Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.50
OSK's Cash-to-Debt is ranked higher than
61% of the 23 Companies
in the Global Truck Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 0.42 vs. OSK: 0.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
OSK' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0.12 Max: No Debt
Current: 0.5
Equity-to-Asset 0.41
OSK's Equity-to-Asset is ranked higher than
57% of the 23 Companies
in the Global Truck Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 0.44 vs. OSK: 0.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
OSK' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.02  Med: 0.41 Max: 0.71
Current: 0.41
0.02
0.71
Interest Coverage 5.98
OSK's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
65% of the 23 Companies
in the Global Truck Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 17.66 vs. OSK: 5.98 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
OSK' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.9  Med: 5.83 Max: 7.66
Current: 5.98
2.9
7.66
Piotroski F-Score: 7
Altman Z-Score: 3.38
Beneish M-Score: -3.03
WACC vs ROIC
12.20%
9.32%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 5.67
OSK's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
57% of the 23 Companies
in the Global Truck Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 5.80 vs. OSK: 5.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
OSK' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -18.65  Med: 6.79 Max: 14.51
Current: 5.67
-18.65
14.51
Net Margin % 3.30
OSK's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
52% of the 23 Companies
in the Global Truck Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 3.65 vs. OSK: 3.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
OSK' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -20.92  Med: 3.7 Max: 8.04
Current: 3.3
-20.92
8.04
ROE % 10.66
OSK's ROE % is ranked higher than
73% of the 22 Companies
in the Global Truck Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 7.73 vs. OSK: 10.66 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
OSK' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -115.5  Med: 14.2 Max: 85.84
Current: 10.66
-115.5
85.84
ROA % 4.44
OSK's ROA % is ranked higher than
78% of the 23 Companies
in the Global Truck Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 3.03 vs. OSK: 4.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
OSK' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -20.26  Med: 5.38 Max: 16.67
Current: 4.44
-20.26
16.67
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 27.68
OSK's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
83% of the 23 Companies
in the Global Truck Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 12.07 vs. OSK: 27.68 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
OSK' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -124.11  Med: 52.01 Max: 261.06
Current: 27.68
-124.11
261.06
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -0.70
OSK's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
50% of the 22 Companies
in the Global Truck Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: -0.70 vs. OSK: -0.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
OSK' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -12.7  Med: 8.9 Max: 42.9
Current: -0.7
-12.7
42.9
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate -2.40
OSK's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
75% of the 20 Companies
in the Global Truck Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 4.50 vs. OSK: -2.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
OSK' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -61.8  Med: 9.3 Max: 176.8
Current: -2.4
-61.8
176.8
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate -6.20
OSK's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked lower than
57% of the 21 Companies
in the Global Truck Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 9.70 vs. OSK: -6.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
OSK' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -62.7  Med: 13.1 Max: 158.8
Current: -6.2
-62.7
158.8
GuruFocus has detected 1 Warning Sign with Oshkosh Corp $OSK.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» OSK's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-07-28 Est.)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2016

OSK Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Paul Tudor Jones 6,942 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 16,500 sh (New)
Keeley Asset Management Corp 29,400 sh (+11.66%)
David Dreman Sold Out
Joel Greenblatt Sold Out
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 1,333,550 sh (-1.11%)
Mairs and Power 188,140 sh (-2.79%)
Columbia Wanger 1,335,006 sh (-10.18%)
FPA Capital Fund 211,060 sh (-12.19%)
First Pacific Advisors 403,860 sh (-13.32%)
Robert Olstein 203,229 sh (-36.38%)
» More
Q3 2016

OSK Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Joel Greenblatt 20,255 sh (New)
Jim Simons 405,500 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 43,259 sh (+523.15%)
Mairs and Power 212,180 sh (+12.78%)
Keeley Asset Management Corp 30,010 sh (+2.07%)
Steven Cohen Sold Out
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 1,325,520 sh (-0.60%)
Columbia Wanger 1,158,093 sh (-13.25%)
FPA Capital Fund 172,520 sh (-18.26%)
First Pacific Advisors 315,040 sh (-21.99%)
Robert Olstein 123,914 sh (-39.03%)
» More
Q4 2016

OSK Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Joel Greenblatt 542,297 sh (+2577.35%)
Jim Simons 1,104,800 sh (+172.45%)
Keeley Asset Management Corp 32,795 sh (+9.28%)
Paul Tudor Jones 46,586 sh (+7.69%)
Robert Olstein Sold Out
Mairs and Power 188,290 sh (-11.26%)
First Pacific Advisors 242,890 sh (-22.90%)
FPA Capital Fund 127,000 sh (-26.39%)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 951,310 sh (-28.23%)
Columbia Wanger 764,893 sh (-33.95%)
» More
Q1 2017

