to Portfolio Price Range * (?) Current Price Change from Average Current Shares
David Tepper 2017-09-30 Add 32.20%2.29%$27.49 - $37.96 $ 49.1456%17,053,999
Donald Smith 2017-09-30 Reduce -9.28%0.9%$27.49 - $37.96 $ 49.1456%12,109,847
David Einhorn 2017-09-30 Add 89.51%1.49%$27.49 - $37.96 $ 49.1456%5,021,900
Ken Heebner 2017-09-30 Reduce -6.22%0.19%$27.49 - $37.96 $ 49.1456%2,110,000
Joel Greenblatt 2017-09-30 New Buy0.85%$27.49 - $37.96 $ 49.1456%1,477,788
Chris Davis 2017-09-30 Sold Out $27.49 - $37.96 $ 49.1456%0
Donald Smith 2017-06-30 Reduce -3.14%0.32%$26.57 - $32.5 $ 49.1468%13,349,250
David Tepper 2017-06-30 Add 92.83%2.75%$26.57 - $32.5 $ 49.1468%12,900,000
David Einhorn 2017-06-30 Add 65.63%0.51%$26.57 - $32.5 $ 49.1468%2,650,000
Ken Heebner 2017-06-30 Reduce -14.45%0.48%$26.57 - $32.5 $ 49.1468%2,250,000
Chris Davis 2017-06-30 Reduce -19.97%$26.57 - $32.5 $ 49.1468%12,828
Donald Smith 2017-03-31 Reduce -6.74%0.59%$21.71 - $28.97 $ 49.14101%13,782,244
David Tepper 2017-03-31 Add 105.85%1.64%$21.71 - $28.97 $ 49.14101%6,690,000
Ken Heebner 2017-03-31 Reduce -14.05%0.42%$21.71 - $28.97 $ 49.14101%2,630,000
David Einhorn 2017-03-31 New Buy0.64%$21.71 - $28.97 $ 49.14101%1,600,000
Chris Davis 2017-03-31 Reduce -50.00%$21.71 - $28.97 $ 49.14101%16,028
Donald Smith 2016-12-31 Reduce -3.08%0.23%$16.62 - $23.3 $ 49.14162%14,779,020
David Tepper 2016-12-31 New Buy1.26%$16.62 - $23.3 $ 49.14162%3,250,000
Ken Heebner 2016-12-31 Reduce -14.04%0.42%$16.62 - $23.3 $ 49.14162%3,060,000
First Eagle Investment 2016-12-31 Sold Out 0.01%$16.62 - $23.3 $ 49.14162%0
Premium More recent guru trades are included for Premium Members only!!
Premium More recent guru trades are included for USA Subscribe Members only!!
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Semiconductors » Semiconductor Memory    NAICS: 334413    SIC: 3674
Compare:XKRX:000660, TPE:2408, SHSE:603986, TPE:2344, TPE:4958, SHSE:603501, TPE:2337, NAS:RMBS, SZSE:300183, ROCO:3529, TPE:5269, NAS:SGH, ROCO:3260, HKSE:03638, TPE:8112, XKRX:036540, XKRX:222800, TSE:2737, NAS:IOTS, ASX:BRN » details
Traded in other countries:MU.Austria, MTE.Germany, MU.Italy, MU.Mexico, MU.Switzerland,
Headquarter Location:USA
Micron Technology Inc along with its subsidiaries provide memory and storage solutions. Its product portfolio consists of memory and storage technologies such as DRAM, NAND, NOR and 3D XPoint memory.

Micron Technology Inc has historically focused on providing dynamic random-access memory for PCs and servers. The firm has expanded into the NAND flash memory market over the past decade. It has also gained a meaningful presence in the NOR flash market with its 2010 Numonyx acquisition and is increasing its DRAM scale with the purchase of Elpida (completed in mid-2013) and Inotera (completed in December 2016).

Guru Investment Theses on Micron Technology Inc

Jerome Dodson Comments on Micron Technology - Apr 26, 2017

Micron Technology (NASDAQ:MU) was the Fund’s best performer for an impressive fourth consecutive quarter, adding 67 basis points to the return, as its stock soared 31.8% from $21.92 to $28.90. Micron makes two kinds of memory chips, DRAMs (dynamic random access memory) and NAND flash. Prices for both memory chips continue to rise, and the company expects its earnings to reach an all-time high next quarter. Micron has worked hard to move down the cost curve and qualify its products for higher-value uses, which has led to an amazing increase in earnings per share, from a loss of $0.05 only three quarters ago to next quarter’s forecasted gain of $1.50.

