Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.25
PWR's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
76% of the 1044 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.92 vs. PWR: 0.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
PWR' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.01  Med: 0.63 Max: 43855.67
Current: 0.25
0.01
43855.67
Equity-to-Asset 0.61
PWR's Equity-to-Asset is ranked higher than
79% of the 1011 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.42 vs. PWR: 0.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
PWR' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.31  Med: 0.62 Max: 0.8
Current: 0.61
0.31
0.8
Interest Coverage 23.49
PWR's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
52% of the 890 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 19.80 vs. PWR: 23.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
PWR' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.88  Med: 39.69 Max: 178.41
Current: 23.49
7.88
178.41
Piotroski F-Score: 6
Altman Z-Score: 3.79
Beneish M-Score: -2.45
WACC vs ROIC
6.35%
6.65%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 4.42
PWR's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
56% of the 1031 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 5.27 vs. PWR: 4.42 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
PWR' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.14  Med: 6.55 Max: 7.86
Current: 4.42
3.14
7.86
Net Margin % 2.79
PWR's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
57% of the 1034 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 3.50 vs. PWR: 2.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
PWR' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.59  Med: 4.2 Max: 6.27
Current: 2.79
2.59
6.27
ROE % 6.90
PWR's ROE % is ranked lower than
56% of the 1022 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 8.19 vs. PWR: 6.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
PWR' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.93  Med: 6.63 Max: 10.05
Current: 6.9
3.93
10.05
ROA % 4.19
PWR's ROA % is ranked higher than
61% of the 1047 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 3.07 vs. PWR: 4.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
PWR' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.93  Med: 4.74 Max: 7.35
Current: 4.19
2.93
7.35
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 16.82
PWR's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
53% of the 1041 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 18.24 vs. PWR: 16.82 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
PWR' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.85  Med: 20.35 Max: 29.84
Current: 16.82
10.85
29.84
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate 17.70
PWR's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
88% of the 878 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.50 vs. PWR: 17.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
PWR' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -18.1  Med: 6.7 Max: 103.5
Current: 17.7
-18.1
103.5
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate -0.90
PWR's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
65% of the 746 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 6.30 vs. PWR: -0.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
PWR' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -53.3  Med: 16.9 Max: 133.8
Current: -0.9
-53.3
133.8
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate -10.00
PWR's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked lower than
72% of the 681 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 6.40 vs. PWR: -10.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
PWR' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -23.2  Med: 23.1 Max: 95.5
Current: -10
-23.2
95.5
GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Signs with Quanta Services Inc $PWR.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» PWR's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-11-03 Est.)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2016

PWR Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Jim Simons 423,199 sh (New)
Ray Dalio 26,400 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 307,954 sh (+3320.19%)
Steven Cohen 1,538,410 sh (+53.84%)
Joel Greenblatt 291,517 sh (+11.41%)
Chris Davis Sold Out
Chuck Royce Sold Out
David Dreman 43,058 sh (-4.07%)
» More
Q3 2016

PWR Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Paul Tudor Jones 479,000 sh (+55.54%)
Steven Cohen 1,693,700 sh (+10.09%)
Ray Dalio Sold Out
Jim Simons 414,899 sh (-1.96%)
David Dreman 40,549 sh (-5.83%)
Joel Greenblatt 115,395 sh (-60.42%)
» More
Q4 2016

PWR Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Jim Simons Sold Out
David Dreman 37,850 sh (-6.66%)
Steven Cohen 423,000 sh (-75.03%)
Paul Tudor Jones 108,893 sh (-77.27%)
Joel Greenblatt 9,858 sh (-91.46%)
» More
Q1 2017

PWR Guru Trades in Q1 2017

Caxton Associates 13,600 sh (New)
Ray Dalio 6,716 sh (New)
John Hussman 100,000 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 769,352 sh (+81.88%)
Joel Greenblatt Sold Out
David Dreman 36,339 sh (-3.99%)
Paul Tudor Jones 29,382 sh (-73.02%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with PWR

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Engineering & Construction » Engineering & Construction    NAICS: 238210    SIC: 1731
Compare:NYSE:ACM, NYSE:EME, NYSE:MTZ, NYSE:FLR, NYSE:JEC, NYSE:DY, NAS:TTEK, NYSE:KBR, NYSE:GVA, NYSE:TPC, NYSE:FIX, NAS:PRIM, NYSE:AGX, NAS:AEGN, NYSE:TRR, NAS:MYRG, NAS:VSEC, NAS:NVEE, NAS:IESC, NAS:STRL » details
Traded in other countries:QAA.Germany,
Headquarter Location:USA
Quanta Services Inc is a provider of specialty contracting services. The Company offers infrastructure solutions to the electric power and oil and gas industries in North America and in select international markets.