OSK Guru Trades in Q1 2017

Caxton Associates 110,000 sh (New)
Columbia Wanger 996,216 sh (+30.24%)
Mairs and Power 188,690 sh (+0.21%)
FPA Capital Fund 127,000 sh (unchged)
First Pacific Advisors 242,160 sh (-0.30%)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 908,636 sh (-4.49%)
Joel Greenblatt 416,752 sh (-23.15%)
Jim Simons 163,800 sh (-85.17%)
Paul Tudor Jones 5,000 sh (-89.27%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with OSK

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Truck Manufacturing » Truck Manufacturing    NAICS: 336120    SIC: 3711
Compare:NYSE:NAV, OTCPK:KIGRY, NYSE:WNC, NYSE:HY, AMEX:STS, NAS:SPAR, OTCPK:MAGOY, NAS:PCAR, OTCPK:VOLVF » details
Traded in other countries:OK3.Germany,
Headquarter Location:USA
Oshkosh Corp along with its subsidiaries, designs, manufactures and markets specialty vehicles and vehicle bodies.

Founded in 1917, Oshkosh is a leading designer, manufacturer, and marketer of a broad range of specialty vehicles (including military, fire, concrete mixer, and refuse trucks) and aerial work platforms under the JLG brand. The firm serves customers in the private and public sectors, including the U.S. Department of Defense, which constitutes a majority of total revenue. Oshkosh employs 13,100 employees and generates annual revenue of about $7 billion.

Guru Investment Theses on Oshkosh Corp

Mairs & Power Comments on Oshkosh Truck - Nov 23, 2016

Oshkosh Truck (NYSE:OSK) has benefited from strong end markets in fire and emergency vehicles and a more stable end market in construction-related aerial lift platforms. But the business development we are most excited by is their win of the joint forces light tactical vehicle contract to replace an aging Humvee fleet for the U.S. military. While this contract will take time to ramp up, we believe it will be a significant piece of business for Oshkosh over the next decade.



From Mairs & Power's Small Cap Fund third quarter 2016 commentary.



Check out Mairs and Power latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about Oshkosh Corp

Mairs & Power Comments on Oshkosh Truck Guru stock highlight
Oshkosh Truck (NYSE:OSK) has benefited from strong end markets in fire and emergency vehicles and a more stable end market in construction-related aerial lift platforms. But the business development we are most excited by is their win of the joint forces light tactical vehicle contract to replace an aging Humvee fleet for the U.S. military. While this contract will take time to ramp up, we believe it will be a significant piece of business for Oshkosh over the next decade. Read more...
FPA Capital's Top Performing Second Quarter Sales 7 companies producing high returns
FPA Capital Fund (Trades, Portfolio) has a concentrated portfolio and invests primarily in undervalued small to mid cap companies. During the second quarter of 2016, the firm traded some stocks. The following are the ones with the highest performance since that trade. Read more...
Osisko Initiates Exploration at Souart

