1. How to use GuruFocus - Tutorials
  2. What Is in the GuruFocus Premium Membership?
  3. A DIY Guide on How to Invest Using Guru Strategies
Articles  | Author's Website |

110ct dollars

March 06, 2010 | About:
Given that investors prefer higher ROE, the market value of a dollar is greater if it was earned using less equity. The logic being, that a dollar retained in a high ROE business will generate superior returns in future.

The simple way to calculate ROE is to divide twelve months of earnings by the average shareholders equity over that period. Oh and multiply the result by 100 to get a percentage. This article would be done now if there were not an alternative way to calculate ROE.

I ROE = (assets/equity) x (revenue/assets) x (net income/revenue)

Cancel out assets and revenue and you get back to the method above. Substitute “Net margin” for (net income/revenue), “Leverage” for (assets/equity) "Asset turnover" for (revenue/assets) and you get:

II ROE = Asset turnover x Net margin x Leverage

As an aside,
III ROA = Asset turnover x Net margin.
That makes sense, the difference between ROE and ROA is leverage.

In any case, formula II lends itself to some further analysis. Remember, investors prefer high ROE businesses because a dollar retained is more effective. Well…. high leverage is not an indication of an effective core business. In fact, retaining a dollar in a highly leveraged business reduces leverage and therefore ROE.

High net margin on the other hand is a good thing. However, it may be due to external factors and therefore unsustainable (cyclical businesses suffer from margin compression and expansion). It may also be due to aggressive accounting or GAAP “features”. Also, net margin may be temporarily depressed due to say litigation costs or writeoffs. In many cases, the retention of a dollar earned is not a good idea simply because a business has high net margin.

This leaves us with what IMO is the most fundamental factor in the equation for ROE…. asset turnover. A business with superior asset turnover has a competitive advantage within its industry. A dollar retained there is truly more effective than the same dollar retained elsewhere.

Just to give the gurufocus crowd something to poke at let’s see if this is of any use in selecting stocks.

Stock; 1999 asset turnover; 1999 EPS; 2009 EPS
WMT; 2.4; $ 1.21; $ 3.46
TGT; 2; $ 1.30; $ 2.87

GD; 1.3; $2.27; $6.22
NOC; 0.9; $3.36; ($3.86) some non-cash charges there though !

JNJ; 1; $1.55; $4.44
PFE; 0.8; $0.82; $1.2

Two final notes…..
1) Just taking two stocks with equal P/E and buying the one with the highest asset turnover may not be a good idea. Earnings growth depends on a lot of factors; but if you have two companies that have an identical macro environment, the one with the highest asset turnover has an advantage.

2) A company is not great because it has great accounts. The accounts are great because the company is. Understanding just why a company is superior is the key to selecting the right growth stocks.

Remember, do not overpay.

About the author:

I define intrinsic value as the price I would gladly pay to own the business outright. With current management in place. For most stocks, that value is 0. I can be reached at batbeer AT hotmail DOT com

Visit Batbeer2's Website

Rating: 4.2/5 (26 votes)


Benethridge - 7 years ago    Report SPAM
Thinking of ROE this way assumes that the dollar value of shareholder equity is not shrinking, right? Coz if it is shrinking, ROE can be very misleading.
Batbeer2 premium member - 7 years ago
Take Jakks; they write down some goodwill and you could well see a jump in ROE or for that matter ROA. Indeed misleading. The business is not better (or worse) all of a sudden. Now we can go down the ROIC/CROIC/ROCE track but I leave that to proper writers.




I think those metrics are more meaningfull than ROE as usually reported because this may be based on not so meaningfull earnings and intangible assets.

So I break down ROE into its components and focus on asset turnover. You see a decline in assets with steady turnover and you are looking at a well managed business likely to rebound as the economic cycle turns.... PMD

You see growing assets coupled with increasing turnover likely to continue into the future and you have a well managed growth stock say BYD or KTII

You see declining assets with declining turnover and I tell you that trend will end.

Basically I am using a lot of space to say I don't have a simple answer to your question.
Benethridge - 7 years ago    Report SPAM
Thanks for trying to answer, anyway.
DocMoney - 6 years ago    Report SPAM
Is nice, I like! - Borat

Now to do a backtest for a bigger basket of stocks...

Please leave your comment:

GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Signs with Johnson & Johnson $JNJ.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.

Performances of the stocks mentioned by Batbeer2

User Generated Screeners

canidPE >50th percentile of INDUSTR
brucexoct 17 user defined screen
AngryQuality Growth cheap
EnjoylifeDad 1
punjanoot2007a academy+joe
kltan12LOW PB/PS
carlentValue - Short
carlentValue - Long
Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat