Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.13
TEN's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
79% of the 1245 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 0.53 vs. TEN: 0.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
TEN' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.01  Med: 0.12 Max: 0.27
Current: 0.13
0.01
0.27
Equity-to-Asset 0.15
TEN's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
95% of the 1232 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 0.48 vs. TEN: 0.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
TEN' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.12  Med: 0.07 Max: 0.48
Current: 0.15
-0.12
0.48
Debt-to-Equity 2.10
TEN's Debt-to-Equity is ranked lower than
92% of the 1093 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 0.51 vs. TEN: 2.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-Equity only.
TEN' s Debt-to-Equity Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -305.75  Med: 3.77 Max: 259.4
Current: 2.1
-305.75
259.4
Debt-to-EBITDA 2.17
TEN's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
59% of the 1032 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 2.49 vs. TEN: 2.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-EBITDA only.
TEN' s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.61  Med: 1.98 Max: 4.37
Current: 2.17
1.61
4.37
Interest Coverage 6.31
TEN's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
68% of the 1093 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 16.92 vs. TEN: 6.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
TEN' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.84  Med: 4.75 Max: 7.82
Current: 6.31
0.84
7.82
Piotroski F-Score: 6
Altman Z-Score: 2.24
Beneish M-Score: -1.63
WACC vs ROIC
10.28%
18.54%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 5.11
TEN's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
53% of the 1248 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 5.90 vs. TEN: 5.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
TEN' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.89  Med: 5.46 Max: 6.38
Current: 5.11
1.89
6.38
Net Margin % 2.33
TEN's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
61% of the 1248 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 3.84 vs. TEN: 2.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
TEN' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -7.01  Med: 2.27 Max: 4.22
Current: 2.33
-7.01
4.22
ROE % 32.29
TEN's ROE % is ranked higher than
96% of the 1228 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 8.97 vs. TEN: 32.29 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
TEN' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -557.05  Med: 53.12 Max: 223.58
Current: 32.29
-557.05
223.58
ROA % 4.60
TEN's ROA % is ranked higher than
59% of the 1259 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 4.09 vs. TEN: 4.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
TEN' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -12.93  Med: 4.88 Max: 8.74
Current: 4.6
-12.93
8.74
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 29.05
TEN's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
81% of the 1256 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 14.10 vs. TEN: 29.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
TEN' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.81  Med: 35.31 Max: 42.18
Current: 29.05
7.81
42.18
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate 8.70
TEN's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
71% of the 1190 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 3.80 vs. TEN: 8.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
TEN' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -42.9  Med: 3.6 Max: 12.3
Current: 8.7
-42.9
12.3
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate 2.20
TEN's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
61% of the 1101 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 6.70 vs. TEN: 2.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
TEN' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -51.3  Med: 2.3 Max: 17.2
Current: 2.2
-51.3
17.2
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate 2.40
TEN's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked lower than
59% of the 987 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 7.20 vs. TEN: 2.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
TEN' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0 Max: 67.7
Current: 2.4
0
67.7
GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Signs with Tenneco Inc TEN.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» TEN's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2019-02-07 Est.)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q4 2017

TEN Guru Trades in Q4 2017

FPA Capital Fund 97,230 sh (New)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 28,440 sh (New)
First Pacific Advisors 250,893 sh (New)
Columbia Wanger 626,230 sh (+29.28%)
Mario Gabelli 724,496 sh (+1.73%)
Joel Greenblatt Sold Out
Steven Cohen Sold Out
Jim Simons Sold Out
Paul Singer Sold Out
David Dreman 781 sh (-85.50%)
Jeremy Grantham 52,900 sh (-1.12%)
Paul Tudor Jones 8,159 sh (-50.95%)
Diamond Hill Capital 503,914 sh (-2.24%)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 95,446 sh (-14.01%)
Scott Black 38,462 sh (-0.83%)
» More
Q1 2018

TEN Guru Trades in Q1 2018

Joel Greenblatt 147,906 sh (New)
Chuck Royce 323 sh (New)
FPA Capital Fund 147,270 sh (+51.47%)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 28,869 sh (+1.51%)
Jeremy Grantham 75,500 sh (+42.72%)
Paul Tudor Jones 9,534 sh (+16.85%)
First Pacific Advisors 370,626 sh (+47.72%)
Diamond Hill Capital 505,224 sh (+0.26%)
Mario Gabelli 739,874 sh (+2.12%)
David Dreman 781 sh (unchged)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 95,385 sh (-0.06%)
Scott Black 35,950 sh (-6.53%)
» More
Q2 2018

