GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Industrials » Industrial Products » Pall Corporation (BUE:PLL) » Definitions » EBITDA per Share

Pall (BUE:PLL) EBITDA per Share : ARS40.03 (TTM As of Apr. 2015)


View and export this data going back to . Start your Free Trial

What is Pall EBITDA per Share?

Pall's EBITDA per Share for the three months ended in Apr. 2015 was ARS9.81. Its EBITDA per Share for the trailing twelve months (TTM) ended in Apr. 2015 was ARS40.03.

During the past 12 months, the average EBITDA per Share Growth Rate of Pall was 18.40% per year. During the past 3 years, the average EBITDA per Share Growth Rate was 4.90% per year. During the past 5 years, the average EBITDA per Share Growth Rate was 9.30% per year. During the past 10 years, the average EBITDA per Share Growth Rate was 8.30% per year. Please click Growth Rate Calculation Example (GuruFocus) to see how GuruFocus calculates Wal-Mart Stores Inc (WMT)'s revenue growth rate. You can apply the same method to get the EBITDA per Share growth rate using EBITDA per Share data.

The historical rank and industry rank for Pall's EBITDA per Share or its related term are showing as below:

BUE:PLL' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -19.7   Med: 8.15   Max: 22.4
Current: 4.9

During the past 13 years, the highest 3-Year average EBITDA per Share Growth Rate of Pall was 22.40% per year. The lowest was -19.70% per year. And the median was 8.15% per year.

BUE:PLL's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is not ranked
in the Industrial Products industry.
Industry Median: 10.5 vs BUE:PLL: 4.90

Pall's EBITDA for the three months ended in Apr. 2015 was ARS1,064.64 Mil.

During the past 12 months, the average EBITDA Growth Rate of Pall was 15.50% per year. During the past 3 years, the average EBITDA Growth Rate was 3.00% per year. During the past 5 years, the average EBITDA Growth Rate was 7.90% per year. During the past 10 years, the average EBITDA Growth Rate was 7.00% per year. Please click Growth Rate Calculation Example (GuruFocus) to see how GuruFocus calculates Wal-Mart Stores Inc (WMT)'s revenue growth rate. You can apply the same method to get the EBITDA Growth Rate using EBITDA data.

During the past 13 years, the highest 3-Year average EBITDA Growth Rate of Pall was 21.80% per year. The lowest was -17.50% per year. And the median was 7.75% per year.


Pall EBITDA per Share Historical Data

The historical data trend for Pall's EBITDA per Share can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

Pall EBITDA per Share Chart

Pall Annual Data
Trend Jul05 Jul06 Jul07 Jul08 Jul09 Jul10 Jul11 Jul12 Jul13 Jul14
EBITDA per Share
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 14.63 18.98 19.66 25.71 43.17

Pall Quarterly Data
Jul10 Oct10 Jan11 Apr11 Jul11 Oct11 Jan12 Apr12 Jul12 Oct12 Jan13 Apr13 Jul13 Oct13 Jan14 Apr14 Jul14 Oct14 Jan15 Apr15
EBITDA per Share Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 7.81 11.52 9.68 9.01 9.81

Pall EBITDA per Share Calculation

EBITDA per Share is the amount of Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) per outstanding share of the company's stock.

Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) is what the company earns before it expenses interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.

Pall's EBITDA per Share for the fiscal year that ended in Jul. 2014 is calculated as

EBITDA per Share(A: Jul. 2014 )
=EBITDA/Shares Outstanding (Diluted Average)
=4832.328/111.949
=43.17

Pall's EBITDA per Share for the quarter that ended in Apr. 2015 is calculated as

EBITDA per Share(Q: Apr. 2015 )
=EBITDA/Shares Outstanding (Diluted Average)
=1064.637/108.557
=9.81

EBITDA per Share for the trailing twelve months (TTM) ended in Apr. 2015 adds up the quarterly data reported by the company within the most recent 12 months, which was ARS40.03

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.


Pall  (BUE:PLL) EBITDA per Share Explanation

EBITDA is a cash flow measure that ignores changes in working capital. EBITDA minus Depreciation, and Amortization (DA) equals EBIT. EBIT is profit before interest and taxes. Of course, Interest and taxes need to be paid.