Jerome Dodson (Trades, Portfolio)'s first quarter 2017 Parnassus Funds commentary.

Check out Jerome Dodson latest stock trades

Jerome Dodson Comments on Micron Technology - Jan 25, 2017

Micron Technology (NASDAQ:MU) was right on Applied Materials’ heels, adding an amazing 215 basis points to the Fund’s return, as the stock raced higher by 54.8%, from $14.16 to $21.92. It was a rollercoaster year for Micron, as prices of its main product, dynamic random access memory semiconductor chips (also known as DRAMS), were falling sharply to begin the year. DRAM chips are commodities, and their pricing is volatile, going up sharply when demand exceeds supply and dropping suddenly when the balance tilts in the other direction. We invested because production capacity growth had slowed below demand, and we were confident that DRAM prices would eventually rise. Sure enough, in the second half of the year DRAM prices rose sharply, and we’re enjoying the upside.



From the Parnassus Fund fourth quarter 2016 commentary.



Check out Jerome Dodson latest stock trades

Jerome Dodson Comments on Micron Technology - Nov 01, 2016

Micron Technology (NASDAQ:MU) was the Fund’s best performer for the second consecutive quarter, adding 119 basis points to the Fund’s return, as its stock soared 29.2% from $13.76 to $17.78. Micron makes semiconductor memory chips, and its stock climbed higher as prices for dynamic random access memory (also known as DRAM) continued to rise, spurred by a recovery in demand for personal computers and strong smartphone growth. Since production capacity is growing at a slower rate than demand, we think DRAM prices have further to run, so we’re holding onto the stock.



From Jerome Dodson (Trades, Portfolio)'s Parnassus Fund third-quarter 2016 commentary.

Check out Jerome Dodson latest stock trades

Jerome Dodson Comments on Micron Technology - Jul 26, 2016

Our biggest winner was Micron Technology (NASDAQ:MU), which boosted the Fund’s return by 101 basis points, as its stock rose 31.4% from $10.47 to $13.76. Micron makes semiconductor memory chips, and its stock jumped as prices for dynamic random access memory (also known as DRAM) increased in June for the first time in two years. Just last quarter, Micron was our biggest loser, as DRAM prices continued their fall and investors fretted that there was no end in sight. Since production capacity is growing at a slower rate than demand, we were confident DRAM prices would eventually stabilize, but we didn’t know precisely when. While we were early with our initial investment, we added to our position on the weakness, and we’re happy our conviction is beginning to pay off. We expect demand growth to continue as computing becomes even more integral to the global economy, which should push Micron’s earnings, and its stock, higher.


From Jerome Dodson (Trades, Portfolio)'s Parnassus Fund second quarter 2016 commentary.

Check out Jerome Dodson latest stock trades

Parnassus Fund Comments on Micron Technology - May 09, 2016

Micron Technology (NASDAQ:MU) was our worst performer, as its stock fell 26.1% from $14.16 to $10.47 and reduced the return by 114 basis points. Micron makes semiconductor memory chips, and its stock fell after weaker-than-expected demand for personal computers caused memory chip prices—and Micron’s earnings—to decline. This issue has been affecting the company for over a year now, and the stock has fallen dramatically from its peak of $36.49 in December of 2014. We don’t know precisely when memory chip prices will stabilize, but we’re confident they eventually will. Memory chips benefit from the long-term trends of increasing smartphone penetration in emerging markets; the proliferation of Internet-connected devices, such as watches, cars and industrial machines; and the rapid growth of data centers. Micron is now trading below its book value of $11.80, and we took advantage of the deeply discounted price to add to our position.



From the Parnassus Fund first quarter 2016 shareholder letter.



Check out Jerome Dodson latest stock trades

David Einhorn Comments on Micron Technology - Jan 19, 2016

MU (NASDAQ:MU) was our biggest winner in 2014 and our biggest loser in 2015. We have written a lotabout it and have exited the position. When all the dust settled, our average purchase was at$19.93 and our average sale was at $22.14, generating an IRR of 14%. The coulda-woulda-shoulda perspective that this was a disaster is belied by the overall decent return we made onthe investment.

From David Einhorn (Trades, Portfolio)'s Green Light Capital fourth quarter 2015 shareholder letter.