Quanta Services Inc was organized as a corporation in the state of Delaware in 1997. The Company provides specialty contracting services, offering infrastructure solutions to the electric power and oil and gas industries in the United States, Canada and Australia and select other international markets. The services it provides include the design, installation, upgrade, repair and maintenance of infrastructure within each of the industries it serve, such as electric power transmission and distribution networks, substation facilities, renewable energy facilities, pipeline transmission and distribution systems and facilities, and infrastructure services for the offshore and inland water energy markets. The Company also owns fiber optic telecommunications infrastructure in select markets and license the right to use these point-to-point fiber optic telecommunications facilities to customers. The Company's business segments are Electric Power Infrastructure Services, and Oil and Gas Infrastructure Services. The Electric Power Infrastructure Services segment provides network solutions to customers in the electric power industry. Services performed by the Electric Power Infrastructure Services segment generally include the design, installation, upgrade, repair and maintenance of electric power transmission and distribution infrastructure and substation facilities along with other engineering and technical services. The Oil and Gas Infrastructure Services segment provides infrastructure solutions to customers involved in the development and transportation of natural gas, oil and other pipeline products. Services performed by the Oil and Gas Infrastructure Services segment generally include the design, installation, repair and maintenance of pipeline transmission and distribution systems, gathering systems, production systems and compressor and pump stations, as well as related trenching, directional boring and automatic welding services. The Company's customers include electric power and oil and gas companies, as well as commercial, industrial and governmental entities- Ameren Corporation, Georgia Power, ITC Holdings Corp., Australia Pacific LNG, Northeast Utilities System, First Energy, Southern California Edison Co., Xcel Energy Inc., ExxonMobil Corporation and First Energy. The Company's operations are subject to numerous federal, state, local and international environmental laws and regulations governing its operations, including the handling, transportation and disposal of non-hazardous and hazardous substances and wastes, as well as emissions and discharges into the environment, including discharges to air, surface water, groundwater and soil.

Top Ranked Articles about Quanta Services Inc

Quanta Services Acquires Stronghold
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Announces Investigation of Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR)
Quanta Services to Present at Several Institutional Investor Conferences in June
Quanta Services Authorizes $300 Million Stock Repurchase Program
Quanta Services Announces First Quarter 2017 Earnings Release & Conference Call Schedule
ViZn Energy Systems and The Ryan Company Announce Strategic Partnership

Zinc Redox Technology to Be Used for Utility & Commercial Scale Solar Storage

AUSTIN, TX and GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO--(Marketwired - Sep 12, 2016) - ViZn Energy Systems Inc. (ViZn), a leading provider of zinc and iron chemistry-based flow battery energy storage systems for utilities and microgrids, and The Ryan Company (an operating unit of Quanta Services, (NYSE: PWR)) are pleased to announce a strategic partnership aimed at solar battery storage integration for owners of utility and commercial scale solar installations. Bloomberg New Energy Finance projects the solar storage sector to grow exponentially and receive $250 billion of total investment by 2040. "The Ryan Company has a deep background in both solar EPC integration and complex electrical infrastructure improvements across the United States," said David Mintzer, Vice President of Business Development at ViZn Energy. "We seek partners who are first class EPCs and have the engineering expertise to integrate our zinc redox flow batteries into multifaceted projects where our system will be expected to perform stacked applications and deliver significant ROI over its 20-year lifespan." The Ryan Company, a wholly owned Quanta Services subsidiary, is a top-tier electrical EPC company with over 700MW of installed solar projects and numerous references in the electrical infrastructure space including: frequency regulation, substation/transformer installation, and public-sector electrical upgrades. ViZn Energy's flow battery systems are capable of performing both high-power and long-duration duties while also offering low O&M, which enables utilities, C&I customers, and other end users to stack applications and incorporate multiple value streams. ViZn's systems have an expected lifespan of 20 years, which is twice (or more) that of the average large scale lithium-ion storage system, they do not suffer from capacity fade or require cell replacements, and they have access to 100% of their state-of-charge and do not require a 20% or higher discharge threshold. "ViZn has a highly scalable, robust technology that can provide multiple lines of value for intermittent renewable assets," said Bill Hargett, Director of Business Development at The Ryan Company. "We believe that solar power producers are increasingly looking for ways to provide a more dynamic and flexible dispatch profile to the grid, and ViZn Energy has the product and ability to make this happen." Within the strategic partnership, The Ryan Company and ViZn will provide a comprehensive battery storage system for utility solar power plants that seek improved economics based on ViZn Energy's capacity to address load shifting and fast frequency response power management services. Both ViZn Energy and The Ryan Company will be exhibiting at Solar Power International in Las Vegas September 12-15. About ViZn Energy Systems, Inc.