TORONTO, ONTARIO--(Marketwired - Jul 6, 2016) - Osisko Mining Inc. (TSX:OSK) ("Osisko") is pleased to announce that it has commenced exploration on its 100% owned Souart property situated 15 kilometres to the SW of the Windfall Project. The program will be carried out in parallel to ongoing work at the Windfall Project and will include trenching and drilling designed to confirm and expand upon historic work on Souart. Trenching has commenced with the design of exposing the gold-bearing structure defined by previous work on the property and to better understand its geometry prior to commencing Osisko's planned drill program. Osisko plans to drill approximately 3,000 metres in this first phase to test the gold mineralized structure east of the historical resource. In addition, 2,450 metres in ten historical drill holes (completed in 2011) have been re-logged and sampled with analytical results pending.
Qualified Person
The scientific and technical content of this press release has been reviewed by Mr. Jean-Philippe Desrochers, PhD, P.Geo. Senior Project Manager, who is a "Qualified Person" as defined by National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101"). About the Souart Property The Souart property is located in Urban Township, approximately 90 kilometres east of Lebel sur Quevillon. Souart is 15 kilometres southwest and parallel to the geological trend of Osisko's Windfall Lake project. Three zones have been defined by historical work on the property including the Nubar Zone (with estimated resources of 564,000 tonnes at 6.2 g/t Au, based on historical estimates that have not been prepared in accordance with NI 43-101); the Tourmaline Hill Zone; and the Barry-Souart Zone. The three separate zones are situated along a 5 kilometre length of the same geological structure. Please see "Disclosure of Historical Estimates" below. Disclosure of Historical Estimates In 1950, Nubar Mines Ltd. sunk a 44 metre deep shaft and drove 135 metres of drifts and crosscuts. Several exploration surveys were then completed by a number of other companies (Glenelm Developers Limited, Goldmaster Mines Ltd., Shell Canada Limited, Tut Explorations, Société de développement de la Baie-James (SDBG) and Oasis Resources Inc.). Between 1985 and 1990, Oasis Resources Inc. completed 152 drill holes, followed with an estimated resource calculation of 564,000 tonnes at 6.2 g/t Au. This resource estimate is of a historical nature and does not comply with NI 43-101. However, the resource estimate may be relevant because the Souart property forms part of the same geological trend encompassed by the Nubar Zone and, to the best of the knowledge of Mr. Jean-Philippe Desrochers, Qualified Person, there has been no material change with respect to the metallic minerals within the original resource estimation area (and region) that would affect the estimation parameters since 1985. Further drilling would be required to upgrade or verity the historical resource estimate as current mineral resources or reserves. Osisko is unaware of the existence of any technical report prepared in connection with the scientific and technical information in this news release. A Qualified Person (within the meaning of NI 43-101) has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimate as current mineral resources or mineral reserves. Osisko is not treating the historical estimate as current mineral resources or mineral reserves. Further, there have not been any mineral resources calculated on the Souart property recently. About Osisko Mining Inc.
Osisko is a mineral exploration company focused on the acquisition, exploration, and development of precious metal resource properties in Canada. Osisko holds a 100% in the high-grade Windfall Lake gold deposit located between Val-d'Or and Chibougamau in Québec and holds a 100% undivided interest in a large area of claims in the surrounding Urban Barry area (82,400 hectares), a 100% interest in the Marban project located in the heart of Québec's prolific Abitibi gold mining district, and properties in the Larder Lake Mining Division in northeast Ontario, including the Jonpol and Garrcon deposits on the Garrison property, the Buffonta past producing mine and the Gold Pike mine property. The Company also holds interests and options in a number of additional properties in northern Ontario. Osisko is well financed with approximately $94 million in cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities (pro-forma financing announced by Osisko on June 27, 2016). Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information
This news release contains "forward-looking information" within the meaning of the applicable Canadian securities legislation that is based on expectations, estimates and projections as at the date of this news release. The information in this news release about pending drilling, ongoing drill program, potential mineralization, the ability to realize upon any mineralization in a manner that is economic, the ability to complete any proposed exploration activities and the results of such activities; the continuity or extension of any mineralization; and any other information herein that is not a historical fact may be "forward looking information". Any statement that involves discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions, future events or performance (often but not always using phrases such as "expects", or "does not expect", "is expected", "is designed", "anticipates" or "does not anticipate", "plans", "budget", "scheduled", "forecasts", "estimates", "believes" or "intends" or variations of such words and phrases or stating that certain actions, events or results "may" or "could", "would", "might" or "will" be taken to occur or be achieved) are not statements of historical fact and may be forward-looking information and are intended to identify forward-looking information. This forward-looking information is based on reasonable assumptions and estimates of management of Osisko, at the time it was made, involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Osisko to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking information. Such factors include, among others, risks relating to property interests; ability of Osisko to complete further exploration activities, including drilling; the results of exploration activities; risks relating to mining activities; the global economic climate; metal prices; dilution; environmental risks; and community and non-governmental actions. Although the forward-looking information contained in this news release is based upon what management believes, or believed at the time, to be reasonable assumptions, Osisko cannot assure shareholders and prospective purchasers that actual results will be consistent with such forward-looking information, as there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended, and neither Osisko nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of any such forward-looking information. Osisko does not undertake, and assumes no obligation, to update or revise any such forward-looking statements or forward-looking information contained herein to reflect new events or circumstances, except as may be required by law.







