Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.78
PTEN's Cash-to-Debt is ranked higher than
59% of the 68 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.34 vs. PTEN: 0.78 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
PTEN' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.03  Med: 0.78 Max: No Debt
Current: 0.78
Equity-to-Asset 0.64
PTEN's Equity-to-Asset is ranked higher than
66% of the 61 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.58 vs. PTEN: 0.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
PTEN' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.28  Med: 0.66 Max: 0.85
Current: 0.64
0.28
0.85
Piotroski F-Score: 5
Altman Z-Score: 2.33
Beneish M-Score: -2.39
WACC vs ROIC
6.51%
-9.82%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % -47.64
PTEN's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
81% of the 62 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -3.07 vs. PTEN: -47.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
PTEN' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -49.81  Med: 12.8 Max: 31.7
Current: -47.64
-49.81
31.7
Net Margin % -32.73
PTEN's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
68% of the 63 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -13.30 vs. PTEN: -32.73 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
PTEN' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -34.79  Med: 7.46 Max: 20.75
Current: -32.73
-34.79
20.75
ROE % -12.82
PTEN's ROE % is ranked lower than
67% of the 64 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -6.45 vs. PTEN: -12.82 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
PTEN' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -13.25  Med: 6.3 Max: 25.37
Current: -12.82
-13.25
25.37
ROA % -7.60
PTEN's ROA % is ranked lower than
63% of the 70 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -3.82 vs. PTEN: -7.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
PTEN' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -7.65  Med: 3.96 Max: 18.83
Current: -7.6
-7.65
18.83
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % -12.73
PTEN's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
69% of the 68 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -3.66 vs. PTEN: -12.73 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
PTEN' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -12.73  Med: 8.16 Max: 35.34
Current: -12.73
-12.73
35.34
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -30.50
PTEN's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
75% of the 59 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -20.90 vs. PTEN: -30.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
PTEN' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -30.5  Med: 9.95 Max: 51.7
Current: -30.5
-30.5
51.7
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate -38.80
PTEN's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
79% of the 53 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -16.20 vs. PTEN: -38.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
PTEN' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -40.1  Med: 6.6 Max: 92.9
Current: -38.8
-40.1
92.9
GuruFocus has detected 2 Warning Signs with Patterson-UTI Energy Inc $PTEN.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» PTEN's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-07-27)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - Drilling » Oil & Gas Drilling    NAICS: 213111    SIC: 1381
Compare:NYSE:RSPP, NYSE:RIG, NYSE:HP, NYSE:NBR, NYSE:ESV, NYSE:DO, NYSE:RDC, OTCPK:CESDF, NYSE:NE, NYSE:UNT, OTCPK:ESVIF, NYSE:ATW, NYSE:SBR, OTCPK:TDGCF, OTCPK:GFKSY, NYSE:SDLP, NYSE:SDRL, OTCPK:SVGYF, OTCPK:ARHVF, NYSE:PES » details
Traded in other countries:PE1.Germany,
Headquarter Location:USA
Patterson-UTI Energy Inc is a provider of contract services to the oil and natural gas industry. It operates in three segments namely contract drilling services, pressure pumping services, and oil and natural gas exploration and production.

Patterson-UTI Energy is one of the largest North America-based land rig drilling contractors. Its fleet consists of about 315 land rigs, which it markets to independents and small producers. The firm also operates a pressure pumping division and owns a small financial interest in oil and gas exploration and production assets in Texas and New Mexico.

Guru Investment Theses on Patterson-UTI Energy Inc

FPA Capital Fund Comments on Patterson-UTI Energy - Feb 09, 2016

PTEN (NASDAQ:PTEN) is the second largest land-based drilling rig operator after Helmerich & Payne; the company also owns a fleet of pressuring pump equipment to help shale oil & gas companies fracture rocks that contain hydrocarbons. During the current market down turn, the top 10 pressure pumping companies, including PTEN, have increased their aggregate market share from 60% to 75%. PTEN has a strong balance sheet at 1x debt/EBITDA, and it has no public debt outstanding. Despite oil prices being down 70% from mid-2014, PTEN’s consensus free cash flow expectation for 2016 is $0.75 per share. PTEN is trading at less than book value and 3.5x normalized EBITDA, which we believe are attractive valuation characteristics. We added to the position in the most recent quarter.

From FPA Capital Fund (Trades, Portfolio)'s fourth quarter 2015 commentary.

