Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany, Mexico

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 9/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt No Debt
NAS:SEIC's Cash-to-Debt is ranked higher than
99% of the 1171 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 480.00 vs. NAS:SEIC: No Debt )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
NAS:SEIC' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.29  Med: 8.25 Max: No Debt
Current: No Debt
0.29
No Debt
Equity-to-Asset 0.81
NAS:SEIC's Equity-to-Asset is ranked higher than
57% of the 1023 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 0.76 vs. NAS:SEIC: 0.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
NAS:SEIC' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.25  Med: 0.61 Max: 0.86
Current: 0.81
0.25
0.86
Interest Coverage 685.25
NAS:SEIC's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
57% of the 938 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. NAS:SEIC: 685.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
NAS:SEIC' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 97.14  Med: 442.05 Max: 770.27
Current: 685.25
97.14
770.27
Piotroski F-Score: 7
Altman Z-Score: 18.48
Beneish M-Score: -2.87
WACC vs ROIC
9.49%
43.96%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 27.21
NAS:SEIC's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
58% of the 826 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 17.78 vs. NAS:SEIC: 27.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
NAS:SEIC' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 21.32  Med: 26.41 Max: 39.77
Current: 27.21
21.32
39.77
Net Margin % 31.15
NAS:SEIC's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
58% of the 1046 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 20.33 vs. NAS:SEIC: 31.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
NAS:SEIC' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 11.16  Med: 24.34 Max: 31.15
Current: 31.15
11.16
31.15
ROE % 32.00
NAS:SEIC's ROE % is ranked higher than
94% of the 1154 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 4.20 vs. NAS:SEIC: 32.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
NAS:SEIC' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 18.26  Med: 24.75 Max: 32
Current: 32
18.26
32
ROA % 26.49
NAS:SEIC's ROA % is ranked higher than
96% of the 1186 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.87 vs. NAS:SEIC: 26.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
NAS:SEIC' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.74  Med: 18.31 Max: 26.49
Current: 26.49
10.74
26.49
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 366.78
NAS:SEIC's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
77% of the 799 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 29.92 vs. NAS:SEIC: 366.78 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
NAS:SEIC' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 185.07  Med: 304.95 Max: 400.87
Current: 366.78
185.07
400.87
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate 8.60
NAS:SEIC's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
61% of the 843 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 3.70 vs. NAS:SEIC: 8.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
NAS:SEIC' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -11.1  Med: 11.05 Max: 27.4
Current: 8.6
-11.1
27.4
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate 6.90
NAS:SEIC's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked higher than
52% of the 596 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 5.80 vs. NAS:SEIC: 6.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
NAS:SEIC' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -11  Med: 9.65 Max: 42.7
Current: 6.9
-11
42.7
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate 10.40
NAS:SEIC's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked higher than
56% of the 723 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 6.60 vs. NAS:SEIC: 10.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
NAS:SEIC' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -8.1  Med: 15.45 Max: 54.9
Current: 10.4
-8.1
54.9
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» NAS:SEIC's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2019-04-25)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q1 2018

SEIC Guru Trades in Q1 2018

Jeremy Grantham 72,600 sh (+32.24%)
Pioneer Investments 61,825 sh (+51.08%)
Tom Gayner 306,200 sh (unchged)
Mairs and Power 3,300 sh (unchged)
Chuck Royce 495,700 sh (-11.80%)
Jim Simons 29,626 sh (-59.58%)
» More
Q2 2018

SEIC Guru Trades in Q2 2018

Ray Dalio 5,993 sh (New)
Pioneer Investments 84,133 sh (+36.08%)
Jim Simons 119,626 sh (+303.79%)
Tom Gayner 306,200 sh (unchged)
Mairs and Power 3,300 sh (unchged)
Jeremy Grantham 40,630 sh (-44.04%)
Chuck Royce 412,600 sh (-16.76%)
» More
Q3 2018

SEIC Guru Trades in Q3 2018

Tom Gayner 329,200 sh (+7.51%)
Jim Simons 208,926 sh (+74.65%)
Pioneer Investments 92,921 sh (+10.45%)
Chuck Royce 412,600 sh (unchged)
Mairs and Power 3,300 sh (unchged)
Jeremy Grantham Sold Out
Ray Dalio 5,516 sh (-7.96%)
» More
Q4 2018

