Switch to:
Also traded in: Canada, Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt No Debt
NAK's Cash-to-Debt is ranked higher than
99% of the 1545 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 291.20 vs. NAK: No Debt )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
NAK' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.93  Med: No Debt Max: No Debt
Current: No Debt
Interest Coverage No Debt
NAK's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 1021 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 10000.00 vs. NAK: No Debt )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
NAK' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: No Debt  Med: No Debt Max: No Debt
Current: No Debt
Piotroski F-Score: 4
Altman Z-Score: 194.76
WACC vs ROIC
25.06%
-18.21%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
ROE % -15.57
NAK's ROE % is ranked lower than
62% of the 1395 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -10.31 vs. NAK: -15.57 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
NAK' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -67.79  Med: -12.95 Max: -0.84
Current: -15.57
-67.79
-0.84
ROA % -15.33
NAK's ROA % is ranked lower than
64% of the 1566 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -9.58 vs. NAK: -15.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
NAK' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -43.59  Med: -12.59 Max: -0.61
Current: -15.33
-43.59
-0.61
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % -18.49
NAK's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
58% of the 1487 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -13.76 vs. NAK: -18.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
NAK' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -11300  Med: -46.2 Max: -0.04
Current: -18.49
-11300
-0.04
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate 63.40
NAK's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked higher than
78% of the 1105 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -18.10 vs. NAK: 63.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
NAK' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 8.9 Max: 70.3
Current: 63.4
0
70.3
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate 54.20
NAK's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked higher than
76% of the 990 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -20.60 vs. NAK: 54.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
NAK' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -77.7  Med: 12.9 Max: 175.9
Current: 54.2
-77.7
175.9
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» NAK's 30-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2016

NAK Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Jim Simons 25,600 sh (New)
Donald Smith Sold Out
» More
Q3 2016

NAK Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Jim Simons 79,208 sh (+209.41%)
» More
Q4 2016

NAK Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Paul Tudor Jones 150,000 sh (New)
Jim Simons 232,100 sh (+193.03%)
» More
Q1 2017

NAK Guru Trades in Q1 2017

Paul Tudor Jones 836,805 sh (+457.87%)
Jim Simons 520,100 sh (+124.08%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with NAK

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Metals & Mining » Industrial Metals & Minerals    NAICS: 212299    SIC: 619
Compare:NAS:SND, OTCPK:WLDVF, OTCPK:FTMNF, OTCPK:SWYDF, OTCPK:NYRSY, OTCPK:CGOOF, OTCPK:OROCF, NAS:MPVD, NYSE:CINR, OTCPK:GGPXF, AMEX:KLDX, OTCPK:MJDLF, OTCPK:OBNNF, OTCPK:WNARF, OTCPK:DBEXF, OTCPK:PILBF, OTCPK:GALXF, OTCPK:LNMIF, OTCPK:TREVF, OTCPK:ATUSF » details
Traded in other countries:NDM.Canada, ND3.Germany,
Headquarter Location:Canada
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd is a mineral exploration company. It is engaged in developing the Pebble Project, a copper-gold-molybdenum mineral project located in Alaska, United States of America.

Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd was incorporated in 1983. The Company is a mineral exploration company engaged in developing the Pebble Project, a copper-gold-molybdenum mineral project. The Pebble Project is located in southwest Alaska, a contiguous block of approximately 2,402 mineral claims covering approximately 417 square miles located in southwest Alaska, 17 miles (30 kilometers) from the villages of Iliamna and Newhalen, and approximately 200 miles (320 kilometers) southwest of the city of Anchorage.

Top Ranked Articles about Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd

NAK DEADLINE NOTICE - Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Reminds Investors of Class Action Against Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. & Lead Plaintiff Deadline: April 17, 2017
NAK NOTICE: Rosen Law Firm Reminds Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. Investors of Important Deadline in Class Action – NAK
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Pomerantz Law Firm Announces the Filing of a Class Action against Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. and Certain Officers – NAK
EQUITY ALERT: Khang & Khang LLP Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. and Reminds Investors with Losses Over $100,000 to Contact the Firm
EQUITY ALERT: Lundin Law PC Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. and Encourages Investors with Losses In Excess of $100,000 to Contact the Firm
The Klein Law Firm Announces a Class Action Filed on Behalf of Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. Shareholders and a Lead Plaintiff Deadline of April 17, 2017 (NAK)
EQUITY ALERT: Rosen Law Firm Announces Filing of Securities Class Action Lawsuit Against Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. – NAK

