Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.21
ACM's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
82% of the 1044 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.92 vs. ACM: 0.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
ACM' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.13  Med: 0.49 Max: No Debt
Current: 0.21
Equity-to-Asset 0.27
ACM's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
76% of the 1011 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.42 vs. ACM: 0.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
ACM' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.17  Med: 0.38 Max: 0.53
Current: 0.27
-0.17
0.53
Debt-to-Equity 1.06
ACM's Debt-to-Equity is ranked lower than
79% of the 862 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.45 vs. ACM: 1.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-Equity only.
ACM' s Debt-to-Equity Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.99  Med: 0.49 Max: 1.42
Current: 1.06
-0.99
1.42
Interest Coverage 2.24
ACM's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
88% of the 890 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 19.80 vs. ACM: 2.24 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
ACM' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.43  Med: 8.64 Max: 46.96
Current: 2.24
0.43
46.96
Piotroski F-Score: 7
Altman Z-Score: 1.92
Beneish M-Score: -2.68
WACC vs ROIC
9.67%
-1.70%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 3.18
ACM's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
70% of the 1031 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 5.27 vs. ACM: 3.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
ACM' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.65  Med: 4.41 Max: 5.24
Current: 3.18
0.65
5.24
Net Margin % 1.46
ACM's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
72% of the 1034 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 3.50 vs. ACM: 1.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
ACM' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.86  Med: 2.79 Max: 3.62
Current: 1.46
-0.86
3.62
ROE % 7.35
ACM's ROE % is ranked lower than
58% of the 1022 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 8.19 vs. ACM: 7.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
ACM' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -5.54  Med: 11.17 Max: 20.26
Current: 7.35
-5.54
20.26
ROA % 1.88
ACM's ROA % is ranked lower than
64% of the 1047 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 3.07 vs. ACM: 1.88 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
ACM' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1.54  Med: 4.44 Max: 5.25
Current: 1.88
-1.54
5.25
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 48.93
ACM's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
73% of the 1041 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 18.24 vs. ACM: 48.93 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
ACM' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.35  Med: 45.14 Max: 62.15
Current: 48.93
6.35
62.15
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate 11.70
ACM's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
79% of the 878 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.50 vs. ACM: 11.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
ACM' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 8.6 Max: 17.9
Current: 11.7
0
17.9
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate 2.50
ACM's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
59% of the 746 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 6.30 vs. ACM: 2.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
ACM' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 5.15 Max: 49.5
Current: 2.5
0
49.5
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate -35.90
ACM's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked lower than
91% of the 681 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 6.40 vs. ACM: -35.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
ACM' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 4.4 Max: 31.9
Current: -35.9
0
31.9
GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Signs with AECOM $ACM.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» ACM's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-11-14 Est.)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q3 2016

ACM Guru Trades in Q3 2016

David Dreman 9,375 sh (unchged)
Scott Black Sold Out
Caxton Associates Sold Out
PRIMECAP Management 7,341,075 sh (-2.62%)
Richard Pzena 2,793,775 sh (-20.11%)
Joel Greenblatt 11,883 sh (-25.32%)
David Einhorn 2,004,571 sh (-34.70%)
» More
Q4 2016

ACM Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Jim Simons 822,977 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 110,692 sh (+831.52%)
David Dreman 13,979 sh (+49.11%)
PRIMECAP Management 7,424,025 sh (+1.13%)
David Einhorn Sold Out
Richard Pzena 2,228,974 sh (-20.22%)
» More
Q1 2017

ACM Guru Trades in Q1 2017

Richard Snow 122,040 sh (New)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 610 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 7,800 sh (New)
PRIMECAP Management 8,636,075 sh (+16.33%)
David Dreman 13,979 sh (unchged)
Joel Greenblatt Sold Out
Richard Pzena 2,225,695 sh (-0.15%)
Jim Simons 392,677 sh (-52.29%)
» More
Q2 2017

