Is Group (TCOM) a Smart Investment or a Value Trap? An In-Depth Exploration

Unraveling the True Worth of Group Amidst Market Fluctuations

Article's Main Image

Value investors are perpetually in search of undervalued stocks that promise high returns. Group Ltd (TCOM, Financial) has recently come under such scrutiny. The stock, currently trading at $35.36, has experienced a significant day's gain of 6.56%, despite a 3-month decline of 8.2%. The GF Value for Group stands at $54.39, suggesting potential undervaluation. However, discerning investors know that price alone doesn't paint the full picture.

The GF Value is a proprietary measure that estimates the intrinsic value of a stock, incorporating historical trading multiples, adjustments based on past performance, and future business projections. Ideally, a stock trading below its GF Value could be an attractive investment, poised for future gains. Yet, Group's current market price, juxtaposed with its GF Value, raises a critical question: Is this a genuine opportunity or a value trap in disguise?


Understanding Financial Health Indicators

Before diving into Group's specifics, it's essential to comprehend key financial health metrics. The Altman Z-score, a well-regarded predictor of bankruptcy risk, is particularly alarming for Group, with a score of 1.31. This score is well below the safety threshold of 3 and even under the distress level of 1.8, hinting at potential financial turbulence ahead.

Snapshot of Group Group, the leading online travel agency in China, has a diverse revenue stream, with a significant portion derived from accommodation reservations and transportation ticketing. Despite the company's strong positioning in a growing Chinese outbound travel market, its financials have been less than stellar, with declining revenues and earnings over the past five years. This decline, coupled with the stock's current valuation below GF Value, could be indicative of deeper issues.

1729148269155643392.png Group's Low Altman Z-Score: A Breakdown of Key Drivers

The company's EBIT to Total Assets ratio, a measure of operational effectiveness, has shown inconsistency, with figures from 2021 at 0.03, dipping to 0.00 in 2022, and rising again to 0.05 in 2023. Such volatility suggests that Group may not be leveraging its assets efficiently to generate profits, adversely affecting its Altman Z-score.

Asset turnover, another key indicator of operational efficiency, also presents a mixed picture, with a decrease from 0.10 in 2021 to 0.09 in 2022 before increasing to 0.16 in 2023. This fluctuation could point to underutilization of assets or reduced market demand, emphasizing the need for strategic operational improvements.

Warning Signs: Declining Revenues and Earnings

The downward trajectory of Group's revenue per share over the last five years, with figures like 2019's $8.67 falling to $6.89 in 2023, alongside a 5-year revenue growth rate of -11.7%, signals potential challenges such as decreasing market demand or intensifying competition. Furthermore, negative growth rates in 3-year and 5-year EBITDA underscore potential structural issues within the company.

The Red Flag: Sluggish Earnings Growth

Earnings growth paints a similarly bleak picture for Group. A 3-year EPS without NRI growth rate of -38.7% and a future 3 to 5-year EPS growth estimate of 0% suggest the company is struggling to efficiently convert sales into profits. This is a critical red flag for investors, as it may indicate deeper, unresolved operational or market challenges.

Assessing the Potential Value Trap

Despite its appealing price-to-fair-value ratio, Group's declining financial indicators cast doubt on its investment potential. While a low stock price relative to intrinsic value can sometimes signal a buying opportunity, it requires the company's fundamentals to be stable or improving. In the case of Group, the deteriorating revenues, EBITDA, and earnings growth point to the possibility of a value trap rather than an investment opportunity.

Without a convincing strategy to reverse these trends, the risk of continued performance decline and further price drops looms large. Investors must exercise caution, as the current low price-to-GF-Value ratio might not reflect a bargain but rather a pitfall for the unwary.


After a thorough analysis, it becomes evident that Group, despite its seemingly attractive valuation, exhibits multiple signs of a value trap. The company's low Altman Z-score, inconsistent operational metrics, and declining revenue and earnings growth rates are red flags that should not be overlooked. Investors considering Group should proceed with caution and conduct extensive due diligence before making any investment decisions.

For GuruFocus Premium members seeking more robust financial health, the Walter Schloss Screen can help identify stocks with high Altman Z-Scores. Conversely, those looking for companies with strong revenue and earnings growth can utilize the Peter Lynch Growth with Low Valuation Screener.

This article, generated by GuruFocus, is designed to provide general insights and is not tailored financial advice. Our commentary is rooted in historical data and analyst projections, utilizing an impartial methodology, and is not intended to serve as specific investment guidance. It does not formulate a recommendation to purchase or divest any stock and does not consider individual investment objectives or financial circumstances. Our objective is to deliver long-term, fundamental data-driven analysis. Be aware that our analysis might not incorporate the most recent, price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative information. GuruFocus holds no position in the stocks mentioned herein.


I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and have no plans to buy any new positions in the stocks mentioned within the next 72 hours. Click for the complete disclosure