John Burzynski
President and Chief Executive Officer
(416) 363-8653




Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 23.07
OSK's PE Ratio is ranked higher than
65% of the 20 Companies
in the Global Truck Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 24.66 vs. OSK: 23.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
OSK' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.74  Med: 13.22 Max: 42.19
Current: 23.07
2.74
42.19
Forward PE Ratio 19.69
OSK's Forward PE Ratio is ranked lower than
90% of the 20 Companies
in the Global Truck Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 18.28 vs. OSK: 19.69 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 23.07
OSK's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked higher than
60% of the 20 Companies
in the Global Truck Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 24.66 vs. OSK: 23.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
OSK' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.11  Med: 12.88 Max: 27.04
Current: 23.07
1.11
27.04
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 9.58
OSK's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked higher than
77% of the 13 Companies
in the Global Truck Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 35.66 vs. OSK: 9.58 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
OSK' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.63  Med: 15.21 Max: 524.62
Current: 9.58
1.63
524.62
PB Ratio 2.42
OSK's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
55% of the 22 Companies
in the Global Truck Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 2.47 vs. OSK: 2.42 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
OSK' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.23  Med: 2 Max: 25.79
Current: 2.42
0.23
25.79
PS Ratio 0.75
OSK's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
57% of the 23 Companies
in the Global Truck Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 0.90 vs. OSK: 0.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
OSK' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.05  Med: 0.48 Max: 1.2
Current: 0.75
0.05
1.2
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 9.40
OSK's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
67% of the 12 Companies
in the Global Truck Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 25.58 vs. OSK: 9.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
OSK' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.57  Med: 13.12 Max: 133.16
Current: 9.4
0.57
133.16
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 7.72
OSK's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
58% of the 12 Companies
in the Global Truck Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 9.31 vs. OSK: 7.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
OSK' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.54  Med: 10.48 Max: 69.38
Current: 7.72
0.54
69.38
EV-to-EBIT 14.30
OSK's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
80% of the 41 Companies
in the Global Truck Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 20.10 vs. OSK: 14.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
OSK' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -7.1  Med: 9 Max: 23.2
Current: 14.3
-7.1
23.2
EV-to-EBITDA 10.58
OSK's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
57% of the 44 Companies
in the Global Truck Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 11.97 vs. OSK: 10.58 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
OSK' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -9.2  Med: 7.15 Max: 22.2
Current: 10.58
-9.2
22.2
Shiller PE Ratio 37.24
OSK's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked lower than
80% of the 10 Companies
in the Global Truck Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 23.49 vs. OSK: 37.24 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
OSK' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.49  Med: 28.67 Max: 264.6
Current: 37.24
2.49
264.6
Current Ratio 1.62
OSK's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
65% of the 23 Companies
in the Global Truck Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 1.42 vs. OSK: 1.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
OSK' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1  Med: 1.55 Max: 3.89
Current: 1.62
1
3.89
Quick Ratio 0.81
OSK's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
52% of the 23 Companies
in the Global Truck Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 0.89 vs. OSK: 0.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
OSK' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.31  Med: 0.82 Max: 2.51
Current: 0.81
0.31
2.51
Days Inventory 87.08
OSK's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
61% of the 23 Companies
in the Global Truck Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 62.23 vs. OSK: 87.08 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
OSK' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 38.08  Med: 55.21 Max: 87.08
Current: 87.08
38.08
87.08
Days Sales Outstanding 54.47
OSK's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
57% of the 21 Companies
in the Global Truck Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 53.31 vs. OSK: 54.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
OSK' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 33.06  Med: 49.09 Max: 62.28
Current: 54.47
33.06
62.28
Days Payable 48.22
OSK's Days Payable is ranked lower than
78% of the 18 Companies
in the Global Truck Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 59.08 vs. OSK: 48.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
OSK' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 29.98  Med: 38.98 Max: 48.22
Current: 48.22
29.98
48.22

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 1.27
OSK's Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
100% of the 40 Companies
in the Global Truck Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 3.22 vs. OSK: 1.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
OSK' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.24  Med: 1.15 Max: 9.43
Current: 1.27
0.24
9.43
Dividend Payout Ratio 0.29
OSK's Dividend Payout Ratio is ranked higher than
77% of the 22 Companies
in the Global Truck Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 0.65 vs. OSK: 0.29 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout Ratio only.
OSK' s Dividend Payout Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.1  Med: 0.17 Max: 0.29
Current: 0.29
0.1
0.29
Forward Dividend Yield % 1.30
OSK's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
84% of the 43 Companies
in the Global Truck Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 3.17 vs. OSK: 1.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 1.27
OSK's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 42 Companies
in the Global Truck Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 3.18 vs. OSK: 1.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
OSK' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.24  Med: 1.15 Max: 9.43
Current: 1.27
0.24
9.43
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio 5.10
OSK's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
89% of the 9 Companies
in the Global Truck Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 0.30 vs. OSK: 5.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
OSK' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -9.2  Med: -0.8 Max: 6.2
Current: 5.1
-9.2
6.2