TEN Guru Trades in Q2 2018

Jim Simons 22,000 sh (New)
FPA Capital Fund 190,944 sh (+29.66%)
Joel Greenblatt 183,312 sh (+23.94%)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 74,779 sh (+159.03%)
Chuck Royce 672 sh (+108.05%)
Paul Tudor Jones 20,381 sh (+113.77%)
First Pacific Advisors 504,965 sh (+36.25%)
Diamond Hill Capital 527,119 sh (+4.33%)
Jeremy Grantham 48,583 sh (-35.65%)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 95,236 sh (-0.16%)
Mario Gabelli 736,214 sh (-0.49%)
Scott Black 35,084 sh (-2.41%)
» More
Q3 2018

TEN Guru Trades in Q3 2018

Pioneer Investments 29,398 sh (New)
Chuck Royce 1,194 sh (+77.68%)
Jim Simons 161,800 sh (+635.45%)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 111,724 sh (+49.41%)
FPA Capital Fund Sold Out
First Pacific Advisors Sold Out
Jeremy Grantham Sold Out
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Mario Gabelli 714,024 sh (-3.01%)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 85,749 sh (-9.96%)
Diamond Hill Capital 526,510 sh (-0.12%)
Scott Black 29,045 sh (-17.21%)
Joel Greenblatt 182,030 sh (-0.70%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with TEN

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

Guru Date Action
Impact Price Range
(Average)*
Change from Average Comment Current Shares
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Autos » Auto Parts    NAICS: 336390    SIC: 3714
Compare:SZSE:300176, NSE:WABCOINDIA, MEX:NEMAK A, NYSE:CPS, SHSE:603305, NAS:DORM, SHSE:601689, XTER:LEO, XTER:SHA, TSE:5991, SHSE:603730, XKRX:204320, BOM:504973, NSE:ENDURANCE, SHSE:600715, LSE:TIFS, TSE:7313, NSE:SUNDRMFAST, TSE:6995, NAS:MNRO » details
Traded in other countries:TNN.Germany,
Headquarter Location:USA
Tenneco Inc produces clean air and ride performance products and systems for light vehicle, commercial truck, off-highway and other vehicle applications. It serves original equipment vehicle manufacturers and repair and replacement markets or aftermarket.

Tenneco's emissions-control products meet strict air-quality legislation, optimize engine performance, improve fuel economy, and acoustically tune engine sound to fit a vehicle's profile. Ride-control products enhance safety by enabling improved steering, braking, and acceleration as well as improving ride comfort. Walker, Monroe, and Clevite are some of Tenneco's well-known aftermarket brands.

Guru Investment Theses on Tenneco Inc

FPA Capital Comments on Tenneco - Jul 26, 2018

Tenneco (NYSE:TEN) is one of the cheapest auto parts supplier stocks in the market today, trading at about 4.0x next 12-month EBITDA. Peers trade at much higher multiples -- nearly 7x next 12-month EBITDA, reflecting investor fear that Tenneco's exposure to the internal combustion engine (ICE) will ultimately send its business into a long-term secular decline.



We believe investors are missing a few critical points:




  • Many market participants worry about pure battery-based powertrains (where TEN has no content) taking market share. But even if those vehicles garner a 10% market share, Tenneco could still have content on 90% of vehicles sold.




  • More stringent regulation (already in place) will continue to increase Tenneco's content per vehicle each year over the next decade.




  • Tenneco's Ride Performance & Aftermarket businesses (nearly 40% of EBIT) are largely agnostic to powertrain choice.



Over the last three years, management expressed confidence in the business by buying back stock (nearly 20% of shares outstanding) and routinely reiterated the points we made above. But the market continued to focus on secular decline worries, ignored content/vehicle growth, and would not assign a higher multiple to the secularly growing and less cyclical Ride Performance & Aftermarket businesses. We were left with a situation where earnings were expanding, but the multiple was contracting.