NEW YORK, March 17, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces the filing of a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. securities (:NAK) from September 16, 2013 through February 13, 2017, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). The lawsuit seeks to recover damages for Northern Dynasty investors under the federal securities laws. To join the Northern Dynasty class action, go to http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-1056.html or call Phillip Kim, Esq. or Kevin Chan, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] or [email protected] for information on the class action. NO CLASS HAS YET BEEN CERTIFIED IN THE ABOVE ACTION. UNTIL A CLASS IS CERTIFIED, YOU ARE NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL UNLESS YOU RETAIN ONE. YOU MAY ALSO REMAIN AN ABSENT CLASS MEMBER AND DO NOTHING AT THIS POINT. YOU MAY RETAIN COUNSEL OF YOUR CHOICE. According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Northern Dynasty’s Pebble project is commercially unviable; (2) Northern Dynasty’s Pebble project had a negative present value; and (3) as a result, Defendants’ statements about Northern Dynasty’s business, operations and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable bases at all relevant times. On February 14, 2017, Kerrisdale Capital Management published a report asserting that Northern Dynasty’s Pebble Project is commercial unviable and Northern Dynasty has spent years trying to conceal from the public that its Pebble project had a negative present value. On this news, shares of Northern Dynasty fell $0.68 per share or over 21% to close at $2.50 per share on February 14, 2017, damaging investors. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than April 17, 2017. If you wish to join the litigation, go to http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-1056.html or to discuss your rights or interests regarding this class action, please contact Phillip Kim or Kevin Chan of Rosen Law Firm toll free at 866-767-3653 or via email at [email protected] or [email protected]. Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm or on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm. Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation.
Contact Information:

Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
Kevin Chan, Esq.
The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
275 Madison Avenue, 34th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Tel: (212) 686-1060
Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
Fax: (212) 202-3827
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
www.rosenlegal.com

Read more...
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Brower Piven Encourages Investors Who Have Losses In Excess Of $100,000 From Investment In Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK) To Contact Brower Piven Before The Lead Plaintiff Deadline In Class Action Lawsuit

STEVENSON, Md., March 14, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The securities litigation law firm of Brower Piven, A Professional Corporation, announces that a class action lawsuit has been commenced in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of purchasers of Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (:NAK) (“Northern Dynasty” or the “Company”) common stock during the period between September 16, 2013 and February 14, 2017, inclusive (the “Class Period”). Investors who wish to become proactively involved in the litigation have until April 17, 2017 to seek appointment as lead plaintiff.
If you wish to choose counsel to represent you and the Class, you must apply to be appointed lead plaintiff and be selected by the Court. The lead plaintiff will direct the litigation and participate in important decisions including whether to accept a settlement for the Class in the action. The lead plaintiff will be selected from among applicants claiming the largest loss from investment in Northern Dynasty common stock during the Class Period. Members of the Class will be represented by the lead plaintiff and counsel chosen by the lead plaintiff. No class has yet been certified in the above action. The complaint accuses the defendants of violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by virtue of the defendants’ failure to disclose during the Class Period that the Company’s Pebble Project carried a negative net present value and was not commercially viable. According to the complaint, following a February 14, 2017 report regarding the Pebble Project not being commercially viable, the value of Northern Dynasty shares declined significantly. If you have suffered a loss in excess of $100,000 from investment in Northern Dynasty common stock purchased on or after September 16, 2013 and held through the revelation of negative information during and/or at the end of the Class Period and would like to learn more about this lawsuit and your ability to participate as a lead plaintiff, without cost or obligation to you, please visit our website at http://www.browerpiven.com/currentsecuritiescases.html. You may also request more information by contacting Brower Piven either by email at [email protected] or by telephone at (410) 415-6616. Brower Piven also encourages anyone with information regarding the Company’s conduct during the period in question to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others. Attorneys at Brower Piven have extensive experience in litigating securities and other class action cases and have been advocating for the rights of shareholders since the 1980s. If you choose to retain counsel, you may retain Brower Piven without financial obligation or cost to you, or you may retain other counsel of your choice. You need take no action at this time to be a member of the class.
CONTACT: Charles J. Piven
Brower Piven, A Professional Corporation
1925 Old Valley Road
Stevenson, Maryland 21153
Telephone: 410-415-6616
[email protected]

Read more...
NAK LOSS NOTICE: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Reminds Investors of Class Action Against Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. & Lead Plaintiff Deadline: April 17, 2017

NEW YORK, March 10, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Attorney Advertising -- Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC reminds investors that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (“Northern Dynasty” or the “Company”) (:NAK) and certain of its officers, and is on behalf of purchasers of Northern Dynasty securities between September 16, 2013 and February 13, 2017, inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: http://www.bgandg.com/nak.
This class action seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”).
The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Northern Dynasty’s Pebble project is commercially unviable; (2) Northern Dynasty’s Pebble project had a negative present value; and (3) consequently, Defendants’ statements about Northern Dynasty’s business, operations and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.
On February 14, 2017, Kerrisdale Capital Management released an article about Northern Dynasty alleging that Northern Dynasty’s main asset, the low-grade Pebble deposit, is not commercially sustainable and that for several years the Company has been concealing this information from the investing public that the Pebble project has a negative present value. Following this news, Northern Dynasty stock dropped $0.68 per share or over 21% to close at $2.50 per share on February 14, 2017. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint you can visit the firm’s site: http://www.bgandg.com/nak or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Investor Relations Analyst, Yael Hurwitz of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 212-697-6484. If you suffered a loss in Northern Dynasty you have until April 17, 2017 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff.  Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as a lead plaintiff. Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a corporate litigation boutique.  Our primary expertise is the aggressive pursuit of litigation claims on behalf of our clients.  In addition to representing institutions and other investor plaintiffs in class action security litigation, the firm’s expertise includes general corporate and commercial litigation, as well as securities arbitration.   Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
Contact:
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
Peretz Bronstein or Yael Hurwitz
212-697-6484 | [email protected]

Read more...
NAK SHAREHOLDER ALERT: The Law Offices of Vincent Wong Reminds Investors of a Class Action Involving Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. and a Lead Plaintiff Deadline of April 17, 2017
NEW YORK, March 08, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The Law Offices of Vincent Wong announce that a class action lawsuit has been commenced in the USDC for the Southern District of New York on behalf of investors who purchased Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (“Northern Dynasty”) (MKT:NAK) securities between September 16, 2013 and February 14, 2017.
Click here to learn about the case: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra/northern-dynasty-minerals-ltd. There is no cost or obligation to you.According to the complaint, throughout the class period Defendants issued materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) the Pebble Project carries a negative net present value; (ii) the Pebble Project is not commercially viable; and (iii) as a result of the foregoing, the Company’s financial statements, as well as Defendants’ statements about Northern Dynasty’s business, operations, and prospects, were false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.On February 14, 2017, shares of Northern Dynasty stock plummeted during intraday trading following the publication of a report on Seeking Alpha alleging that “Northern Dynasty is worthless” because its Pebble Project is not “commercially viable.”If you suffered a loss in Northern Dynasty you have until April 17, 2017 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn’t require that you serve as a lead plaintiff. To obtain additional information, contact Vincent Wong, Esq. either via email [email protected], by telephone at 212.425.1140, or visit http://www.wongesq.com/pslra/northern-dynasty-minerals-ltd.Vincent Wong, Esq. is an experienced attorney that has represented investors in securities litigations involving financial fraud and violations of shareholder rights.  Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
CONTACT:
Vincent Wong, Esq.
39 East Broadway
Suite 304
New York, NY 10002
Tel. 212.425.1140
Fax. 866.699.3880
E-Mail: [email protected]

Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PB Ratio 3.32
NAK's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
68% of the 1388 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 2.03 vs. NAK: 3.32 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
NAK' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0 Max: 8.06
Current: 3.32
0
8.06
EV-to-EBIT -23.73
NAK's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 904 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 20.02 vs. NAK: -23.73 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
NAK' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -33.72  Med: 0 Max: 0
Current: -23.73
-33.72
0
EV-to-EBITDA -23.91
NAK's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 971 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 10.14 vs. NAK: -23.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
NAK' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -33.94  Med: 0 Max: 0
Current: -23.91
-33.94
0
Current Ratio 25.95
NAK's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
74% of the 1502 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 2.17 vs. NAK: 25.95 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
NAK' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.41  Med: 8.19 Max: 661.46
Current: 25.95
0.41
661.46
Quick Ratio 25.95
NAK's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
75% of the 1502 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 1.71 vs. NAK: 25.95 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
NAK' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.41  Med: 8.19 Max: 661.46
Current: 25.95
0.41
661.46