Check out David Einhorn latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about Micron Technology Inc

Should You Buy BlackBerry Ltd, salesforce, Micron, Palo Alto Networks or Visa?
Micron Technology to Report Fiscal First Quarter Results on December 19, 2017
Should You Buy Applied Materials Inc., Alibaba, Foot Locker, 21st Century Fox or Micron Stock?
Joel Greenblatt Buys Micron Technology, Lockheed, Pentair The investor's largest 3rd quarter buys
Joel Greenblatt (Trades, Portfolio) is an American hedge fund manager, writer and investor. He started his own hedge fund, Gotham Capital, in 1985, which produced an annualized return of 40% until 2006. He is also a director at Pzena Investment Management. Read more...
Marvell Semiconductor President and CEO Matt Murphy Elected Chair of SIA
Micron Technology Announces Upcoming Investor Events
Donald Smith Sells Micron Technology, Air France-KLM, AerCap The fund's largest 3rd-quarter sales
As an investment management firm, Donald Smith (Trades, Portfolio) & Co. Inc. manages a portfolio composed of 70 stocks with a total value of $4.155 billion. During the third quarter the guru sold shares in the following stocks: Read more...
Micron Advances Persistent Memory with 32GB NVDIMM
Enmotus and Micron Demonstrate NVDIMM/NVMe Storage Solution at SC17
Investor Psychology: Overcoming Bias in Our Mental Maps Investors must understand what is real in an industry based on abstractions
We live in a world of symbols. In finance and economics, our chief symbols are numbers. Earnings figures, sales improvements, leverage ratios, Sharpe ratios, GDP, etc., are all number symbols that have meaning because they attach to something real in the world. While the popular view of financiers may be that they simply push papers around and manipulate numbers on a screen, the reality is far different. Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 11.27
MU's PE Ratio is ranked higher than
89% of the 595 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Memory industry.

( Industry Median: 22.64 vs. MU: 11.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
MU' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.54  Med: 10.67 Max: 64.71
Current: 11.27
3.54
64.71
Forward PE Ratio 6.09
MU's Forward PE Ratio is ranked higher than
98% of the 121 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Memory industry.

( Industry Median: 17.73 vs. MU: 6.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 11.27
MU's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked higher than
90% of the 592 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Memory industry.

( Industry Median: 22.86 vs. MU: 11.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
MU' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.54  Med: 10.67 Max: 64.71
Current: 11.27
3.54
64.71
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 11.87
MU's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked higher than
80% of the 377 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Memory industry.

( Industry Median: 22.39 vs. MU: 11.87 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
MU' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4  Med: 9.34 Max: 1367.69
Current: 11.87
4
1367.69
PB Ratio 2.93
MU's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
58% of the 835 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Memory industry.

( Industry Median: 2.02 vs. MU: 2.93 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
MU' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.26  Med: 1.17 Max: 3.63
Current: 2.93
0.26
3.63
PS Ratio 2.80
MU's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
59% of the 838 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Memory industry.

( Industry Median: 1.79 vs. MU: 2.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
MU' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.25  Med: 1.23 Max: 2.8
Current: 2.8
0.25
2.8
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 17.04
MU's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
83% of the 380 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Memory industry.

( Industry Median: 21.04 vs. MU: 17.04 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
MU' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.77  Med: 13.82 Max: 120.34
Current: 17.04
2.77
120.34
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 7.03
MU's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
85% of the 486 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Memory industry.

( Industry Median: 13.78 vs. MU: 7.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
MU' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.31  Med: 5.13 Max: 11.06
Current: 7.03
1.31
11.06
EV-to-EBIT 10.91
MU's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
82% of the 597 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Memory industry.

( Industry Median: 17.61 vs. MU: 10.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
MU' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -256.6  Med: 7.7 Max: 159.2
Current: 10.91
-256.6
159.2
EV-to-EBITDA 6.55
MU's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
82% of the 661 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Memory industry.

( Industry Median: 12.96 vs. MU: 6.55 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
MU' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.2  Med: 6.3 Max: 45.5
Current: 6.55
2.2
45.5
EV-to-Revenue 3.11
MU's EV-to-Revenue is ranked lower than
63% of the 843 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Memory industry.

( Industry Median: 1.80 vs. MU: 3.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-Revenue only.
MU' s EV-to-Revenue Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.7  Med: 1.6 Max: 3.2
Current: 3.11
0.7
3.2
PEG Ratio 0.42
MU's PEG Ratio is ranked higher than
88% of the 231 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Memory industry.

( Industry Median: 2.01 vs. MU: 0.42 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG Ratio only.
MU' s PEG Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.25  Med: 0.62 Max: 19.83
Current: 0.42
0.25
19.83
Shiller PE Ratio 75.45
MU's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked lower than
64% of the 148 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Memory industry.

