Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.19
SM's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
63% of the 458 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.64 vs. SM: 0.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
SM' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0.19 Max: No Debt
Current: 0.19
Equity-to-Asset 0.40
SM's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
63% of the 413 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.53 vs. SM: 0.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
SM' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.19  Med: 0.49 Max: 0.83
Current: 0.4
0.19
0.83
Debt-to-Equity 1.16
SM's Debt-to-Equity is ranked lower than
73% of the 284 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.51 vs. SM: 1.16 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-Equity only.
SM' s Debt-to-Equity Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.01  Med: 0.32 Max: 1.93
Current: 1.16
0.01
1.93
Piotroski F-Score: 6
Altman Z-Score: 0.59
Beneish M-Score: -3.49
WACC vs ROIC
11.38%
-3.80%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % -23.17
SM's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
53% of the 424 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -21.78 vs. SM: -23.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
SM' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -87.01  Med: 14.61 Max: 46.22
Current: -23.17
-87.01
46.22
Net Margin % -23.44
SM's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
53% of the 422 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -26.96 vs. SM: -23.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
SM' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -62.24  Med: 7.08 Max: 26.41
Current: -23.44
-62.24
26.41
ROE % -13.29
SM's ROE % is ranked lower than
62% of the 413 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -8.01 vs. SM: -13.29 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
SM' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -34.84  Med: 9.97 Max: 34.21
Current: -13.29
-34.84
34.21
ROA % -4.82
SM's ROA % is ranked higher than
53% of the 498 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -6.75 vs. SM: -4.82 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
SM' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -12.61  Med: 3.58 Max: 11.91
Current: -4.82
-12.61
11.91
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % -5.46
SM's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
50% of the 470 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -7.27 vs. SM: -5.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
SM' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -18.55  Med: 8.61 Max: 24.85
Current: -5.46
-18.55
24.85
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -22.20
SM's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
51% of the 364 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -21.40 vs. SM: -22.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
SM' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -22.2  Med: 16.9 Max: 47.3
Current: -22.2
-22.2
47.3
GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Signs with SM Energy Co $SM.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» SM's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-11-03 Est.)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q3 2016

SM Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Jim Simons 603,400 sh (+165.58%)
Steven Cohen 188,511 sh (+88.51%)
Sarah Ketterer 2,272,203 sh (+7.89%)
FPA Capital Fund -500 sh (unchged)
Paul Tudor Jones 7,446 sh (-23.97%)
FPA Capital Fund 363,133 sh (-30.15%)
First Pacific Advisors 645,659 sh (-33.03%)
Jeremy Grantham 26,458 sh (-81.98%)
Arnold Schneider 156,969 sh (-89.70%)
» More
Q4 2016

SM Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Keeley Asset Management Corp 136,027 sh (New)
Caxton Associates 42,673 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 1,281,340 sh (+579.72%)
Paul Tudor Jones 17,885 sh (+140.20%)
Arnold Schneider Sold Out
Jim Simons Sold Out
Jeremy Grantham 25,358 sh (-4.16%)
Sarah Ketterer 2,093,434 sh (-7.87%)
First Pacific Advisors 568,673 sh (-11.92%)
FPA Capital Fund 299,413 sh (-17.55%)
» More
Q1 2017

SM Guru Trades in Q1 2017

Jim Simons 133,700 sh (New)
Sarah Ketterer 6,909,664 sh (+230.06%)
First Pacific Advisors 915,253 sh (+60.95%)
FPA Capital Fund 464,453 sh (+55.12%)
Jeremy Grantham 28,358 sh (+11.83%)
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Caxton Associates Sold Out
Steven Cohen 605,000 sh (-52.78%)
» More
Q2 2017

SM Guru Trades in Q2 2017

Jim Simons 737,000 sh (+451.23%)
First Pacific Advisors 1,724,380 sh (+88.40%)
FPA Capital Fund 837,440 sh (+80.31%)
Sarah Ketterer 9,721,824 sh (+40.70%)
Jeremy Grantham 28,358 sh (unchged)
Steven Cohen 32,800 sh (-94.58%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with SM