ACM Guru Trades in Q2 2017

Scott Black 19,790 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 125,000 sh (New)
Richard Snow 223,401 sh (+83.06%)
PRIMECAP Management 13,354,475 sh (+54.64%)
Richard Pzena 2,227,578 sh (+0.08%)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss Sold Out
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
David Dreman 12,745 sh (-8.83%)
Jim Simons 59,744 sh (-84.79%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with ACM

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

GuruDate Trades Impact to Portfolio Price Range * (?) Current Price Change from Average Current Shares
Richard Pzena 2017-06-30 Add 0.08%$31.93 - $35.59 $ 35.547%2,227,578
David Dreman 2017-06-30 Reduce -8.83%0.03%$31.93 - $35.59 $ 35.547%12,745
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 2017-06-30 Sold Out $31.93 - $35.59 $ 35.547%0
Richard Pzena 2017-03-31 Reduce -0.15%$33.86 - $39.13 $ 35.54-3%2,225,695
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 2017-03-31 New Buy$33.86 - $39.13 $ 35.54-3%610
Joel Greenblatt 2017-03-31 Sold Out 0.05%$33.86 - $39.13 $ 35.54-3%0
Richard Pzena 2016-12-31 Reduce -20.22%0.1%$26.92 - $40.13 $ 35.547%2,228,974
Joel Greenblatt 2016-12-31 Add 831.52%0.04%$26.92 - $40.13 $ 35.547%110,692
David Dreman 2016-12-31 Add 49.11%0.09%$26.92 - $40.13 $ 35.547%13,979
David Einhorn 2016-12-31 Sold Out 1.14%$26.92 - $40.13 $ 35.547%0
Richard Pzena 2016-09-30 Reduce -20.11%0.14%$27.6 - $36.17 $ 35.5410%2,793,775
David Einhorn 2016-09-30 Reduce -34.70%0.62%$27.6 - $36.17 $ 35.5410%2,004,571
Joel Greenblatt 2016-09-30 Reduce -25.32%$27.6 - $36.17 $ 35.5410%11,883
Premium More recent guru trades are included for Premium Members only!!
Premium More recent guru trades are included for USA Subscribe Members only!!
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Engineering & Construction » Engineering & Construction    NAICS: 541330    SIC: 8711
Compare:NYSE:PWR, NYSE:FLR, NYSE:EME, NYSE:JEC, NYSE:MTZ, NYSE:KBR, NYSE:DY, NAS:TTEK, NYSE:GVA, NAS:PRIM, NYSE:TPC, NYSE:FIX, NYSE:AGX, NAS:AEGN, NAS:VSEC, NAS:NVEE, NAS:MYRG, NAS:STRL, NAS:IESC, NYSE:AMRC » details
Traded in other countries:E6Z.Germany,
Headquarter Location:USA
AECOM provides consulting and engineering services to clients in transportation, facilities, environmental, and other markets. It mainly designs, builds, and operates infrastructure projects for governments, businesses, and organizations.

Los Angeles-based AECOM is one of the world's largest providers of engineering and construction services, with an emphasis on infrastructure and government services. Its integrated services model designs, builds, finances, and operates a broad range of technical project and program services. AECOM's customers include military and security entities, transportation facilities, environmental agencies, and energy companies. The company generated fiscal 2016 sales and adjusted EBIT of $17.4 billion and $632 million, respectively, and employs 87,000.

Top Ranked Articles about AECOM

Hyperloop One Announces 10 Winners for Hyperloop One Global Challenge
Scott Black Establishes 4 New Positions in 2nd Quarter Guru releases quarterly portfolio
Delphi Management founder Scott Black (Trades, Portfolio) established four new positions in the second quarter: Dick’s Sporting Goods Inc. (NYSE:DKS), Nova Measuring Instruments Ltd. (NASDAQ:NVMI), Cohu Inc. (NASDAQ:COHU) and AECOM (NYSE:ACM). Read more...
United Nations Disaster Resilience Scorecard, Developed by AECOM and IBM, Helps Cities Prepare for Disaster

