GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Energy » Oil & Gas » Geospace Technologies Corp (NAS:GEOS) » Definitions » Piotroski F-Score

Geospace Technologies (Geospace Technologies) Piotroski F-Score : 7 (As of Apr. 28, 2024)


View and export this data going back to 1997. Start your Free Trial

What is Geospace Technologies Piotroski F-Score?

Good Sign:

Piotroski F-Score is 7, indicates a very healthy situation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Geospace Technologies has an F-score of 7. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Geospace Technologies's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

GEOS' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2   Med: 5   Max: 8
Current: 7

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Geospace Technologies was 8. The lowest was 2. And the median was 5.


Geospace Technologies Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for Geospace Technologies's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

Geospace Technologies Piotroski F-Score Chart

Geospace Technologies Annual Data
Trend Sep14 Sep15 Sep16 Sep17 Sep18 Sep19 Sep20 Sep21 Sep22 Sep23
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 7.00 4.00 4.00 6.00 7.00

Geospace Technologies Quarterly Data
Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Mar20 Jun20 Sep20 Dec20 Mar21 Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 4.00 6.00 7.00 7.00 7.00

Competitive Comparison of Geospace Technologies's Piotroski F-Score

For the Oil & Gas Equipment & Services subindustry, Geospace Technologies's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Geospace Technologies's Piotroski F-Score Distribution in the Oil & Gas Industry

For the Oil & Gas industry and Energy sector, Geospace Technologies's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Geospace Technologies's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Dec23) TTM:Last Year (Dec22) TTM:
Net Income was 4.637 + 3.228 + 4.438 + 12.679 = $25.0 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -0.214 + 8.206 + 12.43 + 2.652 = $23.1 Mil.
Revenue was 31.37 + 32.715 + 29.315 + 50.032 = $143.4 Mil.
Gross Profit was 12.949 + 13.979 + 14.228 + 22.236 = $63.4 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Dec22)
to the end of this year (Dec23) was
(138.433 + 138.442 + 145.683 + 153.042 + 167.383) / 5 = $148.5966 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Dec22) was $138.4 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.4 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $100.0 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $20.6 Mil.
Net Income was -1.474 + -6.574 + -8.04 + -0.097 = $-16.2 Mil.

Revenue was 24.7 + 20.691 + 25.871 + 31.109 = $102.4 Mil.
Gross Profit was 6.81 + 3.651 + 5.88 + 10.534 = $26.9 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Dec21)
to the end of last year (Dec22) was
(150.533 + 145.61 + 142.396 + 135.056 + 138.433) / 5 = $142.4056 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Dec21) was $150.5 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.7 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $68.6 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $15.8 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Geospace Technologies's current Net Income (TTM) was 25.0. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Geospace Technologies's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 23.1. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec22)
=24.982/138.433
=0.18046275

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec21)
=-16.185/150.533
=-0.10751795

Geospace Technologies's return on assets of this year was 0.18046275. Geospace Technologies's return on assets of last year was -0.10751795. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Geospace Technologies's current Net Income (TTM) was 25.0. Geospace Technologies's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 23.1. ==> 23.1 <= 25.0 ==> CFROA <= ROA ==> Score 0.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Dec23)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec22 to Dec23
=0.439/148.5966
=0.00295431

Gearing (Last Year: Dec22)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec21 to Dec22
=0.701/142.4056
=0.00492256

Geospace Technologies's gearing of this year was 0.00295431. Geospace Technologies's gearing of last year was 0.00492256. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Dec23)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=99.993/20.612
=4.85120318

Current Ratio (Last Year: Dec22)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=68.57/15.79
=4.34262191

Geospace Technologies's current ratio of this year was 4.85120318. Geospace Technologies's current ratio of last year was 4.34262191. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Geospace Technologies's number of shares in issue this year was 13.461. Geospace Technologies's number of shares in issue last year was 13.068. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=63.392/143.432
=0.44196553

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=26.875/102.371
=0.26252552

Geospace Technologies's gross margin of this year was 0.44196553. Geospace Technologies's gross margin of last year was 0.26252552. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Dec22)
=143.432/138.433
=1.03611133

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Dec21)
=102.371/150.533
=0.68005686

Geospace Technologies's asset turnover of this year was 1.03611133. Geospace Technologies's asset turnover of last year was 0.68005686. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+1+0+1+1+0+1+1
=7

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Geospace Technologies has an F-score of 7. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

Geospace Technologies  (NAS:GEOS) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Geospace Technologies Piotroski F-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of Geospace Technologies's Piotroski F-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


Geospace Technologies (Geospace Technologies) Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
N/A
Address
7007 Pinemont Drive, Houston, TX, USA, 77040-6601
Geospace Technologies Corp is engaged in designing and manufacturing of seismic instruments and non-seismic equipment used in the oil and gas industry. The company has three different segments: oil and gas markets, adjacent markets, and emerging markets. The oil and gas markets segment, which accounts for the majority of the company's revenue, includes traditional exploration products, wireless exploration products, and reservoir characterization products and services. The adjacent markets business is closely tied to the oil and gas markets and includes imaging products and industrial products. The company operates globally across Asia, Canada, Europe, South America and others with more than half of revenue generated within the United States.
Executives
Gary D Owens director, officer: President & CEO 7007 PINEMONT DRIVE, HOUSTON TX 77040
Walter R. Wheeler officer: Executive Vice President 7007 PINEMONT DRIVE, HOUSTON TX 77040
Robbin B. Adams officer: Executive Vice President 7007 PINEMONT DRIVE, HOUSTON TX 77040
Margaret Ashworth director 6212 PARKHILL DRIVE, ALEXANDRIA VA 22312
Kenneth Asbury director 1100 N. GLEBE ROAD, ARLINGTON VA 22201
Tina M Langtry director 3211 CANYON LINKS DRIVE, KATY TX 77450
Thomas L Davis director COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES-DEPT. OF GEOPHY, 1500 ILLINOISE STREET, GOLDEN CO 80401-1887
William H Moody director 2309 BIRKDALE LANE, KERRVILLE TX 78028
Richard F Miles director 7007 PINEMONT DRIVE, HOUSTON TX 77040
Robert L. Curda officer: Chief Financial Officer 7007 PINEMONT, HOUSTON TX 77040
Giesinger Edgar R. Jr. director 1915 SANDGATE FALLS, HOUSTON TX 77062
Lacey Rice officer: Vice President 2527 BUFFALO TRAIL, SUGAR LAND TX 77479
Thomas T Mcentire officer: Chief Financial Officer 7334 N GESSNER ROAD, HOUSTON TX 77040
Michael J Sheen director, officer: SVP & Chief Technical Officer 7007 PINEMONT DRIVE, HOUSTON TX 77040
Takashi Kanemori director, 10 percent owner OYO CORPORATION, 2-6 KUDAN-KITA 4-CHOME, CHIYODA-KU, TOKYO M0 102-0073

Geospace Technologies (Geospace Technologies) Headlines