While depreciation and amortization expenses do not need to be paid in cash, assets - especially tangible assets - do need to be replaced over time. EBITDA is not a measure of profit in any sense. EBITDA is a measure of cash generation by a business where the uses of that cash may be more or less discretionary depending on the nature of the business.

The EBITDA of a TV station is largely discretionary. Owners may use much of the EBITDA generated by a TV station as they see fit. The EBITDA of a railroad is largely non-discretionary. Owners must use much of the EBITDA generated by a railroad to replace the physical assets of the railroad or the business will literally fall apart over time.

EBITDA can be thought of as the cash a business generates that is available to:

Add more inventory
Add more receivables
Replace property, plant, and equipment
Add more property, plant, and equipment
Pay interest
Pay taxes
And finally: pay owners

EBITDA is widely used in financial analysis because Depreciation and Amortization are not present day cash expenses. Depreciation and amortization are the spreading out of the costs of assets over the time in which those assets provide benefits. Today's depreciation and amortization expenses relate to assets bought in the past. The assets being expensed may or may not need to be replaced in the future. And the cost to replace the assets may be more or less than it was in the past. For this reason, the depreciation and amortization expenses a company records in the present year may have no relationship to the actual cash costs needed to maintain its assets in future years.

A company's depreciation expense depends on both its expectations about the assets it owns and its choice of accounting methods. Two companies owning identical assets may have different depreciation expenses because they have different expectations about the useful lives of those assets and because they make different accounting choices.

Analysts use EBITDA to remove this element of personal choice from a company's accounting statements. The use of EBITDA is an attempt to make the results of different companies more comparable and uniform.


Be Aware

Although depreciation is not a cash cost, it is a real business cost because the company has to pay for the fixed assets when they purchase them. Both Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger hate the idea of EBITDA because in this calculation, depreciation is not counted as an expense.

EBITDA over Revenue is a good metric for comparing the operating efficiencies between companies because EBITDA is less vulnerable to companies' accounting choices. For this reason, EBITDA is used in ranking the Predictability of Companies.


Pall EBITDA per Share Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of Pall's EBITDA per Share provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


Pall (BUE:PLL) Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
N/A
Address
Pall Corporation is a New York corporation incorporated on July 31, 1946. The Company supplies filtration, separation and purification technologies. Its products are used to remove solid, liquid and gaseous contaminants from a variety of liquids and gases. Its serves its customers through two businesses: Life Sciences and Industrial. The Life Sciences business group is engaged in developing, manufacturing and selling products to customers in the BioPharmaceutical, Food & Beverage and Medical markets. The Industrial business group is engaged in developing, manufacturing and selling products to customers in the Process Technologies, Aerospace and Microelectronics markets. The Life Sciences technologies facilitate the process of drug discovery, development, regulatory validation and production, and are used in research laboratories, and the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. It also supplies products and technologies for food and beverage industries and in hospitals at the point of patient care. The Industrial segment provides enabling and process-enhancing technologies throughout the industrial marketplace. These include the Process Technologies, Aerospace and Microelectronics markets. It has the capability to provide customers with integrated solutions using its proprietary consumable filtration products for their process fluids. The Company's competition varies by product and application. Its competitors in the BioPharmaceuticals market include Merck Millipore (a division of Merck KGaA), The Sartorius Group and GE Healthcare (a unit of General Electric Company ("GE")). Its competitors in the Food & Beverage market include 3M Purification, Pentair, Inc., Filtrox Group, The Sartorius Group, Eaton Corporation and Parker Domnick Hunter (a division of Parker Hannifin). Its competitors in the Medical market include Merck Millipore, GE Healthcare, Teleflex Incorporated, Covidien plc and Intersurgical, Ltd. Its competitors in the Process Technologies market include CLARCOR Inc., Donaldson Company, Inc., Parker Hannifin Corporation, HYDAC International GmbH, GE Infrastructure (a unit of GE), Pentair, Inc., 3M Purification, U.S. Filter (a unit of Siemens AG) and ESCO Technologies Inc. Its competitors in the Aerospace market include Donaldson Company, Inc. and ESCO Technologies Inc. Its competitors in the Microelectronics market include Entegris, Inc., Parker Hannifin Corporation and Mott Corporation. The Company is subject to competition in all of the global markets in which it operates.