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 9.53
OSK's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
95% of the 21 Companies
in the Global Truck Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 2.59 vs. OSK: 9.53 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
OSK' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.53  Med: 8.94 Max: 279.64
Current: 9.53
0.53
279.64
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 1.41
OSK's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked higher than
62% of the 13 Companies
in the Global Truck Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 1.49 vs. OSK: 1.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
OSK' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.14  Med: 0.78 Max: 6.76
Current: 1.41
0.14
6.76
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 1.60
OSK's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked lower than
63% of the 19 Companies
in the Global Truck Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 1.42 vs. OSK: 1.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
OSK' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.17  Med: 0.73 Max: 2.93
Current: 1.6
0.17
2.93
Price-to-Graham-Number 3.13
OSK's Price-to-Graham-Number is ranked lower than
79% of the 19 Companies
in the Global Truck Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 1.73 vs. OSK: 3.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Graham-Number only.
OSK' s Price-to-Graham-Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.49  Med: 2.58 Max: 14.51
Current: 3.13
0.49
14.51
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 7.00
OSK's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
78% of the 37 Companies
in the Global Truck Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 4.98 vs. OSK: 7.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
OSK' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.3  Med: 10.8 Max: 42.3
Current: 7
4.3
42.3
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % 5.68
OSK's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked higher than
65% of the 17 Companies
in the Global Truck Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 4.00 vs. OSK: 5.68 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
OSK' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -11.6  Med: 16.15 Max: 101.2
Current: 5.68
-11.6
101.2

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $6,333
EPS (TTM) $ 2.80
Beta1.89
Short Percentage of Float5.85%
52-Week Range $44.01 - 75.00
Shares Outstanding (Mil)74.79

Analyst Estimate

Sep17 Sep18 Sep19
Revenue (Mil $) 6,606 6,840 7,244
EPS ($) 3.29 3.98 5.12
EPS without NRI ($) 3.29 3.98 5.12
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
N/A
Dividends per Share ($) 0.83 0.91 1.00
» More Articles for OSK

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
7 Stocks Outperforming the Market Feb 02 2017 
Robert Olstein Exits Pentair, Brady, Trims WestRock Dec 20 2016 
Mairs & Power Comments on Oshkosh Truck Nov 23 2016 
MAirs & Power Small Cap Fund 3rd Quarter Results Nov 23 2016 
Oshkosh Corporation: Attractive Long-Term Investment Aug 17 2016 
FPA Capital's Top Performing Second Quarter Sales Aug 11 2016 
Osisko Initiates Exploration at Souart Jul 06 2016 
FPA Reduces Position in Helmerich & Payne Apr 13 2016 
Oshkosh to Benefit From Government Defense Contracts Apr 11 2016 
Oshkosh Corporation Is a Strong Buy and Hold Aug 26 2015 

More From Other Websites
AmeraMex International Reports Revenue of $1.5 Million First Quarter Ended March 31, 2017 May 16 2017
ETFs with exposure to Oshkosh Corp. : May 15, 2017 May 15 2017
AmeraMex International to Represent Oshkosh Defense, LLC, within the Federal Republic of Nigeria May 12 2017
Florida lawyer, neighbor charged with insider trading May 11 2017
Oshkosh Corp. : OSK-US: Dividend Analysis : May 12th, 2017 (record date) : By the numbers : May 10,... May 10 2017
Post Earnings Coverage as Oshkosh's Quarterly Revenue Jumped 6.2%; Increased Guidance May 04 2017
Oshkosh Corp. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : OSK-US : May 2, 2017 May 02 2017
Oshkosh Corporation to Ring Closing Bell on New York Stock Exchange on May 4 May 01 2017
Why Is the U.S. Pentagon Selling $300 Million of Military Hardware to the Kurdish Army? Apr 29 2017
Oshkosh Corp. :OSK-US: Earnings Analysis: Q2, 2017 By the Numbers : April 28, 2017 Apr 28 2017
Edited Transcript of OSK earnings conference call or presentation 26-Apr-17 1:00pm GMT Apr 28 2017
Johnson Controls (JCI) Meets Q2 Earnings, Trims Guidance Apr 27 2017
Oshkosh tops Street 2Q forecasts Apr 26 2017
Oshkosh Corporation Reports Fiscal 2017 Second Quarter Results Apr 26 2017
Auto Stocks to Report Q1 Earnings on Apr 26: LEA, OSK & More Apr 25 2017
Why You Shouldn't Bet Against Oshkosh (OSK) Stock Apr 20 2017
New Strong Buy Stocks for April 19th Apr 19 2017
Oshkosh Corp. secures $258M Army order for trucks, trailers Apr 19 2017
Oshkosh Defense Awarded $258 Million from U.S. Army for Recapitalization of Heavy Vehicle Fleet Apr 18 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)