Doing more of the same was not an option. In order for each business to be appropriately valued, Tenneco needed to be split up so the secularly growing and stickier Ride Performance & Aftermarket businesses would be valued separately from the Clean Air business. Furthermore, with a simpler story, the Clean Air business could focus on returning its very strong cash flows to shareholders, potentially attracting a more value-oriented investor base.



Unfortunately, each business was too small to independently support its own public company cost structure, so alternatives needed to be explored. The recently announced Federal Mogul transaction allowed the separate businesses to get enough scale to profitably operate independently. Tenneco paid 5.4x EBITDA (including synergies), which we view as a fair price. While the deal does add leverage above levels we like to see from an auto parts supplier, management is focused on reducing leverage rapidly and has established reasonable targets for each business. Furthermore, we take solace in the debt term structure, which avoids material maturities until 2022.



In our view, the Federal Mogul transaction provides an opportunity for a substantial multiple rerating of both businesses, as capital allocation decisions to maximize FCF and shareholder returns can be prioritized in one business, while reinvestment in growth can be prioritized in the other.



As with any deal, we would always like to see a cheaper purchase price and less advantage used, but we believe this deal is a stepping stone toward long-term value creation.



From FPA Capital's second quarter 2018 shareholder letter.



Check out FPA Capital Fund latest stock trades

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 6.22
TEN's PE Ratio is ranked higher than
82% of the 1032 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 15.55 vs. TEN: 6.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
TEN' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.22  Med: 13.56 Max: 72.69
Current: 6.22
6.22
72.69
Forward PE Ratio 3.83
TEN's Forward PE Ratio is ranked higher than
91% of the 201 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 10.89 vs. TEN: 3.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 6.22
TEN's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked higher than
83% of the 1039 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 15.71 vs. TEN: 6.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
TEN' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.22  Med: 13.56 Max: 72.69
Current: 6.22
6.22
72.69
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 14.99
TEN's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked higher than
71% of the 570 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 18.64 vs. TEN: 14.99 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
TEN' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.76  Med: 21.11 Max: 332.43
Current: 14.99
1.76
332.43
PB Ratio 1.94
TEN's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
79% of the 1218 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.45 vs. TEN: 1.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
TEN' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.36  Med: 6.19 Max: 444.58
Current: 1.94
0.36
444.58
PS Ratio 0.15
TEN's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
87% of the 1225 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 0.78 vs. TEN: 0.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
TEN' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.01  Med: 0.32 Max: 0.5
Current: 0.15
0.01
0.5
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 11.18
TEN's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
74% of the 486 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 17.77 vs. TEN: 11.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
TEN' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.71  Med: 24.13 Max: 139.89
Current: 11.18
5.71
139.89
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 2.86
TEN's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
86% of the 734 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 10.35 vs. TEN: 2.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
TEN' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.28  Med: 6.32 Max: 17.3
Current: 2.86
0.28
17.3
EV-to-EBIT 7.74
TEN's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
82% of the 1071 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 12.56 vs. TEN: 7.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
TEN' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6  Med: 9.4 Max: 68.8
Current: 7.74
6
68.8
EV-to-EBITDA 5.11
TEN's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
86% of the 1129 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 9.72 vs. TEN: 5.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
TEN' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.7  Med: 6.05 Max: 10.5
Current: 5.11
3.7
10.5
EV-to-Revenue 0.37
TEN's EV-to-Revenue is ranked higher than
87% of the 1234 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 0.98 vs. TEN: 0.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-Revenue only.
TEN' s EV-to-Revenue Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.2  Med: 0.5 Max: 0.6
Current: 0.37
0.2
0.6
PEG Ratio 1.35
TEN's PEG Ratio is ranked lower than
61% of the 659 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.43 vs. TEN: 1.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG Ratio only.
TEN' s PEG Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.69  Med: 1.57 Max: 40.41
Current: 1.35
0.69
40.41
Shiller PE Ratio 11.46
TEN's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked lower than
54% of the 416 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 20.26 vs. TEN: 11.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
TEN' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.48  Med: 53.94 Max: 554.5
Current: 11.46
0.48
554.5
Current Ratio 0.79
TEN's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
89% of the 1238 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.52 vs. TEN: 0.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
TEN' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.79  Med: 1.26 Max: 1.81
Current: 0.79
0.79
1.81
Quick Ratio 0.41
TEN's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
89% of the 1238 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.08 vs. TEN: 0.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
TEN' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.41  Med: 0.87 Max: 1.23
Current: 0.41
0.41
1.23
Days Inventory 31.47
TEN's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
84% of the 1215 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 61.24 vs. TEN: 31.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
TEN' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 31.47  Med: 36.42 Max: 44.32
Current: 31.47
31.47
44.32
Days Sales Outstanding 52.05
TEN's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 1222 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 64.43 vs. TEN: 52.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
TEN' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.78  Med: 46.79 Max: 52.05
Current: 52.05
2.78
52.05
Days Payable 76.93
TEN's Days Payable is ranked higher than
66% of the 1204 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 61.95 vs. TEN: 76.93 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
TEN' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 56.95  Med: 72.76 Max: 79.66
Current: 76.93
56.95
79.66

