GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Consumer Defensive » Consumer Packaged Goods » SeaDragon Ltd (NZSE:SEA) » Definitions » Piotroski F-Score

SeaDragon (NZSE:SEA) Piotroski F-Score : 0 (As of Jun. 05, 2024)


View and export this data going back to 1986. Start your Free Trial

What is SeaDragon Piotroski F-Score?

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

SeaDragon has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for SeaDragon's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:


SeaDragon Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for SeaDragon's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

SeaDragon Piotroski F-Score Chart

SeaDragon Annual Data
Trend Mar11 Mar12 Mar13 Mar14 Mar15 Mar16 Mar17 Mar18 Mar19 Mar20
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 3.00 4.00 3.00 6.00 4.00

SeaDragon Semi-Annual Data
Sep10 Mar11 Sep11 Mar12 Sep12 Mar13 Sep13 Mar14 Sep14 Mar15 Sep15 Mar16 Sep16 Mar17 Sep17 Mar18 Sep18 Mar19 Sep19 Mar20
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 3.00 - 6.00 - 4.00

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar20) TTM:Last Year (Mar19) TTM:
Net Income was NZ$-7.04 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was NZ$-4.38 Mil.
Revenue was NZ$6.63 Mil.
Gross Profit was NZ$-2.82 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar19)
to the end of this year (Mar20) was (11.54 + 10.668) / 2 = NZ$11.104 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar19) was NZ$11.54 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was NZ$1.57 Mil.
Total Current Assets was NZ$2.68 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was NZ$1.84 Mil.
Net Income was NZ$-9.58 Mil.

Revenue was NZ$4.89 Mil.
Gross Profit was NZ$-2.04 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar18)
to the end of last year (Mar19) was (14.805 + 11.54) / 2 = NZ$13.1725 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar18) was NZ$14.81 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was NZ$0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was NZ$3.34 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was NZ$2.47 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

SeaDragon's current Net Income (TTM) was -7.04. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

SeaDragon's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -4.38. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar19)
=-7.038/11.54
=-0.60987868

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar18)
=-9.576/14.805
=-0.64680851

SeaDragon's return on assets of this year was -0.60987868. SeaDragon's return on assets of last year was -0.64680851. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

SeaDragon's current Net Income (TTM) was -7.04. SeaDragon's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -4.38. ==> -4.38 > -7.04 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar20)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar19 to Mar20
=1.568/11.104
=0.14121037

Gearing (Last Year: Mar19)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar18 to Mar19
=0/13.1725
=0

SeaDragon's gearing of this year was 0.14121037. SeaDragon's gearing of last year was 0. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar20)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=2.68/1.841
=1.45573058

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar19)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=3.341/2.466
=1.35482563

SeaDragon's current ratio of this year was 1.45573058. SeaDragon's current ratio of last year was 1.35482563. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

SeaDragon's number of shares in issue this year was 48.433. SeaDragon's number of shares in issue last year was 46.735. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=-2.823/6.625
=-0.42611321

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=-2.041/4.887
=-0.41763863

SeaDragon's gross margin of this year was -0.42611321. SeaDragon's gross margin of last year was -0.41763863. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar19)
=6.625/11.54
=0.57409012

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar18)
=4.887/14.805
=0.33009119

SeaDragon's asset turnover of this year was 0.57409012. SeaDragon's asset turnover of last year was 0.33009119. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+0+1+1+0+1+0+0+1
=4

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

SeaDragon has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

SeaDragon  (NZSE:SEA) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


SeaDragon Piotroski F-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of SeaDragon's Piotroski F-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


SeaDragon (NZSE:SEA) Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
N/A
Address
12 Nayland Road, Stoke, Nelson, NZL, 7011
SeaDragon Ltd is engaged in the manufacture of refined fish oils. The Company's products include Omega-2 and Omega-3. Its Omega-2 product is sourced from either animal or vegetable sources and is used in the cosmetics, nutraceutical, pharmaceutical industries, lubrication and in fiber coatings. The Omega-3 products involve tuna and marine-farmed salmon which help in the processing of initial unrefined oils. The company exports its products to various countries, which include Australia, South East and North Asia, Japan, the European Union, China, the United States and Canada.

SeaDragon (NZSE:SEA) Headlines

From GuruFocus

Wilbur Ross Likes Alcoa, Shipping Industry Due to China

By Bram de Haas Bram de Haas 01-11-2016