Glass House BrandsGLASF -4.16%44 Return-on-Tangible-Asset is -19.98% as of Mar. 2026. GuruFocus rates GLASF with a GF Score™ of 44/100 and a GF Value™ of $6.13 (Significantly Overvalued). The stock has 4 warning signs investors should review. Among 1,003 Drug Manufacturers companies, Glass House Brands ranks worse than 78.46% on this metric.
Return-on-Tangible-Asset is calculated as Net Income divided by its average total tangible assets. Total tangible assets equals to Total Assets minus Intangible Assets. Glass House Brands's annualizedNet Income for the quarter that ended in Mar. 2026 was $-62.0 Mil. Glass House Brands's average total tangible assets for the quarter that ended in Mar. 2026 was $310.4 Mil. Therefore, Glass House Brands's annualized Return-on-Tangible-Asset for the quarter that ended in Mar. 2026 was -19.98%.
The historical rank and industry rank for Glass House Brands's Return-on-Tangible-Asset or its related term are showing as below:
GLASF'
s Return-on-Tangible-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -35.13 Med: -18.75 Max: 0.18
Current: -11.32
During the past 6 years, Glass House Brands's highest Return-on-Tangible-Asset was 0.18%. The lowest was -35.13%. And the median was -18.75%.
GLASF's Return-on-Tangible-Asset is ranked worse than 78.46% of 1003
companies
in the Drug Manufacturers industry
Industry Median: 3.13
vs GLASF: -11.32
Glass House Brands (OTCPK:GLASF) Return-on-Tangible-Asset Explanation
Return-on-Tangible-Asset measures the rate of return on the average total tangible assets (total assets minus intangible assets). Tangible means physical in nature. Intangible Assets are assets that are not physical in nature, and typically "derive their value from legal or intellectual rights." Return-on-Tangible-Asset measures a firm's efficiency at generating profits from its tangible assets. It shows how well a company uses what it has to generate earnings. Return-on-Tangible-Assets can vary drastically across industries. Therefore, Return-on-Tangible-Asset should not be used to compare companies in different industries.
Be Aware
Like ROE and ROA, Return-on-Tangible-Asset is calculated with only 12 months data. Fluctuations in the companys earnings or business cycles can affect the ratio drastically. It is important to look at the ratio from a long term perspective. Return-on-Tangible-Asset can be affected by events such as stock buyback or issuance, and by a companys tax rate and its interest payment. Return-on-Tangible-Asset may not reflect the true earning power of the assets. A more accurate measurement is ROC % (ROC).
Many analysts argue the higher return the better. Buffett states that really high Return-on-Tangible-Asset may indicate vulnerability in the durability of the competitive advantage.
Glass House Brands Return-on-Tangible-Asset Related Terms
Glass House Brands Return-on-Tangible-Asset Historical Data
* Premium members only.
The historical data trend for Glass House Brands's Return-on-Tangible-Asset can be seen below:
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
GLASF vs ZTS, UTHR: Return-on-Tangible-Asset Comparison
For the Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic subindustry, Glass House Brands's Return-on-Tangible-Asset, along with its competitors' market caps and Return-on-Tangible-Asset data, can be viewed below:
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.
Glass House Brands Return-on-Tangible-Asset vs Drug Manufacturers Industry
For the Drug Manufacturers industry and Healthcare sector, Glass House Brands's Return-on-Tangible-Asset distribution charts can be found below:
* The bar in red indicates where Glass House Brands's Return-on-Tangible-Asset falls into.
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
In the calculation of annual Return-on-Tangible-Asset, the net income of the last fiscal year and the average total tangible assets over the fiscal year are used. In calculating the quarterly data,
the Net Income data used here is four times the quarterly (Mar. 2026) net income data.
What does a Return-on-Tangible-Asset of -19.98% mean?
Glass House Brands (GLASF) has a Return-on-Tangible-Asset of -19.98% as of Mar. 2026. Return on tangible assets is the ratio of current-period net income to average two-period tangible assets. View historical data on Glass House Brands and its competitors. According to the industry distribution chart, Glass House Brands ranks #787 out of 1003 companies in the Drug Manufacturers industry, placing it in the top 78.5%.
Is Glass House Brands' Return-on-Tangible-Asset too high?
Glass House Brands' current Return-on-Tangible-Asset is -19.98%. Based on the distribution chart, Glass House Brands ranks #787 out of 1003 companies in the Drug Manufacturers industry, which is in the bottom quartile relative to peers. Overall, Glass House Brands has a GF Score™ of 44/100 and is considered Significantly Overvalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Glass House Brands' Return-on-Tangible-Asset compare to ZTS and UTHR?
According to the Drug Manufacturers industry distribution chart, Glass House Brands ranks #787 out of 1003 companies for Return-on-Tangible-Asset. This places Glass House Brands in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Return-on-Tangible-Asset is 3.13. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Return-on-Tangible-Asset for a Drug Manufacturers company?
The median Return-on-Tangible-Asset among Drug Manufacturers companies is 3.13, based on 1,003 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Return-on-Tangible-Asset significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Return-on-Tangible-Asset should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Return-on-Tangible-Asset mean?
A high Return-on-Tangible-Asset can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. Return on tangible assets is the ratio of current-period net income to average two-period tangible assets. View historical data on Glass House Brands and its competitors. For the Drug Manufacturers industry, the median Return-on-Tangible-Asset is 3.13 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Glass House Brands's current Return-on-Tangible-Asset is -19.98%. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Glass House Brands stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Glass House Brands (GLASF) is currently considered Significantly Overvalued. The stock's GF Value™ is $6.13, compared to a current price of $12.21 — trading 99.2% above its estimated fair value. The current Return-on-Tangible-Asset is -19.98%. Glass House Brands' overall GF Score™ is 44/100 with 4 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Return-on-Tangible-Asset calculated?
Return-on-Tangible-Asset is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Glass House Brands (GLASF), the current Return-on-Tangible-Asset is -19.98% as of Mar. 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.
Is Glass House Brands (GLASF) Overvalued in 2026?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Glass House Brands stock appears to be overvalued.
The current stock price of $12.21 is trading 99.2% above its estimated GF Value™ of $6.13.
GuruFocus considers Glass House Brands to be Significantly Overvalued.
Key valuation signals for GLASF:
Return-on-Tangible-Asset: -19.98%
GF Value™: $6.13 vs. price of $12.21 (99.2% above fair value)
No single metric tells the full story. See the GLASF stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.
Glass House Brands Inc is an integrated cannabis company that operates exclusively in the state of California. Its portfolio of brands includes Glass House Farms, Forbidden Flowers, and Mama Sue Wellness. It cultivates, manufactures, and distributes cannabis bulk flower and trim to wholesalers and consumer packaged goods to third-party retail stores. It also owns and operates retail cannabis stores in the state of California. It has three reportable segments: Retail, Wholesale Biomass, and Cannabis-related consumer packaged goods. It generates the majority of its revenue from the Wholesale Biomass segment.
44GF Score
Get the complete analysis for GLASF
Return-on-Tangible-Asset is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.
Quick Browse
Personalize
Premium Gurus 
Create New Portfolio
GLASF has been successfully added to your 