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 3.59
TEN's Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
54% of the 1520 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 2.17 vs. TEN: 3.59 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
TEN' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.38  Med: 1.75 Max: 3.59
Current: 3.59
0.38
3.59
Dividend Payout Ratio 0.22
TEN's Dividend Payout Ratio is ranked higher than
65% of the 920 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 0.26 vs. TEN: 0.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout Ratio only.
TEN' s Dividend Payout Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.22  Med: 0.26 Max: 0.26
Current: 0.22
0.22
0.26
Forward Dividend Yield % 3.59
TEN's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
52% of the 1487 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 2.41 vs. TEN: 3.59 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 3.59
TEN's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked lower than
56% of the 1498 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 2.80 vs. TEN: 3.59 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
TEN' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.38  Med: 1.73 Max: 3.62
Current: 3.59
0.38
3.62
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio 5.60
TEN's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
97% of the 677 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: -2.00 vs. TEN: 5.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
TEN' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -81  Med: -2.4 Max: 5.6
Current: 5.6
-81
5.6

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 2.14
TEN's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
76% of the 1176 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.63 vs. TEN: 2.14 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
TEN' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.06  Med: 7.22 Max: 176.99
Current: 2.14
0.06
176.99
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 0.70
TEN's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked higher than
62% of the 717 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.23 vs. TEN: 0.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
TEN' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.54  Med: 2.39 Max: 44.76
Current: 0.7
0.54
44.76
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.46
TEN's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
81% of the 1171 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.02 vs. TEN: 0.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
TEN' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.04  Med: 0.71 Max: 1.52
Current: 0.46
0.04
1.52
Price-to-Graham-Number 0.77
TEN's Price-to-Graham-Number is ranked higher than
52% of the 951 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.17 vs. TEN: 0.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Graham-Number only.
TEN' s Price-to-Graham-Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.77  Med: 2.15 Max: 15.68
Current: 0.77
0.77
15.68
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 12.92
TEN's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
85% of the 1257 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 6.90 vs. TEN: 12.92 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
TEN' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.5  Med: 10.7 Max: 16.8
Current: 12.92
1.5
16.8
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % 12.80
TEN's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked higher than
56% of the 849 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 8.28 vs. TEN: 12.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
TEN' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -91.7  Med: 8.9 Max: 20.1
Current: 12.8
-91.7
20.1

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $9,874.00
EPS (TTM) $ 4.47
Beta1.82
Volatility26.90%
52-Week Range $27.50 - 65.59
Shares Outstanding (Mil)80.88

Analyst Estimate

Dec18 Dec19 Dec20
Revenue (Mil $) 11,787 18,406 18,954
EBIT (Mil $) 750 1,228 1,334
EBITDA (Mil $) 1,061 1,798 1,989
EPS ($) 6.10 7.74 8.55
EPS without NRI ($) 6.10 7.74 8.55
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
3.91%
Dividends per Share ($) 1.00 1.00 1.00

Piotroski F-Score Details

Piotroski F-Score: 66
Positive ROAY
Positive CFROAY
Higher ROA yoyY
CFROA > ROAY
Lower Leverage yoyY
Higher Current Ratio yoyN
Less Shares Outstanding yoyY
Higher Gross Margin yoyN
Higher Asset Turnover yoyN

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}