SEIC Guru Trades in Q4 2018

Tom Gayner 363,200 sh (+10.33%)
Chuck Royce 432,376 sh (+4.79%)
Jim Simons 594,009 sh (+184.32%)
Ray Dalio 56,169 sh (+918.29%)
Pioneer Investments 114,373 sh (+23.09%)
Mairs and Power Sold Out
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with SEIC

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

Guru Date Action
Impact Price Range
(Average)*
Change from Average Comment Current Shares
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Asset Management » Asset Management    NAICS: 523930    SIC: 6211
Compare:NYSE:KKR, OSTO:INDU C, JSE:REM, OSTO:KINV A, NYSE:AMG, NYSE:VOYA, OSTO:LUND B, SHSE:600816, NYSE:APO, LSE:HL., NYSE:IVZ, LSE:SDR, SHSE:601108, SHSE:600958, TSX:IGM, HKSE:02799, XPAR:MF, OSTO:LATO B, NAS:ARCC, NAS:CG » details
Traded in other countries:SI3.Germany, SEIC.Mexico,
Headquarter Location:USA
SEI Investments Co is an asset management firm. It caters to financial advisors and investors with investment management activities. It is a provider of investment processing, investment management, and investment operations platforms.

SEI is a global provider of investment processing, investment management, and investment operations solutions. Its clients include corporations, financial institutions and advisors, institutional investors, and high-net-worth individuals who may need to outsource some aspect of their financial planning. Most of its assets under administration derive from mutual fund and pooled or separately managed assets. Since its origin, the company has placed a premium on delivering technological solutions as part of its platform of financial service offerings. Revenue is mostly earned from monthly fees derived from contracted services or as a percentage of assets under administration.

Top Ranked Articles about SEI Investments Co

SEI Adds $1.1 Billion in New OCIO Assets in Fourth-Quarter 2018
SEI Establishes Exclusive Agreement with Inovea Group
Fundamental Business Analysis: SEI Investments, Part 3 In this final segment, I look at SEI Investment's history of growth and potential to keep compounding value over time
In this – part four – of a four-part series on fundamental business analysis, I will continue using SEI Investments (NASDAQ:SEIC) as a case study taking readers through the three major components of a successful fundamental business analysis. I will bring readers through the major steps in analyzing the history of SEI Investments' growth and ask whether that growth can continue. In particular, I will focus on whether the company’s growth has added value –and will continue to add value – through scalability, capital allocation and strength of management. Read more...
SEI to Announce Fourth-Quarter 2018 Earnings on Wednesday, Jan. 30, 2019
Fundamental Business Analysis: SEI Investments, Part 2 Taking a look at the company's competitive moat
In the third installment of this four-part series, I will continue using SEI Investments Co. (NASDAQ:SEIC) as a case study, taking readers through the three major components of a successful fundamental business analysis. I will bring readers through the major steps in analyzing a company’s moat, which will include the major traits of the moat, how the company developed and implemented these components and steps required to maintain or even broaden its existing moat. Read more...
Fundamental Business Analysis: SEI Investments, Part 1 Taking a look at the financial services company's financials
I previously discussed the role fundamental business analysis plays in my style of value investing. I thought I would use a holding in both the Nintai Investments LLC and Hayashi Foundation’s portfolios – SEI Investments Co. (NASDAQ:SEIC) - to focus on how I utilize such analysis to both reduce risk and assess growth potential for each portfolio holding. At the end of each calendar year, I complete an assessment of each holding as if it is a potential investment I might be interested in purchasing. This fresh start – so to speak – forces me to think through each component with an unjaundiced eye (hopefully). The next three parts of this series will go into detail about the three major components of fundamental business analysis. Read more...
Financial Advisors Expect Market Downturn in 2019, According to SEI New Year's Resolutions Survey
SEI Declares Dividend of $0.33 Per Share and Announces Increase in Stock Repurchase Program
SEI Provides IT Hosting Platform to Strategic Global Advisors, LLC
High-Net-Worth Investors Rank Personalization and Trust as Most Important Factors for Productive Advisor Relationships