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 21.81
ACM's PE Ratio is ranked lower than
66% of the 824 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 15.75 vs. ACM: 21.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
ACM' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.83  Med: 16.1 Max: 812.25
Current: 21.81
6.83
812.25
Forward PE Ratio 11.64
ACM's Forward PE Ratio is ranked higher than
81% of the 98 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 16.00 vs. ACM: 11.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 21.81
ACM's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked lower than
67% of the 824 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 15.92 vs. ACM: 21.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
ACM' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.83  Med: 16.25 Max: 812.25
Current: 21.81
6.83
812.25
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 8.26
ACM's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked higher than
66% of the 485 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 14.35 vs. ACM: 8.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
ACM' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.94  Med: 12.72 Max: 126.94
Current: 8.26
3.94
126.94
PB Ratio 1.50
ACM's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
53% of the 1001 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.34 vs. ACM: 1.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
ACM' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.68  Med: 1.44 Max: 2.83
Current: 1.5
0.68
2.83
PS Ratio 0.30
ACM's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
81% of the 1010 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.68 vs. ACM: 0.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
ACM' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.21  Med: 0.39 Max: 0.75
Current: 0.3
0.21
0.75
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 8.13
ACM's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
56% of the 334 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 12.78 vs. ACM: 8.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
ACM' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.43  Med: 10.78 Max: 280.95
Current: 8.13
4.43
280.95
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 6.95
ACM's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
57% of the 429 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 9.17 vs. ACM: 6.95 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
ACM' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.69  Med: 8.85 Max: 193.96
Current: 6.95
3.69
193.96
EV-to-EBIT 15.60
ACM's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
69% of the 860 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 11.74 vs. ACM: 15.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
ACM' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.1  Med: 12.9 Max: 84.2
Current: 15.6
6.1
84.2
EV-to-EBITDA 10.33
ACM's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
56% of the 890 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 9.58 vs. ACM: 10.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
ACM' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.8  Med: 9.8 Max: 27.2
Current: 10.33
4.8
27.2
EV-to-Revenue 0.49
ACM's EV-to-Revenue is ranked higher than
70% of the 1004 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.94 vs. ACM: 0.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-Revenue only.
ACM' s EV-to-Revenue Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.3  Med: 0.5 Max: 0.8
Current: 0.49
0.3
0.8
PEG Ratio 1.68
ACM's PEG Ratio is ranked lower than
60% of the 367 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.14 vs. ACM: 1.68 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG Ratio only.
ACM' s PEG Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.28  Med: 1.93 Max: 82.8
Current: 1.68
0.28
82.8
Shiller PE Ratio 25.05
ACM's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked lower than
61% of the 202 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 19.33 vs. ACM: 25.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
ACM' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 16.72  Med: 22.2 Max: 30.17
Current: 25.05
16.72
30.17
Current Ratio 1.22
ACM's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
70% of the 1019 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.48 vs. ACM: 1.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
ACM' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.13  Med: 1.48 Max: 1.7
Current: 1.22
1.13
1.7
Quick Ratio 1.22
ACM's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
55% of the 1019 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.29 vs. ACM: 1.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
ACM' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.13  Med: 1.48 Max: 1.7
Current: 1.22
1.13
1.7
Days Sales Outstanding 46.20
ACM's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
64% of the 771 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 72.06 vs. ACM: 46.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
ACM' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 46.2  Med: 104.89 Max: 121.01
Current: 46.2
46.2
121.01
Days Payable 46.47
ACM's Days Payable is ranked lower than
70% of the 675 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 75.31 vs. ACM: 46.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
ACM' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 25.39  Med: 35.4 Max: 49.92
Current: 46.47
25.39
49.92

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -17.00
ACM's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked lower than
85% of the 534 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: -2.60 vs. ACM: -17.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
ACM' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -47.7  Med: -6.75 Max: 0
Current: -17
-47.7
0