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -41.80
NAK's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked lower than
74% of the 1131 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -12.90 vs. NAK: -41.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
NAK' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -72.5  Med: -15.5 Max: 0
Current: -41.8
-72.5
0

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Net-Cash 11.86
NAK's Price-to-Net-Cash is ranked lower than
97% of the 460 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 9.75 vs. NAK: 11.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Net-Cash only.
NAK' s Price-to-Net-Cash Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.76  Med: 17.78 Max: 138.5
Current: 11.86
6.76
138.5
Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value 11.86
NAK's Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value is ranked lower than
95% of the 640 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 8.00 vs. NAK: 11.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value only.
NAK' s Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.19  Med: 16.58 Max: 138.5
Current: 11.86
5.19
138.5
Price-to-Tangible-Book 3.39
NAK's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
64% of the 1342 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 2.29 vs. NAK: 3.39 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
NAK' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.33  Med: 5.04 Max: 1500
Current: 3.39
0.33
1500
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 4.37
NAK's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked lower than
69% of the 325 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 2.03 vs. NAK: 4.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
NAK' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.42  Med: 2.02 Max: 145.33
Current: 4.37
0.42
145.33
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % -4.19
NAK's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
84% of the 1748 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -0.10 vs. NAK: -4.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
NAK' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -106.91  Med: 0 Max: 0
Current: -4.19
-106.91
0

More Statistics

EPS (TTM) $ -0.07
Beta0.97
Short Percentage of Float16.04%
52-Week Range $0.28 - 3.45
Shares Outstanding (Mil)299.90

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18
Revenue (Mil $)
EPS ($) -0.07 -0.02
EPS without NRI ($) -0.07 -0.02
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
N/A
Dividends per Share ($)
» More Articles for NAK

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Northern Dynasty: Pebble Partnership achieves settlement with US Environmental Protection Agency May 12 2017 
Northern Dynasty: Pebble Partnership, EPA file Joint Motion to extend Stay of Proceedings May 04 2017 
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Pomerantz Law Firm Reminds Shareholders with Losses on their Investment in Northe Apr 14 2017 
NAK DEADLINE NOTICE - Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Reminds Investors of Class Action Against N Apr 13 2017 
Northern Dynasty: State of Alaska approves Pebble Project land use permit Apr 11 2017 
NAK NOTICE: Rosen Law Firm Reminds Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. Investors of Important Deadline in Apr 06 2017 
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Pomerantz Law Firm Announces the Filing of a Class Action against Northern Dyna Apr 04 2017 
EQUITY ALERT: Khang & Khang LLP Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Northern Dynasty M Apr 04 2017 
EQUITY ALERT: Lundin Law PC Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Northern Dynasty Miner Apr 03 2017 
The Klein Law Firm Announces a Class Action Filed on Behalf of Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. Shareh Apr 03 2017 

More From Other Websites
Northern Dynasty announces Pebble Project Advisory Committee May 18 2017
Northern Dynasty reports 1Q loss May 12 2017
Northern Dynasty: Pebble Partnership achieves settlement with US Environmental Protection Agency May 12 2017
Is Northern Dynasty Minerals on the Verge of a Resolution with the EPA May 10 2017
Northern Dynasty: Pebble Partnership, EPA file Joint Motion to extend Stay of Proceedings May 04 2017
Today's Research Reports on Stocks to Watch: iRobot and Northern Dynasty Minerals Apr 27 2017
Should You Buy Into the Hype for These Stocks? Apr 24 2017
2 Stocks I'd Never Buy, and 1 I'll Consider Apr 21 2017
APRIL 17 DEADLINE: Khang & Khang LLP Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Northern... Apr 14 2017
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Pomerantz Law Firm Reminds Shareholders with Losses on their Investment in... Apr 14 2017
The Klein Law Firm Announces Commencement of a Class Action on Behalf of Northern Dynasty Minerals... Apr 14 2017
MONDAY DEADLINE: Lundin Law PC Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Northern Dynasty... Apr 13 2017
Company News for April 13, 2017 Apr 13 2017
NAK INVESTOR ALERT: The Law Offices of Vincent Wong Reminds Investors of a Class Action Involving... Apr 13 2017
April 17 Deadline Alert: Law Offices of Howard G. Smith Reminds Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.... Apr 13 2017
NAK DEADLINE NOTICE - Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Reminds Investors of Class Action Against... Apr 13 2017
Today's Research Reports on Stocks to Watch: Northern Dynasty Minerals and Cameco Apr 13 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}