Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 2.49
NYSE:OIS's Cash-to-Debt is ranked higher than
71% of the 235 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 0.49 vs. NYSE:OIS: 2.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
NYSE:OIS' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.01  Med: 0.11 Max: N/A
Current: 2.49
Equity-to-Asset 0.89
NYSE:OIS's Equity-to-Asset is ranked higher than
92% of the 240 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 0.49 vs. NYSE:OIS: 0.89 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
NYSE:OIS' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.16  Med: 0.59 Max: 0.89
Current: 0.89
0.16
0.89
Piotroski F-Score: 4
Altman Z-Score: 7.30
Beneish M-Score: -3.38
WACC vs ROIC
11.14%
-3.95%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % -10.72
NYSE:OIS's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
56% of the 243 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: -6.55 vs. NYSE:OIS: -10.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
NYSE:OIS' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -10.72  Med: 13.64 Max: 21.11
Current: -10.72
-10.72
21.11
Net Margin % -7.52
NYSE:OIS's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
54% of the 243 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: -10.90 vs. NYSE:OIS: -7.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
NYSE:OIS' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -7.52  Med: 8.58 Max: 29.56
Current: -7.52
-7.52
29.56
ROE % -4.18
NYSE:OIS's ROE % is ranked higher than
58% of the 235 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: -7.94 vs. NYSE:OIS: -4.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
NYSE:OIS' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -4.18  Med: 13.78 Max: 21.13
Current: -4.18
-4.18
21.13
ROA % -3.55
NYSE:OIS's ROA % is ranked higher than
55% of the 245 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: -4.62 vs. NYSE:OIS: -3.55 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
NYSE:OIS' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -3.55  Med: 8.2 Max: 11.62
Current: -3.55
-3.55
11.62
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % -7.80
NYSE:OIS's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
54% of the 243 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: -4.45 vs. NYSE:OIS: -7.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
NYSE:OIS' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -7.8  Med: 10.57 Max: 32.44
Current: -7.8
-7.8
32.44
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -22.20
NYSE:OIS's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
63% of the 221 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: -14.70 vs. NYSE:OIS: -22.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
NYSE:OIS' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -22.2  Med: 3.2 Max: 37.1
Current: -22.2
-22.2
37.1
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate -45.80
NYSE:OIS's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
88% of the 138 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: -13.50 vs. NYSE:OIS: -45.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
NYSE:OIS' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -45.8  Med: 7.55 Max: 56.9
Current: -45.8
-45.8
56.9
GuruFocus has detected 2 Warning Signs with Oil States International Inc $NYSE:OIS.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» NYSE:OIS's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-07-26 Est.)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2016

OIS Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Ron Baron 49,531 sh (+12.49%)
Steven Cohen Sold Out
David Einhorn Sold Out
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 87,032 sh (-0.03%)
Chuck Royce 205,706 sh (-28.48%)
» More
Q3 2016

OIS Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Jim Simons 143,300 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 312,330 sh (New)
Columbia Wanger 678,252 sh (New)
Chuck Royce 268,106 sh (+30.33%)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 85,146 sh (-2.17%)
Ron Baron 24,531 sh (-50.47%)
» More
Q4 2016

OIS Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Chuck Royce 304,306 sh (+13.50%)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 85,146 sh (unchged)
Ron Baron Sold Out
Steven Cohen Sold Out
Columbia Wanger 606,264 sh (-10.61%)
Jim Simons 95,300 sh (-33.50%)
» More
Q1 2017

OIS Guru Trades in Q1 2017

Joel Greenblatt 80,618 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 48,212 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 6,637 sh (New)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 92,238 sh (+8.33%)
Columbia Wanger 589,504 sh (-2.76%)
Chuck Royce 295,006 sh (-3.06%)
Jim Simons 20,000 sh (-79.01%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with OIS