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

GuruDate Trades Impact to Portfolio Price Range * (?) Current Price Change from Average Current Shares
FPA Capital Fund 2017-06-30 Add 80.31%1.71%$14.1 - $24.02 $ 16.61-17%837,440
FPA Capital Fund 2017-03-31 Add 55.12%0.79%$20.75 - $36.08 $ 16.61-40%464,453
FPA Capital Fund 2016-12-31 Reduce -17.55%0.45%$30.7 - $41.27 $ 16.61-54%299,413
Keeley Asset Management Corp 2016-12-31 New Buy0.2%$30.7 - $41.27 $ 16.61-54%136,027
Arnold Schneider 2016-12-31 Sold Out 0.98%$30.7 - $41.27 $ 16.61-54%0
FPA Capital Fund 2016-09-30 Reduce -30.15%0.8%$23.99 - $39.49 $ 16.61-48%363,133
Arnold Schneider 2016-09-30 Reduce -89.70%6.92%$23.99 - $39.49 $ 16.61-48%156,969
Premium More recent guru trades are included for Premium Members only!!
Premium More recent guru trades are included for USA Subscribe Members only!!
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - E&P » Oil & Gas E&P    NAICS: 211111    SIC: 1311
Compare:NAS:UPL, NYSE:WLL, NYSE:OAS, NAS:VNOM, NYSE:CPE, NAS:TELL, NYSE:WRD, NAS:CRZO, NAS:XOG, NAS:NEXT, NAS:GPOR, NYSE:MTDR, NYSE:HK, AMEX:PARR, NYSE:JAG, NYSE:EPE, NYSE:DKL, AMEX:REI, AMEX:ERN, NYSE:SD » details
Traded in other countries:SJL.Germany,
Headquarter Location:USA
SM Energy Company is an energy company engaged in the acquisition, exploration, development, and production of oil, gas, and natural gas liquids in onshore North America.

SM Energy is an independent energy company engaged in the acquisition, exploration, development, and production of crude oil and condensate, natural gas, and natural gas liquids. Operating primarily out of the United States, the company actively participates in joint ventures, prospects/leaseholds and drill-to-earn opportunities. The majority of the company's revenue is derived from some of the United States' premier drilling locations. Drilling location interests have been traditionally obtained through oil and gas leases from third parties. SM Energy relies on its fleet of geologists, geophysicists, landmen, and engineers to help extract the full potential out of all properties held.

Guru Investment Theses on SM Energy Co

FPA Capital Comments on SM Energy - Jan 30, 2017

SM Energy (NYSE:SM) also detracted from the Fund’s performance in the quarter by 14 basis points. SM declined in the quarter because the company issued a large secondary offering of stock to help pay for a couple of large properties it acquired in the Permian Basin. We agree with management that the Permian Basin offers very attractive oil and gas properties, but these properties will take a couple of years to develop and start producing cash flow for shareholders. In anticipation of a large equity offering, and after benefitting from the stock’s substantial appreciation during 2016, we had already reduced the Fund’s position in the stock by over 60% before the quarter commenced. Notably, SM was up 75% for the year, even after an approximately 11% decline in the fourth quarter.



From FPA Capital's fourth quarter 2016 commentary.



Check out FPA Capital Fund latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about SM Energy Co