( Industry Median: 44.35 vs. MU: 75.45 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
MU' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 42.42  Med: 90.06 Max: 848.5
Current: 75.45
42.42
848.5
Current Ratio 2.34
MU's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
53% of the 855 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Memory industry.

( Industry Median: 2.23 vs. MU: 2.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
MU' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.45  Med: 2.35 Max: 4.57
Current: 2.34
1.45
4.57
Quick Ratio 1.75
MU's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
52% of the 855 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Memory industry.

( Industry Median: 1.70 vs. MU: 1.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
MU' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.07  Med: 1.72 Max: 3.85
Current: 1.75
1.07
3.85
Days Inventory 91.06
MU's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
60% of the 827 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Memory industry.

( Industry Median: 79.77 vs. MU: 91.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
MU' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 79.29  Med: 89.85 Max: 112.67
Current: 91.06
79.29
112.67
Days Sales Outstanding 62.68
MU's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
53% of the 779 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Memory industry.

( Industry Median: 64.24 vs. MU: 62.68 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
MU' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 41.36  Med: 54.8 Max: 83.23
Current: 62.68
41.36
83.23
Days Payable 40.93
MU's Days Payable is ranked lower than
58% of the 758 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Memory industry.

( Industry Median: 53.42 vs. MU: 40.93 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
MU' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 33.29  Med: 40.93 Max: 61.63
Current: 40.93
33.29
61.63

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -1.20
MU's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
65% of the 616 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Memory industry.

( Industry Median: -3.70 vs. MU: -1.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
MU' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -11.9  Med: -2.8 Max: 0.2
Current: -1.2
-11.9
0.2

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 3.21
MU's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
54% of the 802 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Memory industry.

( Industry Median: 2.16 vs. MU: 3.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
MU' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.56  Med: 1.68 Max: 8.56
Current: 3.21
0.56
8.56
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 2.08
MU's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked higher than
54% of the 465 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Memory industry.

( Industry Median: 1.62 vs. MU: 2.08 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
MU' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.69  Med: 2.31 Max: 13.47
Current: 2.08
0.69
13.47
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-DCF (Earnings Based) 1.05
MU's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-DCF (Earnings Based) is ranked higher than
87% of the 30 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Memory industry.

( Industry Median: 1.88 vs. MU: 1.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-DCF (Earnings Based) only.
MU' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-DCF (Earnings Based) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.69  Med: 0.91 Max: 1.12
Current: 1.05
0.69
1.12
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 2.27
MU's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked lower than
80% of the 763 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Memory industry.

( Industry Median: 1.18 vs. MU: 2.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
MU' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.46  Med: 1.32 Max: 6.2
Current: 2.27
0.46
6.2
Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value 0.45
MU's Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value is ranked higher than
92% of the 159 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Memory industry.

( Industry Median: 1.38 vs. MU: 0.45 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value only.
MU' s Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.29  Med: 0.65 Max: 3.09
Current: 0.45
0.29
3.09
Price-to-Graham-Number 1.26
MU's Price-to-Graham-Number is ranked higher than
78% of the 546 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Memory industry.

( Industry Median: 1.56 vs. MU: 1.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Graham-Number only.
MU' s Price-to-Graham-Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.36  Med: 1.39 Max: 3.15
Current: 1.26
0.36
3.15
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 9.17
MU's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
87% of the 860 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Memory industry.

( Industry Median: 3.46 vs. MU: 9.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
MU' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -33  Med: 3.4 Max: 24.1
Current: 9.17
-33
24.1
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % 27.20
MU's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked higher than
82% of the 384 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Memory industry.

( Industry Median: 8.32 vs. MU: 27.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
MU' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -55.6  Med: 12 Max: 40.7
Current: 27.2
-55.6
40.7

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $20,322.00
EPS (TTM) $ 4.36
Beta2.14
Short Percentage of Float5.08%
52-Week Range $18.18 - 49.89
Shares Outstanding (Mil)1,153.26

Analyst Estimate

Aug18 Aug19 Aug20
Revenue (Mil $) 25,004 24,832 26,467
EPS ($) 7.51 6.54 5.30
EPS without NRI ($) 7.51 6.54 5.30
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
-12.52%
Dividends per Share ($)

Piotroski F-Score Details

Piotroski F-Score: 88
Positive ROAY
Positive CFROAY
Higher ROA yoyY
CFROA > ROAY
Lower Leverage yoyY
Higher Current Ratio yoyY
Less Shares Outstanding yoyN
Higher Gross Margin yoyY
Higher Asset Turnover yoyY

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}