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 16.79
SEIC's PE Ratio is ranked lower than
61% of the 810 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 12.95 vs. SEIC: 16.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
SEIC' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 12.21  Med: 20.98 Max: 30.92
Current: 16.79
12.21
30.92
Forward PE Ratio 16.29
SEIC's Forward PE Ratio is ranked lower than
82% of the 153 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 11.07 vs. SEIC: 16.29 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 16.79
SEIC's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked lower than
60% of the 787 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 13.20 vs. SEIC: 16.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
SEIC' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 12.21  Med: 20.98 Max: 30.92
Current: 16.79
12.21
30.92
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 18.19
SEIC's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked lower than
68% of the 352 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 11.34 vs. SEIC: 18.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
SEIC' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.82  Med: 22.53 Max: 54.43
Current: 18.19
8.82
54.43
PB Ratio 5.07
SEIC's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
92% of the 1181 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 0.99 vs. SEIC: 5.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
SEIC' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.34  Med: 4.73 Max: 8.22
Current: 5.07
2.34
8.22
PS Ratio 5.25
SEIC's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
57% of the 967 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 4.18 vs. SEIC: 5.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
SEIC' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.63  Med: 4.92 Max: 8.22
Current: 5.25
1.63
8.22
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 17.51
SEIC's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
58% of the 310 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 13.33 vs. SEIC: 17.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
SEIC' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.04  Med: 20.76 Max: 33.6
Current: 17.51
10.04
33.6
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 15.23
SEIC's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
61% of the 547 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 10.94 vs. SEIC: 15.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
SEIC' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.13  Med: 16.82 Max: 27.26
Current: 15.23
7.13
27.26
EV-to-EBIT 11.87
SEIC's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
52% of the 618 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 11.02 vs. SEIC: 11.87 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
SEIC' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.9  Med: 11.8 Max: 21.3
Current: 11.87
4.9
21.3
EV-to-EBITDA 10.54
SEIC's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
50% of the 644 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 10.43 vs. SEIC: 10.54 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
SEIC' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.5  Med: 10.25 Max: 18.8
Current: 10.54
4.5
18.8
EV-to-Revenue 4.50
SEIC's EV-to-Revenue is ranked higher than
53% of the 915 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 4.87 vs. SEIC: 4.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-Revenue only.
SEIC' s EV-to-Revenue Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.5  Med: 4.4 Max: 7.8
Current: 4.5
1.5
7.8
PEG Ratio 1.51
SEIC's PEG Ratio is ranked lower than
64% of the 171 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 0.96 vs. SEIC: 1.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG Ratio only.
SEIC' s PEG Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.42  Med: 2.03 Max: 9.13
Current: 1.51
0.42
9.13
Shiller PE Ratio 29.06
SEIC's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked lower than
80% of the 310 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 15.31 vs. SEIC: 29.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
SEIC' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 11.81  Med: 27.1 Max: 48.31
Current: 29.06
11.81
48.31
Current Ratio 5.38
SEIC's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
57% of the 902 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 3.87 vs. SEIC: 5.38 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
SEIC' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.81  Med: 2.04 Max: 6.52
Current: 5.38
0.81
6.52
Quick Ratio 5.38
SEIC's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
58% of the 902 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 3.62 vs. SEIC: 5.38 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
SEIC' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.81  Med: 2.04 Max: 6.52
Current: 5.38
0.81
6.52
Days Sales Outstanding 82.23
SEIC's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
69% of the 575 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 43.70 vs. SEIC: 82.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
SEIC' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 13.99  Med: 27.54 Max: 82.23
Current: 82.23
13.99
82.23
Days Payable 5.50
SEIC's Days Payable is ranked lower than
83% of the 484 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 57.32 vs. SEIC: 5.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
SEIC' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.63  Med: 3.68 Max: 11.07
Current: 5.5
1.63
11.07