SM Energy Update On Effects Of Hurricane Harvey
SM Energy Schedules Second Quarter 2017 Earnings Release And Call
SM Energy Announces Participation In Upcoming Investor Conferences
SM Energy Announces Operations Update - Increasing Production Guidance And Positive Early Viper Well Results
Sarah Ketterer Gains 4 Stocks in 1st Quarter Guru releases quarterly portfolio
Causeway Capital Management’s Sarah Ketterer (Trades, Portfolio) gained four new stocks in the first quarter. They are Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd. (NYSE:CP), Flowserve Corp. (NYSE:FLS), Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo (NYSE:SBS) and SodaStream International Ltd. (NASDAQ:SODA). Read more...
SM Energy Announces Update On Divestiture Process
FPA Capital Buys Vista Outdoor, Akorn The fund's largest 1st-quarter buys
The FPA Capital Fund (Trades, Portfolio), a Los Angeles-based institutional money management fund, employs a disciplined approach to value investing that seeks superior long-term returns while maintaining a focus on capital preservation. During the first quarter, the fund bought shares of the following stocks: Read more...
FPA Capital Buys 2 Beaten-Down Stocks, Energy in Fourth Quarter Fund buys stocks at low points
FPA Capital released its first portfolio update of 2017, disclosing purchase of two new positions and a raft of oil and gas stocks as it adhered to its guideline of selling equities that approach intrinsic value and buying those with a margin of safety and price discount to intrinsic value. Read more...
SM Energy Declares Semi-Annual Cash Dividend, Announces Participation In IPAA's 23rd OGIS New York Conference, and Schedules First Quarter 2017 Earnings Call
FPA Capital Comments on SM Energy Guru stock highlight
SM Energy (NYSE:SM) also detracted from the Fund’s performance in the quarter by 14 basis points. SM declined in the quarter because the company issued a large secondary offering of stock to help pay for a couple of large properties it acquired in the Permian Basin. We agree with management that the Permian Basin offers very attractive oil and gas properties, but these properties will take a couple of years to develop and start producing cash flow for shareholders. In anticipation of a large equity offering, and after benefitting from the stock’s substantial appreciation during 2016, we had already reduced the Fund’s position in the stock by over 60% before the quarter commenced. Notably, SM was up 75% for the year, even after an approximately 11% decline in the fourth quarter. Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PB Ratio 0.76
SM's PB Ratio is ranked higher than
71% of the 417 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.23 vs. SM: 0.76 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
SM' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.3  Med: 2.37 Max: 7.28
Current: 0.76
0.3
7.28
PS Ratio 1.28
SM's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
78% of the 389 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 3.00 vs. SM: 1.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
SM' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.36  Med: 2.32 Max: 4.68
Current: 1.28
0.36
4.68
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 2.90
SM's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
82% of the 266 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. SM: 2.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
SM' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.57  Med: 4.04 Max: 9.97
Current: 2.9
0.57
9.97
EV-to-EBIT -14.88
SM's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 169 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 14.43 vs. SM: -14.88 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
SM' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -278.7  Med: 8.6 Max: 103.4
Current: -14.88
-278.7
103.4
EV-to-EBITDA 11.22
SM's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
54% of the 263 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. SM: 11.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
SM' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -548.4  Med: 5.6 Max: 16.1
Current: 11.22
-548.4
16.1
EV-to-Revenue 3.43
SM's EV-to-Revenue is ranked higher than
73% of the 413 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 4.88 vs. SM: 3.43 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-Revenue only.
SM' s EV-to-Revenue Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1  Med: 3.1 Max: 5.3
Current: 3.43
1
5.3
Shiller PE Ratio 75.51
SM's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked lower than
77% of the 81 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 16.32 vs. SM: 75.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
SM' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.66  Med: 30.66 Max: 90.47
Current: 75.51
4.66
90.47
Current Ratio 2.21
SM's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
70% of the 484 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.28 vs. SM: 2.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
SM' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.54  Med: 1.12 Max: 4.75
Current: 2.21
0.54
4.75
Quick Ratio 2.21
SM's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
72% of the 483 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.19 vs. SM: 2.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
SM' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.54  Med: 1.12 Max: 4.75
Current: 2.21
0.54
4.75
Days Sales Outstanding 31.47
SM's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
82% of the 376 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 51.71 vs. SM: 31.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
SM' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 23.39  Med: 41.05 Max: 58.67
Current: 31.47
23.39
58.67

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 0.61
SM's Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
90% of the 304 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 3.32 vs. SM: 0.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
SM' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.11  Med: 0.25 Max: 1.21
Current: 0.61
0.11
1.21
Forward Dividend Yield % 0.60
SM's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
94% of the 270 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 3.46 vs. SM: 0.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 0.61
SM's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked lower than
87% of the 408 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 2.74 vs. SM: 0.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
SM' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.11  Med: 0.25 Max: 1.21
Current: 0.61
0.11
1.21
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -18.40
SM's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked lower than
57% of the 364 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -10.80 vs. SM: -18.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
SM' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -18.4  Med: -2.5 Max: 0.9
Current: -18.4
-18.4
0.9