ViZn Energy Systems, Inc. is comprised of a visionary team of scientists, engineers and business leaders who are passionate about creating and commercializing a revolutionary energy storage solution for the commercial & industrial, microgrid and utility-scale markets. Founded in 2009 and based on eight previous years of research, ViZn is commercializing highly scalable energy storage systems, ranging from tens of kilowatts to mega-watt storage. The ViZn solution is safe, reliable, cost effective, and scalable to meet the needs of today's ever-changing energy landscape. For more information, visit: www.ViZnEnergy.com About The Ryan Company

As an operating unit of Quanta Services (NYSE: PWR), the Ryan Company has engineered and installed solar facilities, substation systems, public sector electrical upgrades, frequency and battery storage systems, and numerous other electrical infrastructure projects in the United States and the Caribbean. With offices in Denver Colorado and Norton, MA, our national construction and delivery footprint and complete in-house engineering disciplines allow us to design, engineer, and construct technically complex projects on-time, on-budget, and on-point. Please visit www.ryancompany.net for more information.


For additional information, please contact:

Wendy Prabhu

Mercom Communications, a division of Mercom Capital Group

1-512-215-4452

Email Contact





Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 22.84
PWR's PE Ratio is ranked lower than
66% of the 824 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 15.75 vs. PWR: 22.84 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
PWR' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.8  Med: 23.97 Max: 196.83
Current: 22.84
9.8
196.83
Forward PE Ratio 16.61
PWR's Forward PE Ratio is ranked lower than
52% of the 98 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 16.00 vs. PWR: 16.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 22.99
PWR's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked lower than
66% of the 824 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 15.92 vs. PWR: 22.99 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
PWR' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 14.77  Med: 26.53 Max: 214.73
Current: 22.99
14.77
214.73
PB Ratio 1.45
PWR's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
54% of the 1001 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.34 vs. PWR: 1.45 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
PWR' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.86  Med: 1.45 Max: 4.77
Current: 1.45
0.86
4.77
PS Ratio 0.64
PWR's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
52% of the 1010 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.68 vs. PWR: 0.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
PWR' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.45  Med: 1.05 Max: 2.01
Current: 0.64
0.45
2.01
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 29.13
PWR's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
86% of the 429 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 9.17 vs. PWR: 29.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
PWR' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.3  Med: 19.35 Max: 62.31
Current: 29.13
5.3
62.31
EV-to-EBIT 14.61
PWR's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
59% of the 860 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 11.74 vs. PWR: 14.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
PWR' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.1  Med: 15.3 Max: 45.5
Current: 14.61
9.1
45.5
EV-to-EBITDA 9.34
PWR's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
52% of the 890 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 9.58 vs. PWR: 9.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
PWR' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.4  Med: 10.4 Max: 30.4
Current: 9.34
6.4
30.4
PEG Ratio 2.81
PWR's PEG Ratio is ranked lower than
74% of the 367 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.14 vs. PWR: 2.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG Ratio only.
PWR' s PEG Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.36  Med: 1.8 Max: 138.05
Current: 2.81
0.36
138.05
Shiller PE Ratio 26.94
PWR's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked lower than
64% of the 202 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 19.33 vs. PWR: 26.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
PWR' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 16.35  Med: 52 Max: 159.29
Current: 26.94
16.35
159.29
Current Ratio 1.96
PWR's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
74% of the 1019 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.48 vs. PWR: 1.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
PWR' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.15  Med: 2.38 Max: 3.74
Current: 1.96
1.15
3.74
Quick Ratio 1.89
PWR's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
78% of the 1019 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.29 vs. PWR: 1.89 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
PWR' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.09  Med: 2.29 Max: 3.66
Current: 1.89
1.09
3.66
Days Inventory 4.31
PWR's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
83% of the 852 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 25.05 vs. PWR: 4.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
PWR' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.96  Med: 3.83 Max: 5.74
Current: 4.31
1.96
5.74
Days Sales Outstanding 71.48
PWR's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
51% of the 771 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 72.06 vs. PWR: 71.48 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
PWR' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 71.48  Med: 80.01 Max: 98.9
Current: 71.48
71.48
98.9
Days Payable 27.46
PWR's Days Payable is ranked lower than
81% of the 675 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 75.31 vs. PWR: 27.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
PWR' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 24.83  Med: 27.76 Max: 68.96
Current: 27.46
24.83
68.96

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio 12.10
PWR's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
99% of the 534 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: -2.60 vs. PWR: 12.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
PWR' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -26.4  Med: -10 Max: 12.1
Current: 12.1
-26.4
12.1