Check out FPA Capital Fund latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about Patterson-UTI Energy Inc

Patterson-UTI Reports Drilling Activity for May 2017
Kahn Brothers Sells Hologic, Pfizer, Citigroup The guru's largest 1st-quarter transactions
Irving Kahn, along with brothers Alan and Thomas, founded Kahn Brothers (Trades, Portfolio) in 1978. Kahn Brothers employs a bottom-up stock selection approach and invests in undervalued equity securities that are usually out of favor in the market. During the first quarter the guru sold shares in the following stocks: Read more...
Patterson-UTI Energy Reports John E. Vollmer III, its EVP-Corporate Development, CFO and Treasurer, Announces Decision to Retire
Patterson-UTI Reports Drilling Activity for April 2017
Patterson-UTI Energy Completes Merger with Seventy Seven Energy
Seventy Seven Energy Inc. Extends Deadline for Warrant Exercises
Patterson-UTI Reports Drilling Activity for March 2017
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Levi & Korsinsky, LLP Announces the Filing of a Complaint Concerning the Fairness of the Sale of Seventy Seven Energy, Inc. to Patterson-UTI, Inc. -- SVNT

NEW YORK, March 14, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The following statement is being issued by Levi & Korsinsky, LLP:
To: All Persons or Entities who purchased Seventy Seven Energy, Inc. (OTCMKTS:SVNT) stock prior to December 12, 2016. Levi & Korsinsky, LLP announces that a complaint has been filed challenging the fairness of the sale of Seventy Seven Energy to Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ:PTEN). The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma. Seventy Seven Energy shareholders at set to receive 1.7725 shares of Patterson-UTI common stock for every Seventy Seven Energy share they own. To learn more about the action and your rights, go to: http://zlk.9nl.com/seventy-seven-energy-svnt  or contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. either via email at [email protected] or by telephone at (212) 363-7500, toll-free: (877) 363-5972. There is no cost or obligation to you. Levi & Korsinsky is a national firm with offices in New York, Connecticut, California, and Washington D.C. The firm’s attorneys have extensive expertise in prosecuting securities litigation involving financial fraud, representing investors throughout the nation in securities lawsuits and have recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for aggrieved shareholders. For more information, please feel free to contact any of the attorneys listed below. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
Levi & Korsinsky, LLP
Joseph E. Levi, Esq.
Eduard Korsinsky, Esq.
30 Broad Street - 24th Floor
New York, NY 10004
Tel: (212) 363-7500
Toll Free: (877) 363-5972
Fax: (212) 363-7171
www.zlk.com

Read more...
FPA Capital Trims Nearly Half of Patterson-UTI Energy Stake Company was nearing its 2-year high in price, and revenue per share and gross margins had been in long-term decline
FPA Capital Fund (Trades, Portfolio), an investment firm that seeks long-term growth through the careful selection of common stocks and select fixed-income securities, slashed its stake in Patterson-UTI Energy Inc. (NASDAQ:PTEN) during the fourth quarter. Read more...
FPA Capital Fund Sells Apollo Education, Helmerich & Payne Largest sales by the fund in second quarter
FPA Capital Fund (Trades, Portfolio) has a concentrated portfolio and invests primarily in undervalued small-to-mid cap companies. During the first quarter, the firm sold shares in the following stocks: Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PB Ratio 1.23
PTEN's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
80% of the 60 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.58 vs. PTEN: 1.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
PTEN' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.56  Med: 1.25 Max: 3.16
Current: 1.23
0.56
3.16
PS Ratio 3.11
PTEN's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
80% of the 61 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.88 vs. PTEN: 3.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
PTEN' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.65  Med: 1.55 Max: 4.58
Current: 3.11
0.65
4.58
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 81.20
PTEN's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
100% of the 30 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 3.48 vs. PTEN: 81.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
PTEN' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.64  Med: 18.06 Max: 2041.11
Current: 81.2
4.64
2041.11
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 14.63
PTEN's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
88% of the 42 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 2.93 vs. PTEN: 14.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
PTEN' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.7  Med: 4.12 Max: 20.71
Current: 14.63
1.7
20.71
EV-to-EBITDA 22.04
PTEN's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
80% of the 45 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 7.67 vs. PTEN: 22.04 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
PTEN' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.4  Med: 4.2 Max: 23.5
Current: 22.04
1.4
23.5
Shiller PE Ratio 25.54
PTEN's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked lower than
88% of the 16 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 6.00 vs. PTEN: 25.54 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
PTEN' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.38  Med: 12.68 Max: 40.44
Current: 25.54
5.38
40.44
Current Ratio 2.48
PTEN's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
60% of the 70 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 1.93 vs. PTEN: 2.48 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
PTEN' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.96  Med: 1.93 Max: 3.92
Current: 2.48
0.96
3.92
Quick Ratio 2.41
PTEN's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
64% of the 70 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 1.68 vs. PTEN: 2.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
PTEN' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.93  Med: 1.84 Max: 3.92
Current: 2.41
0.93
3.92
Days Inventory 8.81
PTEN's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
83% of the 47 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 35.53 vs. PTEN: 8.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
PTEN' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.61  Med: 6.67 Max: 18.26
Current: 8.81
4.61
18.26
Days Sales Outstanding 80.67
PTEN's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
62% of the 50 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 65.65 vs. PTEN: 80.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
PTEN' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 42.39  Med: 68.88 Max: 84.12
Current: 80.67
42.39
84.12
Days Payable 81.52
PTEN's Days Payable is ranked higher than
76% of the 45 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 49.64 vs. PTEN: 81.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
PTEN' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 24.51  Med: 54.77 Max: 81.52
Current: 81.52
24.51
81.52