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - Services » Oil & Gas Equipment & Services    NAICS: 333132    SIC: 3533
Compare:AMEX:SRCI, NYSE:FET, NYSE:USAC, NYSE:MRC, NYSE:PUMP, NYSE:SPN, NYSE:DNOW, NYSE:FRAC, NAS:NCSM, NAS:APLP, NYSE:EXTN, NYSE:DRQ, NYSE:HLX, NYSE:FMSA, NYSE:AROC, NYSE:BAS, NYSE:CJ, NYSE:MDR, NYSE:NR, NYSE:CKH » details
Traded in other countries:OI2.Germany,
Headquarter Location:USA
Oil States International Inc provides products and services to oil and natural gas companies. It operates in oil and natural gas producing regions, including U.S., Canada, West Africa, North Sea, South America and Southeast and Central Asia.

Oil States International is a global provider of specialty products and services to oil and natural gas companies. The company operates through two main segments: offshore products and well site services. Offshore products compose a majority of Oil States International's revenue. Under this segment, the company aims to design and manufacture low cost and technologically advanced products for offshore customers. Advanced technologies from the company include flex-element technology, advanced connector systems, high-pressure riser systems, compact valves, and other options catered to deepwater regions. In addition, the company caters largely to North American exploration and production firms through the completion and land drilling services it offers under its well site services arm.

Top Ranked Articles about Oil States International Inc

Oil States Announces Second Quarter 2017 Earnings Conference Call
Oil States Announces First Quarter 2017 Earnings Conference Call
Great Lakes Announces Changes to Board of Directors