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value 15.01
PWR's Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value is ranked lower than
87% of the 566 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 3.40 vs. PWR: 15.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value only.
PWR' s Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.55  Med: 10.2 Max: 123.79
Current: 15.01
5.55
123.79
Price-to-Tangible-Book 3.07
PWR's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
77% of the 914 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.47 vs. PWR: 3.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
PWR' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.67  Med: 3.3 Max: 214.09
Current: 3.07
0.67
214.09
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 1.19
PWR's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked higher than
51% of the 504 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.20 vs. PWR: 1.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
PWR' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.8  Med: 1.47 Max: 5.74
Current: 1.19
0.8
5.74
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-DCF (Earnings Based) 1.33
PWR's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-DCF (Earnings Based) is ranked lower than
71% of the 58 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.04 vs. PWR: 1.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-DCF (Earnings Based) only.
N/A
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.61
PWR's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
91% of the 941 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.15 vs. PWR: 0.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
PWR' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.09  Med: 0.96 Max: 4.31
Current: 0.61
0.09
4.31
Price-to-Graham-Number 1.77
PWR's Price-to-Graham-Number is ranked lower than
72% of the 708 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.02 vs. PWR: 1.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Graham-Number only.
PWR' s Price-to-Graham-Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.41  Med: 2.23 Max: 21.73
Current: 1.77
1.41
21.73
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 6.84
PWR's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
51% of the 1045 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 6.71 vs. PWR: 6.84 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
PWR' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.2  Med: 6.6 Max: 11
Current: 6.84
2.2
11
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % 1.95
PWR's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
61% of the 522 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 7.23 vs. PWR: 1.95 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
PWR' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.7  Med: 13.7 Max: 49.5
Current: 1.95
1.7
49.5

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $8,115.75
EPS (TTM) $ 1.46
Beta0.74
Short Percentage of Float3.95%
52-Week Range $23.22 - 38.82
Shares Outstanding (Mil)148.11

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18 Dec19
Revenue (Mil $) 8,368 9,037 9,874
EPS ($) 1.89 2.34 2.75
EPS without NRI ($) 1.89 2.34 2.75
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
8.00%
Dividends per Share ($)
» More Articles for PWR

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Quanta Services Acquires Stronghold Jul 21 2017 
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Announces Investigation of Quanta Services, In Jul 20 2017 
Quanta Services to Present at Several Institutional Investor Conferences in June Jun 05 2017 
Quanta Services Authorizes $300 Million Stock Repurchase Program May 25 2017 
Quanta Services Announces First Quarter 2017 Earnings Release & Conference Call Schedule Apr 27 2017 
ViZn Energy Systems and The Ryan Company Announce Strategic Partnership Sep 15 2016 
5 Undervalued Companies With a Low Beta Aug 03 2016 
Undervalued Companies With a Low Beta Jul 07 2016 
POCML 3 Inc. Enters Into Binding Letter Agreement With Neo Lithium Corp. to Complete Qualifying Tran Mar 04 2016 
5 Undervalued Companies With a Low Beta Jan 29 2016 

More From Other Websites
Quanta (PWR) Fortifies Energy Business on Stronghold Buyout Jul 24 2017
Corporate News Blog - Quanta Services Acquires Stronghold Jul 24 2017
Quanta Services Acquires Stronghold Jul 21 2017
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Announces Investigation of Quanta Services,... Jul 20 2017
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Levi & Korsinsky, LLP Notifies Investors of an Investigation Involving Possible... Jul 19 2017
Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP Commences Investigation on Behalf of Quanta Services, Inc. Investors Jul 19 2017
ETFs with exposure to Quanta Services, Inc. : July 13, 2017 Jul 13 2017
Quanta Services, Inc. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bullish Manner : PWR-US : July 3, 2017 Jul 03 2017
ETFs with exposure to Quanta Services, Inc. : June 30, 2017 Jun 30 2017
Quanta Services, Inc. :PWR-US: Earnings Analysis: Q1, 2017 By the Numbers : June 16, 2017 Jun 16 2017
Quanta Services to Present at Several Institutional Investor Conferences in June Jun 05 2017
Quanta Services Authorizes $300 Million Stock Repurchase Program May 25 2017
Edited Transcript of PWR earnings conference call or presentation 4-May-17 1:00pm GMT May 08 2017
Quanta Services (PWR) Q1 Earnings Miss, Revenues Up Y/Y (Revised) May 04 2017
Quanta Services (PWR) Q1 Earnings and Revenues Beat, View Up May 04 2017
Quanta Services misses 1Q profit forecasts May 04 2017
Quanta Services Reports 2017 First Quarter Results May 04 2017
Construction Stocks Earnings on May 4: FLR, PWR, MTZ & TREX May 03 2017
Quanta Services (PWR) Q1 Earnings: What's in the Cards? May 02 2017
Quanta Services Announces First Quarter 2017 Earnings Release & Conference Call Schedule Apr 27 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}