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 0.74
SM's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked higher than
74% of the 390 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.28 vs. SM: 0.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
SM' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.69  Med: 2.2 Max: 7.56
Current: 0.74
0.69
7.56
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.55
SM's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
77% of the 360 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.88 vs. SM: 0.55 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
SM' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.31  Med: 1.18 Max: 2.28
Current: 0.55
0.31
2.28
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % -6.72
SM's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
63% of the 501 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -3.80 vs. SM: -6.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
SM' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -29.3  Med: 6.9 Max: 26.4
Current: -6.72
-29.3
26.4
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % -49.98
SM's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
80% of the 176 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -16.04 vs. SM: -49.98 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
SM' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -105.5  Med: -3.8 Max: 37.2
Current: -49.98
-105.5
37.2

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $1,226.02
EPS (TTM) $ -3.05
Beta3.53
Short Percentage of Float16.55%
52-Week Range $12.29 - 43.09
Shares Outstanding (Mil)111.62

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18 Dec19
Revenue (Mil $) 1,199 1,414 2,374
EPS ($) -1.16 -0.48 2.66
EPS without NRI ($) -1.16 -0.48 2.66
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
N/A
Dividends per Share ($) 0.10 0.10 0.10
» More Articles for SM

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
SM Energy Update On Effects Of Hurricane Harvey Sep 14 2017 
SM Energy Schedules Second Quarter 2017 Earnings Release And Call Jul 12 2017 
SM Energy Announces Participation In Upcoming Investor Conferences Jun 14 2017 
SM Energy Announces Operations Update - Increasing Production Guidance And Positive Early Viper Well Jun 06 2017 
Sarah Ketterer Gains 4 Stocks in 1st Quarter May 19 2017 
SM Energy Announces Update On Divestiture Process May 16 2017 
FPA Capital Buys Vista Outdoor, Akorn Apr 19 2017 
FPA Capital Fund Buys 2 Low in Fourth Quarter Apr 11 2017 
SM Energy Declares Semi-Annual Cash Dividend, Announces Participation In IPAA's 23rd OGIS New York C Mar 31 2017 
FPA Capital Comments on SM Energy Jan 30 2017 

More From Other Websites
SM Energy's (SM) Operations Return to Pre-Harvey Levels Sep 15 2017
Cramer's lightning round: Don't run for Finish Line Sep 14 2017
SM Energy Update On Effects Of Hurricane Harvey Sep 14 2017
SM Energy Co. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bullish Manner : SM-US : September 14, 2017 Sep 14 2017
ETFs with exposure to SM Energy Co. : September 14, 2017 Sep 13 2017
SM Energy Co. :SM-US: Earnings Analysis: Q2, 2017 By the Numbers : September 11, 2017 Sep 11 2017
SM Energy (SM) Down 10.4% Since Earnings Report: Can It Rebound? Sep 05 2017
Here's why one market bear is buying up Nvidia shares Aug 23 2017
Edited Transcript of SM earnings conference call or presentation 4-Aug-17 2:00pm GMT Aug 13 2017
SM Energy (SM) Q2 Earnings Meet Estimates, Revenues Fall Aug 07 2017
Investor Network: SM Energy Company to Host Earnings Call Aug 04 2017
SM Energy Co. – Value Analysis (NYSE:SM) : August 4, 2017 Aug 03 2017
SM Energy Reports Second Quarter Of 2017 Results - Focus On Capital Efficiency Driving Value,... Aug 03 2017
SM Energy Co. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : SM-US : August 3, 2017 Aug 03 2017
Will US Crude Oil Inventories Extend Oil’s Gains? Jul 26 2017
SM Energy Co. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bullish Manner : SM-US : July 20, 2017 Jul 20 2017
Which Energy Stocks Captured Oil’s Gains Last Week? Jul 17 2017
SM Energy Schedules Second Quarter 2017 Earnings Release And Call Jul 12 2017
Is the US Capturing Crude Oil Market Share in China and India? Jul 12 2017
OPEC’s Monthly Report Could Pressure Oil Prices Jul 11 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}