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 1.20
SEIC's Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
92% of the 1130 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 4.62 vs. SEIC: 1.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
SEIC' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.53  Med: 1.06 Max: 1.74
Current: 1.2
0.53
1.74
Dividend Payout Ratio 0.20
SEIC's Dividend Payout Ratio is ranked higher than
95% of the 597 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 0.62 vs. SEIC: 0.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout Ratio only.
SEIC' s Dividend Payout Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.16  Med: 0.25 Max: 0.27
Current: 0.2
0.16
0.27
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate 8.00
SEIC's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked higher than
61% of the 407 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 3.60 vs. SEIC: 8.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
SEIC' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8  Med: 19.85 Max: 41.5
Current: 8
8
41.5
Forward Dividend Yield % 1.25
SEIC's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
91% of the 1041 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 4.97 vs. SEIC: 1.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 2.11
SEIC's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked lower than
82% of the 1108 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 5.20 vs. SEIC: 2.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
SEIC' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.93  Med: 1.87 Max: 3.07
Current: 2.11
0.93
3.07
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio 2.00
SEIC's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
81% of the 673 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: -1.20 vs. SEIC: 2.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
SEIC' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.6  Med: 1.75 Max: 3.9
Current: 2
-0.6
3.9

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Net-Cash 19.87
SEIC's Price-to-Net-Cash is ranked lower than
81% of the 502 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 3.50 vs. SEIC: 19.87 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Net-Cash only.
SEIC' s Price-to-Net-Cash Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 13.86  Med: 20.41 Max: 2141
Current: 19.87
13.86
2141
Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value 9.95
SEIC's Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value is ranked lower than
77% of the 577 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 2.67 vs. SEIC: 9.95 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value only.
SEIC' s Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.12  Med: 25.83 Max: 196.56
Current: 9.95
7.12
196.56
Price-to-Tangible-Book 6.81
SEIC's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
91% of the 1128 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.02 vs. SEIC: 6.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
SEIC' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.69  Med: 7.78 Max: 30.8
Current: 6.81
3.69
30.8
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 1.43
SEIC's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked lower than
69% of the 381 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 0.97 vs. SEIC: 1.43 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
SEIC' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.63  Med: 1.8 Max: 6.38
Current: 1.43
0.63
6.38
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 1.07
SEIC's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked lower than
65% of the 763 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 0.93 vs. SEIC: 1.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
SEIC' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.16  Med: 0.87 Max: 2.16
Current: 1.07
0.16
2.16
Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value 1.96
SEIC's Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value is ranked lower than
79% of the 95 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 0.93 vs. SEIC: 1.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value only.
SEIC' s Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.75  Med: 1.88 Max: 7.49
Current: 1.96
0.75
7.49
Price-to-Graham-Number 2.25
SEIC's Price-to-Graham-Number is ranked lower than
81% of the 691 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 0.87 vs. SEIC: 2.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Graham-Number only.
SEIC' s Price-to-Graham-Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.39  Med: 2.9 Max: 9.4
Current: 2.25
1.39
9.4
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 8.42
SEIC's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
68% of the 1023 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 3.20 vs. SEIC: 8.42 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
SEIC' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.7  Med: 8.5 Max: 20.3
Current: 8.42
4.7
20.3
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % 12.75
SEIC's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked higher than
58% of the 337 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 8.21 vs. SEIC: 12.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
SEIC' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.5  Med: 12.6 Max: 30.8
Current: 12.75
-2.5
30.8

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $1,624.17
EPS (TTM) $ 3.14
Beta1.14
Volatility23.86%
52-Week Range $42.27 - 78.35
Shares Outstanding (Mil)153.63

Analyst Estimate

Dec19 Dec20
Revenue (Mil $) 1,658 1,760
EBIT (Mil $)
EBITDA (Mil $)
EPS ($) 3.23 3.68
EPS without NRI ($) 3.23 3.68
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
12.00%
Dividends per Share ($) 0.62 0.66

Piotroski F-Score Details

Piotroski F-Score: 77
Positive ROAY
Positive CFROAY
Higher ROA yoyY
CFROA > ROAY
Lower Leverage yoyY
Higher Current Ratio yoyN
Less Shares Outstanding yoyY
Higher Gross Margin yoyY
Higher Asset Turnover yoyN

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}