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 0.41
PTEN's Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
98% of the 49 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 4.59 vs. PTEN: 0.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
PTEN' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.29  Med: 1.28 Max: 6.98
Current: 0.41
0.29
6.98
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate -7.20
PTEN's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked higher than
72% of the 29 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -37.00 vs. PTEN: -7.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
PTEN' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0 Max: 94.3
Current: -7.2
0
94.3
Forward Dividend Yield % 0.41
PTEN's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
95% of the 43 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 4.59 vs. PTEN: 0.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 0.52
PTEN's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked lower than
99% of the 89 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 5.70 vs. PTEN: 0.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
PTEN' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.37  Med: 1.63 Max: 8.87
Current: 0.52
0.37
8.87
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -0.90
PTEN's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
60% of the 52 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -2.60 vs. PTEN: -0.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
PTEN' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -43.2  Med: -1.7 Max: 3.6
Current: -0.9
-43.2
3.6

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 1.27
PTEN's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
79% of the 57 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.62 vs. PTEN: 1.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
PTEN' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.67  Med: 1.91 Max: 9.16
Current: 1.27
0.67
9.16
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 1.30
PTEN's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked lower than
78% of the 32 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.76 vs. PTEN: 1.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
PTEN' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.33  Med: 1.69 Max: 18.26
Current: 1.3
0.33
18.26
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 2.01
PTEN's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked lower than
92% of the 60 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.61 vs. PTEN: 2.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
PTEN' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.29  Med: 1.1 Max: 2.98
Current: 2.01
0.29
2.98
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % -10.54
PTEN's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
67% of the 69 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -2.14 vs. PTEN: -10.54 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
PTEN' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -19  Med: 9.25 Max: 45.6
Current: -10.54
-19
45.6
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % -25.37
PTEN's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
77% of the 30 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -10.65 vs. PTEN: -25.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
PTEN' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -26  Med: 14.95 Max: 81.8
Current: -25.37
-26
81.8

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $952.10
EPS (TTM) $ -2.09
Beta0.81
Short Percentage of Float9.37%
52-Week Range $17.61 - 29.76
Shares Outstanding (Mil)211.97

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18 Dec19
Revenue (Mil $) 2,154 3,213 4,108
EPS ($) -1.01 0.13 0.44
EPS without NRI ($) -1.01 0.13 0.44
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
N/A
Dividends per Share ($) 0.10 0.10 0.06
» More Articles for PTEN

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Patterson-UTI Reports Drilling Activity for May 2017 Jun 05 2017 
Kahn Brothers Sells Hologic, Pfizer, Citigroup May 11 2017 
Patterson-UTI Energy Reports John E. Vollmer III, its EVP-Corporate Development, CFO and Treasurer, May 11 2017 
Patterson-UTI Reports Drilling Activity for April 2017 May 03 2017 
Patterson-UTI Energy Completes Merger with Seventy Seven Energy Apr 20 2017 
Seventy Seven Energy Inc. Extends Deadline for Warrant Exercises Apr 10 2017 
Patterson-UTI Reports Drilling Activity for March 2017 Apr 05 2017 
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Levi & Korsinsky, LLP Announces the Filing of a Complaint Concerning the Fairness Mar 14 2017 
FPA Capital Fund 4th Quarter 2016 Commentary Jan 30 2017 
FPA Capital Trims Nearly Half of Patterson-UTI Energy Stake Jan 27 2017 

More From Other Websites
What Analysts Are Recommending for Nabors Industries Jun 23 2017
How Schlumberger Relates to Crude Oil as of June 16 Jun 20 2017
Cramer’s Exec Cut: Company leaders reveal what gives them... Jun 16 2017
Cramer Remix: The No. 1 stock to own when the market sentiment changes Jun 15 2017
Energy Company Updates between June 5–June 9, 2017 Jun 13 2017
What Was Weatherford’s Short Interest on June 7? Jun 12 2017
Patterson-UTI Energy on the Street: Analyst Recommendations and Target Prices Jun 08 2017
Inside PTEN’s Latest Correlation with Crude Oil Jun 08 2017
Patterson-UTI Energy’s Dividend Yield on June 2 Jun 08 2017
Shorting Patterson-UTI Energy: Gauging Short Interest as of June 5 Jun 08 2017
A Look at Patterson-UTI Energy’s Higher 2017 Capex Plan Jun 08 2017
What’s Patterson-UTI Energy’s Valuation Compared to Peers? Jun 07 2017
What Patterson-UTI Energy’s Valuation Tells Us Jun 07 2017
Will High-Pressure Pumping Revenue Help PTEN’s Returns? Jun 07 2017
Why Patterson-UTI Energy’s Net Debt Fell after the Merger Jun 07 2017
Can Patterson-UTI Energy Reach Its Rig Count Estimate? Jun 07 2017
Can Upstream Operators’ Capex Affect PTEN’s Margin in 2017? Jun 07 2017
What Were Patterson-UTI Energy’s Drivers in 1Q17? Jun 06 2017
Management’s Views on Patterson-UTI Energy after 1Q17 Jun 06 2017
Why Patterson-UTI Energy Stock Is So Bearish Jun 06 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}