GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Technology » Software » Sino Payments Inc (OTCPK:SNPY) » Definitions » Debt-to-EBITDA

Sino Payments (Sino Payments) Debt-to-EBITDA : -10.00 (As of Sep. 2023)


View and export this data going back to . Start your Free Trial

What is Sino Payments Debt-to-EBITDA?

Debt-to-EBITDA measures a company's ability to pay off its debt.

Sino Payments's Short-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation for the quarter that ended in Sep. 2023 was $1.45 Mil. Sino Payments's Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation for the quarter that ended in Sep. 2023 was $0.99 Mil. Sino Payments's annualized EBITDA for the quarter that ended in Sep. 2023 was $-0.24 Mil. Sino Payments's annualized Debt-to-EBITDA for the quarter that ended in Sep. 2023 was -10.00.

A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt. According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.

The historical rank and industry rank for Sino Payments's Debt-to-EBITDA or its related term are showing as below:

SNPY' s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.55   Med: 0.38   Max: 2.74
Current: -7.75

During the past 13 years, the highest Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio of Sino Payments was 2.74. The lowest was -0.55. And the median was 0.38.

SNPY's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked worse than
100% of 1628 companies
in the Software industry
Industry Median: 1.06 vs SNPY: -7.75

Sino Payments Debt-to-EBITDA Historical Data

The historical data trend for Sino Payments's Debt-to-EBITDA can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

Sino Payments Debt-to-EBITDA Chart

Sino Payments Annual Data
Trend Aug13 Dec14 Dec15 Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22
Debt-to-EBITDA
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 0.01 2.74 0.96 0.38 2.39

Sino Payments Quarterly Data
Dec18 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Mar20 Jun20 Sep20 Dec20 Mar21 Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23
Debt-to-EBITDA Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only -3.67 2.84 -2.58 -4.97 -10.00

Competitive Comparison of Sino Payments's Debt-to-EBITDA

For the Information Technology Services subindustry, Sino Payments's Debt-to-EBITDA, along with its competitors' market caps and Debt-to-EBITDA data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Sino Payments's Debt-to-EBITDA Distribution in the Software Industry

For the Software industry and Technology sector, Sino Payments's Debt-to-EBITDA distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Sino Payments's Debt-to-EBITDA falls into.



Sino Payments Debt-to-EBITDA Calculation

Debt-to-EBITDA measures a company's ability to pay off its debt.

Sino Payments's Debt-to-EBITDA for the fiscal year that ended in Dec. 2022 is calculated as

Debt-to-EBITDA=Total Debt / EBITDA
=(Short-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation + Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation) / EBITDA
=(1.463 + 0.16) / 0.678
=2.39

Sino Payments's annualized Debt-to-EBITDA for the quarter that ended in Sep. 2023 is calculated as

Debt-to-EBITDA=Total Debt / EBITDA
=(Short-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation + Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation) / EBITDA
=(1.448 + 0.992) / -0.244
=-10.00

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

In the calculation of annual Debt-to-EBITDA, the EBITDA of the last fiscal year is used. In calculating the annualized quarterly data, the EBITDA data used here is four times the quarterly (Sep. 2023) EBITDA data.


Sino Payments  (OTCPK:SNPY) Debt-to-EBITDA Explanation

In the calculation of Debt-to-EBITDA, we use the total of Short-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation and Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation divided by EBITDA. In some calculations, Total Liabilities is used to for calculation.


Be Aware

A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt.

According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.


Sino Payments Debt-to-EBITDA Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of Sino Payments's Debt-to-EBITDA provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


Sino Payments (Sino Payments) Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
Address
Shatin Industrial Centre, 5-7 Yuen Shun Circuit, Unit 02-03, 6th Floor, Block B, Shatin, Hong Kong, HKG
Value Exchange International Inc is a United States based software company. The company through its subsidiaries provides customer-centric hardware and software system solutions for the retail industry in China, Hong Kong, and Philippines. Its primary services and products of the IT Business are Systems maintenance and related service and Systems development and integration. The company serves Public and Retail sector. It get majority of its revenue from software development and maintenance services.
Executives
Matthew R Mecke director 6501 RED HOOK PLZA, STE 201-553, ST THOMAS VI 00802
Johan Pehrson director C/O JOHAN PEHRSON, HALMSTAD V7 30259
Tsang Po Yee Bella director, 10 percent owner 7/F DARTON TOWER, 142 WAI YIP ST, KWUN TONG, KOWLOON K3 00000
Chun Wing Yeung director 7/F DARTON TOWER, 142 WAI YIP ST, KWUN TONG, KOWLOON K3 00000
Seng Wee Tan director, 10 percent owner 7/F DARTON TOWER, 142 WAI YIP ST, KWUN TONG, KOWLOON K3 00000
Anthony Robinson director UNIT T25, GF BANGKOK BANK BUILDING, 18 BONHAM STRAND WEST, SHEUNG WAN K3 00000
Paul F. Manning director UNIT T25, GF BANGKOK BANK BUILDING, 18 BONHAM STRAND WEST, SHEUNG WAN K3 00000