EPR Props (EPR) Sees Raised Price Target Despite Neutral Rating | EPR Stock News

Author's Avatar
3 days ago
Article's Main Image

On July 16, 2025, prominent analyst Michael Goldsmith from UBS maintained a "Neutral" rating on EPR Props (EPR, Financial), a real estate investment trust. Despite keeping the rating unchanged, Goldsmith raised the price target for EPR Props from $56.00 to $62.00 USD.

This adjustment represents a significant price target increase of approximately 10.71%, indicating potential growth or positive market conditions for EPR Props (EPR, Financial) in the near future.

Investors and market watchers may consider this price target update as a noteworthy development for EPR, reflecting the analyst's expectations for the company's valuation despite maintaining a neutral outlook.

Wall Street Analysts Forecast

1945509195281494016.png

Based on the one-year price targets offered by 10 analysts, the average target price for EPR Properties (EPR, Financial) is $56.40 with a high estimate of $65.00 and a low estimate of $51.00. The average target implies an downside of 5.94% from the current price of $59.96. More detailed estimate data can be found on the EPR Properties (EPR) Forecast page.

Based on the consensus recommendation from 13 brokerage firms, EPR Properties's (EPR, Financial) average brokerage recommendation is currently 2.5, indicating "Outperform" status. The rating scale ranges from 1 to 5, where 1 signifies Strong Buy, and 5 denotes Sell.

Based on GuruFocus estimates, the estimated GF Value for EPR Properties (EPR, Financial) in one year is $49.68, suggesting a downside of 17.14% from the current price of $59.96. GF Value is GuruFocus' estimate of the fair value that the stock should be traded at. It is calculated based on the historical multiples the stock has traded at previously, as well as past business growth and the future estimates of the business' performance. More detailed data can be found on the EPR Properties (EPR) Summary page.

Disclosures

I/We may personally own shares in some of the companies mentioned above. However, those positions are not material to either the company or to my/our portfolios.