OAK BROOK, Ill., Jan. 26, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (the “Company” or “Great Lakes”) (NASDAQ:GLDD), the largest provider of dredging services in the United States and a major provider of environmental and remediation services, today announced that Lawrence R. Dickerson and D. Michael Steuert have been appointed to the Board of Director’s 2019 director class, effective January 24, 2017. Mr. Dickerson has been appointed to the Compensation Committee, and Mr. Steuert has been appointed to the Audit Committee.  With the addition of Messrs. Dickerson and Steuert, the Board will expand to nine members.  The Board is expected to be reduced to eight members as of the 2017 Annual Meeting. 
The Company also announced today that current Board Member Peter Deutsch has elected to withdraw his name from consideration for the 2017 slate of nominees.  Mr. Deutsch is a Member of the Audit Committee and a Member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Mr. Dickerson spent 34 years at Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. (NYSE:NYSE:DO), a deepwater oil  and gas drilling contractor, where he served as President and Chief Executive Officer from 2008 until his retirement in 2014.  Prior to his service as President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Dickerson served as Chief Financial Officer (CFO), during which he helped take the company public, and Chief Operating Officer, during which he gained substantial operating and commercial experience.  In addition to being a seasoned executive, Mr. Dickerson has significant board experience.  He has been a Member of the Board of Directors on the boards of Murphy Oil Corporation (MUR), a gas exploration and production company, and Oil States International (NYSE:NYSE:OIS), an oilfield equipment services company, since 2014.  Mr. Dickerson is on the Audit and Nominating and Governance Committees at Murphy Oil Corporation and on the Audit Committee at Oil States International.  He was Chairman of the Board of Directors at Hercules Offshore, Inc. from 2015 to 2016, an offshore drilling company, and he was a director of on the Board of Directors Global Industries, Ltd. from 2008 - 2012, a subsea construction company that was sold to Technip in 2011.  Mr. Steuert served as senior vice president (SVP) and CFO of Fluor Corporation (NYSE:NYSE:FLR), one of the world’s largest publicly traded engineering, procurement, construction, maintenance, and project management companies, from 2001 until his retirement in 2012.  Prior to his service at Fluor, Mr. Steuert served as SVP and CFO of Litton Industries Inc., a defense contractor acquired by Northrop Grumman Corporation in 2001, and as SVP and CFO of GenCorp Inc., now Aerojet Rocketdyne, a technology-based aerospace and defense company, from 1990 to 1999.  Mr. Steuert started his career at TRW Inc. In addition to his extensive executive leadership experience, Mr. Steuert has substantial board experience.  He has been a Member of the Board of Directors of LNG Ltd. (ASX:LNG) since 2015 and is a member of the Board’s Audit Committee and Chairman of its Risk Committee.  He has been a Member of the Board of Directors of Weyerhaeuser Co. (NYSE:NYSE:WY) since 2004 and is Chairman and Financial expert of the Audit Committee and is a member of the Corporate Responsibility and Governance Committee. Robert B. Uhler, P.E., Chairman of the Board, commented, “Larry and Mike bring a wealth of relevant valuable experience to the GLDD Board.  I am confident each will contribute to the GLDD Board and to management’s goal of delivering long-term shareholder value for the Company.  On behalf of the Board, I welcome both of them and look forward to working with them.” Mr. Uhler continued, “These appointments follow our previous announcements that Lasse Petterson and Ryan Levenson joined the Great Lakes Board in late December. The addition of these new directors reflects our commitment to Board refreshment and further strengthens our Board of Directors.  Finally, on behalf of the Board, I’d like to extend our sincere gratitude to Mr. Deutsch for his service and commitment to the Board over the past several years.” The Company Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (“Great Lakes” or the “Company”) is the largest provider of dredging services in the United States and the only U.S. dredging company with significant international operations. The Company is also a significant provider of environmental and remediation services on land and water.  The Company employs civil, ocean and mechanical engineering staff in its estimating, production and project management functions.  In its over 126-year history, the Company has never failed to complete a marine project. Great Lakes has a disciplined training program for engineers that ensures experienced-based performance as they advance through Company operations. Great Lakes also owns and operates the largest and most diverse fleet in the U.S. dredging industry, comprised of over 200 specialized vessels. Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements in this press release may constitute "forward-looking" statements as defined in Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the "PSLRA") or in releases made by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), all as may be amended from time to time. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Great Lakes and its subsidiaries, or industry results, to differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Statements that are not historical fact are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements can be identified by, among other things, the use of forward-looking language, such as the words "plan," "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "intend," "estimate," "project," "may," "would," "could," "should," "seeks," or "scheduled to," or other similar words, or the negative of these terms or other variations of these terms or comparable language, or by discussion of strategy or intentions. These cautionary statements are being made pursuant to the Exchange Act and the PSLRA with the intention of obtaining the benefits of the "safe harbor" provisions of such laws. Great Lakes cautions investors that any forward-looking statements made by Great Lakes are not guarantees or indicative of future performance. Important assumptions and other important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those forward-looking statements with respect to Great Lakes, include, but are not limited to: our ability to obtain federal government dredging and other contracts; our ability to qualify as an eligible bidder under government contract criteria and to compete successfully against other qualified bidders; risks associated with cost over-runs, operating cost inflation and potential claims for liquidated damages, particularly with respect to our fixed cost contracts; the timing of our performance on contracts; significant liabilities that could be imposed were we to fail to comply with government contracting regulations; risks related to international dredging operations, including instability in the Middle East; a significant negative change to large, single customer contracts from which a significant portion of our international revenue is derived; changes in previously-recorded revenue and profit due to our use of the percentage-of-completion method of accounting; consequences of any lapse in disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting; changes in the amount of our estimated backlog; our ability to obtain bonding or letters of credit; increasing costs to operate and maintain aging vessels; equipment or mechanical failures; acquisition integration and consolidation risks; liabilities related to our historical demolition business; impacts of legal and regulatory proceedings; unforeseen delays and cost overruns related to the construction of new vessels; our becoming liable for the obligations of joint ventures, partners and subcontractors; capital and operational costs due to environmental regulations; unionized labor force work stoppages; maintaining an adequate level of insurance coverage; information technology security breaches; our substantial amount of indebtedness; restrictions imposed by financing covenants; the impact of adverse capital and credit market conditions; limitations on our hedging strategy imposed by new statutory and regulatory requirements for derivative transactions; foreign exchange risks; changes in macroeconomic indicators and the overall business climate; and losses attributable to our investments in privately financed projects. For additional information on these and other risks and uncertainties, please see Item 1A. "Risk Factors" of Great Lakes' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, and in other securities filings by Great Lakes with the SEC. Although Great Lakes believes that its plans, intentions and expectations reflected in or suggested by such forward-looking statements are reasonable, actual results could differ materially from a projection or assumption in any forward-looking statements. Great Lakes' future financial condition and results of operations, as well as any forward-looking statements, are subject to change and inherent risks and uncertainties. The forward-looking statements contained in this press release are made only as of the date hereof and Great Lakes does not have or undertake any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, subsequent events or otherwise, unless otherwise required by law. Source: Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation GLDD CORP
For further information contact:
Mary Morrissey, Investor Relations
630-574-3467

Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 177.35
OIS's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked lower than
93% of the 61 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 14.67 vs. OIS: 177.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
OIS' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.34  Med: 10.95 Max: 1117.42
Current: 177.35
2.34
1117.42
PB Ratio 1.18
OIS's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
54% of the 232 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.08 vs. OIS: 1.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
OIS' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.26  Med: 1.14 Max: 2.73
Current: 1.18
0.26
2.73
PS Ratio 1.99
OIS's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
72% of the 233 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.03 vs. OIS: 1.99 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
OIS' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.11  Med: 0.91 Max: 3.21
Current: 1.99
0.11
3.21
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 13.52
OIS's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
61% of the 98 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 10.43 vs. OIS: 13.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
OIS' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.02  Med: 10.39 Max: 162.04
Current: 13.52
3.02
162.04
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 10.79
OIS's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
66% of the 140 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 8.05 vs. OIS: 10.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
OIS' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.25  Med: 5.35 Max: 14.99
Current: 10.79
1.25
14.99
EV-to-EBIT -18.69
OIS's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 99 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 14.47 vs. OIS: -18.69 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
OIS' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -76.8  Med: 6.75 Max: 629.9
Current: -18.69
-76.8
629.9
EV-to-EBITDA 29.72
OIS's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
83% of the 146 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 10.87 vs. OIS: 29.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
OIS' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.4  Med: 5.6 Max: 40.3
Current: 29.72
1.4
40.3
Shiller PE Ratio 6.87
OIS's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked higher than
84% of the 64 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 14.75 vs. OIS: 6.87 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
OIS' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.23  Med: 11.52 Max: 18.6
Current: 6.87
5.23
18.6
Current Ratio 4.43
OIS's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
88% of the 241 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.83 vs. OIS: 4.43 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
OIS' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.93  Med: 2.7 Max: 4.57
Current: 4.43
0.93
4.57
Quick Ratio 2.70
OIS's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
78% of the 241 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.52 vs. OIS: 2.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
OIS' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.51  Med: 1.36 Max: 3.53
Current: 2.7
0.51
3.53
Days Inventory 136.38
OIS's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
80% of the 192 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 54.44 vs. OIS: 136.38 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
OIS' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 75.53  Med: 96.74 Max: 161.24
Current: 136.38
75.53
161.24
Days Sales Outstanding 79.00
OIS's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
56% of the 208 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 83.71 vs. OIS: 79.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
OIS' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 66.8  Med: 104.41 Max: 155.82
Current: 79
66.8
155.82
Days Payable 25.86
OIS's Days Payable is ranked lower than
81% of the 157 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 55.17 vs. OIS: 25.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
OIS' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 23.7  Med: 43.73 Max: 70.41
Current: 25.86
23.7
70.41

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 0.40
OIS's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked lower than
100% of the 347 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 3.99 vs. OIS: 0.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
OIS' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0 Max: 0
Current: 0.4
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio 1.80
OIS's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
94% of the 176 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: -4.60 vs. OIS: 1.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
OIS' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -29.2  Med: -0.95 Max: 2.5
Current: 1.8
-29.2
2.5

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value 4.52
OIS's Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value is ranked lower than
56% of the 105 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 4.00 vs. OIS: 4.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value only.
OIS' s Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.56  Med: 10.63 Max: 217.56
Current: 4.52
1.56
217.56
Price-to-Tangible-Book 1.57
OIS's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
58% of the 216 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.27 vs. OIS: 1.57 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
OIS' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.39  Med: 1.7 Max: 4.06
Current: 1.57
0.39
4.06
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 0.44
OIS's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked higher than
85% of the 123 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 0.99 vs. OIS: 0.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
OIS' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.3  Med: 0.9 Max: 1.88
Current: 0.44
0.3
1.88
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 2.17
OIS's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked lower than
93% of the 222 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 0.89 vs. OIS: 2.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
OIS' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.14  Med: 0.67 Max: 3.35
Current: 2.17
0.14
3.35
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % -5.33
OIS's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
55% of the 246 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: -3.59 vs. OIS: -5.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
OIS' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -5.7  Med: 10.1 Max: 56.2
Current: -5.33
-5.7
56.2
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % -16.04
OIS's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
62% of the 141 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: -5.57 vs. OIS: -16.04 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
OIS' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -20.4  Med: 9.5 Max: 47.7
Current: -16.04
-20.4
47.7

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $676.26
EPS (TTM) $ -1.01
Beta1.54
Short Percentage of Float13.50%
52-Week Range $25.25 - 41.75
Shares Outstanding (Mil)51.64

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18 Dec19
Revenue (Mil $) 687 880 1,300
EPS ($) -0.77 0.26 1.65
EPS without NRI ($) -0.77 0.26 1.65
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
N/A
Dividends per Share ($)
» More Articles for OIS

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Oil States Announces Second Quarter 2017 Earnings Conference Call Jul 17 2017 
Seeking Value in the Oil Industry: Civeo Jun 27 2017 
Oil States Announces First Quarter 2017 Earnings Conference Call Apr 17 2017 
Great Lakes Announces Changes to Board of Directors Jan 26 2017 
John Keeley's Keeley Funds Annual Letter to Shareholders 2014 Jan 03 2015 
David Einhorn Buys 10% of Civeo Corp, Calls for CEO Ouster Oct 09 2014 
Greenlight Capital Top Second Quarter Picks Sep 03 2014 
Greenlight Capital and David Einhorn's Top Five of the First Quarter May 20 2014 
David Einhorn's Favorite Greek Bank and Top 5 Holding - Alpha Bank May 09 2014 
The Midas Touch - Chuck Royce Second Quarter Sells Aug 23 2013 

More From Other Websites
Oil States International, Inc. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bullish Manner : OIS-US :... Jul 20 2017
How Weatherford International Correlates with Crude Oil Jul 19 2017
Correlation between Schlumberger and Crude Oil on July 14 Jul 18 2017
Oil States Announces Second Quarter 2017 Earnings Conference Call Jul 17 2017
Short Interest in Schlumberger on July 14, 2017 Jul 17 2017
What Analysts Expect from NOV’s 2Q17 Earnings Jul 13 2017
National Oilwell Varco’s Correlation with Crude Oil on July 7 Jul 11 2017
What’s the Correlation between Schlumberger and Crude Oil? Jul 07 2017
Are Things About To Get Worse For Oilfield Services Stocks? Jul 07 2017
Oil States to Participate in the J.P. Morgan Energy Equity Conference Jun 26 2017
Supreme Court to rule on legality of patent review system Jun 12 2017
What’s Weatherford’s Valuation Compared to Its Peers’? Jun 09 2017
ETFs with exposure to Oil States International, Inc. : June 6, 2017 Jun 06 2017
What Was Halliburton’s Correlation with Crude Oil on June 2? Jun 05 2017
What’s Weatherford’s Correlation with Crude Oil on May 22? May 23 2017
ETFs with exposure to Oil States International, Inc. : May 15, 2017 May 15 2017
Oil States International's Onshore Business Shows Signs of Life May 01 2017
Oil States International, Inc. :OIS-US: Earnings Analysis: Q1, 2017 By the Numbers : May 1, 2017 May 01 2017
Edited Transcript of OIS earnings conference call or presentation 27-Apr-17 3:00pm GMT Apr 30 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}