GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Healthcare » Drug Manufacturers » Vibe Growth Corp (XCNQ:VIBE) » Definitions » Piotroski F-Score

Vibe Growth (XCNQ:VIBE) Piotroski F-Score : 3 (As of Dec. 14, 2024)


View and export this data going back to 2012. Start your Free Trial

What is Vibe Growth Piotroski F-Score?

Warning Sign:

Piotroski F-Score of 3 is low, which usually implies poor business operation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Vibe Growth has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Vibe Growth's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

XCNQ:VIBE' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1   Med: 4   Max: 7
Current: 3

During the past 12 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Vibe Growth was 7. The lowest was 1. And the median was 4.


Vibe Growth Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for Vibe Growth's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

Vibe Growth Piotroski F-Score Chart

Vibe Growth Annual Data
Trend Jul14 Jul15 Jul16 Jul17 Jul18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 4.00 5.00 4.00 2.00 3.00

Vibe Growth Quarterly Data
Dec19 Mar20 Jun20 Sep20 Dec20 Mar21 Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00

Competitive Comparison of Vibe Growth's Piotroski F-Score

For the Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic subindustry, Vibe Growth's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Vibe Growth's Piotroski F-Score Distribution in the Drug Manufacturers Industry

For the Drug Manufacturers industry and Healthcare sector, Vibe Growth's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Vibe Growth's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Sep24) TTM:Last Year (Sep23) TTM:
Net Income was -9.72 + -0.973 + -0.591 + -0.126 = C$-11.41 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -2.196 + 0.207 + -0.174 + 0.247 = C$-1.92 Mil.
Revenue was 4.104 + 3.997 + 4.214 + 4.423 = C$16.74 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0.447 + 1.723 + 2.222 + 1.804 = C$6.20 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Sep23)
to the end of this year (Sep24) was
(30.341 + 21.84 + 21.31 + 20.823 + 20.645) / 5 = C$22.9918 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Sep23) was C$30.34 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was C$2.74 Mil.
Total Current Assets was C$5.81 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was C$17.32 Mil.
Net Income was -9.068 + -1.572 + -1.857 + -1.815 = C$-14.31 Mil.

Revenue was 5.142 + 5.479 + 4.903 + 4.595 = C$20.12 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0.954 + 2.024 + 1.744 + 2.773 = C$7.50 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Sep22)
to the end of last year (Sep23) was
(42.85 + 35.173 + 33.179 + 31.651 + 30.341) / 5 = C$34.6388 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Sep22) was C$42.85 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was C$3.36 Mil.
Total Current Assets was C$9.78 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was C$14.90 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Vibe Growth's current Net Income (TTM) was -11.41. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Vibe Growth's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -1.92. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Sep23)
=-11.41/30.341
=-0.3760588

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Sep22)
=-14.312/42.85
=-0.33400233

Vibe Growth's return on assets of this year was -0.3760588. Vibe Growth's return on assets of last year was -0.33400233. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Vibe Growth's current Net Income (TTM) was -11.41. Vibe Growth's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -1.92. ==> -1.92 > -11.41 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Sep24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Sep23 to Sep24
=2.739/22.9918
=0.11912943

Gearing (Last Year: Sep23)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Sep22 to Sep23
=3.362/34.6388
=0.09705879

Vibe Growth's gearing of this year was 0.11912943. Vibe Growth's gearing of last year was 0.09705879. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Sep24)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=5.806/17.319
=0.33523876

Current Ratio (Last Year: Sep23)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=9.776/14.899
=0.65615142

Vibe Growth's current ratio of this year was 0.33523876. Vibe Growth's current ratio of last year was 0.65615142. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Vibe Growth's number of shares in issue this year was 10.797. Vibe Growth's number of shares in issue last year was 11.161. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=6.196/16.738
=0.37017565

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=7.495/20.119
=0.37253343

Vibe Growth's gross margin of this year was 0.37017565. Vibe Growth's gross margin of last year was 0.37253343. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Sep23)
=16.738/30.341
=0.55166277

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Sep22)
=20.119/42.85
=0.46952159

Vibe Growth's asset turnover of this year was 0.55166277. Vibe Growth's asset turnover of last year was 0.46952159. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+0+0+1+0+0+1+0+1
=3

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Vibe Growth has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

Vibe Growth  (XCNQ:VIBE) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Vibe Growth Piotroski F-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of Vibe Growth's Piotroski F-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


Vibe Growth Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
Address
997 Seymour Street, Suite 250, Vancouver, BC, CAN, V6B3M1
Vibe Growth Corp is engaged in the evaluation, acquiring, and developing cannabis cultivation, distribution, and manufacturing assets and retail cannabis dispensaries, predominantly in the U.S., in order to become a vertically integrated cannabis operator. The Company currently operates five dispensaries, one distribution and two cultivation operations in the State of California plus one dispensary in Portland, Oregon.
Executives
Hadron Capital (cayman) Limited 10% Security Holder
Michal Jozef Holub Senior Officer
Joseph Starr 10% Security Holder, Senior Officer
Mark William Waldron 10% Security Holder, Director, Senior Officer

Vibe Growth Headlines

No Headlines