GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Consumer Defensive » Consumer Packaged Goods » Flowerkist Skin Care & Cosmetics Inc (OTCPK:FKST) » Definitions » Piotroski F-Score

Flowerkist Skin Caresmetics (Flowerkist Skin Caresmetics) Piotroski F-Score : 0 (As of May. 25, 2024)


View and export this data going back to 2015. Start your Free Trial

What is Flowerkist Skin Caresmetics Piotroski F-Score?

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Flowerkist Skin Caresmetics has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Flowerkist Skin Caresmetics's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:


Flowerkist Skin Caresmetics Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for Flowerkist Skin Caresmetics's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

Flowerkist Skin Caresmetics Piotroski F-Score Chart

Flowerkist Skin Caresmetics Annual Data
Trend Jul14 Jul15 Jul16 Jul17 Jul18 Jul19 Jul20 Dec21
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Flowerkist Skin Caresmetics Quarterly Data
Apr14 Jul14 Oct14 Jan15 Apr15 Jul15 Oct15 Jan16 Jul16 Jul17 Jul18 Jul19 Jul20 Mar21 Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Sep22) TTM:Last Year (Sep21) TTM:
Net Income was -0.002 + -0.022 + 0 + -0.016 = $-0.04 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.
Revenue was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Sep21)
to the end of this year (Sep22) was
(0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0) / 5 = $0 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Sep21) was $0.00 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $0.00 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $0.02 Mil.
Net Income was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.

Revenue was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Jul19)
to the end of last year (Sep21) was
(0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0) / 5 = $0 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Jul19) was $0.00 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $0.00 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $0.00 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Flowerkist Skin Caresmetics's current Net Income (TTM) was -0.04. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Flowerkist Skin Caresmetics's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 0.00. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Sep21)
=-0.04/0
=

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jul19)
=0/0
=

Flowerkist Skin Caresmetics's return on assets of this year was . Flowerkist Skin Caresmetics's return on assets of last year was . ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Flowerkist Skin Caresmetics's current Net Income (TTM) was -0.04. Flowerkist Skin Caresmetics's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 0.00. ==> 0.00 > -0.04 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Flowerkist Skin Caresmetics's gearing of this year was . Flowerkist Skin Caresmetics's gearing of last year was . ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Sep22)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0/0.024
=0

Current Ratio (Last Year: Sep21)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0/0
=

Flowerkist Skin Caresmetics's current ratio of this year was 0. Flowerkist Skin Caresmetics's current ratio of last year was . ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Flowerkist Skin Caresmetics's number of shares in issue this year was 0.13. Flowerkist Skin Caresmetics's number of shares in issue last year was 0.13. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0/0
=

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0/0
=

Flowerkist Skin Caresmetics's gross margin of this year was . Flowerkist Skin Caresmetics's gross margin of last year was . ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Flowerkist Skin Caresmetics's asset turnover of this year was . Flowerkist Skin Caresmetics's asset turnover of last year was . ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+0+0+1+1+0+1+0+0
=3

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Flowerkist Skin Caresmetics has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

Flowerkist Skin Caresmetics  (OTCPK:FKST) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Flowerkist Skin Caresmetics Piotroski F-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of Flowerkist Skin Caresmetics's Piotroski F-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


Flowerkist Skin Caresmetics (Flowerkist Skin Caresmetics) Business Description

Comparable Companies
Traded in Other Exchanges
N/A
Address
1117 State Street, Santa Barbara, CA, USA, 93101
Flowerkist Skin Care & Cosmetics Inc is involved in the Development and contract manufacturing of CBD (0% THC) infused skincare and cosmetics. Marketing and selling these products through various online and targeted channels including Medical SPAs.

Flowerkist Skin Caresmetics (Flowerkist Skin Caresmetics) Headlines

No Headlines