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 0.65
ACM's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked higher than
78% of the 504 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.20 vs. ACM: 0.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
ACM' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.58  Med: 0.81 Max: 2.34
Current: 0.65
0.58
2.34
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.82
ACM's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
86% of the 941 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.15 vs. ACM: 0.82 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
ACM' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.58  Med: 1.03 Max: 1.84
Current: 0.82
0.58
1.84
Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value 0.91
ACM's Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value is ranked lower than
59% of the 240 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.91 vs. ACM: 0.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value only.
ACM' s Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.36  Med: 1.11 Max: 78.95
Current: 0.91
0.36
78.95
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 6.37
ACM's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
57% of the 1045 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 6.71 vs. ACM: 6.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
ACM' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.2  Med: 7.75 Max: 16.5
Current: 6.37
1.2
16.5
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % 35.62
ACM's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked higher than
87% of the 522 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 7.23 vs. ACM: 35.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
ACM' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -3.8  Med: 10.2 Max: 36.8
Current: 35.62
-3.8
36.8

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $17,670.11
EPS (TTM) $ 1.63
Beta1.85
Short Percentage of Float3.14%
52-Week Range $26.46 - 40.72
Shares Outstanding (Mil)156.71

Analyst Estimate

Sep17 Sep18 Sep19
Revenue (Mil $) 17,896 18,857 19,148
EPS ($) 2.74 2.96 3.23
EPS without NRI ($) 2.74 2.96 3.23
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
7.41%
Dividends per Share ($)
» More Articles for ACM

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Hyperloop One Announces 10 Winners for Hyperloop One Global Challenge Sep 14 2017 
Scott Black Establishes 4 New Positions in 2nd Quarter Aug 22 2017 
United Nations Disaster Resilience Scorecard, Developed by AECOM and IBM, Helps Cities Prepare for D May 23 2017 
Primecap Keeps Buying Aecom Sep 10 2015 
Five Speculative and Overvalued Companies to Avoid – August 2015 Aug 20 2015 
Primecap Management Increases Position in Aecom May 26 2015 
Richard Pzena Keeps Buying Aecom May 21 2015 
Aecom Beats Expectations May 14 2015 
Aecom's Earnings Preview May 02 2015 
Should You Buy AECOM After The Recent Correction? Apr 03 2015 

More From Other Websites
AECOM -- Moody's Says AECOM's Capital Allocation Policy is Credit Negative; no ratings impact Sep 22 2017
UPDATE: KC Council picks Edgemoor team for KCI terminal job Sep 21 2017
AECOM announces capital allocation policy and $1 billion stock repurchase authorization Sep 21 2017
Advisers' initial ranking put Edgemoor's KCI presentation No. 3 Sep 20 2017
People misunderstand complexity of challenge of rebuildin... Sep 19 2017
ETFs with exposure to AECOM : September 18, 2017 Sep 18 2017
IIROC Trading Halt - ACM Sep 15 2017
Hyperloop One Announces 10 Winners for Hyperloop One Global Challenge Sep 14 2017
AECOM :ACM-US: Earnings Analysis: Q3, 2017 By the Numbers : September 5, 2017 Sep 05 2017
AECOM breached its 50 day moving average in a Bullish Manner : ACM-US : August 30, 2017 Aug 30 2017
Earnings Review and Free Research Report: Jacobs’ Net Income Jumped 30% Aug 30 2017
Are There Solutions to the Current US Debt Crisis? Aug 25 2017
AECOM – Value Analysis (NYSE:ACM) : August 21, 2017 Aug 21 2017
Committee zeroes in on apples-to-apples comparisons for KCI terminal Aug 21 2017
Fruit references fly in debate about KCI terminal team selection process Aug 17 2017
Breaking down the KCI plans from Burns & McDonnell, AECOM Aug 15 2017
Edited Transcript of ACM earnings conference call or presentation 8-Aug-17 4:00pm GMT Aug 11 2017
See what the IHS Markit Score report has to say about Aecom. Aug 11 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}