1. How to use GuruFocus - Tutorials
  2. What Is in the GuruFocus Premium Membership?
  3. A DIY Guide on How to Invest Using Guru Strategies
Steve Pomeranz
Steve Pomeranz
Articles  | Author's Website |

The Problem with Utilities

June 17, 2012 | About:
Safety in Numbers? I Don’t Think So!

With the high degree of uncertainty in the investing world today, investors naturally gravitate to investments perceived as low risk. Whether bidding up the prices of U.S. Treasury Bonds, or parking money in low volatility stocks with predictable earnings streams like utility stocks, investors seem happy to place money in these asset classes without regard to the prospect of future returns.

The future returns of Treasury bonds are easy to calculate. It only takes a minute for a high-schooler to be able to figure out the future return of the 10 year Treasury bond. Calculating the future return of a utility stock gets a little more complicated. It’s not rocket science mind you, but it does take a little more knowledge to get to a satisfactory conclusion.

Case in Point: Consolidated Edison (NYSE:ED)

According to Morningstar, for the month ending May 31st, 2012, the 1, 3, and 5 year total returns for Con Ed including dividends are 23.85%, 23.42% and 9.62% respectively. Everyone will agree that this is a batch of very healthy returns especially considering the difficulty of the period represented.

Historic rates of return are good to know but they tell us nothing about the future and after all, that’s all that matters in the world of investing. There are numerous ways to attempt to calculate a company’s future return but I would like to highlight a simple and yet effective way to make a decent projection. This idea is put forth by Mary Buffett and David Clark in their recent book: The Warren Buffett Stock Portfolio, Warren Buffett Stock Picks: Why and When He is investing in Them. (You can also hear my interview with Mary and David on my radio show: http://www.onthemoneyradio.org/guests/uploads/784.mp3

Here is how the calculation goes.

First we gather a couple of basic inputs; 1) The annual earnings per share 10 years ago and 2) the most recent EPS. 3) The current dividend rate, 4) the current price and 5) the lowest price to earnings ratio in the previous 10 years. The idea is to capture a long enough time frame to smooth out the business cycle and the authors feel 10 years is sufficient.

You will also need a CAGR (Compound Annual Growth) calculator (available on line) or as I have done, create a spreadsheet using IRR formulas to do the work for you.

Here is a table with the inputs for Con Ed.

Earnings in 2001


Earnings latest year


Dividend at today's rate


Current Price 6/14/12


Lowest PE- last 10 years


These inputs create the following calculations:

EPS Growth last 10 years: 1.71%

Earnings per share in 10 years at 1.71% CAGR: $4.25

Future Price Estimate (Future EPS X Lowest PE): $32.33

10 years of dividend earnings at $2.42 per year: $24.20

Total value at the end of 10 years: $56.53

Future Estimated Rate of Return at the Current Price: -.92%

Perhaps using the lowest PE is too stringent. Using a rough estimate of the average PE over the last 10 years of 15.2, the future CAGR rises to only 3.66% which is less than the current dividend yield.

Some may argue there are better measures than earnings per share for capital intensive companies. EBITDA and Free Cash Flow are often cited as superior yardsticks. Con Ed fails in these measures as well. According to Gurufocus.com, the 10 year growth of EBITDA and Free Cash Flow has been 1.7% and 0%, respectively. These numbers do not help the case for an investment in Con Ed.

At the current price, call it a bubble or just a crowded trade, the bottom line remains that in spite of the high dividend and perceived element of safety, Con Ed, in my opinion, is anything BUT safe. Always remember that you can buy a terrific company with the best balance sheet, the cleanest financials and most wonderful prospects for the future (Con Ed would NOT be included in this list) yet make the most serious mistake of all; the mistake of paying too much.

Hopefully, this exercise will help you to avoid that mistake. It is a good time to take profits and look elsewhere.

About the author:

Steve Pomeranz
Managing Director of United Capital, Formerly President of Pomeranz Financial, a fee-only RIA located in Boca Raton, Florida. A CFP since 1988 and over 30 years in the investment advisory world. For the past 11 years, host of On The Money Radio, currently airing on 9 NPR or Public Radio affiliates nationwide.

Visit Steve Pomeranz's Website

Rating: 3.6/5 (7 votes)


Cornelius Chan
Cornelius Chan - 5 years ago    Report SPAM
Pomeranz, I understand where you're coming from. You say utilities... aren't there other stocks per industry that are overvalued as well? I know that one of the stocks of safety is the drink manufacturers: ABV, BUD, SBMRY, HINKY, SAM. Take one look at these 10-year charts and it looks like one giant beer bubble LOL. What do you think?

It would be cool if you could do a utility industry rate of return sometime.

Thanks for the insight. A friend of mine says reading Mary Buffett changed his life. I've got to get my hands on them.

Please leave your comment:

Performances of the stocks mentioned by Steve Pomeranz

User Generated Screeners

pbarker46Total Payout Yield
DBrizanrota16Jan2018 1143p
DBrizanrota16Jan2018 1118p
DBrizanrota16Jan2018 1114p
pbarker46BV & TBV
doniemaherScreen #27 - ROI
aroblessAJR - PIEC (Asia)
Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat