Equity Like Returns But With Less Risk!

The media and most investors have been focusing on the carnage in

the stock market, as the major market averages have plunged 50% or more

since the market top in October, 2007. However, the carnage in the non

Federal government bond market has been equally shocking.


The normally stable market for high quality corporate bonds was

rocked by defaults by blue chip issuers like Lehman Brothers. A

representative index of these bonds has declined nearly 11% this year, even

including the income generated.


Lower rated corporate debt has suffered even more. The Merrill

Lynch High Yield index has tumbled 32.7% this year (including income),

rivaling the beating taken by the S&P 500, down 41.2%, including the

reinvestment of dividends.


Even municipal bond investors have their tails between their legs.

The Bond Buyer Municipal Bond Index has declined 16.7% this year, even

including the interest paid out. Investors are frightened by news that such

large profile issuers like California may default amid record deficits and

tax revenues crimped by recessionary conditions.


As a result, fixed income investors have rushed into US Treasuries,

reasoning that the return of their principal was more important than the

return on their principal. Yields on these Treasuries have been driven down

to 50 year lows. Ninety day Treasury bills yield practically nothing,

0.05%, while 30 year Treasuries are at yields approaching 3%. Imagine

giving up the use of your money for 30 years at such a low rate of interest,

notwithstanding the inflation and currency debasement that will inevitably

occur over that period.


Equity investors have not embraced the new bargains among non

Federal Government bonds. While the yields and potential returns have

soared, equity investors fret that bonds are not in their equity benchmark

indexes, and may not deliver the bang to keep up if we see a quick

convincing recovery from our woes.


So, non Federal Governmental bonds are neglected by fixed income

investors, who see them as too risky, while equity investors see them as,

well, not equities. This dearth of buyers has created many opportunities in

fixed income that more flexible investors should consider.


Municipal Bonds


Traditionally, yields on the debt of states and political

subdivisions were lower than the debt of the US Government. After all, so

called municipal debt was free from Federal taxes and normally, if held by a

resident of the state where issued, state and local taxes, too. US

Government debt, on the other hand, is only free from state and local taxes.


However, amid the credit crunch investors have fled this paper, and

yields are at record high spreads to Treasuries. For example, the yield on

the Merrill Lynch Municipal index for maturities of 22 years or longer is

now at 6.88%, or as much as 3.83% more than 30 year Treasury debt. So, an

investor can not only receive greater income but also pay no taxes. A 6.88%

muni yield for an investor paying combined Federal and state taxes at the

40% marginal rate is a taxable equivalent yield of 11.47%. That's an equity

like return!


There's no question that risks are elevated in muni land. The State

of California is talking about paying its vendors in IOUs by March if

conditions don't improve. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey

failed to receive any bids for a recent offering (although of taxable

notes). The liquidity of these bonds is not as good as Treasuries, although

buying the bonds through a mutual fund addresses that issue.


Nevertheless, given the generally stellar credit performance of

these bonds over the decades, including during the 1930s, these juicy yields

appear to compensate for the risk. Favor general obligation bonds, which

are backed by the taxing power of the issuer, or revenue bonds supported by

critical infrastructure projects, like sewers or water. If muni bonds

recover their 2008 losses in 2009, investors will enjoy equity like returns

with less risk than the equity markets.


High Quality Corporate Bonds


The flight from any sort of risk following the implosions of Lehman,

Washington Mutual and other financial institutions has left the debt of even

creditworthy stable corporations at bargain basement levels.


The yields are attractive both on an absolute basis and relative to

Treasury bonds of similar maturities. Yields on corporate bonds now average

8.6%. The extra yield on US corporate debt relative to Treasuries is

approximately 6.39%, according to Merrill Lynch indexes that track that

metric. Such a gulf has never been seen in the 12 years Merrill has made

those calculations.


Why the bargains? Investors fear a 1930s style economy, complete

with rising defaults among corporations. There is concern that financial

institutions have not completely written down their bad loans. Fear abounds

of more ratings agency downgrades, of more forced selling by hedge funds and

other institutions. Investors have lost faith in the rating agencies.


Could they be right? No one can rule any scenario out. However, we

do know that investors in corporate bonds are taking less risk. Corporate

bonds rank higher in the capital structure, meaning they have first claim on

the cash flow, and are thus senior to its equity. The income stream from

corporate bonds is typically higher than the dividends on the common stock,

thus reducing volatility. Failure to pay that income is a default leading

to bankruptcy; omission of a dividend payment is embarrassing, but is not of

the same magnitude. With corporate bonds, there is a stated maturity, a

date when the corporation promises to give you your money back.


With yields to maturity, meaning the current income plus the gain on

the principal from current levels to par at maturity, now reaching double

digit percentage levels, investors should incorporate this asset class into

their equity portfolios. Corporate bonds are best held in a tax sheltered

account, as bond income is taxed as ordinary income, incurring nearly twice

the tax burden imposed on most stock dividends.


Bonds are not as liquid as stocks. Smaller investors may be best

off buying their bonds in bundles, in other words using bond funds. This

provides instant diversification, and allows for relatively easy entrance

and exit.


Low Quality Corporate Bonds


These bonds, also known as high yield or junk bonds, have been the

most pummeled of all types of fixed income. Their yields are at levels

never seen before, now averaging 22.37% per Merrill Lynch. The margin of

that yield over Treasuries, close to 19%, has never been seen before. As

recently as June, 2007 that spread was just 2.68%!


Investors seem to be pricing in a rate of default that surpasses

even what was seen during the Great Depression. Even if these default rates

come to pass, investors could still receive a positive return on this asset

class due to the record low valuations and superior yields of the survivors.


The risks are legion, but like their high quality brethren, these

securities are safer than the underlying common stock of their issuers.

Their yields are higher, offering investors an extra measure of safety and

dampening volatility.


To minimize the risks of selecting the bad apple of the group,

invest in these securities via a fund. Fidelity's High Income Fund (SPHIX)

is down nearly 29% this year, and yields 14.5%. An exchange traded fund,

iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond Fund (HYG), yields nearly 13% and

it, too, is down over 29% year to date. For aggressive investors,

Prudential manages the closed end High Yield Income Fund (HYI). Down 38%

year to date, it trades at a 20% discount to the net asset value of its

diversified holdings, and yields 18.6%.


A recovery in the high yield market to just where it was at the

start of the year, even if it takes several years, would provide returns

rivaling the long run returns normally enjoyed in the stock market.


In sum, equity investors trying to navigate these markets should

consider any fixed income not issued by the US Treasury in their search for

superior returns with less risk.


By David G. Dietze, JD, CFA, CFP(tm)

President and Chief Investment Strategist

Point View Financial Services, Inc.

Visit our web site www.ptview.com